Cellular effects of terahertz waves

Olga P. Cherkasova; Danil S. Serdyukov; Eugenia F. Nemova; Alex S. Ratushnyak; Anna S. Kucheryavenko; Irina N. Dolganova; Guofu Xu; Maksim Skorobogatiy; Igor V. Reshetov; Peter S. Timashev; Igor E. Spektor; Kirill I. Zaytsev; Valery V. Tuchin

doi:10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.090902

30 September 2021 Cellular effects of terahertz waves

Olga P. Cherkasova, Danil S. Serdyukov, Eugenia F. Nemova, Alex S. Ratushnyak, Anna S. Kucheryavenko, Irina N. Dolganova, Guofu Xu, Maksim Skorobogatiy, Igor V. Reshetov, Peter S. Timashev, Igor E. Spektor, Kirill I. Zaytsev, Valery V. Tuchin

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Biomedical Optics, Vol. 26, Issue 9, 090902 (September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.090902

Abstract

Significance: An increasing interest in the area of biological effects at exposure of tissues and cells to the terahertz (THz) radiation is driven by a rapid progress in THz biophotonics, observed during the past decades. Despite the attractiveness of THz technology for medical diagnosis and therapy, there is still quite limited knowledge about safe limits of THz exposure. Different modes of THz exposure of tissues and cells, including continuous-wave versus pulsed radiation, various powers, and number and duration of exposure cycles, ought to be systematically studied.

Aim: We provide an overview of recent research results in the area of biological effects at exposure of tissues and cells to THz waves.

Approach: We start with a brief overview of general features of the THz-wave–tissue interactions, as well as modern THz emitters, with an emphasis on those that are reliable for studying the biological effects of THz waves. Then, we consider three levels of biological system organization, at which the exposure effects are considered: (i) solutions of biological molecules; (ii) cultures of cells, individual cells, and cell structures; and (iii) entire organs or organisms; special attention is devoted to the cellular level. We distinguish thermal and nonthermal mechanisms of THz-wave–cell interactions and discuss a problem of adequate estimation of the THz biological effects’ specificity. The problem of experimental data reproducibility, caused by rareness of the THz experimental setups and an absence of unitary protocols, is also considered.

Results: The summarized data demonstrate the current stage of the research activity and knowledge about the THz exposure on living objects.

Conclusions: This review helps the biomedical optics community to summarize up-to-date knowledge in the area of cell exposure to THz radiation, and paves the ways for the development of THz safety standards and THz therapeutic applications.

1. Introduction

An increasing interest in biomedical applications of terahertz (THz) radiation, featuring the frequencies of 0.1 to 3.0 THz, the free-space wavelengths of $≃ 3 mm$ to $100 μ m$ , or the quantum energies of $≃ 0.3$ to 10 meV (see Fig. 1), has been observed during the past few decades,¹^–⁵ driven by rapid progress in THz technology.⁶^,⁷ Numerous research papers demonstrate the potential of THz technology in label-free early noninvasive, least-invasive, and intraoperative diagnosis of malignant and benign neoplasms with different nosologies and localizations,³^,⁴^,⁸^–¹⁸ sensing of glycated tissues and blood in the context of diabetes diagnosis,¹^,¹⁹^–²¹ determining the degree of traumatic injuries,²²^–²⁵ hydration levels,²⁶^–²⁹ and viability³⁰ of tissues. Along with the diagnostic applications, THz technology holds strong potential in therapeutics,³¹^,³² for example, in nonthermal regulation in expression of genes associated with cancer and inflammatory diseases.³³ Nevertheless, THz therapy is still at the initial stage of its development.

Fig. 1

The THz range of the electromagnetic spectrum. Courtesy of the authors.

Despite the attractiveness of THz technology for medical diagnostics and therapy, currently, the accumulated data on the safe limits of its effects on tissues and its harmlessness to the human body are rather limited.³⁴^–³⁷ The existing recommendations of THz-radiation safety limits were developed relying on extrapolation of the data from the neighboring millimeter-wave (MMW) and infrared (IR) ranges.³⁸^–⁴² Therefore, THz-wave biological effects require thorough investigation for defining the safety limits in THz biomedical diagnostics and determining the optimal dose for THz therapeutics. In Fig. 2, an annually increasing number of research items according to Scopus and Web of Science is shown, illustrating a growing interest in the considered issues. To objectively uncover benefits and weaknesses of THz medical diagnosis and therapy and to define safe limits of tissue exposure to THz waves, appropriate modes of continuous-wave (CW) and pulsed THz exposure (average power, duration, and number of exposure cycles) ought to be systematically studied and analyzed.

Fig. 2

Increasing number of research items in the area of biological objects exposure to THz waves according to Scopus and Web of Science; report dated February 2, 2021. Courtesy of the authors.

In this review, we begin with the technical aspects of the effect of THz waves on biological objects. Next, we discuss and compare modern THz emitters and their applicability for studying biological effects. We then describe the three levels of organization of biological systems, at which the effects of exposure to radiation are usually studied:

• biological molecules,
• cultures of cells, individual cells, and cell structures,
• entire organs or organisms.

We perform an in-depth analysis of cell exposure to CW and pulsed THz radiation, considering different types of cells (such as blood, skin, neuronal, epithelial, and stem cells) and distinguishing two distinct mechanisms of the THz-wave–cell interactions:

• heating due to the strong THz-wave absorption by polar water molecules;³⁴
• nonthermal effects, including changes in the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) molecule dynamics (local breaks of hydrogen bonds and the DNA chains’ melting) and gene expression.⁴³^–⁴⁵

Original contributions of the authors to the described research areas are discussed, including studies of THz biological effects on neurons and fibroblasts, and evaluation of biological objects’ heating by pulsed and CW THz radiation. Finally, this review addresses the problem of adequate estimation of the THz biological effects’ specificity, as well as the problem of reproducibility of experimental data, originating from both rareness and uniqueness of the THz systems and absence of unitary irradiation protocols, which sometimes leads to contradictions of the results obtained by different research groups.³⁵ Thereby, this review summarizes up-to-date knowledge in the area of cell exposure to THz radiation and poses important problems that hinder further developments in THz safety standards and in diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

2. THz-Wave--Tissue Interactions

Before proceeding to biological effects of THz waves, we should briefly overview some general principles of THz-wave–tissue interactions, which together with the rapid development of THz components and instruments⁶^,⁷ cause significant interest to different THz applications.²^,³⁴^,⁴⁶^,⁴⁷ The following remarkable features of these interactions attract special attention:

• THz radiation is nonionizing in nature due to quite low photon energy, as compared with the ionization energy, which leads to dissociation of atoms and molecules.
• THz radiation interacts with free charges, low-frequency molecular motions, and collective excitations of media. Energy of THz quanta corresponds to the energy of hydrogen bounds and Van der Waals intramolecular interactions.
• Solid state materials and molecular crystals might be characterized by unique “fingerptints” in the THz range, i.e., resonant spectral absorption peaks.
• THz radiation is strongly absorbed by polar molecules, such as water in liquid and gas states. On the one hand, this makes THz waves very sensitive to the content and state (free or bound) of water in the measured object, including different biological tissues. On the other hand, this limits the depth of THz-wave penetration in biological tissues by only hundred or even tens of microns, depending on the frequency and tissue type.
• THz waves penetrate into various nonhydrated dielectric materials, such as plastic, paper, cloths, and wood, especially at the sub-THz frequencies.
• Structural inhomogeneities of many objects, including different biological tissues, are small at the THz-wavelength scale. This reduces the Mie scattering effects, increases the THz-wave penetration depth in such objects as compared to the visible and IR waves, and allows one to apply the effective medium theory for analysis and description.

High water content is a general feature of all living organisms, which is of crucial importance for their interaction with THz waves. Indeed, water constitutes up to $≃ 60 %$ (by weight) of the adult human body; and its content is $≃ 73 %$ in tissue of the brain and heart, $≃ 83 %$ in the lungs, $≃ 64 %$ in the skin, $≃ 79 %$ in the muscle tissues and kidney, and $≃ 31 %$ in the bones. Blood constitutes 7% to 8% of the human body, which is as much as 4.5 to 6.0 l for adults. In Fig. 3, structure and effective optical properties of the skin are illustrated in form of the frequency-dependent refractive index $n$ , absorption coefficient $α$ (by field), and penetration depth $δ = 1 / α$ (by field). The given data are calculated based on the double-Debye model of the tissues dielectric response at THz frequencies, introduced in Ref. 48. As it is shown in Fig. 3(b), the penetration depth $δ$ decreases with increasing frequency $ν$ , whereas it is smaller than 0.3 mm in the considered spectral range.

Fig. 3

THz optical properties of the skin (epidermis). (a) Refractive index $n$ and absorption coefficient $α$ (by field), calculated from the double-Debye model described in Ref. 48. (b) THz-wave penetration depth $δ$ (by field). Inset in (b) shows a scheme of the skin, where (in most cases) only the epidermis is probed by the THz radiation. Courtesy of the authors.

The above-mentioned features of the THz waves open wide capabilities of their use in different branches of biology and medicine, which are discussed later with an emphasis on THz exposure effects.

2.1.

Dimensions of Tissue Components Versus the THz Wavelengths

Depending on the ratio between the dimensions of tissue structural elements $δ$ and the free-space electromagnetic wavelength $λ$ , one can expect distinct regimes of the electromagnetic wave–tissue interactions, which are governed by different physical regularities.⁴⁹ When the tissue components are small in the wavelength scale ( $δ ≪ λ$ ), the Rayleigh scattering regime takes place and tissues are assumed to be homogeneous. In such case, one can use the effective medium theory² for describing the electromagnetic-wave–tissue interactions, which is widely applied in the MMW range, that bounds the THz gap from its low-frequency side.⁵⁰ Otherwise, when the tissue structural elements have mesoscale dimensions ( $δ \sim λ$ ), or even appear to be large ( $δ ≫ λ$ ), the Mie scattering effects occur and the radiation transfer theory should be applied to describe the interactions. This theory is widely used in the ultraviolet, visible, and IR bands;⁵¹ the latter is adjacent to the THz range at its high-frequency side.

In Fig. 4, dimensions of the typical tissue structural elements, such as microfibrils, separate cells, and cell organelles,⁵² are compared with the characteristic free-space THz wavelength of $λ = 300 μ m$ ( $ν ≃ 1.0 THz$ ). Here, a vertical red solid line points out the $≃ λ / 2$ Abbe diffraction limit of spatial resolution of lens- or mirror-based optical systems. On the one side, the majority of the tissue structural components are much smaller as compared with the defined THz wavelength, which allows using the effective medium theory for describing the THz-wave interaction with tissues comprised of such components.² On the other side, numerous structural components of tissues are characterized by dimensions that are comparable to the THz wavelengths and, thus, become a source of the Mie scattering.

Fig. 4

Dimensions of the tissue structural elements at the THz-wavelength scale. Typical dimensions of the tissue structural elements $δ$ are normalized by the particular wavelength of $λ_{0} = 300 μ m$ ( $ν_{0} ≃ 1.0 THz$ ). Vertical solid red line defines the $λ / 2$ -Abbe diffraction limit. Courtesy of the authors.

Despite the effective medium theory is more usual in THz biophotonics,²^,³ an intermediate position of the THz waves between the IR waves (with their strong Mie scattering in tissues) and the MMW waves (almost insensitive to the tissue structural inhomogeneities) poses a challenging problem of selecting appropriate models of the THz-wave–tissue interactions.

2.2.

Effective Medium Theory in the THz Range

The effective medium theory assumes tissues to be homogeneous at the THz-wavelength scale and describes the THz-wave–tissue interactions using models of their effective dielectric response.²^,³ Such models define simultaneously frequency-dependent real $ε^{'}$ and imaginary $ε^{″}$ parts of a complex dielectric permittivity

Eq. (1)

\tilde{ε} = ε^{'} - i ε^{″},

or real

n^{'}

and imaginary

n^{″}

parts of a complex refractive index

Eq. (2)

\tilde{n} = n^{'} - i n^{″} \equiv n - i \frac{c}{2 π ν} α \equiv \sqrt{\tilde{ε}},

where

c ≃ 3 \times 10^{8} m / s

is the speed of light in free space, and

α

is an absorption coefficient (by field) in

{cm}^{- 1}

.

THz waves strongly interact with polar water molecules in liquid water (either free or bound), aqueous solutions, and tissue water.²^,³^,⁵³ Therefore, content and state of water play dominant roles in the formation of the THz dielectric response of hydrated tissues.²¹ Similarly to the THz dielectric response of liquid water, aqueous solutions, and biological liquids,²^,³ the THz-wave losses in tissues, which are defined by $ε^{″}$ or $α$ , possess no resonant features. In the THz range, complex dielectric permittivity of water and hydrated media is usually described by the relaxation models, among which the double-Debye model should be emphasised as the most widely applied in THz biophotonics⁴⁸^,⁵⁴^–⁶⁰

Eq. (3)

\tilde{ε} = ε_{\infty} + \frac{Δ ε_{1}}{1 + i ω τ_{1}} + \frac{Δ ε_{2}}{1 + i ω τ_{2}},

where

ω = 2 π ν

is a circular frequency,

τ_{1}

,

τ_{2}

and

Δ ε_{1}

,

Δ ε_{2}

are times and amplitudes of the “slow” and “fast” relaxations,

ε_{\infty}

is a constant dielectric permittivity at high frequencies [

ω ≫ {(2 π τ_{i})}^{- 1}

]. In Refs. 2 and 3, one can find parameters of the double-Debye model that are summarized for liquid water, as well as for different healthy and pathologically altered tissues ex vivo and in vivo.

In Figs. 5(a) and 5(b), real $ε^{'}$ and imaginary $ε^{″}$ parts of the complex dielectric permittivity are plotted for the liquid water and epidermis of the skin ex vivo based on the double-Debye model parameters from Ref. 48, respectively, for liquid water: $ε_{\infty} = 4.1$ , $Δ ε_{1} = 72.2$ , $Δ ε_{2} = 2.5$ , $τ_{1} = 10.6 ps$ , and $τ_{2} = 0.18 ps$ ; for epidermis: $ε_{\infty} = 3.0$ , $Δ ε_{1} = 56.4$ , $Δ ε_{2} = 0.6$ , $τ_{1} = 10.0 ps$ , and $τ_{2} = 0.2 ps$ . For both water and epidermis, $ε^{″}$ -curve is formed by the two broad absorption peaks, where one of them is attributed to the “slow” Debye relaxation $Δ ε_{1}$ and centered far below the THz range [at the inverse relaxation time ${(2 π τ_{1})}^{- 1}$ ], whereas another one represents the “fast” Debye relaxation $Δ ε_{2}$ and centered at the high-frequency edge of the THz range [at the frequency of ${(2 π τ_{2})}^{- 1}$ ]. In turn, $ε^{'}$ -curve decays with increasing frequency, with some pronounced changes near the inverse relaxation times ${(2 π τ_{1})}^{- 1}$ and ${(2 π τ_{2})}^{- 1}$ .

Fig. 5

Double-Debye models of the complex dielectric permittivity $\tilde{ε}$ for water and epidermis of the skin ex vivo reported in Ref. 48. Peach-colored area defines the spectral operation range of the THz-pulsed spectrometer that was used in Ref. 48 to measure the dielectric data. Courtesy of the authors.

In Eq. (3), for free bulk water, the “slow” Debye relaxation $Δ ε_{1}$ describes cooperative reorganization of water molecules connected by hydrogen bonds, whereas the “fast” Debye relaxation $Δ ε_{2}$ represents vibrational motions of water molecules that are free from hydrogen bounds.⁶¹ Hydration of biological molecules in aqueous solutions and tissue might lead to more complex dielectric response.⁶²^,⁶³ Electric charges of biological molecules create the electric field, which orients surrounding water molecules and leads to formation of hydrated water layers (shells) ⁶⁴ with their unique relaxation dynamics. Such hydration can either change the parameter of the double-Debye model⁶⁵ or lead to appearance of additional relaxation or quasiresonant terms in the dielectric permittivity model.⁶⁶ Furthermore, ionic conductivity and spectral fingerprints of hydrated ions might also contribute to the THz dielectric response of biological systems.⁶⁷^–⁶⁹ However, an in-depth review of modern research works in the area of the THz dielectric spectroscopy of pure bulk water, aqueous solutions of biomolecules, segregated water, and tissues is far beyond the scope of the present review, but it can be found in Refs. 2 and 21.

Despite the fact that the discussed double-Debye model is generally accepted in THz biophotonics, physically it is not rigorous. Indeed, on the one hand, it implies fitting of the experimental data by the two broad absorption bands, centered either beyond or at the edges of the THz range (see Fig. 5). In other words, when using the double-Debye model, one deals with something similar to the experimental data extrapolation. However, in the case of taking appropriate initial conditions during the fitting procedure, the double-Debye model yields very convenient parametrization of the spectral curves by only five independent parameters: $ε_{\infty}$ , $Δ ε_{1}$ , $Δ ε_{2}$ , $τ_{1}$ , and $τ_{2}$ . On the other hand, the Debye kernels in Eq. (3) do not fulfill the sum rule for the oscillator strength and, thus, predict infinite number of charge carriers/dipoles $N$ underlying the dielectric response of a medium:⁷⁰

Eq. (4)

N \propto \int_{0}^{\infty} ω ε^{″} d ω = finite .

To mitigate this drawback, the double-overdamped oscillator model was applied to describe the THz dielectric response of tissues in Ref. 15. As compared with the double-Debye model, a pair of the overdamped oscillators provides almost equal dielectric curves $ε^{'}$ and $ε^{″}$ in the analyzed THz range but predicts considerably lower losses $ε^{″}$ at high frequencies $ω ≫ {(2 π τ_{i})}^{- 1}$ and, thus, satisfies the sum rule. Other semiempirical relaxation models of a complex dielectric permittivity exist and are sometimes applied for fitting the THz data, including the Cole–Cole,⁷¹^,⁷² Davison–Cole,⁷³ or Havriliak–Negami ⁷⁴ models. They imply more parameters to take into account possible asymmetry of the discussed broad absorption peaks in the $ε^{″}$ -curves.

Moreover, the aforementioned models of the tissue complex dielectric permittivity in the THz range have quite qualitative character. In fact, earlier, the two broad absorption peaks, predicted by these models, were observed experimentally mostly for the liquid water and aqueous solutions;⁵³ at the same time, for biological tissues, they have not been observed experimentally yet involving broadband dielectric measurements, which is, probably, due to complexity of such experiment. Thus, these relaxation models are applied to describe the tissues response only intuitively. Moreover, structure, relaxation dynamics, and THz response of liquid water and, thus, water-containing biological systems can be more complex. Their dielectric permittivity model can comprise three or even more relaxation terms, each representing a particular fraction of free/bound or segregated water, with distinct electrodynamic characteristics, that can be predicted, for example, by numerical simulations using first principles.⁶⁶^,⁷⁵ Detailed overview of picosecond dynamics of water and water-containing media, as well as their THz dielectric response, deserves separate in-depth review, being out of the scope of this paper.

Nevertheless, information about a tissue complex dielectric permittivity (or a complex refractive index) helps to model the THz-wave–tissue interaction within the framework of classical electrodynamics, which is of crucial importance in THz spectroscopy and imaging of tissues aimed at medical diagnosis of different pathological processes. These data can be also useful in THz exposure of tissues since they provide an information about the penetration depth of THz waves into the tissues $δ = 1 / α$ or the volume of the exposed tissue $V ≃ π D^{2} δ / 4$ , where $D$ is the THz beam spot diameter.

2.3.

Fingerprints of the Mie Scattering in the THz Range

Despite the aforementioned effective medium theory is widely applied in THz biophotonics, a lot of biological objects and tissues possess structural inhomogeneities with the dimensions comparable to the THz wavelengths; see Fig. 4. For such objects, the Mie scattering effects should be taken into account.⁵¹

For example, in Refs. 3 and 76, considerable structural inhomogeneities of fibrous connective tissues of the breast were studied both experimentally, using the $0.15 λ$ -resolution THz solid immersion microscopy,⁷⁷ and theoretically, using analytical methods of the Mie scattering theory. THz optical properties of separate fat cells and their agglomerates were found to differ from that of the surrounding fibrous connective tissues of the human breast ex vivo. Such cells form sources of the Mie scattering at THz frequencies. The calculated parameters of such scatterers (i.e., their scattering phase function, differential and integral cross sections, and scattering anistoropy factor) considerably differ from those inherent to the Rayleigh scattering regime. In Refs. 17 and 29, THz solid immersion microscopy revealed structural heterogeneities of intact brain tissues and glioma model 101.8 from rats ex vivo, as well as heterogeneous character of decellularized bovine pericardium collagen matrices. Finally, in Refs. 78 79.–80, polarization-sensitive THz imaging provided useful information for the differentiation between healthy and pathologically altered tissues, which also indirectly justified the Mie-like character of the THz-wave scattering in tissues. Namely, in this imaging modality, one observes changes in polarization of the THz wave interacting with tissues, which could not be described in the framework of the above-mentioned effective medium theory. All these experimental findings stimulate further research and development of approaches for describing the THz-wave–tissue interactions that simultaneously account for the dispersion and absorption properties of tissue components, as well as geometry and organization of scatterers in tissues.

This approach could rely on the radiation transfer theory, applied for describing the electromagnetic-wave–tissue interactions in the ultraviolet, visible, and IR ranges.⁵¹ The basis of the radiation transfer theory is a radiation transfer equation,⁴⁹ which defines a radiance $I (r, \hat{s})$ at a point $r$ in the direction $\hat{s}$ :

Eq. (5)

\frac{\partial I (r, \hat{s})}{\partial s} = - μ_{t} I (r, \hat{s}) + μ_{s} \int_{4 π} I (r, {\hat{s}}^{'}) p (\hat{s}, {\hat{s}}^{'}) d Ω^{'} + I_{0} (r, \hat{s}),

where

μ_{s}

and

μ_{t}

are the scattering and total (power absorption

α_{p}

and scattering

μ_{s}

) coefficients in

{cm}^{- 1}

,

p (\hat{s}, {\hat{s}}^{'})

is the scattering phase function,

Ω^{'}

is the unit solid angle around

{\hat{s}}^{'}

, and

I_{0} (r, \hat{s})

is the radiance of internal sources. Scattering phase function accounts for the characteristic angular distribution of the Mie scattering, including anisotropy of the tissue scattering properties.

Studying the scattering effects in tissues seems to be important for the THz diagnosis, where they can either complicate differentiation of tissues or become a source of additional useful information. In THz exposure of tissues, scattering effects can play an important role due to the effects of electromagnetic field confinements at the shadow side of mesoscale dielectric obstacles that can considerably (by few orders of magnitude) enhance local irradiance of tissues by THz waves and, thus, increase efficiency of tissue exposure to THz waves.

3. Modern THz-Wave Emitters

Currently, tremendous efforts are still paid to boost the development of THz emitters. The THz spectral range and, particularly, the exposure technologies attract increasing interest owing to the appearance of solutions for THz-wave generation.⁶^,⁷ Such emitters working either in CW or pulsed mode allow generation of the output power ranging from the nanowatts to kilowatts. Here, we briefly overview the recent progress in this area with an emphasis on the practically important devices that are capable of solving modern research and engineering problems of tissue exposure to THz waves.

Despite a wide variety of existing THz-wave emitters with their rich diversity of operation principles and regimes, output frequencies, and powers, this review focuses only on widespread systems that went beyond the research work of a physical laboratory and, in our opinion, can be applied for studying biological effects of THz waves or even for therapeutic applications of THz technology. Thus, in Tables 1 and 2, we summarize only the typical technical characteristics of the discussed principles and devices. However, we should stress that unique THz systems developed for experiments in a physical laboratory can provide somewhat higher performance, i.e., broader spectral range, higher power, and wider tunability. In fact, in Tables 1 and 2, we deliberately underestimate the spectral operation ranges of some THz emitters. We consider only those parts of the spectral operation ranges, where THz emitters provide reliable output power, and neglect, at the same time, much less-intense side lobes and tails of the emitted THz spectra.

Table 1

Typical CW THz emitters.

Source and principle	Frequency	Output power	Tunable bandwidth	Conversion efficiency	Operation temp.	Refs.
Interaction between electron beam and back-traveling electromagnetic wave	$< 1.0 THz$	mW to kW	++	$< 10^{- 2}$	293 K	82 83.84.85.–86
DFG and PG
Nonlinear optical process by frequency difference of two optical beams or two stimulated photons in a nonlinear crystal	$< 5.0 THz$	mW to kW	++++	$< 10^{- 3}$	293 K	6,88 89.90.91.92.93.94.95.–96
OPGL
Rotational transitions between vibrational modes in optically pumped molecular gases	$< 8.0 THz$	$μ W$	++	$< 10^{- 2}$	293 K	97 98.99.100.101.–102
Diode-based frequency multiplier
Frequency multiplication of diode-based microwave sources with nonlinear media	$< 2.5 THz$	$μ W$	+++	$< 0.4$	< 293 K	103 104.105.106.107.108.–109
Photomixing
Photocurrent oscillation in photomixer by frequency difference of two optical beams	$< 4.0 THz$	$μ W$ to mW	++++	$\sim 10^{- 6}$ to $10^{- 3}$	293 K	110 111.112.113.–114
Quantum cascade laser
Electrons cascading in intersubband transitions with quantum well semiconductor heterostructures	1.0 to 6.0 THz	mW to W	++++	$< 0.3$	$< 200 K$	115 116.117.118.119.120.–121
Gyrotron
Coherent bremsstrahlung radiation between the gyrating beam electrons and electromagnetic wave	$< 1.5 THz$	W to kW	++	$10^{- 3}$ to $10^{- 1}$	293 K	151 152.153.154.155.156.157.158.159.–160

Table 2

Typical pulsed THz emitters.

Source and principle	Frequency	Average power	Conversion efficiency	Operation temp.	Refs.
Generation in PCA
Acceleration and decay of free charge carriers in biased semiconductor gap pumped with ultrafast laser pulse	$< 3.0 THz$	$μ W - mW$	$\sim 10^{- 6} - 10^{- 2}$	293 K	122 123.–124,126,130 131.–132
OR
Time varying nonlinear polarization in nonlinear crystal pumped with ultrafast laser pulse	$< 7.0 THz$	$μ W - mW$	$\sim 10^{- 7} - 10^{- 2}$	293 K	136 137.138.139.140.141.142.143.144.145.146.147.148.149.–150
Gyrotron
Coherent bremsstrahlung radiation between the gyrating beam electrons and electromagnetic wave	$< 1.5 THz$	kW–MW	$< 0.6$	293 K	161 162.163.–164

3.1.

CW or Quasi-CW THz Sources

3.1.1.

Backward wave oscillator

In terms of the CW sources, backward wave oscillator (BWO)⁸¹ is one of the well-known methods to generate intense THz radiation. Nanosecond pulse with a maximum output power in kW level is also achievable by this method.⁸² In BWO, the THz radiation is generated based on the interaction between an electron beam and an electromagnetic wave traveling in the opposite direction. An electron beam is emitted from a heated cathode and collimated by magnetic field. A modulation device, such as metal grating or corrugated rectangular waveguide, is carefully arranged to modulate the electron beam and give rise to a surface electromagnetic wave. The frequency of the electromagnetic wave could be tuned by adjusting the velocity of electron beam, thus, obtaining the THz radiation.⁸³ Mineo et al. demonstrated a BWO featuring a 20% tuning bandwidth at the central frequency of 1.0 THz with the output power of $\sim 100 mW$ .⁸⁴ In 2015, a plasma wave-assisted BWO was employed to radiate THz waves in the range of 186 to 202 GHz with the maximum power of 20 W by adopting a pseudospark-sourced electron beam.⁸⁵ Recently, oversized BWOs operated in the frequency ranges of 260 to 340 GHz and 310 to 390 GHz were studied theoretically and experimentally. Two BWO types were designed and tested, and the detected peak power of a few hundred of mW was obtained by adopting the optimal structures.⁸⁶

BWOs are capable of operation in a pure CW regime⁸¹ with the monochromatic spectral output, quite wide spectral tunability, the spectral line-width of down to $\sim 10^{- 5} ν$ , and the average output power of $\sim 10^{- 1}$ to $10^{- 4} W$ . Note that the output power decreases with increasing operation frequency $ν$ . Such CW BWOs are widely applied in the THz dielectric measurements.⁸¹

3.1.2.

Difference frequency generation and parametric generation

The principles of difference frequency generation (DFG) and parametric generation (PG) are all based on nonlinear optical process.⁶

For DFG, two optical beams featuring narrow bandwidth and slightly different frequencies colinearly propagate into a nonlinear crystal, leading to a THz radiation generated by the second-order nonlinear polarization at the difference frequency of the two optical beams.⁸⁷ So far, various nonlinear crystals, for example, GaSe⁸⁸ and GaP,⁸⁹ were utilized to generate radiation up to 5.0 THz based on DFG. The output THz power of DFG was also improved from the mW to kW level. In 2014, by stacking four GaP plates reversely, the highest output power of 2.73 kW was achieved at around 2.7 THz and the conversion efficiency was demonstrated to be $\sim 10^{- 3}$ . It was also proved that the reversed GaP plates demonstrate stronger photon conversion than aligned GaP plates.⁹⁰

For PG, only one optical pump beam is used to stimulate two photons, one is commonly named as “idler,” whereas another is the THz one.⁹¹ The THz wave could obtain dramatic amplification when a phase-matching condition is satisfied. The tuning of the THz frequency is continuously achievable by controlling the relative angle between the idler and pump beam.⁹²^,⁹³ Kawase et al. developed a widely tunable THz wave parametric generator in the range of 0.7 to 2.4 THz using injection seeding. The maximum peak output THz power exceeded 200 mW.⁹⁴ The performance of injection-seeding-based parametric generator was further improved through utilizing the laser light scattering from a nonlinear crystal by the same group. It helped to achieve the THz radiation in the range between 0.7 and 3.0 THz and improve the maximum output power from the mW to kW level.⁹¹ Afterward, the maximum output power was increased to $≃ 50 kW$ by Minamide et al.⁹⁵ and Hayashi et al.,⁹⁶ respectively, with or without using the microchip laser.

3.1.3.

Optically pumped gas laser

Optically pumped gas laser (OPGL) features the capability of generating THz waves with narrow linewidth.⁶ The basic principle of OPGL is based on population inversion in the gas molecules. This population inversion occurs when the gas molecules, possessing lower vibrational mode, are optically pumped. Since the gas molecules feature permanent dipole moments, the induced rotational transitions between high and low vibrational modes can be directly coupled to electromagnetic radiation, thus, generating THz wave.⁹⁷

Various molecular gases have been demonstrated for generating THz wave in the range of 0.1 to 8 THz, such as ${CH}_{3} F$ , ${CH}_{3} OH$ , ${NH}_{3}$ , and ${CH}_{2} F_{2}$ .⁹⁸^,⁹⁹ Recently, Chevalier et al. proposed a research on widely tunable THz gas laser, in which over 37 laser lines were observed from 0.25 to 0.96 THz using optically pumped nitrous oxide ( $N_{2} O$ ) laser. The possibility of achieving electromagnetic waves with frequencies above 1.0 THz with a mW-level output power based on QCL pumped gas laser was predicted by theoretical analysis.¹⁰⁰ Wienold et al.¹⁰¹ presented a gas laser based on QCL pumped ${}^{15}{NH}_{3}$ molecules; several laser lines with the output power of up to $30 μ W$ were obtained around 4.5 THz by exploiting the molecular symmetry and employing an alternative resonator. Liu et al.¹⁰² proposed a tunable optically pumped ${CH}_{3} F$ gas laser with a germanium ealton serving as spectrum splitter, four THz laser lines corresponding to a conversion efficiency of $\sim 10^{- 3}$ were observed in the range of 0.5 to 1.7 THz by tuning the incident angles and pump wavelengths.

3.1.4.

Diode-based frequency multiplier

Diode-based frequency multiplier is a solid-state THz source, which implements microwave multiplication from IMPATT (IMPact ionization Avalanche Transit-Time), Gunn, tunnel, and other diodes. By making appropriate operations, the negative resistance devices could be built based on the aforementioned diodes. A resonator coupled with the negative resistance devices is used to generate an AC signal intended for CW microwave radiation. In this process, the zero-attenuation oscillator is a crucial element for the microwave radiation, which is obtained through adjusting the magnitude of the negative resistance devices. Consequently, the THz wave can be received after the microwave passing through a series of frequency multiplier chains, where the Schottky diodes are commonly used as a nonlinear media for harmonic generation of microwave.⁶

The diode-based THz sources are usually compact and operate at room temperatures, which is convenient for practical application. The average output power reaches the mW level and can be improved by cooling. For example, in 2002, Maiwald et al.¹⁰³ demonstrated a peak output power of $120 μ W$ (at 1.178 THz) at room temperatures and an improved peak output power of $190 μ W$ (at 1.183 THz) by cooling down to 113 K. Most of the reported multipliers feature the output power of 1 to $200 μ W$ at the frequencies of $< 2.5 THz$ .¹⁰⁴^–¹⁰⁹

3.1.5.

Photomixing

Photomixing, also known as optical heterodyne generation, is one of the solid-state CW THz generation technique, capable of making narrow band signals with exceptional tunability.¹¹⁰ Two CW laser beams with identical polarization and slightly different frequencies are utilized to generate a THz beat, which illuminates a photomixer, resulting in a modulated photocurrent. The induced photocurrent oscillations adjusted by tuning the frequency difference between the applied lasers determine the desired parameters of THz radiation.¹¹¹ The main well-known disadvantage of this technique is the relatively low output power due to the requirement of CW optical excitation and shortage of semiconductor materials with high thermal conductivities.

Low-temperature-grown GaAs has been employed as the photomixer material in the last few years to generate THz radiation with the frequencies up to 3.0 THz.¹¹² The typical optical-to-THz conversion efficiency for the photomixing method is $\sim 10^{- 6}$ to $10^{- 5}$ , which limits the output power in the order of mWs.¹¹³ Despite tremendous efforts have been put in the enhancement of photomixer performance, the output CW power is still limited by the mW level. Recently, Ironside et al.¹¹⁴ proposed a metamaterial-enhanced photomixer by employing a metal–semiconductor–metal cavity; such photomixer is characterized by the conversion efficiency of $\sim 10^{- 3}$ and is capable of generating THz radiation in the mW range.

3.1.6.

Quantum cascade laser

Quantum ascade laser (QCL) is undisputedly the only solid-state source that can generate THz radiation above 1.0 THz with an average output power at W level.¹¹⁵ The QCL realization is generally based on electrons cascading in intersubband transitions. Driven by electric field, the electrons are injected through a semiconductor heterostructure possessing multiple quantum wells, during which the electrons transit from a state with higher valence band energy to a lower state, thus, generating radiative emission. The efficient laser emission can be obtained, when a large population inversion condition is satisfied.⁶ The QCL tunability is mainly based on the structure of the semiconductor that offers superior bandwidth as compared with the diode-based sources.

To date, the high-power QCLs, operating in the frequency range of 1.0 to 6.0 THz, were demonstrated, with a few-W output power in pulsed mode and up to hundreds of mW in CW.¹¹⁵^–¹¹⁷ In Ref. 118, Li et al. proposed a surface-plasmon waveguide embedded with an active region featuring a bound-to-continuum transition, based on which a THz QCL with the peak-pulsed output power of $> 1 W$ from the single facet at 3.4 THz was demonstrated. Williams et al.¹¹⁹ proposed CW QCL, with the power of 138 mW and the frequency of 4.4 THz, that employs a semiinsulating surface-plasmon waveguide and a resonant-phonon depopulation scheme. With 10 years of development, Wang et al.¹²⁰ significantly improved the CW QCL output power to 230 mW by adopting a hybrid bound-to-continuum transition and resonant phonon extraction. One of the main challenges for QCL technology is the operation at room temperatures since the output power of QCLs decreases drastically as the temperature increases. The highest-reported operation temperature for QCLs without magnetic field assistance is close to 200 and 130 K for the pulsed and CW modes, correspondingly.¹²¹

3.2.

Pulsed THz Sources

3.2.1.

