Full length articleFrom social interactions to private environmental behaviours: The case of consumer food waste
Introduction
Food waste is a societal challenge drawing a burgeoning amount of attention in the agendas of public and private actors. In developed countries, consumers are responsible for the largest share of waste along value chains (Gunders, 2012, Gustavsson, Cederberg, Sonesson, Van Otterdijk, Meybeck, 2011, Stenmarck, Jensen, Quested, Moates, Buksti, Cseh, Juul, Parry, Politano, Redlingshofer, et al., 2016), equalling 53% of the total food waste in the EU.1 This implies the waste of valuable resources like soil, energy and water, but also the unnecessary emission of huge amounts of CO2 contributing to climate change. There has thus been an increasing focus on interventions to reduce food waste at the consumption stage. Most of the current literature on this matter focuses on the identification of socio-demographic and situational drivers (Barr, 2007, Canali, Amani, Aramyan, Gheoldus, Moates, Östergren, Silvennoinen, Waldron, Vittuari, 2017, Parizeau, von Massow, Martin, 2015, Setti, Falasconi, Segrè, Cusano, Vittuari, 2016, Sonesson, Anteson, Davis, Sjödén, 2005, Wassermann, Schneider, 2005, Wenlock, Buss, Derry, Dixon, 1980, WRAP), and their relative influence (Grainger et al. 2018b). A social component has also been identified (Evans 2011), suggesting that food waste is not simply an individual problem. However, there has been limited attention to the interaction between idiosyncratic and social aspects of consumers’ food waste behaviour, including though simulation models. An attempt to study the process of consumers’ food waste generation through extensive agent-based simulations has been made by Ravandi and Jovanovic (2019). However, their agent-based model (ABM) focuses on logistic issues in a very specific setting (food-service operations), with limited role for social influence.
To fill this gap, this paper merges evidence from the food waste literature on the one side, and social simulation on the other side, to develop an ABM that explores how individual food waste behaviours are influenced by peers through exchanges of opinions. In particular, we study the impact on food waste of interactions between individuals belonging to different socio-demographic groups. First, we focus on the role of mixing between adult and young consumers; second, we explore the convincing power of a small group of individuals committed to food waste reduction. We pay particular attention to the mismatch between publicly-stated opinions and private behaviours. Unlike most ABMs, which are calibrated qualitatively using general stylised facts, our model is partially calibrated with real-world data.
Our simulations show that peers can influence each other’s behaviour even when this behaviour is highly heterogeneous and private. Networks and similarity emerge as moderators between social influence and behavioural change. Rather than overall convergence, we observe the emerging of different clusters, as behaviours tend to align with individuals from the same group. The case study of adult and young consumers, with the former wasting little and the latter wasting much, suggests that if individuals are sufficiently open-minded, small degrees of mixing between groups are enough to reduce the share of those with “extreme” behaviours. The case study of populations with a small group of committed individuals shows that, under certain conditions, these can convince a significant share of the overall population. Being the first model to assess the impact of social influence on food waste generation though extensive simulations, there is a lack of research for comparison. Nevertheless, our results suggest that policies addressing food waste should promote interaction opportunities among different socio-demographic groups to achieve larger impact.
The paper is structured as follows. First, we review the literature on food behaviours and social influence. Second, we describe our theoretical model and characterise our case studies starting from the literature and available data. Third, we present and discuss the results of extensive simulations. Finally, we draw our conclusions and illustrate their implications for research and policy design.
Section snippets
Literature review
Recent advancements in consumer studies have departed from the assumption that consumers make their decisions in isolation, based only on individual preferences and attitudes. The economics, psychology and sociology literature has been focusing on the impact of social embeddedness (i.e., of constraints due to the social context where economic activities take place) (Jackson, 2005, Jackson, 2010, Jackson et al., 2017), and peers’ opinions (Carroni, Pin, Righi, 2020, Galeotti, 2010, Lamberton,
Data and methods
This section describes the theoretical model, and the data used to characterise the two case studies through calibration.
Results and discussion
As a preliminary step, we consider the dynamic behaviour of our model. Fig. 3 shows the results of baseline simulations where two equally-sized groups of agents (blue and red) are characterised by the same level of confirmation bias , and the same level of cognitive dissonance . The network density is equal to 0.5. In both groups, the initial levels of waste follow a triangular distribution, with ; however, the groups are heterogeneous in their initial average level of
Conclusions and policy implications
The present model, in its simplicity, has uncovered interesting stylised facts concerning the influence of social interactions on private environmental behaviours, providing insights into behaviour change critical for the design of effective policy interventions. To this end, we have explored the effects of social interactions on stated opinions and private food waste behaviours by means of an ABM. We built two numerical case studies of heterogeneous populations by calibrating the model with
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Simone Piras: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Simone Righi: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Marco Setti: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft. Nazli Koseoglu: Validation, Writing – review & editing. Matthew J. Grainger: Writing – review & editing. Gavin B. Stewart: Writing – review & editing. Matteo
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This research received funding from the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union (project REFRESH “Resource Efficient Food and dRink for the Entire Supply cHain”, Grant Agreement 641933) and the Scottish Government’s Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division (RESAS RD3.2.4 “Food Culture and Dietary Choice”). The views reflected in this paper represent the professional views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders.
