Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Longitudinal investigation of the stable and dynamic components of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Measure (WHOQOL-BREF) using generalizability theory

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The WHOQOL-BREF is a widely used 26-item self-report measure of Quality of Life (QOL), but there is lack of research investigating to what extent it measures dynamic (state) and stable (trait) aspects of QOL. Generalizability Theory is the most suitable method to examine the state-trait distinction and to evaluate the overall reliability and generalizability of the WHOQOL-BREF. Generalizability theory was applied to a longitudinal study dataset of 130 participants who had completed the 26-item WHOQOL-BREF at three time points spaced 6 months apart. The results indicated that the total 26-item WHOQOL-BREF has strong reliability in measuring enduring QOL with a G coefficient of 0.90, confirming that the scores are generalizable across persons and occasions. The results also indicate that the social domain subscale of the WHOQOL-BREF has marginally acceptable reliability in measuring trait, with a G-coefficient of 0.77. However, the remaining three domain subscales, physical, psychological and environmental, and the two short versions, WHOQOL-5 and EUROHIS- QOL 8-item index were found to be less reliable in measuring either state or trait QOL with G-coefficients below 0.65 and SCI below 0.15. The ability to distinguish to what extent items of each subscale of QOL are measuring state or trait will advance QOL research by identifying which QOL aspects are likely to change in one’s subjective QOL if targeted by interventions. Using the WHOQOL-BREF total score permits evaluation of long-lasting QOL changes resulting from interventions and/or environmental impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction on to measurement theory. Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balalla, S. K., Medvedev, O. N., Siegert, R. J., & Krägeloh, C. U. (2019). Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and shorter versions using rasch analysis in traumatic brain injury and orthopedic populations. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(10), 1853–1862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, R., & Norman, G. (2012). Generalizability theory for the perplexed: A practical introduction and guide: AMEE guide no. 68. Medical Teacher, 34, 960–992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, R. L. (2011). Utility indexes for decisions about subscores (CASMA Research Report number 33. University of IOWA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardinet, J., Pini, G., & Johnson, S. (2010). Applying generalizability theory using EduG. Routledge Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla, B., Chawla, S., Singh, H., Jain, R., & Arora, I. (2020). Is coronavirus lockdown taking a toll on mental health of medical students? A study using WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 9(10), 5261–5266. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_715_20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 16(2), 137–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1963.tb00206.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyh, S., Fellinghauer, B. A. G., Kirchberger, I., & Post, M. M. W. (2010). Cross-cultural validity of four quality of life scales in persons with spinal cord injury. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gobbens, R. J. J., & van der Ploeg, T. (2021). The prediction of mortality by quality of life assessed with the WHOQOL-BREF: A longitudinal analysis at the domain and item levels using a seven-year follow-up period. Quality of Life Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02790-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, M. A., Krägeloh, C. U., & Wong-Toi, G. (Eds.) (2015). Student motivation and quality of life in higher education. Routledge (ISBN: 9780415858052).

  • IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. IBM Corp.

  • Krägeloh, C. U., Henning, M. A., Hawken, S. J., Zhao, Y., Shepherd, D., & Billington, R. (2011). Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF quality of life questionnaire for use with medical students. Education for Health, 24, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krägeloh, C. U., Billington, R., Hsu, P. H., & Landon, J. (2015). What New Zealanders find important to their quality of life: Comparisons with international WHOQOL data from 14 other countries. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 39(4), 384–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, O. N., Krägeloh, C. U., Narayanan, A., & Siegert, R. J. (2017). Measuring mindfulness: Applying generalizability theory to distinguish between state and trait. Mindfulness. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0679-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvedev, O. N., Norden, P. A., Krägeloh, C. U., & Siegert, R. J. (2018). Investigating unique contributions of dispositional mindfulness facets to depression, anxiety, and stress in general and student populations. Mindfulness, 9(6), 1757–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0917-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189.

  • Obad, A. S., Abdulwali, F. K., Alaidroos, H. A., BaAbbad, A. A., Al-Gunaid, M. A., Al Ghurabi, M. O., ...  Shareef, M. A. (2021). Relationship between shortage of basic life needs and quality of life of medical students in Yemen: A study utilizing validity and reliability of WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 10(3), 1466–1472.https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_935_20

  • Paterson, J., Medvedev, O. N., Sumich, A., Tautolo, E., Krägeloh, C. U., Sisk, R., … Siegert, R. J. (2018). Distinguishing transient versus stable aspects of depression in New Zealand Pacific Island children using generalizability theory. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 698–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.075

  • Schmidt, S., Mühlan, H., & Power, M. (2005). The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: Psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. European Journal of Public Health, 16(4), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cki155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., Webb, N. M., & Rowley, G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoukri, M. M., Asyali, M. H., & Donner, A. (2004). Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: Review and new results. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 13, 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skevington, S. M., Rowland, C., Panagioti, M., Bower, P., & Krägeloh, C. (2021). Enhancing the multi-dimensional assessment of quality of life: Introducing the WHOQOL-COMBI. Quality of Life Research, 30(3), 891–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02661-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Society for Research in Education Working Group. (2006). EDUG User Guide. IRDP.

  • Taylor, T. A., Medvedev, O. N., Owens, R. G., & Siegert, R. J. (2017). Development and validation of the State Contentment Measure. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vo, T. Q., Hieu, T. T. N., & Anh, P. N. T. (2020). Effect of sociodemographic factors on quality of life of medical students in southern Vietnam: A survey using the WHOQOL-BREF assessment. Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmacognosy Research., 8(3), 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291798006667

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health & Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand

    Phoenix Norden & Christian U. Krägeloh

  2. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Mataroria Lyndon & Marcus Henning

  3. University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand

    Oleg Medvedev

Authors
  1. Phoenix Norden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mataroria Lyndon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian U. Krägeloh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcus Henning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Oleg Medvedev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phoenix Norden.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study obtained ethics approval from University of Auckland UAHEPC (Ref 8467).

Dataset availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interest

None declared.

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest associated with this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Norden, P., Lyndon, M., Krägeloh, C.U. et al. Longitudinal investigation of the stable and dynamic components of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Measure (WHOQOL-BREF) using generalizability theory. Curr Psychol 42, 11809–11818 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02474-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02474-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation