Facilitating Power Grid Decarbonization with Distributed Energy Resources: Lessons from the United States

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change) 2019. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, H-O Pörtner, D Roberts, J Skea et al. Geneva: IPCC https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf
2. 2. 

   Williams J, Jones R, Haley B, Kwok G, Hargreaves J et al. 2021. Carbon-neutral pathways for the United States. AGU Adv 2:1e2020AV000284
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   European Commission 2018. A clean planet for all: a European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy Commun. 773, Eur. Comm., Nov. 28. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0773&from=EN
4. 4. 

   Liu Q, Chen Y, Teng F, Tian C, Zheng X, Zhao X. 2017. Pathway and policy analysis to China's deep decarbonization. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 15:39–49
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   IEA (Int. Energy Agency) 2019. Global energy & CO2 status report 2019: the latest trends in energy and emissions in 2018 Rep., IEA Paris: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-co2-status-report-2019
6. 6. 

   Seel J, Mills AD, Wiser RH. 2018. Impacts of high variable renewable energy futures on wholesale electricity prices, and on electric-sector decision making. Rep. LBNL-2001163 LBNL (Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab.) Berkeley: https://emp.lbl.gov/publications/impacts-high-variable-renewable
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Joskow P. 2019. Challenges for wholesale electricity markets with intermittent renewable generation at scale: the US experience. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 35:2291–331
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   ECECP (EU-China Energy Coop. Platf.) 2020. Integration of variable renewables in the energy system of the EU and China Rep., ECECP Beijing: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/default/files/res_integration_report_en.pdf
9. 9. 

   IRENA (Int. Renew. Energy Agency) 2020. Renewable energy statistics 2020 Rep., IRENA Abu Dhabi, UAE: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Jul/IRENA_Renewable_Energy_Statistics_2020.pdf
10. 10. 

    IEA (Int. Energy Agency) 2021. Data and statistics Paris: IEA https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics?country=USA&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=RenewGenBySource
11. 11. 

    EIA (Energy Inf. Adm.) 2019. U.S. renewable electricity generation has doubled since 2008 Washington, DC: EIA https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=38752
12. 12. 

    EIA (Energy Inf. Adm.) 2020. Electricity explained: electricity generation, capacity, and sales in the United States Washington, DC: EIA https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php
13. 13. 

    Barbose G. 2021. U.S. renewables portfolio standards: 2021 status update: early release Rep., Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab. Berkeley: https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/rps_status_update-2021_early_release.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Bird L, Clevenger T. 2019. 2019 was a watershed year for clean energy commitments from U.S. states and utilities. World Resources Institute Insights Dec. 20. https://www.wri.org/blog/2019/12/2019-was-watershed-year-clean-energy-commitments-us-states-and-utilities
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    DOE (Dep. Energy) 2017. Staff report to the secretary on electricity markets and reliability Rep., DOE Washington, DC: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/08/f36/Staff%20Report%20on%20Electricity%20Markets%20and%20Reliability_0.pdf
16. 16. 

    FERC (Fed. Energy Regul. Comm.) 2018. Distributed energy resources: technical considerations for the bulk power system Staff Rep. AD18-10-000, FERC Washington, DC: https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05/der-report_0.pdf
17. 17. 

    NARUC (Natl. Assoc. Regul. Util. Comm.) 2016. NARUC manual on distributed energy resources rate design and compensation Rep., NARUC Washington, DC: https://pubs.naruc.org/pub.cfm?id=19FDF48B-AA57-5160-DBA1-BE2E9C2F7EA0
18. 18. 

    Cook J, Ardani K, O'Shaughnessy E, Smith B, Margolis R 2018. Expanding PV value: lessons learned from utility-led distributed energy resource aggregation in the United States. Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-71984 Natl. Renew. Energy Lab. Golden, CO: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/71984.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    EIA (Energy Inf. Adm.) 2020. Battery storage in the United States: an update on market trends Rep., EIA Washington, DC: https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/electricity/batterystorage/pdf/battery_storage.pdf
20. 20. 

    EIA (Energy Inf. Adm.) 2018. U.S. battery storage market trends Rep., EIA, Washington, DC https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/electricity/batterystorage/archive/2018/pdf/battery_storage.pdf
21. 21. 