Photoconductive antennas

The initial exploration of pulsed broadband THz wave generation using photoconductive antenna (PCA) could be traced back to 1970s to 1980s.¹²²^–¹²⁵ The PCA generation principle is based on the free charge carries (electron and hole) excited in a biased semiconductor gap with femtosecond laser pulses.¹²⁶^–¹²⁸ These free charge carries are accelerated by the applied static or alternating electric field that gives rise to a transient photocurrent. Simultaneously, the density of charge carries goes down due to the their trapping and recombination. The pulsed THz radiation is generated during the acceleration and trapping of these free charge carries. The decay time of the charge carries, which influence the duration and spectral bandwidth of thus generated THz pulse, is defined by the lifetime and mobility of carriers in a photoconductor. Therefore, photoconductors with shorter carrier lifetime are preferred to generate THz pulses with a broader frequency-domain bandwidth.¹²⁶^,¹²⁹

To date, tremendous studies have been done to improve the performance of PCAs. Berry et al.¹³⁰ demonstrated a plasmonic photoconductive THz source with enhanced output power by employing two-dimensional plasmonic contact electrodes. An average output power of $≃ 0.25 mW$ , which is 20 times higher than conventional PCAs, was achieved in the frequency range of up to 1.5 THz. In Ref. 131, Yang et al. reported a photoconductive emitter with the optical-to-THz power conversion efficiency as high as 7.5% using three-dimensional (3D) plasmonic contact electrodes. A broadband THz wave in the 0.1 to 2.0 THz range with the output power higher than 0.1 mW was experimentally observed at a 1.4-mW optical pump. Thereby, as compared with conventional PCA-based THz sources, the above-mentioned hybrid PCAs offer higher optical-to-THz conversion efficiency.¹³⁰^,¹³²^–¹³⁵

3.2.2.

Optical rectification

Optical rectification (OR) is one of the most commonly used methods to generate pulsed THz radiation, which is based on second-order nonlinear optical effect. In the OR process, an ultrafast optical pulse is normally employed to illuminate a nonlinear optical crystal. The pulsed THz radiation is then generated by the time-varying nonlinear polarization.¹³⁶ The bandwidth of the pulsed THz wave is roughly inversely proportional to the duration of the ultrafast optical pulse. The intensity of generated THz wave can be optimized by aligning the polarization of the incident optical beam.⁶

Schneider et al.¹³⁷ and Venkatesh et al.¹³⁸ demonstrated broadband THz radiations in the ranges of 0.4 to 6.7 THz and 0.1 to 3.0 THz, respectively, using a nonlinear organic salt. A near single-cycle THz pulses with the average power of $100 μ W$ were demonstrated by the lithium niobite crystal ( ${LiNbO}_{3}$ ) pumping with femtosecond optical laser pulses. The maximum energy of up to $10 μ J$ was detected at the frequency of 0.5 THz, which corresponds to the optical-to-THz energy conversion efficiency of $\sim 6 \times 10^{- 4}$ .¹³⁹ The maximum energy of pulsed THz wave radiated from ${LiNbO}_{3}$ crystal was improved to $180 μ J$ by Jang et al.¹⁴⁰ The highest average THz power of about 66 mW in the 0.1 to 4.0 THz range has been obtained with a few-cycle ultrafast laser-driven THz source by Meyer et al.¹⁴¹ through optimizing pump spot size and pump pulse duration. Both studies achieved a conversion efficiency on the order of $\sim 10^{- 4}$ . In Refs. 142 and 143, by satisfying the phase-matching condition, the conversion efficiency was dramatically improved to $\sim 10^{- 2}$ , pulsed THz generation with the pulse energies of 20 and $270 μ J$ and the frequency ranges of 0.1 to 5.0 THz and 0.1 to 6.0 THz was demonstrated.

In Ref. 144, Tripathi et al. demonstrated high-power THz-wave generation via OR of femtosecond pulses in 4-dimethylamino-N-methyl-4-stilbazolium tosylate crystal using a fiber-based laser pump, which paths the way for creating ergonomic high-power THz emitters. In Refs. 145 146.147.–148, THz-wave generation was demonstrated in $≃ 0.1$ to 10.0 THz range, using OR of near-IR femtosecond laser pulses (a Cr:forsterite laser system with a TW peak power) in a nonlinear organic crystal, with the output pulse duration and energy of $≃ 0.5$ to 0.7 ps and $< 75 μ J$ , respectively. An experimental system for studying the THz-wave biological effects was developed relying on these unique THz setups.¹⁴⁹^,¹⁵⁰

3.3.

THz Gyrotrons

Gyrotron is one of the most powerful THz-wave sources in both CW and pulsed mode. Therefore, it is increasingly contributing to many application fields, such as nuclear magnetic resonance with signal enhancement using dynamic nuclear polarization, electron cyclotron resonance heating of fusion plasma, electron spin resonance spectroscopy, and x-ray detected magnetic resonance.¹⁵¹^,¹⁵²

The operation principle of gyrotron is based on the electron cyclotron resonance maser instability. The azimuthal and axial bunching of the helically moving beam electrons occurs due to the electromagnetic field stimulation, resulting in a proper synchronism between the electron beam and the electromagnetic wave excited in the resonant cavity, during which the transverse energy of the gyrating beam electrons can be transferred via coherent bremsstrahlung radiation for enhancing the excited electromagnetic wave.¹⁵³ Due to the above principle, gyrotron generally operates at a fixed frequency close to the resonance frequency, and there are two ways that are commonly adopted for the frequency tunability in gyrotrons: tuning the magnetic field intensity or harmonic number of the cyclotron resonance. Nowadays, the highest frequency that can be achieved with the gyrotrons has already exceeded 1.0 THz for both CW and pulsed mode.

A CW gyrotron that is based on a 20-T superconducting pulsed magnet achieved for the first time a breakthrough of 1.0 THz.¹⁵⁴ Its operation frequency and the output power were as high as 1.08 THz and $\sim 100$ to 200 W, respectively. Nevertheless, majority of the reported CW gyrotrons possess an output power at W-level and sub-THz operation frequencies,¹⁵⁵^–¹⁵⁷ whereas a few can obtain kW-level output power. For example, in Ref. 158, a continuously tunable CW gyrotron with the maximum output power of $\sim 400 W$ was demonstrated at the vicinity of $\sim 0.395 THz$ , with the corresponding maximum energy conversion efficiency of 4.3%. Another CW gyrotron, which was developed for the high frequency material processing, features the output power and operation frequency of $\sim 2 kW$ and 0.3 THz, respectively, operates in the magnetic field of up to 12 T, and provides the maximum power efficiency of $\sim 15 %$ .¹⁵⁹^,¹⁶⁰

For pulsed gyrotrons, the output power is even higher, which is generally at the level of kW and up to MW.¹⁵²^,¹⁵⁶^,¹⁶¹ For example, the MW-level gyrotrons with the output frequencies of 110 and 170 GHz were developed based on the depressed collector and the low-loss synthetic diamond window for efficiency improvement and high power Gaussian beam output.¹⁶² For these systems, the maximum efficiency of $\sim 57 %$ was obtained at a 1.1-MW short pulse operation. The generation frequency of the pulsed gyrotron was significantly increased over 1.0 THz by the research group from IAP RAS through the use of intense magnetic fields. In Ref. 163, the radiation power and energy of $\sim 1.5 kW$ and 75 mJ, respectively, in a single shot regime were observed at the frequency of 1.022 THz with the magnetic field of $\sim 38.5 T$ . Afterward, a pulsed gyrotron was reported to operate at even higher frequency in the fundamental cyclotron resonance with a magnetic field strength of $\sim 50 T$ .¹⁶⁴ The highest generation frequency of 1.3 THz was achieved, whereas the average output power was $\sim 0.5 kW$ .

4. Terahertz Exposure of Biological Objects with Different Levels of Organization

Rapid progress in THz technology, together with appearance of effective THz optoelectronic components and THz-wave generation principles, forces a translation of the THz technology into everyday practice, as well as increase an effect of THz radiation on humans. This rises the questions about the safety limits of biological systems’ exposure to THz waves. Defining the permissible exposure doses is impossible without a knowledge of the mechanisms of the THz-radiation–biological objects interactions during the THz exposure.³⁷ Two distinct mechanisms of such interactions are usually distinguished.

4.1.

Thermal Mechanism of THz Exposure

In the thermal mechanism, THz radiation causes heating of the irradiated object due to the strong THz-wave absorption by water.³⁴^,⁴¹^,¹⁶⁵^,¹⁶⁶ Such mechanism is predominantly observed when using CW THz emitters. Mathematical modeling of THz-radiation interactions with different biological tissues¹⁶⁷^,¹⁶⁸ shows that even quite low duration of THz exposure (such as few milliseconds) can cause notable increase in the tissue temperature.¹⁶⁸^,¹⁶⁹ An increase in the cornea temperature of up to 70°C was shown when it was exposed to a CW 1.0 THz radiation with the irradiance of $0.6 W / {cm}^{2}$ ; see Fig. 6. At the same time, experiments on THz exposure effects are often performed under thermostatically controlled conditions at physiological temperatures of $≃ 37 ° C$ , which prevents general heating of an exposed object.⁴²^,¹⁷⁰^–¹⁷²

Fig. 6

Simulated time-dependent evolution of the temperature distributions in cornea heated by the THz beam with the radius of 3 mm and the irradiance of $0.6 W / {cm}^{2}$ , for the exposure times of (a) 10, (b) 30, (c) 60, (d) 180, (e) 300, and (f) 1200 s. Adapted from Ref. 169 with the permission of MDPI.

Several research groups reported the presence of microthermal effects of THz exposure that are difficult to detect during the experiments.³⁴^,¹⁷³ However, significance of such effects still remains unexplored. The THz radiation is not perceived by the living systems as a thermal agent. This can be illustrated by special biological tests, such as studying the expression of genes associated with heat shock proteins. Their expression increases while the temperature rises by only several degrees from its optimal value. For example, the expression increases considerably at 41°C for humans.³⁴^,¹⁷¹

4.2.

Nonthermal Mechanism of THz Exposure

To explain the nonthermal effects of THz exposure, theories of the Fröhlich long-range coherent oscillations,¹⁷⁴ the Davydov molecular solitons,¹⁷⁵ and the coherent acoustoelectric waves¹⁷⁶ are commonly applied. Namely, Fröhlich postulated the presence of collective oscillations of electric dipoles in biological macromolecules and membranes,¹⁷³^,¹⁷⁷ which can interact with low-energy quanta, including that from the THz range. These dipole coherent oscillations are due to the nonlinear interaction between modes, as well as to the energy flow into the lowest-frequency mode. Cell metabolism serves as a source of energy, whereas the nonlinearity is caused by a strong static electric field on the cell membranes.¹⁷⁸ Modern experimental data provide confirmation of this hypothesis. For example, consider the first experimental observation of the Fröhlich condensation in a protein structure, reported few years ago in Ref. 179. Theoretical studies are carried out aimed at describing the Fröhlich condensates.¹⁸⁰^–¹⁸² This effect was analyzed in the semiclassical ¹⁸¹ and quantum frameworks,¹⁸² whereas the full-quantum statistical theory relies on the nonequilibrium Fröhlich condensate motion equations.

The theoretical calculations revealed that, under certain conditions, a resonant (linear or nonlinear) interaction between the THz wave and DNA is possible.¹⁸³^,¹⁸⁴ Such an interaction significantly changes the molecular dynamics and leads to the local breaks of hydrogen bonds in DNA chains, which induces changes in gene expression. Based on a simple nonlinear model of DNA dynamics, it was demonstrated that THz radiation can influence both the vibrational excitations and proton motion in DNA hydrogen bonds. When the radiation frequency matches the vibrational mode, localized excitations in the form of dissipative solitons are generated.¹⁸⁵ The low-amplitude collective breathing of the DNA modes can serve as precursors of generation of the transcription bubbles and other large-scale conformation changes.

Resonant interactions can be observed when using high-power pulsed THz sources.⁴³^,¹⁸⁶^,¹⁸⁷ Indeed, while the average power of picosecond THz pulses is usually quite low (on the order of $μ W$ or mW), their peak powers can be as high as 1 to 30 GW.¹⁴⁵^,¹⁴⁶^,¹⁸⁸ Such powerful THz waves can pass the cytoplasmic and nuclear membranes.⁴⁵^,¹⁸⁹

Nonthermal effects of THz waves can occur for other structural components of living cell, such as proteins¹⁷⁹ and membranes.¹⁶⁵ An important role in THz-radiation–biological system interactions is played by water molecules, which are associated with biomolecules and impact their long-range interactions, collective vibrations, and transitions. Since THz radiation is strongly absorbed by water, the latter is involved into interaction with rapidly alternating electromagnetic fields.³²^,¹⁹⁰ Molecular dynamics simulations revealed an enhanced permutation (by $≃ 1$ order of magnitude) of confined water molecules across a water membrane channel, which is caused by a 1.39-THz radiation with a limited thermal effect; see Fig. 7. The underlying mechanism is due to a combination of the strength matching and frequency resonance between a relatively weak stimulus and the hydrogen bond network of confined water, rather than the bulk water outside. Such combination causes an anomalously structural phase transition of only the confined water while efficiently limiting the thermal effect of bulk water.¹⁹¹

Fig. 7

Numerical data on transition to a superpermeation phase of confined water across a one-dimensional (1D) water channel, that is, nonthermally modulated by THz radiation. (a) Water permeation is strongly and nonlinearly modulated by a 1.39-THz radiation (red squares), but weakly and linearly affected by temperature (blue squares). Inset shows a scheme of the simulated system, where red and gray balls indicate the oxygen and hydrogen atoms, respectively, whereas cyan tube stands for the 1D water channel, and two cyan sheets denote the supporting membrane. (b) Dependence of the permeation transition on the THz-wave frequency. The electric field strength of $2.0 V / nm$ is applied, corresponding to the region of the high plateau, at which the superpermeation phase occurs under the action of a 1.39-THz radiation. Adapted from Ref. 191 with the permission of the American Chemical Society.

4.3.

Dosimetry in the THz Range

Currently, no comprehensive safety standards exist that consider both thermal and nonthermal THz-wave effects and regulate applications of the 0.1 to 10.0 THz radiation for general population and occupational exposure.³⁷ On the one hand, exposure to radiation with the frequencies of $< 0.3 THz$ is governed by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP).⁴⁰ It considers the frequency range of 100 KHz to 300 GHz and was updated in 2020.¹⁹² On the other hand, exposure to radiation with the frequencies of $> 0.3 THz$ is regulated by the ICNIRP standard 2013.¹⁹³ This standard defines exposure to laser radiation with the 180 nm to 1 mm wavelengths, and it is based on the proven thermal effects. However, there is a significant discrepancy between these two guidelines, namely, the $> 0.3 THz$ standard allows for the 20 to 100 times higher exposure intensity, as compared with the $< 0.3 THz$ one.

For the exposure duration of $> 10 s$ and the frequencies $> 0.3 THz$ , the maximum power density is limited by $1 kW / m^{2}$ . Whereas for the frequencies $< 0.3 THz$ , the general public exposure limit is two orders of magnitude lower, i.e., $10 m^{2}$ . Such a discrepancy between the two standards is due to different rules of the exposure threshold selection. The first standard¹⁹² defines the safety limits based on the increase in the body core temperature by only 1°C, i.e., from 37°C to 38°C. Such a small deviation of the body temperature can not cause any considerable hazard to an organism. In turn, the second standard¹⁹³ is based on the 45°C temperature threshold of the skin injury. At the same time, both standards do not account the nonthermal effects of the THz waves.¹⁹⁴ Meanwhile, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) classified radiofrequency radiation in the 30 kHz to 300 GHz range as a human carcinogen, group 1.¹⁹⁵

From a health risk perspective, ICNIRP are generally interested in the fraction of electromagnetic-wave power, which is absorbed by biological tissues and leads to their heating. This is typically described as a function of a relevant dosimetric quantity.⁴⁰^,¹⁹² For the frequencies $< 6 GHz$ , where electromagnetic waves penetrate deeper into tissue, specific energy absorption rate (SAR) in W/kg is introduced denoting the radiation power absorbed by unit mass. Oppositely, in the 6 to 300 GHz range, electromagnetic waves are strongly absorbed by tissue water and, thus, penetrate only the superficial tissues. Therefore, tissue irradiance in ${W / m}^{2}$ (i.e., incident power density per unit area of tissue surface) is used to define the exposure conditions. Considering these two dosimetric quantities, basic limitations of biological object’s exposure to electromagnetic waves¹⁹² are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3

Basic restrictions for the tissue exposure to the electromagnetic waves.

Exposure scenario	Frequency, GHz	Exposure time, min	Whole-body average specific absorption rate, W/kg	Irradiance, W/m2
Occupational	6–300	$\geq 6$	0.4	100
Occupational	2–300	30	Not applicable	50
General public	6–300	$\geq 6$	0.08	20
General public	2–300	30	Not applicable	10

In Ref. 196, different energy quantities that measure safety guidelines to protect humans from thermal effects of the MMW and sub-MMW exposure were analyzed. The power density inside tissues correlates with the surface temperature elevations. Since different tissues possess distinct effective dielectric response in the THz range, their complex dielectric permittivity [Eq. (1)] or complex refractive index [Eq. (2)] should be taken into account during estimations of SAR. Methods for the SAR analysis at THz frequencies were developed by several research groups.⁴²^,¹⁹⁷^,¹⁹⁸ In Ref. 199, simulations of a 0.45-THz-wave absorption by the skin revealed that the electromagnetic-wave energy is mostly absorbed in the upper stratum spinosum, whereas the maximal temperature rise is observed in the lower stratum spinosum. The authors showed that the skin temperature can rise beyond the skin injury threshold of 45°C, when the skin is already under the initial heat stress or when a number of radiation sources are applied simultaneously, each within the ICNIRP guidelines.

For obtaining the reproducible THz-wave effects and adequate dosimetry, the following important conditions should be satisfied during experiments:

1. Technical parameter of the THz emitter (see Fig. 8), conditions and geometry of the THz exposure should be known a priori.
2. Cuvette for the THz exposure experiments should be transparent in the THz range.
3. Optical properties $n$ and $α$ of an exposed object should be known a priori.
4. THz exposure of an object should be performed in a suitable environment. For example, undisturbed cell growth requires the temperature of $≃ 37 ° C$ , certain humidity, and $≃ 5 %$ CO content in an ambient atmosphere. Thus, the exposure of cells is performed in an incubator.
5. Adequate controls must be used during the THz exposure:³¹
- • Sham control: reference cells are handled near the exposed ones, but they are not irradiated by THz waves.
- • Temperature control: THz exposure is carried out at the temperatures above the expected thermal heating, for example, 45°C.
- • Positive control: specific agents/substances are applied to activate some function of cells that can be affected by THz waves.
- • Negative control: specific agents/substances are applied to inhibit some function of cells that can be affected by THz waves.
- • Blind control: analysis of the THz exposure effects is performed by a researcher who has no information on what samples were exposed to THz waves and what were used as control group.

Fig. 8

Important technical factors for the experimental studies on THz irradiation. Courtesy of the authors.

All studies of the nonthermal THz-wave effects can be divided into two main categories:

• First one uses low-power THz-wave emitters, which either lead to a small increase in the sample temperature ( $\leq 1 ° C$ ) or do not cause any temperature alterations at all. The results of such THz exposure experiments are compared with control samples that are not irradiated by THz waves but are in the equal ambient conditions with the same temperature background.
• Second one uses powerful THz-wave emitters, which leads to a pronounced heating of a sample and often induces its thermal stress. In such experiments, an exposed sample is compared with the control one, which is heated to the temperature observed for the exposed sample.

When overviewing consistently different THz exposure experiments below, we consider both the temperature conditions of the experiments and the results of heat shock testing only for those experiments, which belong to the second category.

An important point in studying the biological effects of THz waves concerns selection and sustaining the time intervals between the beginning/end of the THz exposure and the analysis. Response of a living organism to any external factor, including the THz radiation, is developed in several stages, including a compensatory stage. The complexity of these stages in each specific case is still impossible to trace since any radiation-induced processes can begin later or finish earlier than some particular features are analyzed. Therefore, such parameter as the time intervals between the beginning/end of the THz exposure and analysis varied to a large extent in different studies. They can range from several minutes to several days or (in some cases) can be not indicated at all. While surveying the research results below, the experiment metrology and these time intervals are not considered comprehensively.

4.4.

Effects of THz Radiation on the Structural Components of Cells

Considerable amount of data have been accumulated on the THz dielectric spectra of molecular components of cells, such as amino acids,²⁰⁰^,²⁰¹ proteins,²⁰²^–²⁰⁴ nucleic bases,²⁰⁵^,²⁰⁶ and acids,²⁰⁷ as well as sugars.³²^,⁶⁶ At the same time, very limited knowledge about the nonthermal THz-wave effects on such important molecular components of a living cell exist nowadays.

The effect of CW THz radiation on the fluorescence of the tryptophan (Trp) amino acid and proteins was studied in Ref. 208. A remarkable feature of these experiments is a combination of the THz exposure and the fluorescence spectroscopy in a unitary experimental setup. Such favorable combination allows for observing the THz exposure effects either in situ or immediately after the exposure. The experimental setup and related fluorescence spectra are shown in Fig. 9. During the THz exposure, changes in the sample temperature were monitored using a microbolometric camera²⁰⁹^,²¹⁰ and a thermocouple. A 90-s-long exposure of the Trp sample to the CW 2.55 THz radiation, with the irradiance of $11.7 W / {cm}^{2}$ , caused a decrease in the fluorescence signal by $≃ 54 %$ .²⁰⁸ This drop of the fluorescence signal depends linearly on the THz-radiation intensity, and it closely follows the changes in the sample absorptivity. This points out at the resonant character of the THz-wave–Trp interaction.²⁰⁸ For the whey proteins, similar THz exposure leads to the drop of the fluorescence signal by $≃ 10 %$ and $≃ 0.26 %$ at the frequencies of 0.2 and 2.55 THz, correspondingly. This exposure simultaneously leads to an increase in the sample temperature by $≃ 1 ° C$ . The control experiments with a simple sample heating confirmed that the observed THz-wave-induced changes are nonthermal in nature, as well as that such nonthermal effects dominate at the lower THz frequencies.

Fig. 9

(a) Schematic of the experimental setup. The UV beam at 270 nm was isolated from the broadband light generated by a xenon-UV-enhanced arc lamp to excite a sample. A tunable far-IR gas laser produced CW THz radiation. CW UV and CW THz radiations were combined using a parabolic mirror with a hole that allowed UV radiation to pass through it. The fluorescence signal emitted by a sample was isolated using an interference filter, with the central wavelength of 320 nm and the bandwidth of 10 nm, and, then, collected by a lens and detected by a photomultiplier tube. (b) Fluorescence spectra of Trp pellet sample, either with or without the THz exposure. The frequency of CW THz radiation was 2.55 THz, whereas the THz irradiance was 3.0 and $11.7 W / {cm}^{2}$ . Adapted from Ref. 208 with the permission of the Taylor and Francis Group.

THz exposure of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) demonstrated an opposite dynamics of the fluorescence quenching at 0.2 THz, as well as the fluorescence enhancement by $≃ 5 \pm 0.3 %$ at 2.55 THz while the irradiance was $120 mW / {cm}^{2}$ .²⁰⁸ Possible mechanism of such a frequency-selective response can be associated with the vibrational resonant coupling between the THz radiation and the protein structure, as explained in the framework of the Fröhlich’s theory.¹⁷⁴ In Ref. 179, THz exposure of a hen-egg white lysozyme was combined with a highly sensitive x-ray crystallography to visualize low-frequency vibrational modes in the protein structure. It was found that CW 0.4 THz radiation induces a local increase in the electron density in a long $α$ -helix motif consistent with a subtle longitudinal compression of the lysozyme helix. The observed electron density changes can only be explained by a collective excitation of dipole oscillators in the protein, as envisaged by Fröhlich.¹⁷⁴

In Ref. 211, bovine serum albumin (BSA) was exposed, for 60 min, to the CW 3.67 THz waves with the irradiation of $20 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . As the result, changes in the UV and circular dichroism (CD) spectra of the irradiated protein were observed. They were attributed to modifications in the BSA conformation, as was further confirmed by an increase in the Trp fluorescence of BSA²¹² and a twofold decrease in the progesterone binding constant.²¹¹^,²¹² In Ref. 213, BSA was exposed, for 60 min, to the pulsed THz radiation with the 0.2- to 1.5-THz spectral bandwidth and the peak irradiance of $10 mW / {cm}^{2}$ (or the average irradiance of $10 nW / {cm}^{2}$ ), whereas the sample was in the form of thin films on a crystalline ${SiO}_{2}$ substrate. Then, BSA was dissolved in water and brought into interaction with some adsorbates with high biological relevance, i.e., oxygen, ozone, and nitric oxide. It was found that THz waves caused evident changes in such interactions. Interaction between BSA and oxygen was studied by means of in situ spin probing technique. A spin probe was formed directly in solution through the interaction of a diamagnetic dinitrone compound with the reaction sites of BSA, on which oxygen molecules were adsorbed. Quantitative electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy demonstrated that the number of reaction sites of the BSA molecule increased by a factor of $≃ 2$ as a result of THz exposure. THz irradiation excites definite collective rotational motions, which partially eliminate steric hindrance for the adsorption of molecular oxygen on the functional groups of BSA.²¹³

In other studies, THz exposure of several proteins resulted in the following effects:

• a decrease in the enzymatic activity of alkaline phosphatase;²¹⁴
• an increase in the activity of T7 endonuclease;²¹⁵
• a decrease in the stability of the antigen–antibody complex for dinitrophenol (conjugated with BSA) and mouse monoclonal antibodies against it;²¹⁴
• a dose-dependent change in the activity of alcohol dehydrogenase from yeast, horseradish peroxidase, and BSA.²¹⁶

In Ref. 217, modulation of actin polymerization and change in the stability of its filaments, as a result of exposure to intense THz radiation of a free electron laser, were demonstrated; see Fig. 10. At the same time, when actin polymerization was performed under the exposure to the 0.46 THz waves of a gyrotron, the number of actin filaments was increased by a factor of 3.5. In Ref. 218, a change in the conformation (i.e., a decrease in the number of $β$ -sheets and an increase in $α$ -helices) was shown in a five-residue peptide with the amino acid sequence of the calcitonin hormone fragment. In Ref. 216, a reduction in the disordered structure due to an increase of the $α$ -helices and $β$ -sheets was observed as a results of BSA exposure to pulsed THz radiation with the frequency of 3.3 THz and the doses of 1.2 and 3.0 J.

Fig. 10

Actin polymerization affected by the THz exposure in an aqueous solution. (a) A schematic of the experimental setup. Actin solution is placed atop of a film bottom dish. THz waves with the frequency of 4.0 THz radiate this dish with a liquid sample from the bottom side. After the THz exposure, a portion of the actin solution is collected for the fluorescence microscopy. (b) Results of the fluorescence microscopy of the actin filaments in control sample (top) and that exposed to THz waves with the irradiance of $80 μ J / {cm}^{2}$ (bottom). Adapted from Ref. 217 with the permission of Springer Nature.

In Ref. 215, THz-wave induced structural changes were also demonstrated for such model systems, as short (tens of bases long) single-stranded DNA with the specified nucleotide sequences. As a result of their exposure to the broadband pulsed THz radiation with the 0.1 to 3.0 THz spectral range, dissembling or interruption of assembling of deterministic secondary thermodynamic DNA structures in an aqueous solution was observed. Such effects were identified by analysis of fluorescent labels and electrophoresis. In turn, for such relatively large molecules as plasmids, there were practically no effects of THz waves on the molecular structure.

In Refs. 186 and 219, THz radiation was found to cause the DNA demethylation. It was shown that molecules of 5-methylcytidine have three major resonance peaks at the frequencies of 1.29, 1.74, and 2.14 THz at a room temperature, whereas molecules of 2’-deoxycytidine did not show any distinct resonances in the 0.4 to 2.5 THz range.²²⁰ The authors assumed that these THz molecular resonances of 5-methylcytidine are the fingerprints of methylation that are observed at the nucleoside level and can appear at the DNA level.²²⁰ Then, the frozen aqueous solutions of the normal cellular DNA (293 T cells), the corresponding methylated DNA (methylated 293 T), and the cancer DNA from five types of human cancer cell lines were studied by THz pulsed spectroscopy at the temperature of 253 K. A judiciously design procedure for the THz absorption spectra fitting allowed for isolating the broad absorption peak at $≃ 1.7 THz$ , which was similar to the 1.74 THz absorption peak of 5-methylcytidine with slightly shifted central frequency due to an impact of water molecules.²²⁰^,²²¹ In this way, the authors suggested that THz waves might cause resonant effect on global demethylation and, then, proceeded to the experimental confirmation of this hypothesis.¹⁸⁶^,²¹⁹

In Fig. 11, a schematic of the THz-wave-induced demethylation of the methylated DNA is shown. High-power THz emitter was equipped with a bandpass filter, featuring the central frequency of 1.5 THz and the bandwidth of 0.42 THz, aimed at matching the methylated DNA resonance. Magnitude of the resonance peaks observed by the THz pulsed spectrometer decreased after the high-power THz exposure.¹⁸⁶^,²¹⁹ For the artificially methylated DNA samples from the human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T line), demethylation was up to the level of normal values. For the hypermethylated DNA isolated from leukocytes of different cancer lines, it was up to $≃ 70 %$ . Moreover, for the DNA from HEK293T cells, it was found that the demethylation in genes is observed mainly in the so-called CpG islands, i.e., regions with a high density of the cytosine-guanine dinucleotide sequences.²¹⁹

Fig. 11

THz-wave-induced DNA demethylation. (a) A scheme of the demethylation by a 1.7-THz resonant exposure of the methylated DNA. (b) Decrease in the amplitude of a resonant THz-wave absorption peak during the demethylation process. Reproduced from Ref. 186 with the permission of Springer Nature.

It is worth noting that, in further studies, Tao et al.²²² did not observe a 1.6-THz resonance absorption peak of the methylated nucleoside 5-methylcytidine in frozen aqueous solutions. This queries the above-mentioned results of studying the resonant effects of the THz DNA demethylation. In our opinion, this research direction deserves special attention and criticism, whereas further research efforts are necessary for the objective disclosure of THz capabilities to demethylation of DNA.

Parameters of the discussed experiments with exposure of biological molecules to THz waves and their main results are summarized in Tables 4 Table 5–6. Thus, described experimental studies of the protein and DNA samples show that the main THz-induced effects are associated with changes in the conformation and biological activity of biopolymers. These effects might underlie more complex responses of living systems to THz waves, which are described below.

Table 4

Exposure of some biological molecules to THz waves in the CW mode.

Molecules	Frequency, THz	I, mW/cm2	Duration, min	Effects	Refs.
Trp	2.55	3 000	1.5	The fluorescence quenching, 10%	208
Trp	2.55	11 700	1.5	The fluorescence quenching, 54%	208
Whey proteins	0.2	140	1.5	The fluorescence quenching, 10%	208
Whey proteins	2.55	140	1.5	The fluorescence quenching, 0.26%	208
GFP	0.2	120	1.5	The fluorescence quenching, 3%	208
GFP	2.55	120	1.5	The fluorescence enhancement, 5%	208
BSA	3.67	20	60	Changes in the UV and CD spectra, the fluorescence enhancement, twofold decrease in the progesterone binding constant	211,212
Alkaline phosphatase	0.1	0.008	90–120	Reduction in enzyme activity	214
Antigen antibody complex	0.1	0.008	90	Decrease of interaction	214
Lysozyme crystals	0.4	62	25 ms	A subtle longitudinal compression of the $α$ -helix	179

Table 5

Exposure of some biological molecules to THz waves in the pulsed mode.

Molecules	Frequency (THz)	Pulse duration	Repetition rate	Peak power or irradiance	Duration, min	Effects	Refs.
BSA	0.2–1.5	2–3 ps	$\sim 80 MHz$	20 mW	60	Increase the number of reaction sites of BSA	213
BSA	3.3	120 ns	3 Hz	5 mJ	3.3	Increase in the number of $β$ -structure and $α$ -helices; decrease in the binding capacity	216,300
Alcohol dehydrogenase	3.3	120 ns	3 Hz	5 mJ	2.2	Nonlinear change in enzymatic activity	216
T7 endonuclease	0.1–3.0	$\sim 1 ps$	2.5 kHz	0.4 mJ	10	Increase in catalytic activity	215
G-actin	0.46	10 ms	1 Hz	$5.7 mJ / {cm}^{2}$	20	The number of actin filaments was increased by 3.5-fold	301
Plasmid DNA	0.1–3.0	$\sim 1 ps$	2.5 kHz	0.4 mJ	10	No effect	215
dsDNA of up to $\sim 20 bp$	0.1–3.0	$\sim 1 ps$	2.5 kHz	0.4 mJ	10	Completely dissociated dsDNA	215
The genomic DNA samples	$1.5 \pm 0.21$	—	—	$2.4 mW / {cm}^{2}$	30	Global demethylation	186
HEK293T DNA	$1.7 \pm 0.28$	—	—	$2.4 mW / {cm}^{2}$	30	THz demethylation mainly affected cytosine in CpGI (53%), where CpG sites were abundant	219

Table 6

Exposure of some biological molecules to THz waves in the complex mode.

Molecules	Frequency (THz)	Micropulse duration	Macro-pulse duration	Repetition rate of macropulses	Peak power	Duration (min)	Effects	Refs.
Fibril of calcitonin peptide	4.05, 3.74	10 ps	$4 μ s$	5 Hz	$\sim 1 mJ$ (macro)	30	Decrease of $β$ -sheet; increase $α$ -helix, turn, and others	218
G-actin	$4 \pm 1$	5 ps	100 pulses per macro-	5 Hz	80, 160, $250 μ J$ (micro)	30	Decrease of actin filaments	217

4.5.

Effects of THz Radiation on Cells and Cell Cultures

Next, we overview the THz-wave effects on the separate cells and different cell cultures. For this aim, different types of cells are analyzed separately, with an emphasis on the blood, skin, cornea, nerve, and stem cells.

4.5.1.

Blood cells

Considerable amount of data on the THz optical properties of blood and its components was accumulated up-to-date.²^,²²³^–²²⁵ THz-pulsed spectroscopy measurements, with the typical range of 0.1 to 3.2 THz, the average beam power of $10^{- 7}$ to $10^{- 9} W$ , and the measurement duration of 1 to 5 min, did not lead to any changes in the spectral and morphological properties of blood cells.²²⁶ Such low-power THz-pulsed radiation satisfies the discussed ICNIRP guidelines and is reportedly harmless for biological systems.⁴¹

At the same time, a number of research groups demonstrated considerable effects of THz waves on blood cells. In Ref. 227, exposure, for 3 h, of human red blood cells (RBC) to the CW radiation of BWO, with the frequencies of 0.18 to 0.33 THz and the irradiance of $3 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , decreases their osmotic resistance, which was attributed to the release of hemoglobin from erythrocytes. In Ref. 228, when human RBCs were exposed, for 1 h, to the CW THz radiation with the frequency of 3.68 THz and the irradiance of $40 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , the hemoglobin release from erythrocytes with an addition of water in the ratio of 1:2 increased by seven times, as compared with the nonirradiated erythrocytes. From Ref. 46, it follows that viability of rat RBCs exposed, for 1 h, to pulse THz radiation, with the spectral range of 0.1 to 1.75 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 76 MHz, the pulse duration of 1 ps, and the peak pulse power of 8.5 mW, decreases to a greater extent than in control samples when erythrocytes are placed in the 0.54% to 0.48% NaCl solutions. The cell viability was assessed using trypan blue dye, which penetrates into cells when its membrane is broken.

In Ref. 229, human RBC were exposed, for 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 s, to the Novosibirsk free electron laser radiation, with the spectral range of 2.05 to 2.31 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 5.6 MHz, the pulse duration of 120 ps, the peak pulse power of $< 1 MW$ , and the average irradiance of 8 to $10 W / {cm}^{2}$ . A 5-s-long THz exposure did not lead to pronounced changes in the morphology of cells and did not reduce their aggregation. In turn, increase of the exposure time to 10 to 15 s changed the cell morphology (spherocytosis) and decreased the number of erythrocytes in the aggregates (as a linear function of the exposure duration). A 25-s-long exposure led to the destruction of cell membranes and the lysis of erythrocytes. The observed effects were attributed to the passage of powerful ultrasonic waves that were induced by the THz pulses at the laser pulse repetition rate of 5.6 MHz, through the irradiated medium. As a control, heating of erythrocytes to body temperature and their exposure to ultrasound were used, where such effect was not observed. These results indicated a THz-wave-induced change in the cell membrane permeability.

