Skip to main content
Log in

Novel Dynamic Test Methods for Paperboard Composite Structures

  • Applications paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 10 November 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Paperboard-based composites, typically in the form of carton plies, polyethylene, and aluminum foil, are widely used for food packaging applications. The main goal of packaging converting procedures is to create robust and well-shaped commercial packages. This high speed process is very dynamic, resulting in enormous deformation rates within a few milliseconds. In contrast to previous quasi-static investigations, the envisaged dynamic material characterization for soft and thin paperboard plies will help understand and predict the material response during this high speed packaging process. Even though several experimental standards are already available for paperboard tensile tests, these standards are limited to conventional quasi-static test procedures. Specific cylindrical clamps made of aluminum were designed to prevent samples with a thickness of 100 m from slipping. By means of accurate measuring techniques, a maximum strain rate of 80 s-1 was achieved, which effectively corresponded to actual strain rates that occur in paperboard converting procedures. It was shown that paperboard plies exhibited anisotropic properties and rate-dependent characteristics. Compared to quasi-static properties, the dynamic experiments revealed stiffer hardening properties at higher strain rates. A rate-dependent material model based on Cowper-Symonds and Johnson-Cook analytical laws was generated to formulate a paperboard dynamic constitutive model. Experimental investigations towards analytical material formulations were successfully conducted to predict and determine the rate dependent material characteristics of paperboards plies at high strain rates. 

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

• The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to legal and ethical reasons.

• Furthermore, the raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Change history

References

  1. Stenberg N, Fellers C (2002) The out-of-plane Poisson’s ratios of paper and paperboard. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 17(4):387–394. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2002-17-04-p387-394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Y, Stapleton SE, Reese S, Simon JW (2016) Anisotropic elastic-plastic deformation of paper: in-plane model. Int J Solids Struct 100–101:286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nygårds M, Just M, Tryding J (2009) Experimental and numerical studies of creasing of paperboard. Int J Solids Struct 46(11–12):2493–2505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kirwan MJ (2013) Handbook of paper and paperboard packaging technology. Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118470930.ch13

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Xia QXS, Boyce MC, Parks DM (2002) A constitutive model for the anisotropic elastic-plastic deformation of paper and paperboard. Int J Solids Struct 39(15):4053–4071. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7683(02)00238-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borgqvist E, Wallin M, Ristinmaa M, Tryding J (2015) An anisotropic in-plane and out-of-plane elasto-plastic continuum model for paperboard. Compos Struct 126:184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tjahjanto DD, Girlanda O, Östlund S (2015) Anisotropic viscoelastic-viscoplastic continuum model for high-density cellulose-based materials. J Mech Phys Solids 84:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.07.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beex LAA, Peerlings RHJ (2009) An experimental and computational study of laminated paperboard creasing and folding. Int J Solids Struct 46(24):4192–4207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Stapleton S, Simon JW, Reese S (2016) Experimental and Numerical Study of Paperboard Interface Properties. Exp Mech 56(8):1477–1488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0184-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nygårds M, Fellers C, Östlund S (2007) Measuring out-of-plane shear properties of paperboard. J Pulp Pap Sci 33(2):105–109

    Google Scholar 

  11. Huang H, Hagman A, Nygårds M (2014) Quasi static analysis of creasing and folding for three paperboards. Mech Mater 69:11–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.09.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allaoui S, Aboura Z, Benzeggagh M (2009) Phenomena governing uni-axial tensile behaviour of paperboard and corrugated cardboard. Compos Struct 87(1):80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henry W, Haslach JR (2000) The moisture and rate-dependent mechanical properties of paper. Mech Time-Depend Mater 4:169–210. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009833415827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Godshall W (1965) Dynamic tension testing equipment for paperboard and corrugated fiberboard. In: U. S. Forest Service research note no. 081, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA

  15. Paca FB (1960) The response of materials to dynamic loads. U.S. Army ERDL Report 1643-TR

  16. Tiemann HD (1908) The effect of the speed of testing upon the strength of wood and the standardization of tests for speed. Proc Am Soc 8:541

  17. Xiao X (2008) Dynamic tensile testing of plastic materials. Polym Test 27.2:164–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.09.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu W (2015) Identification of strainrate dependent hardening sensitivity of metallic sheets under in-plane biaxial loading. PhD thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Rennes, Rennes, France

  19. Ou Y, Zhu D, Zhang H, Yao Y, Mobasher B, Huang L (2016) Mechanical properties and failure characteristics of CFRP under intermediate strain rates and varying temperatures. Compos Part B: Eng 95:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cherif C, Seidel A, Younes A, Hausding J (2010) Evaluation of a tensile test for the determination of the material behaviour of filament yarns under high strain rates. Autex Res J 10.4:88–94

    Google Scholar 

  21. Younes A, Sankaran V, Seidel A, Waldmann M, Cherif C, Hausding J (2012) Stress-strain behavior of carbon filament yarns under high strain rates. Text Res J 82.7:685–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517511433151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gavrus A (2012) Constitutive equation for description of metallic materials behavior during static and dynamic loadings taking into account important gradients of plastic deformation. Key Eng Mater 504:697–702. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.504-506.697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gambirasio L, Rizzi E (2016) An enhanced Johnson–Cook strength model for splitting strain rate and temperature effects on lower yield stress and plastic flow. Comput Mater Sci 113:231–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.11.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gyliene V, Ostasevicius V (2011) Cowper-Symonds material deformation law application in material cutting process using LS-DYNA FE code: turning and milling. In: LS-DYNA® 8th European Users conference

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully appreciates the technical support from TUDATEX GmbH (Dresden, Germany) and financial support of SIG Combibloc System GmbH during his PhD work. Moreover, the authors acknowledge the Institute of Applied Mechanics (IFAM) of RWTH Aachen University and German Institutes of Textile and Fiber Research (DITF) Denkendorf, Germany for their technical support for the material test experiments.

Funding

This study was funded by Company SIG Combibloc System GmbH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolhasan Nazarinezhad Giashi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

First Author has received research grants from Company SIG Combibloc System GmbH.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article was updated to correct the spelling of Abolhasan Nazarinezhad Giashi in the author list.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nazarinezhad Giashi, A., Gereke, T., Mbarek, T. et al. Novel Dynamic Test Methods for Paperboard Composite Structures. Exp Tech 46, 849–860 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00496-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00496-8

Keywords

Navigation