Abstract
To quicken the process for high global warming potential (GWP) working fluid replacement for organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems, a thermo-economic evaluation of low GWP fluid R1233zd(E) as an R245fa alternative has been performed in comparison with other natural fluids n-Pentane, Isopentane, and Isobutane for geothermal applications. The heat source water mass flow rate remains constant and 5 K pinch point is set for both evaporator side and condenser side. All working fluids have a close net thermal efficiency within 2%. Increasing the heat source from 120 °C to 160 °C gives a more than 20% efficiency rise. The low critical temperature of Isobutane limits its application for 160 °C heat source. R1233zd(E) displays a close mass flow rate (within 2%) from R245fa and others exhibit more than 40% flow rate reduction. The component level performance has also been investigated in this study. All alternatives exhibit a lower evaporator side (evaporator and preheater) heat transfer area than baseline R245fa, and a slightly higher condenser side (condenser and desuperheater) heat transfer area. For turbine performance, R245fa displays the highest volume flow ratio, indicating a significant change of the rotor blade height should be made between the inlet and outlet point for the expansion process. R1233zd(E) displays ∼10% increase for turbine size parameter from baseline, n-Pentane shows ∼22% rise, Isopentane exhibits ∼11% rise, while Isobutane presents 32% decrease, respectively. In general, R1233zd(E) only exhibits ∼2.3% higher specific investment cost than R245fa, while n-Pentane and Isopentane exhibit more than 15% cost rise. Thus, from the thermo-economic scale with an extended application range, R1233zd(E) exhibits a better overall performance index when compared with other R245fa alternatives and can be serviced as promising candidate to replace R245fa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CEPEI:
-
chemical engineering plant cost index
- EORC:
-
organic Rankine cycle with a vapor-liquid ejector
- EU:
-
european union
- GHG:
-
greenhouse gas
- GWP:
-
global warming potential
- HC:
-
hydrocarbon
- HCFC:
-
hydrochlorofluorocarbon
- HFC:
-
hydrofluorocarbon
- HFO:
-
hydrofluoroolefin
- HP:
-
heat pump
- LMTD:
-
logarithmic mean temperature difference
- NBP:
-
normal boiling point
- ODP:
-
ozone depletion potential
- ORC:
-
organic Rankine cycle
- RORC:
-
regenerative organic Rankine cycle
- SIC:
-
specific investment cost
- A:
-
area [m2]
- C:
-
cost [$] or coefficient for the component cost functions [−]
- d:
-
tube diameter [m]
- Ds :
-
shell diameter [m]
- f:
-
friction factor
- G:
-
mass velocity [kg/m2s]
- h:
-
enthalpy per unit mass of the state [kJ/kg] or heat transfer coefficient [W/m2·K]
- k:
-
thermal conductivity [W/m·K]
- K:
-
coefficient related to the component or coefficient related to the shell-and-tube geometry
- L:
-
length [m]
- LMTD:
-
log-mean temperature difference [°C]
- M:
-
refrigerant charge amount [kg]
- m:
-
refrigerant mass flow rate [kg/s]
- P:
-
pressure of the state [kPa or bar]
- Pr :
-
Prandtl number
- PT :
-
tube pitch [mm]
- \(\mathop {\rm{Q}}\limits^ \cdot \) :
-
heat delivery/flow [kW]
- Re:
-
Reynold number
- SP:
-
turbine size indicator [m2]
- SIC:
-
specific investment cost [$/kW]
- U:
-
heat transfer coefficient [W/m2·K]
- V:
-
volume flow rate [m3/s]
- W:
-
power consumption/generation [kW]
- ω :
-
flammability factor, for non-flammable refrigerants, it is 1 and for flammable refrigerants, it is pre-set as 1.1
- Y2 :
-
Chisholm parameter [−]
- ϕ :
-
the turbine size ratio [−]
- α :
-
void fraction[−] x:quality [kg/kg]
- ρ :
-
density [kg/m3] η
- δ :
-
relative area ratio [−]
- p:
-
pump
- s:
-
shell
- t:
-
turbine or tube
- g:
-
gas
- HX:
-
heat exchanger
- in:
-
inlet
- l:
-
liquid
- v:
-
vapor
- out:
-
outlet
- ref:
-
refrigerant
- tp:
-
two phase
- 1–4:
-
state point
References
EU climate action, https://ec.europa.eu/clima/citizens/eu_en (2021).
M. Davis, A. Moronkeji, M. Ahiduzzaman and A. Kumar, Energy Sustain. Dev., 59, 243 (2020).
U. Muhammad, M. Imran, D. H. Lee and B. S. Park, Energy Convers. Manag., 103, 1089 (2015).
M. Li, J. Wang, W He, L. Gao, B. Wang, S. Ma and Y. Dai, Renew. Energy, 57, 216 (2013).
G. Li, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 21, 33 (2017).
G. Li, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 38, 1438 (2021).
The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, Regulation (EU) no 517/2014 of the European parliament and the council of the European union of 16 April 2014 on fluorinated greenhouse gases and repealing regulation (EC) No. 842/2006 (2014).
W Liu, D. Meinel, C. Wieland and H. Spliethoff, Energy, 67, 106 (2014).
F. Moles, J. Navarro-Esbri, B. Peris, A. Mota-Babiloni, A. Barragan-Cervera and K. K. Kontomaris, Appl. Therm. Eng., 71, 204 (2014).
F. Moloney, E. Almatrafi and D. Y. Goswami, Renew. Energy, 147, 2874 (2020).
J. Chen, Y. Huang, Z. Niu, Y. Chen and X. Luo, Energy Convers. Manag., 157, 382 (2018).
G. A. Longo, S. Mancin, G. Righetti, C. Zilio and J. S. Brown, Appl. Therm. Eng., 167, 114804 (2020).
A. Giuffrida, Energy, 161, 1172 (2018).
A. Mahmoudi, M. Fazli and M. R. Morad, Appl. Therm. Eng., 143, 660 (2018).
B. V. Datla and J. J. Brasz, Comparing R1233zd and R245fa for low temperature ORC application, in: 15th International Compressor Engineering Conference at Purdue, 14–17 July, 2014 (2014)
S. Eyerer, C. Wieland, A. Vandersickel and H. Spliethoff, Energy, 103, 660 (2016).
F. Molés, J. Navarro-Esbri, B. Peris and A. Mota-Babiloni, Appl. Therm. Eng., 98, 954 (2016).
J. Yang, Z. Sun, B. Yu and J. Chen, Appl. Therm. Eng., 141, 10 (2018).
J. Yang, Z. Ye, B. Yu, H. Ouyang and J. Chen, Energy, 173, 721 (2019).
S. Eyerer, F. Dawo, J. Kaindl, C. Wieland and H. Spliethoff, Appl. Energy, 240, 946 (2019).
L. Talluri, O. Dumont, G. Manfrida, V. Lemort and D. Fiaschi, Appl. Therm. Eng., 174, 115293 (2020).
L. Talluri, O. Dumont, G. Manfrida, V. Lemort and D. Fiaschi, Energy, 211, 118570 (2020).
E. Lemmon, M. Huber and M. Mclinden, NIST reference fluid thermodynamic and transport properties REFPROP, version 10.0. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) (2021).
Y. A. Çengel, Heat and mass transfer (Second ed.), McGraw-Hill (2002).
D. Q. Kern, Process heat transfer, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New York (1950).
D. Green and R. Perry, Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York (2007).
W. H. McAdams, Heat transmission, McGraw-Hill, New York (1958).
T. Tinker, Proceedings of the general discussion on heat transfer, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London (1951).
G. F. Hewitt, Hemisphere handbook of heat exchanger design, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York (1990).
L. D. Boyko and G. N. Kruzhilin, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., 10, 361 (1967).
E. Macchi, Design criteria for turbines operating with fluids having a low speed of sound in closed cycle gas turbines. Lecture series 100 on closed cycle gas turbines, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics (1977).
S. L. Dixon, Fluid mechanics and thermodynamics of turbomachinery, 4th Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann (1998).
D. Japikse and N. C. Baines, Introduction to turbomachinery, 1st Ed. Concepts ETI, Inc. and Oxford University Press (1997).
R. Turton, R. C. Bailie, W B. Whiting and J. A. Shaeiwitz, Analysis, synthesis and design of chemical processes, Pearson Education (2008).
Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, http://www.chemengonline.com/pci-home, Chemecal Engineering (2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, G. Thermo-economic evaluation of R1233zd(E) as an R245fa alternative in organic Rankine cycle for geothermal applications. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 38, 2195–2207 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-0936-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-0936-8