Skip to main content
Log in

An Open-Source, Scalable, Low-Cost Automatic Modal Hammer for Studying Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although automatic impact hammers are available for use in dynamics and vibration research, they have seen little application in both well-supported labs and resource-poor settings, such as underprivileged communities and the parts of the developing world. The primary reason is that they are cost prohibitive as commercially available automatic modal hammers typically cost more than $10,000 USD, and the prevailing perspective is that testing performed using modal hammers is unrepeatable and uncontrollable. Consequently, this technology has seen limited use throughout academia and industry. An inexpensive automatic modal hammer system that is both controllable and repeatable could thus prove useful in both research and educational labs while promoting a do-it-yourself perspective in future scientists. Such a hammer would also provide immense benefit in the testing of strongly nonlinear systems whose dynamics depend greatly on the applied excitation. This research focuses on the creation and use of an open-source, scalable, repeatable, low-cost automatic modal hammer for investigating the dynamics of strongly nonlinear systems. The proposed design consists of a commercial modal hammer mounted on a stepper motor, commonly used in small 3D printers, that is equipped with an encoder and a servo driver controlled using an Arduino, enabling micro-stepping and precise control of the hammer. The capabilities of the proposed automatic modal hammer are demonstrated using a linear cantilever beam, a two-story building model with two nonlinear vibration absorbers, and a model airplane wing with a non-smooth nonlinear vibration absorber installed on its tip.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silva JMM (1999) Modal Analysis and Testing. Springer, Netherlands, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. D.J. Ewins, Modal Testing: Theory, Practice, and Application, Research Studies Press, 2000.

  3. Avitable P (2018) Modal testing: a practitioner’s guide, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. USA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119222989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.H. Nayfeh, Mook, D.T. (1995) Nonlinear Oscillations, John Wiley & Sons

  5. Vakakis AF, Manevitch LI, Mikhlin YV, Pilipchuk VN, Zevin A (1996) Normal Modes and Localization of Nonlinear Systems. Wiley and Sons, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Kerschen G, Peeters M, Golinval JC, Vakakis AF (2009) Nonlinear normal modes, Part I: A useful framework for the structural dynamicist. Mech Syst Signal Process 23:170–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hill TL, Cammarano A, Neild SA (2017) Identifying the significance of nonlinear normal modes. Proc R Soc A. 473:20160789. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. Maierhofer, A.E. Mahmoudi, D.J. Rixen (2020) Development of a Low Cost Automatic Modal Hammer for Applications in Substructuring, in: A. Linderholt, M.S. Allen, R.L. Mayes, D. Rixen (Eds.), Dyn. Substruct Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12184-6_9.

  9. J.W. Redmon, Impacting device for testing insulation, US4470293A, 1984. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4470293A/en. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  10. H.M. Evans, Method and apparatus for the non-destructive testing of materials, US4519245A, 1985. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4519245A/en. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  11. P. Cawley, R.D. Adams, Testing of structures by impact, US4542639A, 1985. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4542639A/en. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  12. E.G. Sirica, Impact calibration tool, US4967587A, 1990. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4967587A/en. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  13. D. Rioux, Impulse generator for profiling system, US20030174580A1, 2003. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030174580A1/en. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  14. R.A. Adelman, D.A. Corelli, Impact test instrument, US4682490A, 1987. https://patents.google.com/patent/US4682490A/en. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  15. P.E. Norman, G. Jung, C. Ratcliffe, R. Crane, C. Davis, Development of an Automated Impact Hammer for Modal Analysis of Structures, Air Vehicles Division, Defence Science and Techonology Organisation Victoria (Australia), 2012. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA560339 (accessed March 17, 2021).

  16. J. Maierhofer, D.J. Rixen (2021) Development of an Electrodynamic Actuator for an Automatic Modal Impulse Hammer, in: A. Linderholt, M. Allen, W. D’Ambrogio (Eds.), Dyn. Substruct. Vol. 4, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47630-4_18.

  17. Bediz B, Korkmaz E, Burak Ozdoganlar O (2014) An impact excitation system for repeatable, high-bandwidth modal testing of miniature structures. J Sound Vib 333:2743–2761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.02.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. WaveHit - Home | The First Smart Impulse Hammer, (n.d.). https://wave-hit.com/. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  19. Automatic modal hammer without double hits, Maul-Theet. (n.d.). https://www.maul-theet.com/en/products/vibration-modal/hardware/automatic-modal-hammer/. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  20. P. Blaschke, S. Schneider, R. Kamenzky, D.J. Alarcón (2017) Non-linearity Identification of Composite Materials by Scalable Impact Modal Testing, in: E. Wee Sit, C. Walber, P. Walter, S. Seidlitz (Eds.), Sens. Instrum. Vol. 5, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54987-3_2.

  21. Stepper motor, Wikipedia. (2020). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stepper_motor&oldid=995319214 (accessed December 23, 2020).

  22. uStepper - Microcontroller, stepper driver and encoder, (n.d.). https://www.ustepper.com/ (accessed February 23, 2021).

  23. Moon S, Kim Y, Lim Y, Kim DH (2012) Missing step detection in a high speed micro stepping motor using current feedback, in 12th. Int Conf Control Autom Syst 2012:494–497

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stika IC, Kreindler L, Sarca A (2013) A robust method for stepper motor stall detection, in 8TH Int. Symp Adv Top Electr Eng ATEE 2013:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ATEE.2013.6563391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. P. 26 O. 2011 | 19:05 GMT, The Making of Arduino - IEEE Spectrum, IEEE Spectr. Technol. Eng. Sci. News. (n.d.). https://spectrum.ieee.org/geek-life/hands-on/the-making-of-arduino (accessed February 24, 2021).

  26. Badamasi YA (2014) The working principle of an Arduino, in 11th Int. Conf Electron Comput Comput ICECCO 2014:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCO.2014.6997578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Arduino - Home, (n.d.). https://www.arduino.cc/. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  28. A. Singh, K.J. Moore, Automatic Modal Hammer, UNL-MoDAL GitHub Page, GitHub. (n.d.). https://github.com/keeganskateszero/UNL-MoDAL/projects/1 (accessed March 18, 2021).

  29. AccelStepper: AccelStepper library for Arduino, (n.d.). http://www.airspayce.com/mikem/arduino/AccelStepper/index.html. Accessed 18 Mar 2021.

  30. Vakakis AF, Gendelman OV, Bergman LA, McFarland DM, Kerschen G, Lee YS (2008). Nonlinear Targeted Energy Transfer in Mechanical and Structural Systems I. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9130-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vakakis AF (2018) Passive nonlinear targeted energy transfer, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Math. Phys Eng Sci 376:20170132. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh A, Moore KJ (2021) Identification of multiple local nonlinear attachments using a single measurement case. J Sound Vib. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mojahed A, Moore KJ, Bergman LA, Vakakis AF (2018) Strong geometric softening–hardening nonlinearities in an oscillator composed of linear stiffness and damping elements. Int J Non-Linear Mech 107:94–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2018.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Moore KJ (2019) Characteristic nonlinear system identification: A data-driven approach for local nonlinear attachments. Mech Syst Signal Process 131:335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.05.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Singh A, Moore KJ (2020) Characteristic nonlinear system identification of local attachments with clearance nonlinearities. Nonlinear Dyn 102:1667–1684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-06004-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Whitican SM, Copeland TJ (2016) Structural testbed design and testing with controlled nonlinearities. Sound Vib 50:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moore KJ, Mojahed A, Bergman LA, Vakakis AF (2019) Local nonlinear stores induce global dynamical effects in an experimental model plane. AIAA J 57:4953–4965. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J058311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Suraj Patil for his stimulating conversations regarding the project.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or nonprofit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS Conceptualization; Methodology; Software; Validation; Formal Analysis; Investigation; Data Curation; Writing – Original Draft; Visualization. KM Conceptualization; Methodology; Resources; Writing – Review & Editing; Supervision; Project Administration; Funding Acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K.J. Moore.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest or competing interest regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, A., Moore, K. An Open-Source, Scalable, Low-Cost Automatic Modal Hammer for Studying Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Exp Tech 46, 775–792 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00516-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00516-7

Keywords

Navigation