    FERC (Fed. Energy Regul. Comm.) 2007. 2007 assessment of demand response and advanced metering. Staff Rep., FERC Washington, DC: https://www.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/09-07-demand-response.pdf
22. 22. 

    EIA (Energy Inf. Adm.) 2021. Annual electric power industry report: Table 10.8. Demand response - yearly energy and demand savings Washington, DC: EIA https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_10_08.html
23. 23. 

    DOE (Dep. Energy) 2016. Advanced metering infrastructure and customer systems: results from the Smart Grid Investment Grant program Rep., DOE Washington, DC: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/12/f34/AMI%20Summary%20Report_09-26-16.pdf
24. 24. 

    FERC (Fed. Energy Regul. Comm.) 2020. 2020 assessment of demand response and advanced metering Staff Rep., FERC Washington, DC: https://cms.ferc.gov/sites/default/files/2020-12/2020%20Assessment%20of%20Demand%20Response%20and%20Advanced%20Metering_December%202020.pdf
25. 25. 

    Tascıkaraoglu A, Erdinc O 2019. Pathways to a Smarter Power System Cambridge, MA: Acad. Press
26. 26. 

    Obi M, Slay T, Bass R. 2020. Distributed energy resource aggregation using customer-owned equipment: a review of literature and standards. Energy Rep 6:2358–69
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    NARUC (Natl. Assoc. Regul. Util. Comm.) 2019. The value of resilience for distributed energy resources: an overview of current analytical practices Rep., NARUC Washington, DC: https://pubs.naruc.org/pub/531AD059-9CC0-BAF6-127B-99BCB5F02198
28. 28. 

    IRENA (Int. Renew. Energy Agency) 2019. Innovation landscape brief: market integration of distributed energy resources Rep., IRENA Abu Dhabi, UAE: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Feb/IRENA_Market_integration_distributed_system_2019.pdf?la=en&hash=2A67D3A224F1443D529935DF471D5EA1E23C774A
29. 29. 

    RMI (Rocky Mt. Inst.) 2015. The economics of battery energy storage: how multi-use, customer-sited batteries deliver the most services and value to customers and the grid Rep., RMI Basalt, CO: https://rmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/RMI-TheEconomicsOfBatteryEnergyStorage-FullReport-FINAL.pdf
30. 30. 

    Zhai P. 2013. Analyzing solar energy policies using a three-tier model: a case study of photovoltaics adoption in Arizona, United States. Renew. Energy 57:317–22
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Schelly C, Louie EP, Pearce JM. 2017. Examining interconnection and net metering policy for distributed generation in the United States. Renew. Energy Focus 22–23:10–19
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Darghouth NR, Wiser RH, Barbose G, Mills AD. 2016. Net metering and market feedback loops: exploring the impact of retail rate design on distributed PV deployment. Appl. Energy 162:713–22
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Boampong R, Brown D. 2020. On the benefits of behind-the-meter rooftop solar and energy storage: the importance of retail rate design. Energy Econ 86:104682
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Foster N, Orrell A, Homer J, Tagestad J. 2020. The “perfect storm” for distributed wind markets. Renew. Energy 145:1033–39
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Stephens JC, Kopin DJ, Wilson EJ, Peterson TR. 2017. Framing of customer engagement opportunities and renewable energy integration by electric utility representatives. Util. Policy 47:69–74
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Hess D, Lee D. 2020. Energy decentralization in California and New York: conflicts in the politics of shared solar and community choice. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 121:109716
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Hess D. 2016. The politics of niche-regime conflicts: distributed solar energy in the United States. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 19:42–50
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Martinot E. 2016. Grid integration of renewable energy: flexibility, innovation, and experience. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41:223–51
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Satchwell A, Cappers P. 2015. A framework for organizing electric utility regulatory and business models. Electricity J 28:8119–29
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Off. Energy Effic. Renew. Energy 2021. The SunShot Initiative. Department of Energy https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/sunshot-initiative
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    ARPA-E (Adv. Res. Proj. Agency–Energy) 2021. Duration Addition to electricitY Storage (DAYS) overview Doc., ARPA-E https://arpa-e.energy.gov/sites/default/files/documents/files/DAYS_ProgramOverview_FINAL.pdf
42. 42. 

    DOE (Dep. Energy) 2020. Grid-interactive Efficient Buildings: Projects summary. Department of Energy https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2020/09/f79/bto-geb-project-summary-093020.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    DOE (Dep. Energy) 2020. Energy Storage Grand Challenge overview workshop May 1. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2020/07/f76/ESGC_Overview_Deck_May2020_Final_508.pdf
44. 44. 

    Wilson R, Biewald B. 2013. Best practices in electric utility integrated resource planning. Regulatory Assistance Project https://www.raponline.org/knowledge-center/best-practices-in-electric-utility-integrated-resource-planning/
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Wilson R, Biewald B. 2013. Best practices in electric utility integrated resource planning: examples of state regulations and recent utility plans Rep., Regul. Assis. Proj. Montpelier, VT: https://www.synapse-energy.com/sites/default/files/SynapseReport.2013-06.RAP_.Best-Practices-in-IRP.13-038.pdf
46. 46. 

    Kahrl F, Mills AD, Lavin L, Ryan N, Olsen A 2016. The future of electricity resource planning Rep. LBNL-1006269 LBNL (Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab.) Berkeley: https://emp.lbl.gov/publications/future-electricity-resource-planning
47. 47. 

    Girouard C. 2018. Top 10 utility regulation trends of 2018—so far. Greentech Media July 27. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/top-10-utility-regulation-trends-of-2018-so-far
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Shields L. 2021. State renewable portfolio standards and goals. National Conference of State Legislatures https://www.ncsl.org/research/energy/renewable-portfolio-standards.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Lips B. 2018. Credit multipliers in renewable portfolio standards Rep., RPS Collab., Clean Energy States Alliance Montpelier, VT: https://www.cesa.org/wp-content/uploads/RPS-Multipliers.pdf
50. 50. 

    Schwartz L. 2020. PUC distribution planning practices Presented at Distribution Systems and Planning Training for Southeast Region, March 11–12 https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/12_-_schwartz_puc_distribution_planning_practices.pdf
51. 51. 

    Satchwell A, Cappers P. 2018. Recent developments in competition and innovation for regulated electric utilities. Util. Policy 55:110–14
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Darghoutha NR, Barbose G, Zuboy J, Gagnon PJ, Mill AD, Bird L. 2020. Demand charge savings from solar PV and energy storage. Energy Policy 146:111766
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Satchwell AJ, Cappers PA, Barbose GL. 2019. Current developments in retail rate design: implications for solar and other distributed energy resources Rep., Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab. Berkeley: https://emp.lbl.gov/publications/current-developments-retail-rate
54. 54. 

    Washington State Legislature 2019. SB 5223 - 2019-20 concerning net metering. Bill SB 5223 Washington State Legis Olympia: https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=5223&Initiative=false&Year=2019
55. 55. 

    CPUC (Calif. Public Util. Comm.) 2021. Net energy metering rulemaking (R.)14-07-002. California Public Utilities Commission https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/General.aspx?id=3934
56. 56. 

    Eid C, Guillén JR, Marína PF, Hakvoort R. 2014. The economic effect of electricity net-metering with solar PV: consequences for network cost recovery, cross subsidies and policy objectives. Energy Policy 75:244–54
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    MPSC (Mich. Public Serv. Comm.) 2018. MPSC adopts distributed generation billing method News Release, MPSC April 18. https://mi-psc.force.com/sfc/servlet.shepherd/version/download/068t00000022KjgAAE
58. 58. 

    HSEO (Hawaii State Energy Off.) 2018. Hawaii energy facts & figures Rep., Dep. Bus. Econ. Dev. Tour. HSEO, Honolulu: http://energy.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/HSEO_2018_EnergyFactsFigures.pdf
59. 59. 

    NYPSC (New York Public Serv. Comm.) 2017. Order on net energy metering transition, phase one of value of distributed energy resources, and related matters CASE 15-E-0751/CASE 15-E-0082, NYPSC, Albany, March 9. http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId=%7b5B69628E-2928-44A9-B83E-65CEA7326428%7d
60. 60. 

    Faruqui A, Hledik R, Tsoukalis J. 2009. The power of dynamic pricing. Electricity J 22:342–56
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Kind P. 2013. Disruptive challenges: financial implications and strategic responses to a changing retail electric business Rep., Edison Elec. Inst. Washington, DC: https://www.ourenergypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/disruptivechallenges-1.pdf
62. 62. 

    Orans R, Kahrl F, Aas D. 2016. Envisioning the electric utility in 2030: “fat” or “skinny”? Rep., Energy Environ Econ, San Francisco: https://www.ethree.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/E3_Envisioning-the-Electric-Utility-in-2030.pdf
63. 63. 

    Ardani K, Davidson C, Margolis R, Nobler E. 2015. A state-level comparison of processes and timelines for distributed photovoltaic interconnection in the United States. Tech Rep. NREL/TP-7A40-63556 Natl. Renew. Energy Lab. Golden, CO: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/63556.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    ACEEE (Am. Counc. Energy-Eff. Econ.) 2018. State and local policy database: interconnection standards ACEEE: Washington, DC https://database.aceee.org/state/interconnection-standards
65. 65. 

    Lowry MN, Woolf T. 2016. Performance-based regulation in a high distributed energy resources future Rep. LBNL-1004130 LBNL (Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab) Berkeley: https://emp.lbl.gov/publications/performance-based-regulation-high
66. 66. 

    MPUC (Minn. Public Util. Comm.) 2019. In the matter of a commission investigation to identify performance metrics, and potentially, incentives for Xcel Energy's electric utility operation Docket E-002/CI-17-401 MPUC St. Paul: Sept. 18. https://www.edockets.state.mn.us/EFiling/edockets/searchDocuments.do?method=showPoup&documentId={0082456D-0000-CA1F-9241-23A4FFF7C2FB}&documentTitle=20199-155917-01
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    PUCN (Public Util. Comm. Nev.) 2021. State of Nevada Public Utilities Commission. Docket 19-06008 PUCN Carson City: July 8, 2019–Jan. 15, 2021. http://pucweb1.state.nv.us/PUC2/DktDetail.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    NYPSC (New York Public Serv. Comm.) 2016. Order adopting a ratemaking and utility revenue model policy framework Case 14-M-0101 NYPSC Albany: May 19. http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId={D6EC8F0B-6141-4A82-A857-B79CF0A71BF0}
69. 69. 

    NYPSC (New York Public Serv. Comm.) 2016. Public Service Commission approves restructuring of utility regulations to combat climate change & achieve nation-leading clean energy goals Press Release 16028, NYPSC, Albany, May 19. http://www3.dps.ny.gov/pscweb/WebFileRoom.nsf/ArticlesByCategory/9B4FB5513905CB5985257FB8006DAD48/$File/pr16028.pdf?OpenElement
70. 70. 

    Averch H, Johnson L 1962. The behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint. Am. Econ. Rev. 52:1052–69
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    AEE (Adv. Energy Econ.) 2017. Illinois Commerce Commission on its own motion. Docket 17-0855 AEE Washington, DC: Dec. 6. https://powersuite.aee.net/dockets/il-17-0855
72. 72. 

    AEE (Adv. Energy Econ.) 2018. Optimizing capital and service expenditures: providing utilities with financial incentives for a changing grid Rep., AEE Washington, DC: https://info.aee.net/hubfs/PDF/Opex-Capex.pdf
73. 73. 

    CPUC (Calif. Public Util. Comm.) 2018. Actions to limit utility costs and rates Rep., CPUC San Francisco: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=2ahUKEwjhorDWsPjoAhWEvJ4KHXRbANEQFjABegQIAxAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cpuc.ca.gov%2FWorkArea%2FDownloadAsset.aspx%3Fid%3D6442457283&usg=AOvVaw3t_ivaGB8p_oFjs0OVkGCC
74. 74. 

    Lambin X. 2020. Integration of demand response in electricity market capacity mechanisms. Util. Policy 64:101033
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Dupuy M, Kahrl F, Weston F, Shen B, Satchwell AJ et al. 2017. Power consumption, demand and competition cooperation: recommendations for the pilots in Guangdong, Jilin, Jiangsu, and Shanghai Rep., LBNL (Lawrence Berkeley Natl. Lab) Berkeley:
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Hogan M, O'Boyle M, Aggarwal S 2015. Do pay-for-performance capacity markets deliver the grid resiliency outcomes we need?. Greentech Media Apr. 28. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/do-pay-for-performance-capacity-markets-deliver-the-outcomes-we-need
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    ERCOT (Electr. Reliab. Counc. TX) 2013. Future ancillary services in ERCOT Concept Pap., ERCOT Austin: http://www.ercot.com/content/committees/other/fast/keydocs/2014/ERCOT_AS_Concept_Paper_Version_1.1_as_of_11-01-13_1445_black.doc
78. 78. 