An important aspect of studying living organisms under the THz exposure is an evaluation of the antioxidant status of cells, particularly, of erythrocytes. In Ref. 230, RBCs were exposed to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.263 THz and the irradiance of 0.5 to $20 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , for 1 and 15 min, and to the pulsed THz radiation, with the pulse repetition rate of 2.5 Hz, the pulse duration of 200 ms, and the average irradiance of 0.1 to $20 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , for 1 min. As a result of the THz exposure, the intensity of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde concentration) in erythrocytes increased as compared with the nonirradiated control sample, whereas the observed effect depends on the exposure duration. In both regimes, a nonlinearity of the effect was observed, as shown in Fig. 12. At the irradiances of 0.5 to $1.5 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , oxidation was more pronounced than at 5 to $20 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . Such effects may indicate both induction of the oxidative stress upon THz irradiation and activation of the response of the cell antioxidant systems.²³⁰ Other parameters were also altered after such an exposure. The electrophoretic mobility of cells decreased after the CW THz exposure and, conversely, increased after the pulsed one, regardless of the irradiance value. In turn, the metabolic parameters, such as ATP and 2, 3 diphosphoglycerate concentrations, depended on both the exposure regime and irradiance.²³⁰

Fig. 12

Changes in blood cell parameters after the THz exposure with different irradiances, where 100% corresponds to the control level. EEM, erythrocytes electrophoretic mobility; MDA, malondialdehyde; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; 2,3-DPG, 2,3-diphosphoglycerate. The asterisk * indicates statistically significant differences ( $p < 0.05$ ) as compared with the control group. Adapted from Ref. 230 with the permission of Springer Nature.

In Ref. 231, safety limits of blood leukocytes exposure to THz waves were studied, using several pulsed THz emitters and the method of DNA comets.²³² The picosecond pulsed THz radiation, with the spectral range of 0.1 to 6.5 THz, the average irradiance of up to $200 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ , and the exposure duration of 20 min, did not induce any DNA damage in blood leukocytes while heating of thus exposed sample did not exceed 1°C. In Refs. 233 234.–235, no effects of the human white blood cell exposure, for 20 min, to the pulsed THz radiation, with the central frequencies of 0.12 and 0.13 THz, the pulse repetition rates of 21.1 and 73.7 kHz, the pulse duration of 50 ps, and the average irradiance of 30 to $230 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ , were observed, including the absence of the direct DNA damage, the chromosome apparatus changes, and the alteration of cell cycle kinetics. However, in Ref. 235, under certain conditions of cells’ exposure in a THz resonant cavity, some signs of direct DNA damage appeared.

In Ref. 228, exposure, for 30 and 90 min, of the human total blood lymphocytes to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 3.68 THz and the irradiance of $40 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , led to a decrease in the number of viable cells, which was more pronounced at high exposure time. It is worth noting that such THz exposure causes an increased proliferative activity of the surviving cells. In Ref. 236, similar cells were exposed, for 1, 2, and 24 h, to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.1 THz and the irradiance of $31 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ , which was followed by studying four chromosomes (1, 10, 11, and 17) in cells during division. The observed results revealed an increase in aneuploidy of two chromosomes at 2- and 24-h exposure and changes in centromere replication of three and all four chromosomes at 2- and 24-h exposure, respectively. Thus, such a long-term ( $\geq 1 h$ ) THz exposure induces significant genomic instability.

In Ref. 237, human T-lymphocytes (Jurkat cell line) were exposed, for 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min, to the CW THz radiation with the frequency of 2.52 THz and the irradiance of $227 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ . As a result, almost no changes in the lymphocytes survival were observed in the case of a short-term exposures ( $< 20 \min$ ). In turn, an exponential increase of the lymphocytes’ death was observed for the long-term THz exposure ( $\geq 20 \min$ ) due to both apoptosis and necrosis of cells. Finally, for the 40-min-long THz exposure, up to 80% of cells died.

Studies of the global gene expression profile remain the most representative in the THz exposure technologies. For example, in Refs. 238 239.–240, human T-lymphocytes (Jurkat cell line) were exposed to the 2.52-THz CW radiation with the irradiance of $636 mW / {cm}^{2}$ for 30, 40, and 50 min, accompanied by an increase in the sample temperature from 37°C to 44°C. Thus, irradiated cells were then compared with the control group heated to the same temperatures. Pilot measurements revealed that a 40-min-long exposure to THz waves causes a change in the expression of 628 genes, whereas the 40-min-long bulk heating changes expression of 556 genes.²³⁸ Further measurements appeared to be even more illustrative, demonstrating a change in expression of 597 and 725 genes, respectively, with an overlap of only 61 genes. Completely different signaling and metabolic pathways were identified for the THz exposure and heating. There were 30 and 16 pathways for the THz exposure and heating, respectively.¹⁷²^,²⁴⁰ Quite interesting nonlinear effects were observed, i.e., some genes of the potassium and calcium channel proteins showed increased activity when exposed for 40 min, as compared with the 30- and 50-min-long exposures.²³⁸ An additional analysis of individual genes indicated that, although stress genes are activated during the THz exposure, this is not typical for all studied genes and is less pronounced as compared with a simple heating.²³⁹

Overall, studies of blood cell exposure to THz waves revealed the following biotropic effects:

• an increase in the cell membrane permeability;
• influence on various aspects of metabolism (including the oxidative stress), morphology, proliferation, and aggregation activity;
• gene and cytotoxic effects.

In some reactions, fingerprints of the compensatory mechanisms were found. Further extensive studies of the global gene expression profiling that captures many aspects of cellular life deserve special attention. THz effects are often highly constructive and sometimes nonlinear in relation to changes of the THz exposure parameters. The discussed effects of blood cell exposure to THz waves in different regimes are summarized in Table 7. Notice that no effects are observed at low exposure intensity (bottom six lines of the table); whereas various effects occur with the increased exposure (top 12 lines of the table).

Table 7

Exposure of blood cells to THz waves in the different modes.

Cells	Frequency (THz)	Type	Irradiance (mW/cm2)	Duration (min)	Effects	Refs.
Human RBCs	2.05 to 2.31	Pulsed	10000	0.42	Lysis	229
Jurkat cells	2.52	CW	636	30 to 50	Activation of genes of intracellular signal transduction pathways	238
Jurkat cells	2.52	CW	636	240	Increase expression of genes of heat shock proteins, cell growth factors, antiinflam matory cytokines	239
Jurkat cells	2.52	CW	227	20 to 40	Cell death due to both apoptosis and necrosis of cells	240
Human RBCs	3.68	CW	40	60	Decreased osmotic resistance	228
Human blood lymphocytes	3.68	CW	40	30, 90	Decreased cell viability	228
Rat RBCs	0.263	CW	0.5 to 20	1, 15	Electrophoretic mobility of cells decreases, destructive changes of the cell morphofunctional state	230
Rat RBCs	0.263	Pulsed	0.1 to 20	1	Activation of the metabolic processes	230
Human blood lymphocytes	0.13	Pulsed	2, 5	20	DNA damage	235
Human RBCs	0.18, 0.33	CW	3	180	Decreased osmotic resistance	227
Human blood lymphocytes	0.1	CW	0.031	120, 1440	Increased aneuploidy of chromosomes 11 and 17 during cell division	236
Rat RBCs	0.1–1.75	Pulsed	0.01	60	Increased rate of hypoosmotic hemolysis	46
ICNIRP standard	0.002 to 0.3	—	1	30	None	40
Human blood lymphocytes	0.1	CW	0.013	20	None	236
Human blood leukocytes	0.5 to 6.5	Pulsed	0.008	20	None	231
Human blood leukocytes	0.1 to 2.0	Pulsed	0.125	20	None	231
Human blood leukocytes	0.1 to 1.0	Pulsed	0.2	20	None	231
Human blood lymphocytes	0.12 to 0.13	Pulsed	0.03 to 0.25	20	None	233

4.5.2.

Skin and cornea cells

In 2015, the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks published an opinion on the potential health effects of electromagnetic exposure. Given the expected increase in the use of THz technologies, it was recommended to pay special attention to studying the THz-wave effects on the skin, with an emphasis on the long-term low-intense exposure, and on the cornea, with an emphasis on the short-term high-intense exposure.²⁴¹ Therefore, fibroblasts and keratinocytes of the skin, as well as epithelial cells of the cornea, are the most extensively studied cell types in the THz exposure technologies.

In Refs. 242 and 243, human dermal fibroblasts (HDF cell line) were exposed, for 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 min, to the CW THz radiation with the frequency of 2.52 THz and the irradiance of $85 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . This exposure was accompanied by heating of a samples from 37°C to 40°C, therefore, the control sample was heated to 40°C and studied as a reference. Additional genotoxic control samples were exposed, for 3 min, to the CW UV radiation, with the wavelength of 254 nm and the average power of 38 W. A 5- to 20-min-long THz exposure did not lead to a decrease in the number of living cells, whereas longer exposure slightly reduced it. At the same time, some increase in the cell proliferation was observed. As a results of the THz exposure, an increase in expression was noted for genes of the heat shock proteins, however, it was almost equal to that of conventional heating. No enhancement in the expression of DNA sensing and repair genes, which was observed under the UV irradiation, was found after the THz exposure. Overall, no considerable changes at a cellular and molecular level were identified.²⁴²^,²⁴³ At a more intense exposure of the same cells to the THz-wave source with the irradiance of $227 mW / {cm}^{2}$ and the duration varying from few seconds to 2 min, the death of fibroblasts was observed after only the 12-s-long exposure. Finally, as a result of 1- and 2-min-long THz exposure, activation of the genes of some inflammatory cytokines was revealed.²⁴²

In Refs. 244 and 245, when human skin fibroblasts (HFFF2 and HDF cell lines) were exposed, for 20 min, to the broadband pulse THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.1 to 0.15 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 21.1 to 26.3 kHz, the pulse duration of 50 ps, and the average irradiance of $0.4 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , authors observed aneuploidy effects, such as an increase in actin polymerization, chromosomal malsegregation, and micronucleus induction. Meanwhile, no signs of the DNA damage, such as expression of the corresponding proteins, phosphorylation of H2AX histone, and repair telomere length modulation, were noticed. Also, no THz-wave effects on the cell growth and survival, including changes in the prosurvival signaling proteins, were revealed. Thus, there was a clear aneugenic rather than clastogenic effect of THz radiation.²⁴⁴^,²⁴⁵

In Ref. 246, HDFs were exposed, for 20 min, to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.14 THz and the irradiance of 35 to $354 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . Such parameters as proliferative activity, wound closure percentage, and the level of nitric oxide production in the irradiated cells were estimated. No tangible changes in the examined parameters were revealed. Therefore, low-frequency THz radiation does not affect the functional activity of the HDFs.²⁴⁶

In Ref. 247, human skin fibroblasts (NB1RGB cell line) and human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line) were exposed, for 3, 70, and 94 h, to the CW THz radiation, with the tunable output frequency in the range of 0.07 to 0.3 THz and the irradiance of 0.4 to $1.3 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ . THz exposure at different frequencies did not reveal any changes in proliferation, morphology, and cell activity, as well as no signs of cytotoxicity.²⁴⁷ Exposure of the same cells, for 3, 70, and 94 h, at separate frequencies in the range of 0.3 to 0.6 THz with the irradiance of $< 1 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ also did not cause any effects on proliferation, survival, and cell morphology of both cell types.²⁴⁸

In Ref. 249, human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line) and human retinal pigment epithelial cells (ARPE-19 cell line) were exposed to the broadband pulsed THz radiation of synchrotron with a $≃ 0.5 THz$ cut-off frequency, a 1 kHz pulse repetition rate, a 2-ps pulse duration, and a $0.85 - 2.25 kW / {cm}^{2}$ peak irradiance (or a $0.14 - 0.37 mW / {cm}^{2}$ average irradiance), and different exposure terms in the range of 140 to 230 min were examined. Results showed no signs of cytotoxicity, as well as no changes in the cell morphology and proliferation. It was suggested that cells, cultured and maintained under ideal standard conditions, are capable of compensating the THz-wave effects even in the case of such high exposure intensities.²⁴⁹ Negative data were also obtained on the HCE-T cells, exposed to the 0.12-THz CW waves with the irradiance of $5 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , and the exposure duration of 24 h. There was no statistically significant increase in genotoxicity, morphological changes, and alterations in the heat shock protein expression.¹⁷¹

In Ref. 250, human keratinocytes (NHK cell line) and human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line) were exposed to the pulsed THz radiation, with the central frequency of 0.14 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 50 kHz, the pulse duration of 80 ns, the peak irradiance of 24 to $62 mW / {cm}^{2}$ (the average irradiance of 0.1 to $0.25 mW / {cm}^{2}$ ), for the different exposure durations ranging from 10 min to 24 h. The effects of such THz exposure were then compared with those of the UVA (the 315 to 400 nm wavelenths) and UVB (280 to 315 nm) exposures, as well as the 43°C heat shock treatment. No considerable changes in cell activity (viability and proliferation) and differentiation were detected in cases of a single THz exposure (with the duration of up to 24 h) and a double one (with the 48-h-long time interval between the 24-h-long exposure cycles). THz waves did not induce a stress response, such as changes in the glutathione and the heat shock protein 70 levels. At the same time, all studied parameters of cells were sensitive to the UVB exposure and the heat shock.²⁵⁰

In Ref. 251, human skin fibroblasts (HDF cell line) and keratinocytes (HaCaT cell line) were exposed, for 2, 8, and 24 h, to the CW THz radiation, with the frequency of 0.106 THz and the irradiance of 0.04 to $2 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . Although the authors considered THz irradiance of cells either below or above the aforementioned safety limits, they did not find any changes in proliferation rate and abnormalities in the genetic apparatus, such as increased micronucleus formation, formation of strand breaks, or alkali-labile sites in DNA.²⁵¹ Similar negative results were obtained in Ref. 252, using the same cells, but another THz emitters with the output frequencies of 0.38 and 2.52 THz and the irradiance in the range of 0.03 to $0.9 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , whereas the exposure durations were 2 and 8 h.²⁵²

The authors of Ref. 253 irradiated human epidermal keratinocytes (HEK001 cell line), for 20 min, by the CW THz radiation with the three distinct frequencies of 1.4, 2.52, and 3.11 THz and the irradiance of $44 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . Viability of cells and expression of hyperthermic genes were not altered at such exposure conditions. Analysis of the total gene expression revealed 451, 448, and 583 differently expressed genes under exposure to the 1.4, 2.52, and 3.11 THz waves, respectively. More than 50% of these genes in each group were unique, whereas $< 25 %$ in one group appeared to be common for all three regimes of the THz exposure. Bioinformatic analysis revealed activation of 6, 17, and 12 canonical metabolic and signaling pathways for the 1.4, 2.52, and 3.11 THz exposure, respectively. These pathways were also unique for the considered exposure conditions, except for the extracellular signal regulated kinase 5, as shown in Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Gene expression profiles of the human epidermal keratinocytes exposed to the THz radiation at different frequencies. (a) Total number of over- and underexpressed messenger RNAs (mRNA) at the 1.4, 2.52, and 3.11 THz exposures. (b) A Venn diagram indicating the number of unique and common differently expressed mRNAs at each THz exposure. Reprinted from Ref. 253 with the permission of SPIE.

In Ref. 254, human skin keratinocytes from donors were exposed, for 10, 20, and 30 min, to the radiation of the two broadband pulse THz emitters. The first one operated in the frequency range of 0.2 to 3.0 THz, possessed the pulse repetition rate of 80 MHz and the pulse duration of 20 to 30 ps, and provided the average irradiance of $0.009 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . The second one features the following set of characteristics: 0.1 to 2.7 THz, 250 kHz, 250 fs, and $9 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . As a result of these experiments at both low and high intensities, THz radiation did not affect the cell activity (in general) and did not inhibit their capacity to differentiate, even despite the expected variability in the activity of the primary cells isolated from different donors.²⁵⁴

As shown in Fig. 14, HDFs and epidermal keratinocytes of the full thickness artificial human skin tissues model were exposed, for 10 min, to the broadband pulsed THz radiation with the frequencies of 0.1 to 2.0 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 1.7 ps, and the average irradiances of 5.7 and $57 mW / {cm}^{2}$ .³³^,²⁵⁵ As a control, these cells were also exposed, for 2 min, to the pulse UVA radiation with the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 50 fs, the central wavelengths of 400 nm, and the pulse energy of $0.080 μ J$ . Total gene expression analysis revealed a change in the expression of 397 and 442 genes, as a result of the low- and high-intense THz exposures, respectively, against 293 genes, as a result of the UV exposure. THz radiation selectively reduced the expression of genes associated with apoptosis and skin diseases, such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. With regard to the potential risk of carcinogenesis, a dual effect was observed since both anticancer and cancer-promoting genes were activated. Activity of the same genes, under the UV exposure, has a different dynamics than THz. THz exposure showed signs of DNA damage, along with an activation of the DNA damage repair mechanisms, such as histone H2AX phosphorylation and increase in the levels of some proteins. In general, the cellular response to THz radiation is significantly different from the UV-induced one.³³^,²⁵⁵

Fig. 14

Effects of the intense THz pulses on artificial human skin tissues model EpiDermFT. (a), (b) Time-dependent electric field of the THz pulse $E (t)$ , as well as its Fourier spectrum $E (ν)$ , respectively. (c) Intensity of the THz focal spot ${| E |}^{2}$ . (d) Histology of an EpiDermFT tissue model. (e) Schematic of the THz exposure, where the EpiDermFT tissue model is mounted at the focal plane. (f) Venn diagrams summarizing the differently expressed genes in the EpiDermFT tissue model, as a result of exposure to either 1.0 mJ THz wave or 0.14 mJ UVA radiation. Adapted from an open-access Ref. 33 with the permission of Springer Nature.

When similar object was exposed, for 10 min, to broadband pulsed radiation with quite close parameters (the frequency range of 0.1 to 3.0 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 1 ps, the peak irradiance of $74 MW / {cm}^{2}$ , or the average irradiance of $74 mW / {cm}^{2}$ ) in Refs. 256 257.–258, 1681 genes changed their expression, among which 1088 and 593 genes were down- and upregulated, respectively. Bioinformatic analysis showed that through the observed changes in the activity of many of these genes, the processes of initiation, maintenance, and progression of a cancer are suppressed; suppression of the glioma pathway is especially well indicated. Despite the fact that these predictions are based on observations in the skin tissue models, the gene-level mechanisms responsible for the negative perturbation are genes that encode for proteins involved in the calcium and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling; these are ubiquitous and well-conserved across many different cell types, including skin and neural cells.²⁵⁸ Moreover, the authors observed explicit activation of an inflammatory response and suppression of a promitotic signaling, including the suppression of cellular functions, such as cell division, differentiation, motility, and apoptosis. Existence of an energy threshold for the observed effects is quite important: namely, at lower THz radiation intensities (the pulse energy of $< 1.5 μ J$ or the electric field strength of $< 187 kV / cm$ ), no significant changes were observed, as compared with the intense THz exposure ( $2.4 μ J$ and $240 kV / cm$ ), that caused the genetic changes.²⁵⁶^–²⁵⁸ Among the observed genomic response, special attention was paid to the THz-wave effect on calcium signaling pathway due to its general significance in biological regulation. An additional study of the differential gene expression profiles, in the case of the five different THz exposure irradiances in the range of 0.6 to $47 MW / {cm}^{2}$ , revealed suppression of this pathway by THz radiation and enhancement of this effect with the exposure intensity.²⁵⁹

In Ref. 260, mouse keratinocytes of dorsal skin were exposed in vivo, for 1 h, to the broadband pulsed THz radiation, with a 0.1- to 2.5-THz spectral range, a 1-kHz pulse repetition rate, a 310-fs pulse duration, and a $0.032 - mW / {cm}^{2}$ average irradiance. Analysis of the genome-wide expression profile showed a change in the activity of 149 genes involved in the processes of tissue growth and healing, organogenesis, and cell migration. Further bioinformatic analysis indicated a difference in the pattern of gene expression, as a result of the THz exposure, as compared to the UV and neutron ones. Relying on additional studies of individual genes, the authors concluded that general expression gene pattern, induced by THz radiation, is analogous to that by wound stimulus.²⁶⁰ In Ref. 261, mouse ear skin in vivo was exposed, for 30 min, to the pulsed radiation with a 2.7-THz central frequency, a 3-Hz pulse repetition rate, a $4 - μ s$ pulse duration, and a $260 - mW / {cm}^{2}$ average irradiance. Schematic of this exposure is shown in Fig. 15. The observed results indicated an acute inflammatory response in the skin (the infiltration of neutrophils), whereas IR camera detected no notable THz-wave-induced change in the skin temperature.²⁶¹ The results showed that such an acute inflammatory response can be initiated without structural disruption of the skin by THz radiation. THz exposure of living tissue in the in vivo conditions can possibly trigger various unexpected dynamic responses, which can not be mimicked appropriately in the simplified in vitro conditions.²⁶¹

Fig. 15

THz exposure of the mouse ear skin in vivo. (a) A photo of the THz setup. A living anesthetized mouse is placed on an animal holder that is fixed at a motorized 3D translation stage. (b) Distribution of neutrophils in the mouse ear skin before and after the THz exposure: Gr-1 + neutrophil (in red), Tie2 + blood vessel (green), and autofluorescent hair follicle (magenta). Adapted from Ref. 261 with the permission of the Optical Society of America.

Thereby, the overviewed research demonstrated the main reaction of the skin and cornea cells on THz exposure. These cells act in multicellular organisms as the primary barrier that perceives THz waves as a factor of the external environment and protects against it. THz-wave-driven changes at cellular and molecular levels were revealed, both clearly negative, such as the DNA damage and aneuploidy effects, and relatively harmless, such as the increased cell proliferation. Many results of the THz exposure, including the ones observed in terms of geno- and cytotoxic effects, turned out to be negative, emphasizing that the considered regimes of THz exposure were lower than biologically significant thresholds. A comparison of the observed THz effects with other factors, such as the UV exposure and temperature stress, and with the whole-genome gene expression profiling aided by the bioinformatics, confirmed variability and specificity of the cellular response to THz waves.

Tables 8 and 9 show some remarkable results, both positive and negative, of the skin and cornea cells exposure to THz radiation. One should notice that CW exposure overall causes no damage when using the considered small-to-moderate THz exposure intensities. In turn, due to much higher peak power, pulsed THz exposure can cause DNA damage and changes in gene expression. Thus, considerable attention should be paid to determine safe limits of such pulsed exposure to skin and cornea, with an observed rapid developments of THz technology and, particularly, THz wireless communications.

Table 8

Effects of CW THz radiation on the skin and cornea cells.

Cells	Frequency (THz)	Irradiance (mW/cm2)	Duration (min)	Effects	Refs.
Human skin fibroblasts	2.52	84.8	40, 80	Number of viable cells decreased by 10%; enhanced proliferation; no DNA damage	243
Human skin fibroblasts	2.52	227	1, 2	Activation of proinflammatory cytokines and stress response	237
Human epidermal keratinocytes (HEK001 cell line)	1.4, 2.52, 3.11	44	20	The activation of metabolic and signaling pathways specific for each frequency	253
ICNIRP Standard	0.002 to 0.3	1	30	None	40
Human skin fibroblasts	0.14	35 to 354	20	No effect on proliferative activity, wound closure percentage, and the level of nitric oxide production	246
Human skin fibroblasts (NB1RGB cell line)	0.07 to 0.3	$< 0.001$	180, 4200, 5760	Not any effects on proliferation, survival and cell morphology	247
Human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line)	0.07 to 0.3	$< 0.001$	180, 4200, 5760	Not any effects on proliferation, survival and cell morphology	247
Human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line)	0.12	5	1440	No statistically significant increase in genotoxicity, morphological changes, and alterations in the heat shock protein expression	171
HaCaT and HDF cells	0.106	0.04 to 2.0	120, 480, 1440	No induction of DNA strand breaks or chromosomal damage	251
HaCaT and HDF cells	0.38, 2.52	0.03 to 0.6, 0.05 to 0.9	120, 480	No induction of DNA strand breaks or chromosomal damage	252

Table 9

Effects of pulse THz radiation on the skin and cornea cells.

Cells	Frequency (THz)	Irradiance (mW/cm2)	Duration (min)	Effects	Refs.
Artificial human skin	0.1 to 2.0	5.7, 57	10	Formation of DNA double strand breaks, activates DNA damage response	33,255
Artificial human skin	0.1 to 3.0	0.9 to 74	10	Suppression of the Ras signaling and calcium signaling pathways	259
Mouse ear skin in vivo	0.1 to 2.5	0.032	60	Activation of genes included in tissue growth	260
Mouse ear skin in vivo	2.7	260	30	An acute inflammatory response was initiated without structural disruption of the skin	261
Human fibroblast culture	0.1 to 0.15	0.4	20	No DNA damage; enhanced actin polymerization	244
Human corneal epithelial cells (HCE-T cell line)	0.5	0.14 to 0.37	140 to 230	No signs of cytotoxicity, no changes in the cell morphology and proliferation	249
Human keratinocytes (NHK cell line)	0.14	0.1 to 0.25	10 to 1440	No considerable changes in cell viability, proliferation and differentiation	250
Primary human keratinocytes	0.2 to 3.0, 0.1 to 2.7	0.009, 9	10, 20, 30	No effect on cell activity and differentiation	254

4.5.3.

Nerve cells

In Ref. 262, effects of the CW laser THz waves on the isolated neurons of the supraesophageal galglion of the Lymnea stagnalis were investigated at 0.71, 1.63, 2.45, 2.56, 3.68, and 4.28 THz, whereas the irradiance and the exposure duration were 2 to $20 mW / {cm}^{2}$ and 1 h. At 0.71 THz, the adhesive characteristics of membranes were altered, and the contacts between the nerve cells and a substrate were disturbed. At 3.68 THz, the structural changes occurred in the somatic membrane, axons, and growth cone. The effects were delayed and manifested themselves only 40 to 50 h after the exposure. During this period, redistribution of pigment granules occurred, and the membrane cytocortical layer became heterogeneous. Then, anomalous outgrowth-like structures with the arbitrary orientation grew, whereas classical neurites did not form.²⁶² In the same experiment, the response of cell membrane to the THz exposure was not identical at the different stages of the neural network formation. The aforementioned effects occurred at the initial stage of the neural network regeneration, i.e., before formation of the neuron outgrowths. Other phenomena were observed in neurons (with the outgrowths already formed) at the stage of the neuron network formation, namely, the disturbance in the neurites’ growth zone and the cessation of their further growth, which caused disorders in the interneuron links’ formation,²⁶²^,²⁶³ as shown in Fig. 16.

Fig. 16

Effect of the 3.68-THz CW radiation on the isolated neurons at the stage of the neural network formation. (a) Microscopy of the unaltered neural network. (b) Neural network formed after the THz exposure. In panel (b), disturbances in the neurites’ growth zone, and cessation of their further growth, including the disordering in the interneuronic links, are observed. Courtesy of the authors.

In Ref. 263, the same biological object, namely, the isolated neurons of the Lymnea stagnalis, was exposed, for 1 min, to the pulsed THz radiation with the central frequencies of 2.1 and 2.3 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 5.6 to 11.2 MHz, the pulse duration of 30 to 100 ps, and the average irradiance of 0.3 to $30 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . Exposure at 2.3 THz and $30 mW / {cm}^{2}$ caused a gradual decrease in the membrane potential, accompanied by the morphological disorders of membrane and intracellular structures, as well as by the cell death within 2 h after the exposure. At $3 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , cell death occurred within 3 h after the exposure; whereas at $0.3 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , part of cells remained vital, and the number of vital cells stabilized within 2 h after the exposure. However, when resorting to 2.1 THz, even with the minimal irradiance of $0.3 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , no viable cells were detected in 1 h after the exposure.²⁶³

In Refs. 263 and 264, barrier properties of the neuron membrane were studied after the exposure to THz radiation of a free electron laser possessing the frequency of 2.3 THz and irradiance in the range of 0.5 to $20 mW / {cm}^{2}$ (see Fig. 17). Such exposure causes a dose-dependent nonspecific permeability of the cell membrane that was uncovered by studying the vital dye trypan blue transmission through the membrane into the cytoplasm. The dye was distributed nonuniformly in cytoplasm, being localized in separate regions. This effect is reportedly due to the THz-wave-induced formation of hydrophilic pores in the cell membrane. It is reversible, because the membrane potential and functional reactions of cells return to the normal values within 1 day after the exposure.²⁶³^,²⁶⁴ Exposure of cells to the 2.0-THz THz waves with similar parameters did not cause significant changes in the majority of cells. Only sole neurons were colored uniformly, and their membrane potential was decreased or equal to zero, whereas their amount did not differ from the reference values.²⁶⁴ The control of membrane recovery after the disturbance was carried out using the BCECF-AM dye (7′-bis(2-carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein acetoxymethyl ester). This dye can penetrate through the undamaged plasmatic membrane, and it is transformed by the intracellular esterases of living neurons into its fluorescent form BCECF. Fluorescence of noncolored cells and some cells that captured tripan blue was discovered. Membrane of such cells can be recovered after disturbance, and they can retain fluorescence probes inside.²⁶³

Fig. 17

Neurons after the 2.3-THz CW exposure with the irradiance of $0.5 mW / {cm}^{2}$ and the duration of 1 min. (a) White light microscopy of the trypan blue-stained cells. (b) Fluorescence microscopy of the trypan blue + BCECF-AM-stained cells. Reprinted from Ref. 263 with the permission of NSU publishing.

To test the assumption concerning the THz-wave-induced formation of hydrophilic lipid pores and to reveal the underlying mechanisms before the THz exposure, antioxidants were introduced into the salt solution surrounding neurons, along with a dye (lucifer yellow) that does not penetrate through the intact membranes. It was found that phenol antioxidant histochrom significantly reduces the penetration of the dye into the cell. This may indicate that hydrophilic pores are formed in the cell membrane due to the free radical processes that can be blocked by antioxidants.²⁶⁵ Thus, THz radiation may cause reversible disturbance of the membrane barrier properties, serving as an inductor of the biologically active compounds’ delivery into cells. In turn, antioxidants may be applied to manage this process, providing protection from unfavorable THz-wave effects.²⁶⁵

In Ref. 266, a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect was demonstrated during exposure for 1 to 5 min of the rat glial cells (C6 cell line) to the CW THz radiation of BWO, with the output frequencies in the range of 0.12 to 0.18 THz and the irradiance of $3.2 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . A relative number of apoptotic cells increased while sample heating did not exceed 0.1°C. This study posed a problem of possible biological harm caused by such common CW THz-wave sources as BWOs.²⁶⁶

Reference 267 demonstrated an impact of the broadband pulsed THz radiation, with the frequencies in the range of 0.05 to 2.0 THz, the irradiances of 0.5, 5, and $50 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ , and the exposure duration of 3 min, on the neurite growth in the sensory ganglia of 10- to 12-day chicken embryos. An increase in the stimulating effect by 24% was observed at the lowest power density of $0.5 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ . At the same time, at higher intensities of 5 and $50 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ , no notable changes were found. These observations highlighted nonlinear THz-wave effects in relation to the electromagnetic-beam power.

In Ref. 268, the neuron-like pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells were exposed, for 10 min, to the 0.3- to 19.5-THz radiation of a synchrotron. During such exposure, the average temperature of the sample was $25.24 \pm 0.37 ° C$ . High-resolution scanning electron microscopy confirmed permeabilization of the cell membrane. For this aim, translocation of silica nanoparticles into the PC12 cells was visualized. Analysis of the microscopy data revealed formation of atypically large (up to $1 μ m$ ) blebs on the surface of PC12 cells exposed to THz waves, as shown in Fig. 18. Significant differences between the metabolic activity of the THz-wave-treated PC12 cells and of the control ones were not found. However, a higher population of the THz-treated PC12 cells responded to the nerve growth factor by extending longer neurites as compared with the untreated PC12 cells.²⁶⁸

Fig. 18

Scanning electron microscopy of the PheoChromocytoma (PC12) cells after 10-min-long THz exposure. As a result of the THz exposure, formation of blebs on the PC12 cells was demonstrated, as highlighted by white circles in (a); whereas blebs were not found in the untreated PC12 cells, as evident from (b). Adapted from Ref. 268 with the permission of MDPI.

Exposure to the 0.06-THz CW radiation of the pyramidal rat neurons was studied in Ref. 269. For 1-min-long THz exposure at low irradiances (40 to $840 nW / {cm}^{2}$ ), considerable changes in the neuronal firing rate and plasma membrane properties were notable. After resorting to higher irradiances (100 to $600 μ W / {cm}^{2}$ ), dose-dependent increase in the plasma membrane permeability of the intact segmental ganglia of the adult leech (particularly, in the studied Retzius neurons) was observed.²⁷⁰ In Ref. 271, THz exposure, for 1 min, of individual neurons in the leech midbody ganglia at even higher irradiances (1 to $4 mW / {cm}^{2}$ ) revealed different effects of THz waves and equivalent thermal heating on narrowing of the action potential half-width and the firing rate. Possible explanation of this effect is the interaction between the THz wave and the neuronal plasma membrane. In Ref. 272, Romanenko et al. extended their studies by examining the direct effect of 0.06 THz radiation with higher power density (80 to $170 mW / {cm}^{2}$ ) on sensory neurons from the leech, namely, the thermosensitive nociceptor. Both experiments and simulations showed a notable decrease in the voltage threshold of the action potential formation, as compared with the thermal heating. This effect was attributed to the sensitization of the transient potential of the vanilloid 1-like receptor in the leech nociceptor.

In Ref. 273, the cultured primary hippocampal neurons were exposed, for 20 min, to the CW source (Terasense Group Inc.), with the frequency of 0.1 THz and the irradiance of $33 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . The cells were cultured in the 37°C constant temperature incubator and, then, irradiated from the bottom side of the culture dish. RNA-sequencing was performed to identify the expression of 29 genes, as a result of the THz exposure. No considerable difference in the temperature between the culture medium of the sham group and the radiated group was observed. The expression levels of several heat shock proteins genes were not significantly upregulated by the THz exposure. The neuron cells did not undergo serious apoptosis response as well. The authors concluded that THz waves can affect various biomolecule interactions, such as binding of GTPase, phospholipid, tropomyosin, BMP receptor, and long-chain fatty acid, as well as regulate the synapse function and calcium signaling pathway. The upregulation of free intracellular calcium, observed ex vivo, along with the correlated morphological changes in the leech ganglia neuron were also demonstrated at 0.06 THz with the power of 100 mW.²⁷⁴

The discussed effects of the neuron cells’ exposure to THz waves in CW mode are summarized in Tables 10 and 11. Cytotoxicity effects were observed during a number of experiments on exposure of cells and cell models to THz waves with different parameters. THz-wave-induced changes in the structure and functions of the cytoplasmic membrane, including the distortions of the membrane potential, are evident. The processes of nerve tissue regeneration act as an additional factor that modulates the THz-wave effects. In general, THz exposure of nerve cells paves the ways to the development of methods aimed at the noninvasive and selective action on the molecular and cellular regulatory mechanisms.

Table 10

Effects of CW THz radiation on the neurons cells.

Cells	Frequency (THz)	Irradiance (mW/cm2)	Duration (min)	Effects	Refs.
Glial cells	0.12 to 0.18	3.2	1	Number of apoptotic cells increased 1.5-fold	266
Glial cells	0.12 to 0.18	3.2	5	Number of apoptotic cells increased 2.4-fold	266
Neurons of L. stagnalis	0.71	10–20	60	Alteration of adhesive properties of neuron membrane	262,263
Neurons of L. stagnalis	1.63, 2.45, 2.56	2–20	60	None	262,263
Neurons of L. stagnalis	3.68	2–5	60	None	262,263
Neurons of L. stagnalis	3.68	10–20	60	Alteration of neuron membrane and formation of the interneuron connection (structural changes of the somatic membrane, axons and growth cone)	262,263
Neurons of L. stagnalis	4.28	2 to 20	60	None	262,263
The pyramidal rat neurons	0.06	$4 \cdot 10^{- 5}$ to $84 \cdot 10^{- 5}$	1	Considerable changes in the neuronal firing rate and membrane	269
Retzius neurons of leech	0.06	0.1 to 0.6	1	Dose-dependent increase in the plasma membrane permeability	270
Neurons of leech	0.06	1 to 4	1	Narrowing of the action potential half-width	271
Thermosensitive nociceptor of leech	0.06	80 to 170	1	Notable decrease in the voltage threshold of the action potential formation	272
Primary hippocampal neurons	0.1	33	20	Changing various biomolecule interactions as well as regulate the synapse function and calcium signaling pathway	273
The leech ganglia neuron	0.06	100	1	Upregulation of free intracellular calcium and morphological changes	274

Table 11

Effects of pulsed THz radiation on the neurons cells.

Cells	Frequency (THz)	Irradiance (mW/cm2)	Duration (min)	Effects	Refs.
Neurons of L. stagnalis	2.1	0.3	1	Cell death after 60 min	263
Neurons of L. stagnalis	2.3	0.3	1	Membrane changes	263,264
Neurons of L. stagnalis	2.3	3	1	Cell death after 120 min	263,264
Neurons of L. stagnalis	2.3	30	1	Cell death after 180 min	263,264
Neurons of L. stagnalis	2.3	2 to 20	0.6	Reversible membrane permeability	265
The sensory ganglia	0.05 to 2.0	0.0005	3	Stimulating effect by 24%	267
The sensory ganglia	0.05 to 2.0	0.005, 0.05	3	None	267
PC12 cells	0.3 to 19.5	—	10	Formation of atypically large blebs on the surface of cells	268

4.5.4.

Stem cells

Stem cells are extremely sensitive to the environmental stimuli. Therefore, they can be considered as a favorable model for studying the effects of biological system exposure to weak electromagnetic fields including the THz waves. Pluripotency is a unique attribute of stem cells. Thus, a maintenance of the pluripotent state or, vice versa, an increase in the rate of spontaneous or induced differentiation are important features to be investigated, from the point of view of both their high sensitivity and their practical significance.

In Ref. 275, human embryonic stem cells (hESM01 cell line) were exposed, for 1 h, to the pulsed THz radiation, with the central frequency of 2.3 THz, the peak irradiance of $4 kW / {cm}^{2}$ (the average irradiance of $≃ 0.14 W / {cm}^{2}$ ). The whole genome analysis revealed the altered expression of 73 genes, whereas only 1 of those genes (namely, PRDM14, which suppresses differentiation) was specific to the pluripotent state. In total, 74% of the THz-sensitive protein-coding genes belong to the class of ubiquitously expressed genes. Bioinformatic analysis of the affected genes revealed 15 functional classes that were mostly related to mitochondria. Additional studies did not demonstrate signs of genotoxicity (structural chromosomal aberrations and phosphorylation of histone H2AX), morphological signs of spontaneous differentiation, and any effect on the mitotic index. In Ref. 249, similar human embryonic stem cells (hES07 cell line) were exposed to the broadband pulsed THz radiation, with the cut-off frequency of $≃ 0.5 THz$ , the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 2 ps, the peak irradiances in the range of $1.75 kW / {cm}^{2}$ (the average irradiance of 0.21 to $0.29 mW / {cm}^{2}$ ). The exposure duration varied in the range of 120 to 375 min. The authors observed no changes in the cell morphology, attachment, differentiation, and proliferation.

In Ref. 188, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were exposed, for 25 min, to the 0.1- to 4.5-THz pulsed THz radiation with a $75 - μ J$ pulse energy and a $≃ 10 - MV / cm$ field strength. Cell viability analysis was carried out 24 h after the exposure, for which the fluorescent staining with propidium iodide and Hoechst dyes was applied. This study did not reveal any increase in the number of dead cells, as compared with the control group.

Human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) were exposed to the pulsed THz radiation with the central frequency of 0.8 THz and the electric field of $0.5 MV / cm$ in Ref. 276. The estimated temperature rise was only 0.3 mK, which could not trigger to the expression of heat shock proteins. The genes, strongly affected by THz irradiation, were regulated by zinc-finger proteins. The authors supposed that gene expression was induced nonthermally by the electric field of the THz pulse, which might be caused by the movement of zinc ions within the cell compartments.

Mouse mesenchymal stem cells (MSC cell line) were studied in Ref. 277. Cells were preliminarily induced to differentiate toward adipocytes. They were exposed, for 2, 4, 6, and 9 h, to the broadband pulsed THz waves with the frequency range of 1 to 30 THz (the maximal intensity is centered at $≃ 10 THz$ ), the pulse repetition rate of 1 kHz, the pulse duration of 35 fs, the peak power of $≃ 30 MW$ , and the average irradiance of $≃ 1 mW / {cm}^{2}$ . Analysis of the genome-wide expression profile showed a clearly visible change in the profile only after a 9-h exposure; namely, 2204 genes changed their activity. Additional analysis of individual genes and visually increased accumulation of the lipid-like droplets in the cellular cytoplasm justified acceleration of the cells’ differentiation into adipocytes under prolonged irradiation. Further studies that involved a 12-h-long THz exposure of cells to the radiation of the same source as well as their 2-h-long THz exposure to the CW radiation (the frequency of 2.52 THz and the power of $< 150 mW$ ) revealed changes in the activity of 381, 122, and 236 genes at 12-h broadband pulsed, 2-h broadband pulsed, and 2-h CW exposure regimes, respectively. Finally, it was found that a 2-h-long THz exposure (regardless of the applied THz sources) affects genes transcriptionally active in pluripotent stem cells.²⁷⁸^,²⁷⁹ The authors note that the transcriptional response to THz irradiation indirectly indicates manifestation of gene-specific intrinsic double-stranded DNA breathing dynamics, and the THz-field effects are most likely at the level of DNA transcription.²⁷⁷^–²⁷⁹

There is still a quite small amount of investigation in the area of stem cell exposure to THz waves. The observed effects, both at the cellular and genetic levels, can be divided into two categories: general and stem-cell-specific. Effects from the first category, such as cyto- and genotoxicity, have not yet been found against the background of changes in the expression of many genes. Among the effects from the second category, available data allow us to consider THz radiation as a potential tool for noncontact control of gene expression and modulation of cell differentiation.

4.6.

Effects of THz Waves on Fluorescent Cellular Biosensors

Fluorescent cellular biosensors, described in this section, generally have a form of cells with artificial genetic constructs, which include a promoter of a sensor gene (it reacts to the effect of one or another chemical or physical factor) and a reporter gene of fluorescence protein (its activity is regulated by the promoter of the sensor gene).²⁸⁰ The development of such biosensors includes assembly of the hybrid genetic constructs and their introduction into bacterial cells, as shown in Fig. 19.

Fig. 19

The general scheme of the biosensor development: (a) a base vector with a fluorescence protein gene, (b) a sensory gene promoter, (c) an assembly, (d) a hybrid genetic construct, (e) an introduction of the resulting construct into cells, and (f) biosensors. Courtesy of D.S. Serdyukov.

When exposed to the investigated factor, the promoter of a sensor gene activates the reporter gene and, accordingly, the production of the fluorescence protein, thus, leading to a well-detectable fluorescent signal. The biosensory approach to study THz bioeffects makes it possible to trace the THz response of a gene, the promoter of which was used in the assembly of the genetic construct.

E. coli biosensor cells with the promoter of a sensor gene of catalase (katG gene) were exposed, for 5, 10, and 15 min, to pulse THz irradiation, with the central frequencies of 1.50, 2.00, and 2.31 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 2.8 to 11.2 MHz, the pulse duration of 50 ps, the peak power of 1 MW, or the average irradiance of $1.4 W / {cm}^{2}$ . THz radiation was intense enough to heat the samples up to 33°C to 37°C; therefore, the control samples were subjected to the bulk heating at 37°C. In addition, a positive control was applied; namely, exposure to the hydrogen peroxide (a typical inductor for the katG gene) and two additional controls: heat (42°C for 5 min) and cold (30°C for 15 min) shock. As a result, it was shown that THz radiation activates this biosensor (i.e., the catalase gene in the E. coli genome) at all studied THz frequencies, and the effect appears to be dose-dependent. There was no activation at 5-min-long exposure as well as after the heat/cold shock. At the same time, activation was observed in some experiments at 10-min-long exposure and in all experiments at 15-min-long exposure. Figure 20 shows that the effect of THz waves turned out to be more pronounced than that of a positive control; it persisted for more than 4 h after the exposure, which is equal to about eight life cycles of E. coli.

Fig. 20

Fluorescence dynamics of the E. coli biosensor cells with the promoter of a sensor gene katG after their 15-min-long exposure to 2.0 THz radiation, as compared with the bulk heating to 37°C (negative control) and with the exposure to hydrogen peroxide. Adapted from Ref. 281 with the permission of John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

At the same time, radiation did not affect cell survival.²⁸¹ Later, the activity of E. coli biosensors with the promoter of a sensor gene copA (involved in the homeostasis of copper ions) and the promoter of a sensor gene emrR (involved in multidrug resistance) was studied using the same THz source with the central frequency of 2.31 THz and exposure duration of 15 min. The similar temperature conditions were applied. There were also corresponding positive controls that involved exposure to copper (II) sulfate and salicylic acid. As a result, the emrR promoter was not activated during the THz exposure, but there was a prolonged activation (by analogy with katG) of the copA promoter, but in less extent in comparison with the positive control; heat shock had no effect.²⁸² Long-term THz-dependent responses of E. coli stress systems associated with oxidative stress and copper ion metabolism were demonstrated. The absence of a reaction of the antibiotic resistance system emphasizes the specificity of the cellular response.²⁸¹^–²⁸³

Recently, similar E. coli biosensor technology was applied to study the activities of promoters that regulate the production of transcription factors MatA, YdeO, ChbR, and TdcR.²⁸⁴^,²⁸⁵ Being exposed, for 15 and 30 min, to the intense-pulsed THz radiation, with the frequency of 2.31 THz, the pulse repetition rate of 5.6 MHz, the pulse duration of 100 ps, and the average irradiance of $≃ 140 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , the samples were heated up to the temperatures of 35°C to 37°C, and all four biosensors were activated, as compared with the bulk heating at 37°C. However, when exposed, for 15 and 30 min, to the low-intensity 0.14-THz CW radiation with the irradiance of $2 mW / {cm}^{2}$ , the samples were heated up to $≃ 26 ° C$ (which is $\leq 1 ° C$ above an ambient room temperature), and only three biosensors were activated, displaying the biosynthesis of YdeO, ChbR, and TdcR. In almost all of these cases, a dose-dependent effect was observed, i.e., the activation was more pronounced (or was only observed) at 30-min-long exposure, as compared to the 15-min-long one. In addition, as an example of THz-dependent activation of the tdcR gene, the significant influence of the type of vessel for irradiation and the composition of the nutrient medium was shown. Chemical exposure (five different toxins separately) or heat shock (heating up to 42°C) did not cause the activation. Thus, four THz-sensitive biosensors were obtained, which serve as indicators of various cellular functions: biofilm development (MatA), response to various stress (YdeO), uptake and metabolism of chitobiose (ChbR), and transport and metabolism of threonine and serine (TdcR).

Thereby, the described research results justify that nowadays biosensors are considered as a promising platform for research and monitoring of the THz anthropogenic factors.

5. Discussions

Evidently, during the last few decades, large amounts of data have been accumulated regarding biological effects of THz waves. Sometimes, we observed contradicting results of the THz exposure, which poses important problems of adequate designing, planning, and performing of the THz exposure experiments. As described earlier, only a combination of accurate knowledge about the exposure parameters, a number of control measurements (tests), and maintenance of the suitable ambient environment can lead to reproducible and verified experimental data.

Despite a considerable interest paid to the biological effects of THz waves, further research is required for the development of safe limits of THz waves. Obviously, such safe limits should account for not only the thermal THz-wave effects (as the common ICNIRP standards do)⁴⁰^,¹⁹²^,¹⁹³ but also for the nonthermal. Development of the THz dosimetry is of crucial importance for biomedical applications of THz technology in such demanding branches as label-free diagnosis of malignant and benign neoplasms,³^,⁴^,⁸^–¹⁶ sensing of glycated tissues and blood in context of diabetes diagnosis,¹^,¹⁹^–²¹ determining the degree of traumatic injuries²² and viability³⁰ of tissues, and even emerging methods of single cells, microorganisms, bacteria, and viruses sensing.²⁸⁶^–²⁹¹ Also, THz dosimetry is of crucial importance for the rapidly developing 6G wireless communications that will reportedly span sub-THz and THz frequencies.²⁹² There is no doubt that such a wide range of THz technology applications, which involve interaction between THz waves and different biological systems, would stimulate the development of THz safe limits in the nearest future.

Studies of the THz-wave biological effects involving modern methods of cytology, genetics, and molecular biology can uncover THz therapeutic avenue. As mentioned above, THz waves are capable of regulating the gene expression, changing the membrane permeability, and DNA demethylation. Being adequately studied and regulated, such a versatile impact of THz waves on living cell opens a variety of THz technology applications in medical therapy of cancers, inflammatory, and neurodegenerative deceases. Finally, we notice that development of such THz therapeutic applications would require further progress in THz components, including highly efficient uncooled CW and pulsed THz emitters,⁶^,⁷^,¹²⁶^–¹²⁸^,¹³⁰^,¹³²^–¹³⁵ elements of bulk (open space) and fiber/waveguide optics²⁹³^–²⁹⁹ aimed at the THz-wave delivery to the hardly accessible tissues and internal organs. Such elements are still to be developed.

6. Conclusion

Recent research results in the area of THz-wave effects on biological systems of the different organization levels, such as biomolecules, cells, and organism, were discussed. Despite the considerable data accumulated in this demanding research direction, we still possess quite limited knowledge about biological effects of THz waves. Further research and engineering efforts are required to develop adequate safe limits of THz-wave exposure and to objectively uncover strengths and weaknesses of THz technology in different branches of medial therapy. Thus, this review summarizes up-to-date knowledge in the area of cell exposure to THz radiation and paves the ways to the THz dosimetry and therapeutic avenues.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in the framework of state support for the creation and development of world-class research centers, “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare” (# 075–15–2020–926).

Code, Data, and Materials Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

1.

X. Yang et al., “Biomedical applications of terahertz spectroscopy and imaging,” Trends Biotechnol., 34 (10), 810 –824 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.008 TRBIDM 0167-7799 Google Scholar

2.

O. Smolyanskaya et al., “Terahertz biophotonics as a tool for studies of dielectric and spectral properties of biological tissues and liquids,” Prog. Quantum Electron., 62 1 –77 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pquantelec.2018.10.001 PQUEAH 0079-6727 Google Scholar

3.

K. Zaytsev et al., “The progress and perspectives of terahertz technology for diagnosis of neoplasms: a review,” J. Opt., 22 (1), 013001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ab4dc3 Google Scholar

4.

G. Musina et al., “Prospects of terahertz technology in diagnosis of human brain tumors: a review,” J. Biomed. Photonics Eng., 6 (2), 020201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18287/JBPE20.06.020201 Google Scholar

5.

O. Cherkasova et al., “Diagnosis of glioma molecular markers by terahertz technologies,” Photonics, 8 (1), 22 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics8010022 Google Scholar

6.

Y.-S. Lee, Principles of Terahertz Science and Technology, Springer, New York (2009). Google Scholar

7.

H. Guerboukha, K. Nallappan and M. Skorobogatiy, “Toward real-time terahertz imaging,” Adv. Opt. Photonics, 10 (4), 843 –938 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.10.000843 AOPAC7 1943-8206 Google Scholar

8.

R. Woodward et al., “Terahertz pulse imaging of ex vivo basal cell carcinoma,” J. Invest. Dermatol., 120 (1), 72 –78 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12013.x JIDEAE 0022-202X Google Scholar

9.

V. Wallace et al., “Terahertz pulsed imaging of basal cell carcinoma ex vivo and in vivo,” Br. J. Dermatol., 151 (2), 424 –432 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06129.x BJDEAZ 0007-0963 Google Scholar

10.

K. Zaytsev et al., “In vivo terahertz spectroscopy of pigmentary skin nevi: pilot study of non-invasive early diagnosis of dysplasia,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 106 (5), 053702 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907350 Google Scholar

11.

A. Fitzgerald et al., “Terahertz pulsed imaging of human breast tumors,” Radiology, 239 (2), 533 –540 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2392041315 RADLAX 0033-8419 Google Scholar

12.

C. Reid et al., “Terahertz pulsed imaging of freshly excised human colonic tissues,” Phys. Med. Biol., 56 (14), 4333 –4353 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/008 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

13.

S. Oh et al., “Study of freshly excised brain tissues using terahertz imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 5 (8), 2837 –2842 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.002837 Google Scholar

14.

A. Gavdush et al., “Terahertz spectroscopy of gelatin-embedded human brain gliomas of different grades: a road toward intraoperative THz diagnosis,” J. Biomed. Opt., 24 (2), 027001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.2.027001 Google Scholar

15.

A. Gavdush et al., “Terahertz dielectric spectroscopy of human brain gliomas and intact tissues ex vivo: double-Debye and double-overdamped-oscillator models of dielectric response,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (1), 69 –83 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.411025 Google Scholar

16.

M. Konnikova et al., “Malignant and benign thyroid nodule differentiation through the analysis of blood plasma with terahertz spectroscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (2), 1020 –1035 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.412715 Google Scholar

17.

A. Kucheryavenko et al., “Terahertz dielectric spectroscopy and solid immersion microscopy of ex vivo glioma model 101.8: brain tissue heterogeneity,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (8), 5272 –5289 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.432758 Google Scholar

18.

A. Nikitkina et al., “Terahertz radiation and the skin: a review,” J. Biomed. Opt., 26 (4), 043005 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.4.043005 Google Scholar

19.

O. Cherkasova, M. Nazarov and A. Shkurinov, “Noninvasive blood glucose monitoring in the terahertz frequency range,” Opt. Quantum Electron., 48 (3), 217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-016-0490-5 OQELDI 0306-8919 Google Scholar

20.

G. Hernandez-Cardoso et al., “Terahertz imaging for early screening of diabetic foot syndrome: a proof of concept,” Sci. Rep., 7 42124 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42124 Google Scholar

21.

