Skip to main content
Log in

On the TEC bias of altimeter satellites

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason-1, Jason-2 and Jason-3 altimeter missions have provided 27 + years of uninterrupted Total Electron Content (TEC) measurements since 1992, with unprecedented precision. Nevertheless, the issue of a possible systematic bias in the data was identified immediately after first TOPEX measurements were compared with measurements from other sources. The bias issue has remained open for decades, and it has increased in complexity because each new mission had its different bias. The purpose of this paper is to assess the problem of TEC bias of altimeters. Two approaches have been followed. The first one relied on the TEC data series of the four altimeters to determine inter-mission systematic biases using the last available data versions for each mission. The second approach consisted of inspecting the missions’ official reports to trace changes of the inter-mission and inter-version biases, including biases relative to DORIS ionospheric measurements. Both approaches have converged and resulted in the determination of a reference frame where missions, instruments and ionospheric reference levels could be compared. This reference frame was also used to analyze results published in representative papers during the last decades, including ionospheric data from the ENVISAT mission. This reference frame could help to assess TEC levels of the announced new data version of Jason-2, Jason-3 and the imminent Jason-CS/Sentinel missions. The main conclusion of this work is that Jason-1, ‘E’ data version, defines a TEC reference level which is compatible with most of the results found in the literature.

Highlights

  • This contribution provides evidence in favor of TEC data series from Jason-1, ‘E’ version, as the most accurate reference level among altimeter missions and versions.

  • This work tries to assess a long-lasting issue about the existence of systematic biases among ionospheric data series obtained from different satellite altimeters.

  • This work establishes a TEC reference frame where it is possible to ‘map’ already published results and interpret their meanings.

  • This work provides a frame where any possible bias in the upcoming ‘F’ data version series of Jason-2 and Jason-3, and of the imminent Jason-CS/Sentinel-6A mission could be detected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

TOPEX/Poseidon and Jason 1 datasets analyzed for the current study are available at https://openadb.dgfi.tum.de/en/data_access/. Jason 2 and Jason3 datasets analyzed during the current study are available at ftp://ftp.nodc.noaa.gov/pub/data.nodc/.

The missions’ reports used in this work are available at https://www.aviso.altimetry.fr/en/data/calval/systematic-calval.html.

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Ablain M, Philipps S (2006) TOPEX/Poseidon validation activities-13 years of T/P data (GDR-Ms). SALP-RP-MA-EA-21315-CLS, 1rev1

  • Ablain M, Philipps S (2007) Jason-1 validation and cross calibration activities. SALP-RP-MA-EA-21377-CLS, 1rev1

  • Azpilicueta F, Brunini C (2009) Analysis of the bias between TOPEX and GPS vTEC determinations. J Geod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0244-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azpilicueta F, Nava B (2021) Studying the winter anomaly with altimeter-derived TEC data. Adv Space Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanck F, Schgounn C et al (1996) AVISO/Altimetry 1996. AVISO user handbook for merged TOPEX/POSEIDON products, AVI-NT-02-101, 3.0

  • Chen P, Liu H, Ma Y, Zheng N (2019) Accuracy and consistency of different global ionospheric maps released by IGS ionosphere associate analysis centers. Adv Space Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.09.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Ren X, Zhang X et al (2020) Assessment and validation of three ionospheric models (IRI-2016, NeQuick2, and IGS-GIM) from 2002 to 2018. Space Weather. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codrescu MV, Beierle KL et al (2001) More total electron content climatology from TOPEX/Poseidon measurements. Rad Sci. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RS002407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commien L, Philipps S, Ablain M (2009) Jason-1 validation and cross calibration Activities. SALP-RP-MA-EA-21631-CLS, 1rev 1

  • Dumont JP, Rosmorduc V et al (2017a) OSTM/Jason-2 Products Handbook. CNES: SALP-MU-M-OP-15815-CN, EUMETSAT: EUM/OPS-JAS/MAN/08/0041, JPL: OSTM-29-1237, NOAA/NESDIS: Polar Series/OSTM J400, Issue: 1 rev 11

  • Dumont JP, Rosmorduc V et al (2017b) Jason-3 Products Handbook. CNES: SALP-MU-M-OP-16118-CN, Issue 1 rev 4

  • Faugere T, Mertz Y, Dorandeu J (2004) Envisat RA2/MWR ocean data validation and crosscalibration activities. Yearly report, SALP-RP-MA-EA-21234-CLS, 1rev 1

  • Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM et al (2008) The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since. J Geod. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iijima BA, Harris IL et al (1999) Automated daily process for global ionospheric total electron content maps and satellite ocean altimeter ionospheric calibration based on Global Positioning System data. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(99)00067-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imel DA (1994) Evaluation of the TOPEX/POSEIDON dual-frequency ionosphere correction. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston G, Riddell A, Hausler G (2017) The international GNSS service. In: Teunissen PJG, Montenbruck O (eds) Springer handbook of global navigation satellite systems, 1st edn. Springer, Cham, pp 967–982

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mannucci A, Wilson B et al (1994) A new method for monitoring the Earth’s ionospheric Total Electron Content using the GPS global network. In: Proceedings of ION-GPS 93. Salt Palace Convention Center, Salt Lake City, UT, pp 1323–1332

  • Ollivier A, Guibbaud M (2012) Envisat RA2/MWR reprocessing impact on ocean data. SALP-RP-MA-EA-22083-CLS, 1rev 0

  • Ollivier A, Jettou G (2017) Envisat RA2/MWR V3.0 reprocessing impact on ocean data. SALP-RP-MA-EA-23171-CLS, 1rev 2, December 2017.

  • Phillipps S, Ablain M, Valladeau G, Legeais J-F (2012) Jason-2 validation and cross-calibration activities (Annual report 2011). SALP-RP-MA-EA-22042-CLS

  • Picot N, Desai S et al (2016) Jason-1 Products Handbook, CNES: SALP-MU-M5-OP-13184-CN; JPL: JPL D-21352; Issue: 5 rev 1

  • Roinard H, Lievin M (2017a) Jason-2 validation and cross-calibration activities (Annual report 2016). SALP-RP-MA-EA-23058-CLS, 1rev 2

  • Roinard H, Philipps S (2017b) Jason-1 - GDR-E release - Global assessment over ocean. SALP RP-MA-EA-22426-CLS, 1rev1

  • Roinard H, Valladeau G, Legais JF, Phillips S, Ablain M (2014) Jason-1 validation and cross calibration activities [Annual Report 2013]. SALP-RP-MA-EA-22269-CLS, 1rev 1

  • Roinard H, Laurent O, Philipps S (2016) Jason-2 validation and cross-calibration activities (Annual report 2015). SALP-RP-MA-EA-22961-CLS

  • Roinard H, Michaud L (2020) Jason-3 validation and cross calibration activities (Annual report 2019). SALP-RP-MA-EA-23399-CLS, Issue 1.1

  • Ruffini G, Cardellach E et al (1998) Ionospheric calibration of radar altimeters using GPS tomography. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GL900004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the Earth’s ionosphere using the Global Positioning System, Geodaetisch–geophysikalische Arbeiten in der Schweiz, 59, Ph.D. Thesis, Bern University

  • Zhao C, Shum CK et al (2004) Accuracy assessment of TOPEX/poseidon ionosphere measurements. Mar Geodesy. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490410490889076

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank A. Cuestas and E. Scorians from the English Department of FCAG for the revision of the English language.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F. Azpilicueta has contributed by developing the ideas presented in the manuscript, computing the results and writing the manuscript. B. Nava has contributed with conceptual discussions, by cross-validating the results and editing the text of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Azpilicueta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 370 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azpilicueta, F., Nava, B. On the TEC bias of altimeter satellites. J Geod 95, 114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01564-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01564-y

Keywords

Navigation