    NERC (N. Am. Elect. Reliab. Corp.) 2017. Distributed energy resources: connection modeling and reliability considerations Rep., NERC Atlanta: https://www.nerc.com/comm/Other/essntlrlbltysrvcstskfrcDL/Distributed_Energy_Resources_Report.pdf
79. 79. 

    CPUC (Calif. Public Util. Comm.) 2019. Decision addressing auction mechanism, baselines, and auto demand response for battery storage Decis. 19-07-009 CPUC San Francisco: July 11. http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M309/K713/309713644.PDF
80. 80. 

    Barbose G, Satchwell AJ. 2020. Benefits and costs of a utility-ownership business model for residential rooftop solar photovoltaics. Nat. Energy 5:750–58
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Bade G. 2016. REV in 2016: the year that could transform utility business models in New York. Utility Dive Jan. 20. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/rev-in-2016-the-year-that-could-transform-utility-business-models-in-new-y/412410/
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    NYPSC (New York Public Serv. Comm.) 2015. Proceeding on motion of the commission in regard to Reforming the Energy Vision: order adopting regulatory policy framework and implementation plan. Case 14-M-0101 NYPSC Albany: Febr. 26. http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId=%7B0B599D87-445B-4197-9815-24C27623A6A0%7D
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    NYDPS (New York Dep. Public Serv.). Hosting capacity maps and useful links Doc., NYDPS: Albany, NY https://www3.dps.ny.gov/W/PSCWeb.nsf/All/6143542BD0775DEC85257FF10056479C?OpenDocument
84. 84. 

    Forrester SP, Zaman A, Mathieu JL, Johnson JX. 2017. Policy and market barriers to energy storage providing multiple services. Electricity J 30:50–56
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Hledik R, Lueken R, McIntyre C, Bishop H. 2017. Stacked benefits: comprehensively valuing battery storage in California Rep., Brattle Grp. Boston: https://brattlefiles.blob.core.windows.net/system/news/pdfs/000/001/302/original/stacked_benefits_-_final_report.pdf?1505227794
86. 86. 

    Gheorghiu I. 2019. The future of energy storage is here: an inside look at Rocky Mountain Power's 600-battery DR project. Utility Dive Sept. 30. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/virtual-power-plant-utah-sonnen-rocky-mountain-power-future-of-storage-distributed-energy/563734/
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Feldman D, Brockway AM, Ulrich E, Margolis R 2015. Shared solar: current landscape, market potential, and the impact of federal securities regulation. Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-6A20-63892 Natl. Renew. Energy Lab. Golden, CO: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/63892.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    SEIA (Solar Energy Ind. Assoc.) 2016. Residential consumer guide to community solar Rep., SEIA Washington, DC: https://www.seia.org/sites/default/files/Residential%20Consumer%20Guide%20to%20Community%20Solar%20-%20FINAL.pdf
89. 89. 

    Solar Energy Technologies Office, DOE (Department of Energy). Community solar basics https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/community-solar-basics
90. 90. 

    Gilbert M. 2020. Perspectives on community solar policy adoption across the United States. Renew. Energy Focus 33:1–15
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Augustine P. 2015. The time is right for utilities to develop community shared solar programs. Electricity J 28:10107–8
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Booth S. 2014. Here comes the sun: how securities regulations cast a shadow on the growth of community solar in the United States. UCLA Law Rev 760:760–811
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Coughlin J, Grove J, Irvine L, Jacobs JF, Johnson Phillips S et al. 2010. A guide to community solar: utility, private, and non-profit project development Rep., Off. Energy Effic. Renew. Energy, Dep. Energy Washington, DC: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49930.pdf
94. 94. 