References (101)
- et al.
Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: a meta-analysis
Global Environ. Change
(2013) The theory of planned behavior
Org. Behav. Hum. Decis. Processes
(1991)- et al.
When less is more: consumer aversion to unused utility
J. Consum. Psychol.
(2012) - et al.
The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations
Theoretic. Popul. Biol.
(2004) - et al.
Why did I eat that? Perspectives on food decision making and dietary restraint
J. Consum. Psychol.
(2010) - et al.
Is taxing waste a waste of time? evidence from a supreme court decision
Ecol. Econ.
(2018) - et al.
Waste prevention and social preferences: The role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations
Ecol. Econ.
(2014) - et al.
The acuity of vice: Attitude ambivalence improves visual sensitivity to increasing portion sizes
J. Consum. Psychol.
(2014) - et al.
Food wasters: Profiling consumers attitude to waste food in italy
Waste Manag.
(2018) - et al.
The jury is still out on social media as a tool for reducing food waste a response to Young et al. (2017)
Resour. Conservat. Recycl.
(2017)
The use of systems models to identify food waste drivers
Global Food Secur.
Model selection and averaging in the assessment of the drivers of household food waste to reduce the probability of false positives
PloS one
The detection of social exclusion: Evolution and beyond
Group Dyn.: Theory Resear. Pract.
An explication of social norms
Commun. Theory
Household–level dynamics of food waste production and related beliefs, attitudes, and behaviours in Guelph, Ontario
Waste Manag.
Food waste prevention in europe–a cause-driven approach to identify the most relevant leverage points for action
Resour. Conservat. Recycl.
Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy
Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours
Resour. Conservat. Recycl.
Impact of plate size on food waste: Agent-based simulation of food consumption
Resour. Conservat. Recycl.
Food waste matters-a systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications
J. Clean. Product.
Micromotives and macrobehavior
Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests
Soc. Influenc.
Household food waste behaviour in EU-27 countries: A multilevel analysis
Food Policy
Italian consumers’ income and food waste behavior
Brit. Food J.
Consumer decisions in relationships
J. Consum. Psychol.
Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines
Food Qual. Prefer.
New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior
J. Soc. Iss.
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Delivery, impact and approach of household food waste reduction campaigns
J. Clean. Prod.
Theories of Cognitive Consistency: A Sourcebook
Ageing and family solidarity in Europe: patterns and driving factors of intergenerational support
The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context
J. Consum. Res.
Program effectiveness in facilitating intergenerational influence in environmental education: Lessons from the field
J. Environ. Educ.
Emergence of scaling in random networks
Science
Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management
Environ. Behav.
Food waste drivers in Europe, from identification to possible interventions
Sustainability
Bring a friend! privately or publicly?
Manag. Sci.
A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places
J. Personal. Soc. Psychol.
Child-orientated environmental education influences adult knowledge and household behaviour
Environ. Res. Lett.
How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model
J. Artific. Soc. Soc. Simul.
Winners don’t punish
Nature
A review of research on the effectiveness of environmental education in promoting intergenerational learning
J. Environ. Educ.
On random graphs, I
Publicat. Math. (Debrecen)
Blaming the consumer–once again: The social and material contexts of everyday food waste practices in some English households
Critic. Publ. Health
Human behaviour: Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment (reply)
Nature
A theory of social comparison processes
Hum. Relat.
Cognitive dissonance
Sci. Am.
Altruistic punishment and the origin of cooperation
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment
Nature
Sociophysics: a review of Galam models
Int. J. Modern Phys. C
Cited by (20)
What determines citizens' recycling behavior of express delivery packaging? Empirical evidence from a comprehensive model
2024, Journal of Cleaner ProductionUpcycled food: How does it support the three pillars of sustainability?
2024, Trends in Food Science and TechnologyWhat maintains low-carbon consumption behaviors: Evidence from China
2024, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsSocial capital and environmentally friendly behaviors
2024, Environmental Science and PolicyHow social interaction shapes habitual and occasional low-carbon consumption behaviors: Evidence from ten cities in China
2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews