Modeling evapotranspiration and evaporation in corn/tomato intercropping ecosystem using a modified ERIN model considering plastic film mulching

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107286Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A modified ET model (MERIN) for intercropping ecosystem was proposed.

  • The accuracy performance of the MERIN model was better than other ET models.

  • Water competition between crops mainly occurred in elongation and tasseling stages.

  • The variation of water competition under different irrigation levels was similar.

Abstract

Intercropping planting pattern under plastic film mulching (PFM) has been widely adopted in the arid regions to reduce soil evaporation (E), improve land-use efficiency, and increase crop yield. However, water competition between intercropping components in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum remains largely unexplored. The evaporation and radiation interception using the neighboring species model (ERIN) can effectively estimate evapotranspiration (ET) in a different intercropping ecosystem. However, the effects of soil surface resistance in the mulching area on ET are not considered in the ERIN model. Thus, the existing ET models do not accurately estimate ET in the intercropping ecosystem with PFM. In this study, we proposed a modified ERIN model (MERIN). In the MERIN model, soil surface resistance in the mulching area was taken into account, and its performance was compared to ERIN and Penman-Monteith (PM) models. These models were validated against observed ET and E using the water balance method and micro-lysimeters in a corn intercropped tomato experiment under high (HI: 30 mm for corn and 22.5 mm for tomato, a locally recommended irrigation depth), medium (MI: 22.5 mm for corn and 16.9 mm for tomato, 25% of HI), and low irrigation depth (LI: 15 mm for corn and 11.25 mm for tomato, 50% of HI) during 2018-2019, respectively. The outcomes of this study showed that the MERIN model could accurately estimate ET and E variation for a corn-tomato intercropping ecosystem under PFM during the entire crop growth season compared to the other examined models. The most intense water competition between corn and tomato was observed in stage II (the elongation and tasseling stages for corn; the flowering and fruiting stages for tomato). T of corn generally was higher than tomato, but an opposite result was also observed in stage II. Additionally, the variation of water competition under different irrigation levels was similar in the intercropping ecosystem. When irrigation depth decreased to 22.5 and 15 mm from 30 mm, average T for corn decreased by 10.7% and 16.3%, respectively, and by 12.9% and 22.4% for tomato, respectively, in both years.

Introduction

Intercropping planting pattern involves simultaneous cultivation of two or more plant species in the same field (Bolo et al., 2021, Costa et al., 2021, Salehi et al., 2018). It is widely used in agronomic production worldwide as it increases the land-use efficiency (Crusciol et al., 2021), yield of dominant plant species (Berghuijs et al., 2021), and other natural resources (Jardim et al., 2020). Currently, the incorporation of cereals and cash crops in the cropping system is widely employed, for instance, corn-wheat Ma et al., 2020a, Ma et al., 2020b, corn-soybean (Rodehorst et al., 2020), and the corn-tomato intercropping patterns (Li et al., 2017). Inter-specific competition in different intercropping planting patterns varies significantly. Ma et al., 2020a, Ma et al., 2020b demonstrated that wheat plants are more competitive than corn plants in absorbing soil moisture during the intercropping co-growth period. In a study by Ahmed et al. (2020), a decreased co-growth duration increased growth rate and resilience in soybean crops against the size-asymmetric competition in the corn-soybean intercropping pattern. Chen et al. (2020b) evaluated the differences in the competition between corn and tomato crops for soil nitrate. They found that soil nitrate exchange between corn and bare soil regions was lower than between the tomato and bare soil regions due to the lower concentration gradients of soil nitrate in the rhizosphere. Previous studies have systematically elucidated the inter-species competition in different intercropping planting patterns. These studies were primarily focused on the competition between soil water and nutrients between different crop species in the vadose zone. However, water competition between intercropping components in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum (SPAC) needs to be explored further.

Accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) can unravel the water competition mechanism between intercropping components (Qiu et al., 2019). Currently, ET estimation is primarily derived through the use of the estimation method for ET primarily entails crop coefficients with either the, Penman-Monteith (PM) model, and or Shuttleworth-Wallace (SW) models. However, crop coefficient remains to be an indirect calculation method (Allen et al., 1998). Firstly, the crop coefficient is estimated and rectified in this method and then multiplied by reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) (Allen et al., 2005, Chen et al., 2019, Pereira et al., 2021, Rallo et al., 2021). Miao et al. (2016) developed a new method for partitioning ET using plant height and fractions of ground covered by crops based on the dual crop coefficient approach in the intercropping ecosystem. Although the estimation accuracy of this method was satisfactory, determining the accurate value for crop coefficients remains a challenging task.

PM and SW models, a direct method, directly estimates ET by calculating latent heat flux based on energy balance using aerodynamic parameters and meteorological data (Monteith, 1981, Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985). These models have been widely applied in multiple conditions, specifically in uniform underlying surfaces (del Campo et al., 2019; Elfarkh et al., 2021). However, PM and SW models cannot precisely estimate ET in the intercropping ecosystem as interception alters radiation and wind speed within the canopy by neighboring plant species. Thus, there is an urgent need to devise an ET model to estimate the ET of the intercropping ecosystem with the complex underlying surface.

To estimate ET of a cornfield with different plant heights, Kang et al. (2018) proposed an improved PM model (referred to as PM hereinafter) based on Ohm's law by inducing effective aerodynamic and soil surface resistance. This model can also be employed for an accurate estimation of ET in intercropping ecosystem under PFM. However, this model lacks the functional expression for transpiration partitioning in the intercropping ecosystem. An improved model (ERIN) (Wallace, 1997, Wallace, 2000) was developed considering evaporation and radiation interception by neighboring plant species in intercropping ecosystems based on the SW model (Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985). In a study by Gao et al. (2013), transpiration of maize and soybean was estimated using the ERIN model. The statistical outcome of the study by Gao et al. (2013) demonstrated a sound agreement between the observed and the estimated values, with the mean bias error of 0.06 mm d−1, the root mean square error of 0.23 mm d−1, and the index of agreement of 0.93.

ERIN model primarily estimates the ET in the intercropping ecosystem without PFM. Thus, the effects of PFM on ET were not taken into consideration. In general, PFM reduces soil evaporation, increases plant transpiration, and alters water consumption by increasing soil surface resistance (Li et al., 2013, Zribi et al., 2015, Thakur and Kumar, 2020). The current ET model, which considers PFM, primarily focuses on the sole crop field. For instance, Li et al. (2013) deduced a new ET model for cornfield under PFM using mulched and total area ratio based on the SW model. Chen et al. (2020a) further improved the SW model by importing the disintegration area of biodegradable film and re-estimating the difference in ET between PFM and biodegradable film mulching.

Although ET models under mulching conditions or intercropping ecosystems were previously developed, the ET model for an intercropping ecosystem under PFM could not be deduced simply by the superposition of the existing model parameters. In the ET model for an intercropping ecosystem model, total latent heat in the intercropping ecosystem under PFM needs to be reasonably divided. Thus, it is necessary to devise an ET model for an intercropping ecosystem under PFM (MERIN) and determine the water competition between intercropping components. The development of such a model will overcome the disadvantages of the existing ET theory and provide a theoretical foundation for the formulation of an irrigation strategy.

This study aimed to a) develop the MERIN model based on the ERIN model, b) validate the estimation accuracy of MERIN for ET and E in the corn-tomato intercropping ecosystem, c) compare the estimated ET difference during different crop growth stages between PM, ERIN, and MERIN models, d) evaluate the difference in the simulation of E for ERIN and MERIN models, and e) quantify plant transpiration and water competition between intercropping components under different irrigation depths.

Section snippets

Study area and experimental design

A field experiment was conducted in Hetao Irrigation Area, Inner Mongolia (40°41′N, 107°18′E). In 2018 and 2019, this experimental area was characterized by an arid climate with precipitation of 200.8 and 87.9 mm, ET0 of 614.7 and 572.6 mm, and air temperature of 21.5 and 20.9 °C, respectively. Before sowing, five soil samples were collected by a cutting ring (volume of 100 cm3) in the 0–100 cm soil depth layer at 20 cm intervals (Wr, g). Each soil sample contained a total of six replicates,

Multi-source ET model (ERIN)

The multi-source ET model (ERIN) was deduced based on the Shuttleworth-Wallace model, which couples transpiration and evaporation in multi-species mixtures (Wallace, 1997). Since ERIN model did not consider the effects of plastic film mulching on latent heat flux. Thus, the total latent heat flux of components in corn/tomato intercropping ecosystem was written as:λET=λTc+λTt+λEswhere ET is total evapotranspiration to the mixed canopy (W m−2), Tc is plant transpiration of corn (mm d−1), Tt is

Evaluation of model performance

Actual crop evapotranspiration (ETc act) determined using soil water balance method was used to validate the estimation accuracy of MERIN proposed in this study, ERIN developed by Wallace (1997), and PM models deduced by Kang et al. (2018) in the context of ET for corn-tomato intercropping ecosystem under different irrigation levels. These three models captured ET dynamic. The estimation accuracy was highest for the MERIN model with MRE of 9.7%. The corresponding RMSE and NRMSE for the MERIN

Conclusion

In this study, we proposed a modified ET model (MERIN) considering the soil surface resistance in the mulching area based on the ERIN model. The MERIN model overcomes the constraint that the ERIN model lacks the evaporation estimation. The MERIN model can accurately capture ET and E variation for a corn-tomato intercropping ecosystem under PFM during the crop growing season compared to ERIN and PM models. However, the MERIN, ERIN, and PM model’s estimation accuracy were distinct during

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079064 and 51969024), the Major science and technology projects of Inner Mongolia (zdzx2018059), the Scientific and Technological Transformative Project of Inner Mongolia (2021CG0022), and the West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences.

References (63)

  • S. Glaze-Corcoran et al.

    Understanding intercropping to improve agricultural resiliency and environmental sustainability

    Adv. Agron.

    (2020)
  • X.W. Gong et al.

    Evapotranspiration partitioning of greenhouse grown tomato using a modifed Priestley–Taylor model

    Agric. Water Manag.

    (2021)
  • P.D. Jamieson et al.

    A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand

    Field Crops Res.

    (1991)
  • X. Jiang et al.

    Modeling evapotranspiration and its components of maize for seed production in an arid region of northwest China using a dual crop coefficient and multisource models

    Agric. Water Manag.

    (2019)
  • S. Li et al.

    Measuring and modeling maize evapotranspiration under plastic film-mulching condition

    J. Hydrol.

    (2013)
  • X.Y. Li et al.

    Spatial distribution of soil water, soil temperature, and plant roots in a drip-irrigated intercropping field with plastic mulch

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2017)
  • L. Ma et al.

    Coupling evapotranspiration partitioning with water migration to identify the water consumption characteristics of wheat and maize in an intercropping system

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2020)
  • L. Ma et al.

    Recovery growth and water use of intercropped maize following wheat harvest in wheat/maize relay strip intercropping

    Field Crops Res.

    (2020)
  • Q. Miao et al.

    Modeling water use, transpiration and soil evaporation of spring wheat–maize and spring wheat–sunflower relay intercropping using the dual crop coefficient approach

    Agric. Water Manag.

    (2016)
  • L.S. Pereira et al.

    Prediction of crop coefficients from fraction of ground cover and height: practical application to vegetable, field and fruit crops with focus on parameterization

    Agric. Water Manag.

    (2021)
  • R. Qiu et al.

    Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified priestley-taylor model in a rice-wheat rotation system

    Agric. Water Manag.

    (2019)
  • R. Qiu et al.

    Differential response of rice evapotranspiration to varying patterns of warming

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2021)
  • G. Rallo et al.

    Updated single and dual crop coefficients for tree and vine fruit crops

    Agric. Water Manag.

    (2021)
  • M. Retta et al.

    A two-dimensional microscale model of gas exchange during photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L.) leaves

    Plant Sci.

    (2016)
  • J.B. Stewart et al.

    Preliminary modelling of transpiration from the FIFE site in Kansas

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (1989)
  • Z. Wang et al.

    Modeling the coupling processes of evapotranspiration and soil water balance in agroforestry systems

    Agric. Water Manag.

    (2021)
  • G. Zhang et al.

    Spatial interpolation of daily precipitation based on modified ADW method for gauge-scarce mountainous regions: a case study in the Shiyang River Basin

    Atmos. Res.

    (2021)
  • M.C. Zhou et al.

    Estimating potential evapotranspiration using Shuttleworth-Wallacemodel and NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data to feed a distributed hydrological modelover the Mekong River basin

    J. Hydrol.

    (2006)
  • W. Zribi et al.

    Efficiency of inorganic and organic mulching materials for soil evaporation control

    Soil Tillage Res.

    (2015)
  • S. Ahmed et al.

    Optimized planting time and co‐growth duration reduce the yield difference between intercropped and sole soybean by enhancing soybean resilience toward size‐asymmetric competition

    Food Energy Secur.

    (2020)
  • R. Allen et al.

    Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text