    Kahrl F, Patel K, Orans R. 2019. Distributed utility 2.0: re-envisioning the electric distribution utility. Public Utilities Fortnightly Aug. https://www.fortnightly.com/fortnightly/2019/08/distributed-utility-20
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Kristov L, De Martini P, Taft JD. 2016. A tale of two visions: designing a decentralized transactive electric system. IEEE Power Energy Magazine May/June. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=7452738&casa_token=n7_SvGT22U8AAAAA:VMNUJwlcXeu-CZzALLPpdba0lzMMwj51-dRUMeQtvds6N6xszS3GPoOahiKvil8df60imeNKxpA&tag=1
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Patel K, Allen D, Schneiderman B, Jones R et al. 2016. Full value tariff design and retail rate choices Rep., Energy Environ. Econ. San Francisco: http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId=%7BA0BF2F42-82A1-4ED0-AE6D-D7E38F8D655D%7D
97. 97. 

    Sweco 2015. Study on the effective integration of distributed energy resources for providing flexibility to the electricity system: a final report to the European Commission Rep. Proj. 54697590000, Sweco, Stockholm https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/5469759000%20Effective%20integration%20of%20DER%20Final%20ver%202_6%20April%202015.pdf
98. 98. 

    European Commission. Renewable energy directive https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/renewable-energy/renewable-energy-directive/overview_en
99. 99. 

    Pyper J. 2021. How India's renewable energy sector survived and thrived in a turbulent 2020. . Greentech Media Jan. 6. https://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/india-solar-energy-transition-pandemic-2020
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Xi JP. 2021. Carrying on the past and opening up a new journey of global response to climate change: speech at the Climate Ambition Summit. Xinhua Net, December 12. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2020-12/12/c_1126853600.htm (From Chinese )
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     NEA (Natl. Energy Adm.) 2016. Electric power planning administrative measures Doc. 139 NEA Beijing: http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/auto84/201606/t20160606_2258.htm
102. 102. 

     Brinker L, Satchwell AJ. 2020. A comparative review of municipal energy business models in Germany, California, and Great Britain: institutional context and forms of energy decentralization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 119:109521
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103. 

     Girouard C. 2019. UK RIIO sets out to demonstrate how a performance-based regulatory model can deliver value. Utility Dive. May 30. https://www.utilitydive.com/news/uk-riio-sets-out-to-demonstrate-how-a-performance-based-regulatory-model-ca/555761/
104. 104. 

     Stede J, Arnold K, Dufter C, Holtz G, Roon S, Richstein J. 2020. The role of aggregators in facilitating industrial demand response: evidence from Germany. Energy Policy 147:111893
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     Thakur J, Chakraborty B. 2016. Sustainable net metering model for diversified India. Energy Procedia 88:336–40
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Thakur J, Chakraborty B. 2019. Impact of compensation mechanisms for PV generation on residential consumers and shared net metering model for developing nations: a case study of India. J. Cleaner Prod. 218:696–707
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107. 

     Chaianong A, Bangviwat A, Menke C, Darghouth N. 2019. Cost–benefit analysis of rooftop PV systems on utilities and ratepayers in Thailand. Energies 12:122265
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108. 

     Luhmann T, Wieben E, Treydel R, Stadler M, Kumm T 2015. An approach for cost-efficient grid integration of distributed renewable energy sources. Engineering 4:447–52
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     NEA (Natl. Energy Adm.) 2017. Notice of improving power ancillary services compensation (market) mechanism work plan Doc. 67 NEA Beijing: http://zfxxgk.nea.gov.cn/auto92/201711/t20171122_3058.htm
110. 110. 

     Guo PP, Yang D, Chen C 2020. Development status and analysis of demand response in China. Heneng Net August 10. http://www.heneng.net.cn/index.php?mod=news&article_id=46331&action=show&article_id=59999 (From Chinese )
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111. 

     Feng Y, Wang SJ, Sha Y, Ding QZ, Yuan JH, Guo XP. 2018. Coal power overcapacity in China: province-level estimates and policy implications. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 137:89–100
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112. 

     Zeng M, Ouyang SJ, Shi H, Ge YJ, Qian QQ. 2015. Overall review of distributed energy development in China: status quo, barriers and solutions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50:1226–38
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113. 

     Energy Netw. Assoc 2021. Open Networks. Energy Network Association. https://www.energynetworks.org/creating-tomorrows-networks/open-networks