O. Smolyanskaya et al., “Multimodal optical diagnostics of glycated biological tissues,” Biochemistry (Moscow), 84 (S1), 124 –143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297919140086 Google Scholar

22.

H. Zhao et al., “High-sensitivity terahertz imaging of traumatic brain injury in a rat model,” J. Biomed. Opt., 23 (3), 036015 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.23.3.036015 Google Scholar

23.

J. Shi et al., “Automatic evaluation of traumatic brain injury based on terahertz imaging with machine learning,” Opt. Express, 26 (5), 6371 –6381 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.006371 Google Scholar

24.

Y. Wang et al., “Terahertz spectroscopic diagnosis of early blast-induced traumatic brain injury in rats,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (8), 4085 –4098 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.395432 Google Scholar

25.

Y. Cao et al., “Qualitative and quantitative detection of liver injury with terahertz time-domain spectroscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 (2), 982 –993 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.381660 Google Scholar

26.

A. Shchepetilnikov et al., “Quantitative analysis of water content and distribution in plants using terahertz imaging,” Opt. Eng., 59 (6), 061617 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.6.061617 Google Scholar

27.

K. Zaytsev et al., “Special section guest editorial: advances in terahertz biomedical science and applications,” J. Biomed. Opt., 26 (4), 043001 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.4.043001 Google Scholar

28.

E. Iomdina et al., “Terahertz scanning of the rabbit cornea with experimental UVB-induced damage: in vivo assessment of hydration and its verification,” J. Biomed. Opt., 26 (4), 043010 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.4.043010 Google Scholar

29.

G. Musina et al., “Moisture adsorption by decellularized bovine pericardium collagen matrices studied by terahertz pulsed spectroscopy and solid immersion microscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (9), 5368 –5386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.433216 Google Scholar

30.

N. Bajwa et al., “Non-invasive terahertz imaging of tissue water content for flap viability assessment,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 (1), 460 –474 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000460 Google Scholar

31.

M.-O. Mattsson, O. Zeni and M. Simko, “Is there a biological basis for therapeutic applications of millimetre waves and THz waves?,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 39 (9), 863 –878 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0483-5 Google Scholar

32.

S. Romanenko et al., “The interaction between electromagnetic fields at megahertz, gigahertz and terahertz frequencies with cells, tissues and organisms: risks and potential,” J. R. Soc. Interface, 14 (137), 20170585 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0585 Google Scholar

33.

L. Titova et al., “Intense THz pulses down-regulate genes associated with skin cancer and psoriasis: a new therapeutic avenue?,” Sci. Rep., 3 2363 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02363 Google Scholar

34.

G. Wilmink and J. Grundt, “Invited review article: current state of research on biological effects of terahertz radiation,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 32 (10), 1074 –1122 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-011-9794-5 Google Scholar

35.

H. Hintzsche and H. Stopper, “Effects of terahertz radiation on biological systems,” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42 (22), 2408 –2434 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2011.574206 CRETEK 1064-3389 Google Scholar

36.

I. Il’ina, D. Sitnikov and M. Agranat, “State-of-the-art of studies of the effect of terahertz radiation on living biological systems,” High Temp., 56 (5), 789 –810 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X18050127 HITEA4 0018-151X Google Scholar

37.

O. Cherkasova et al., “Effects of terahertz radiation on living cells: a review,” Opt. Spectrosc., 128 (6), 855 –866 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X20060041 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar

38.

“Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) opinion on potential health effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF),” 1 –288 (2015). Google Scholar

39.

“IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz,” (2005). Google Scholar

40.

“Guidelines for limiting exposure to time varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz),” Health Phys., 74 (4), 494 –522 (1998). HLTPAO 0017-9078 Google Scholar

41.

A. Berry et al., “Do in vivo terahertz imaging systems comply with safety guidelines?,” J. Laser Appl., 15 (3), 192 –198 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2351/1.1585079 JLAPEN 1042-346X Google Scholar

42.

T. Kleine-Ostmann et al., “Field exposure and dosimetry in the THz frequency range,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 4 (1), 12 –25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2013.2293115 Google Scholar

43.

L. Alexandrov et al., “Evaluating the role of coherent delocalized phonon-like modes in DNA cyclization,” Sci. Rep., 7 9731 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09537-y Google Scholar

44.

J. Son, Terahertz Biomedical Science and Technology, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014). Google Scholar

45.

P. Weightman, “Prospects for the study of biological systems with high power sources of terahertz radiation,” Phys. Biol., 9 (5), 053001 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/9/5/053001 1478-3975 Google Scholar

46.

V. Fedorov, V. Vechkanov and O. Papafilova, “Influence of terahertz radiation on minimal osmotic resistance of red blood cells,” Biomed. Radioelectron., 5 39 –44 (2014). Google Scholar

47.

M. M. Nazarov et al., “Terahertz time-domain spectroscopy of biological tissues,” Quantum Electron., 38 647 –654 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1070/QE2008v038n07ABEH013851 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar

48.

E. Pickwell et al., “Simulation of terahertz pulse propagation in biological systems,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 84 (12), 2190 –2192 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1688448 Google Scholar

49.

A. Ishimaru, Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Radiation, and Scattering: From Fundamentals to Applications, 2nd ed.IEEE Press, Piscataway, New Jersey (2017). Google Scholar

50.

M. Zhadobov et al., “Millimeter-wave interactions with the human body: state of knowledge and recent advances,” Int. J. Microwave Wireless Technolog., 3 (2), 237 –247 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1759078711000122 Google Scholar

51.

V. Tuchin, Tissue Optics: Light Scattering Methods and Instruments for Medical Diagnostics, 3rd ed.SPIE, Bellingham, Washington (2015). Google Scholar

52.

V. Tuchin, “Tissue optics and photonics: biological tissue structures,” J. Biomed. Photonics Engi., 1 (1), 3 –21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.18287/JBPE-2015-1-1-3 Google Scholar

53.

U. Møller et al., “Terahertz reflection spectroscopy of Debye relaxation in polar liquids,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 26 (9), A113 –A125 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.26.00A113 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar

54.

E. Pickwell et al., “Simulating the response of terahertz radiation to basal cell carcinoma using ex vivo spectroscopy measurements,” J. Biomed. Opt., 10 (6), 064021 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2137667 Google Scholar

55.

G. Walker et al., “Modelling the propagation of terahertz radiation through a tissue simulating phantom,” Phys. Med. Biol., 49 (10), 1853 –1864 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/10/002 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

56.

E. Pickwell et al., “In vivo study of human skin using pulsed terahertz radiation,” Phys. Med. Biol., 49 (9), 1595 –1607 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/9/001 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

57.

M. Ney and I. Abdulhalim, “Modeling of reflectometric and ellipsometric spectra from the skin in the terahertz and submillimeter waves region,” J. Biomed. Opt., 16 (6), 067006 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3592779 Google Scholar

58.

A. Fitzgerald, E. Pickwell-MacPherson and V. Wallace, “Use of finite difference time domain simulations and Debye theory for modelling the terahertz reflection response of normal and tumour breast tissue,” PLoS One, 9 e99291 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099291 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

59.

B. Truong et al., “The potential of the double-Debye parameters to discriminate between basal cell carcinoma and normal skin,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 5 (6), 990 –998 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2485208 Google Scholar

60.

B. Truong et al., “A dielectric model of human breast tissue in terahertz regime,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 62 (2), 699 –707 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2014.2364025 IEBEAX 0018-9294 Google Scholar

61.

K. J. Tielrooij et al., “Dielectric relaxation dynamics of water in model membranes probed by terahertz spectroscopy,” Biophys J, 97 (9), 2484 –2492 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.024 Google Scholar

62.

T. Torii et al., “Measurements of glucose concentration in aqueous solutions using reflected THz radiation for applications to a novel sub-THz radiation non-invasive blood sugar measurement method,” Digit Health, 3 2055207617729534 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617729534 Google Scholar

63.

L. Duponchel et al., “Terahertz microfluidic sensor for in situ exploration of hydration shell of molecules,” Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., 123 28 –35 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.01.009 Google Scholar

64.

N. A. Morozov, “Periodic systems of the structure of matter: the theory of the formation of chemical elements in Russian,” Moscow (1907). Google Scholar

65.

M. Nazarov, O. Cherkasova and A. Shkurinov, “A comprehensive study of albumin solutions in the extended terahertz frequency range,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 39 840 –853 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0513-3 Google Scholar

66.

O. Cherkasova et al., “THz spectroscopy of bound water in glucose: direct measurements from crystalline to dissolved state,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 41 1057 –1068 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-020-00684-4 Google Scholar

67.

M. Asaki et al., “Dielectric relaxation of electrolyte solutions using terahertz transmission spectroscopy,” J. Chem. Phys., 116 (19), 8469 –8482 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1468888 Google Scholar

68.

S. Funkner et al., “Watching the low-frequency motions in aqueous salt solutions: the terahertz vibrational signatures of hydrated ions,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134 (2), 1030 –1035 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207929u JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar

69.

N. Vinh et al., “High-precision gigahertz-to-terahertz spectroscopy of aqueous salt solutions as a probe of the femtosecond-to-picosecond dynamics of liquid water,” J. Chem. Phys., 142 (16), 164502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918708 Google Scholar

70.

E. Buixaderas, S. Kamba and J. Petzelt, “Lattice dynamics and central-mode phenomena in the dielectric response of ferroelectrics and related materials,” Ferroelectrics, 308 (1), 131 –192 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190490508909 FEROA8 0015-0193 Google Scholar

71.

K. Cole and R. Cole, “Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics I. Alternating current characteristics,” J. Chem. Phys., 9 (4), 341 –351 (1941). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1750906 Google Scholar

72.

K. Cole and R. Cole, “Dispersion and absorption in dielectrics II. Direct current characteristics,” J. Chem. Phys., 10 (2), 98 –105 (1942). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1723677 Google Scholar

73.

D. Davidson, “Dielectric relaxation in liquids: I. The representation of relaxation behavior,” Can. J. Chem., 39 (3), 571 –594 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1139/v61-069 CJCHAG 0008-4042 Google Scholar

74.

S. Havriliak and S. Negami, “A complex plane analysis of dispersions in some polymer systems,” J. Polym. Sci. Part C Polym. Symp., 14 (1), 99 –117 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1002/polc.5070140111 Google Scholar

75.

S. Yurchenko and K. Zaytsev, “Spectroscopy of nafion in terahertz frequency range,” J. Appl. Phys., 116 (11), 113508 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4896194 Google Scholar

76.

N. Chernomyrdin et al., “Reflection-mode continuous-wave

0.15 λ

-resolution terahertz solid immersion microscopy of soft biological tissues,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 113 (11), 111102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5045480 Google Scholar

77.

V. Zhelnov et al., “Object-dependent spatial resolution of the reflection-mode terahertz solid immersion microscopy,” Opt. Express, 29 (3), 3553 –3566 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.415049 Google Scholar

78.

C. Joseph et al., “Imaging of ex vivo nonmelanoma skin cancers in the optical and terahertz spectral regions. Optical and terahertz skin cancers imaging,” J. Biophotonics, 7 (5), 295 –303 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201200111 Google Scholar

79.

B. Fan, V. Neel and A. Yaroslavsky, “Multimodal imaging for nonmelanoma skin cancer margin delineation,” Lasers Surg. Med., 49 (3), 319 –326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22552 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar

80.

A. Yaroslavsky et al., “Delineating nonmelanoma skin cancer margins using terahertz and optical imaging,” J. Biomed. Photonics Eng., 3 (1), 010301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.18287/JBPE17.03.010301 Google Scholar

81.

G. Komandin et al., “BWO generators for terahertz dielectric measurements,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 3 (4), 440 –444 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2013.2255914 Google Scholar

82.

L. Hu et al., “Experimental demonstration of a 0.34-THz backward-wave oscillator with a sinusoidally corrugated slow-wave structure,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 65 (6), 2149 –2155 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2018.2805699 IETDAI 0018-9383 Google Scholar

83.

A. Dobroiu et al., “Terahertz imaging system based on a backward-wave oscillator,” Appl. Opt., 43 5637 –5646 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.005637 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar

84.

M. Mineo and C. Paoloni, “Corrugated rectangular waveguide tunable backward wave oscillator for terahertz applications,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 57 (6), 1481 –1484 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2010.2045678 IETDAI 0018-9383 Google Scholar

85.

W. He et al., “Generation of broadband terahertz radiation using a backward wave oscillator and pseudospark-sourced electron beam,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 107 (13), 133501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932099 Google Scholar

86.

M. T. San et al., “Study on operation of oversized backward wave oscillator for broadband terahertz radiation,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 46 (3), 530 –538 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2018.2796559 ITPSBD 0093-3813 Google Scholar

87.

T. Shibuya et al., “Terahertz-wave generation using a 4-dimethylamino-n-methyl-4-stilbazolium tosylate crystal under intra-cavity conditions,” Appl. Phys. Express, 1 (4), 042002 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.1.042002 Google Scholar

88.

W. Shi et al., “Efficient, tunable, and coherent 0.18–5.27-THz source based on GaSe crystal,” Opt. Lett., 27 1454 –1456 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.001454 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

89.

W. Shi and Y. J. Ding, “Tunable terahertz waves generated by mixing two copropagating infrared beams in gap,” Opt. Lett., 30 1030 –1032 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.30.001030 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

90.

Y. J. Ding, “Progress in terahertz sources based on difference-frequency generation invited,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 31 2696 –2711 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.31.002696 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar

91.

K. Kawase, J. Shikata and H. Ito, “Terahertz wave parametric source,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 35 (3), R1 –R14 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/35/3/201 JPAPBE 0022-3727 Google Scholar

92.

K. Kawase et al., “Coherent tunable THz-wave generation from

{LiNbO}_{3}

with monolithic grating coupler,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 68 (18), 2483 –2485 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.115828 Google Scholar

93.

M.-H. Wu et al., “Terahertz parametric generation and amplification from potassium titanyl phosphate in comparison with lithium niobate and lithium tantalate,” Opt. Express, 24 25964 –25973 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.025964 Google Scholar

94.

K. Kawase et al., “Injection-seeded terahertz-wave parametric generator with wide tunability,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 80 (2), 195 –197 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1429299 Google Scholar

95.

H. Minamide et al., “Kilowatt-peak terahertz-wave generation and sub-femtojoule terahertz-wave pulse detection based on nonlinear optical wavelength-conversion at room temperature,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 35 25 –37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-013-0041-0 Google Scholar

96.

S. Hayashi et al., “Ultrabright continuously tunable terahertz-wave generation at room temperature,” Sci. Rep., 4 5045 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05045 Google Scholar

97.

K. Zhong et al., “Optically pumped terahertz sources,” Science China Technological Sciences, 60 1801 –1818 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9057-3 Google Scholar

98.

G. W. Chantry, Long-Wave Optics: The Science and Technology of Infrared and Near-Millimetre Waves. Volume 1 - Principles, Academic Press Inc., London and Orlando, Florida (1984). Google Scholar

99.

G. W. Chantry, Long-Wave Optics: The Science and Technology of Infrared and Near-Millimetre Waves. Volume 2 – Applications, Academic Press Inc., London and Orlando, Florida (1984). Google Scholar

100.

P. Chevalier et al., “Widely tunable compact terahertz gas lasers,” Science, 366 (6467), 856 –860 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8683 SCIEAS 0036-8075 Google Scholar

101.

M. Wienold, A. Zubairova and H.-W. Hübers, “Laser emission at 4.5 THz from

{}^{15}{NH}_{3}

and a mid-infrared quantum-cascade laser as a pump source,” Opt. Express, 28 23114 –23121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.395832 Google Scholar

102.

C. Liu et al., “Tunable terahertz gas laser based on a germanium spectrum splitter,” Appl. Phys. B: Lasers Opt., 126 (8), 133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-020-07486-5 Google Scholar

103.

F. Maiwald et al., “Terahertz frequency multiplier chains based on planar Schottky diodes,” Proc. SPIE, 4855 447 –458 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.459355 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

104.

M. Asada, S. Suzuki and N. Kishimoto, “Resonant tunneling diodes for sub-terahertz and terahertz oscillators,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 47 4375 –4384 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.47.4375 JJAPA5 0021-4922 Google Scholar

105.

A. Maestrini et al., “Schottky diode-based terahertz frequency multipliers and mixers,” C.R. Phys., 11 (7), 480 –495 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2010.05.002 Google Scholar

106.

J. Ward et al., “Capability of THz sources based on Schottky diode frequency multiplier chains,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37535), 1587 –1590 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2004.1338884 Google Scholar

107.

A. Maestrini et al., “A 1.7-1.9 THz local oscillator source,” IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., 14 (6), 253 –255 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2004.828027 Google Scholar

108.

A. Maestrini et al., “Local oscillator chain for 1.55 to 1.75 THz with

100 - μ W

peak power,” IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett., 15 (12), 871 –873 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2005.859989 Google Scholar

109.

J. Rieh, D. Yoon and J. Yun, “An overview of solid-state electronic sources and detectors for terahertz imaging,” in 12th IEEE Int. Conf. Solid-State and Integr. Circuit Technol., 1 –4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSICT.2014.7021179 Google Scholar

110.

T. Ishibashi et al., “Unitraveling-carrier photodiodes for terahertz applications,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 20 (6), 79 –88 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2014.2336537 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

111.

S. Preu et al., “Tunable, continuous-wave terahertz photomixer sources and applications,” J. Appl. Phys., 109 (6), 061301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3552291 Google Scholar

112.

K. A. McIntosh et al., “Terahertz photomixing with diode lasers in low-temperature-grown GaAs,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 67 (26), 3844 –3846 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.115292 Google Scholar

113.

R. Safian, G. Ghazi and N. Mohammadian, “Review of photomixing continuous-wave terahertz systems and current application trends in terahertz domain,” Opt. Eng., 58 (11), 110901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.58.11.110901 Google Scholar

114.

D. J. Ironside et al., “Enhancing THz generation in photomixers using a metamaterial approach,” Opt. Express, 27 9481 –9494 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.009481 Google Scholar

115.

S. Kumar, “Recent progress in terahertz quantum cascade lasers,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 17 (1), 38 –47 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2010.2049735 IJSQEN 1077-260X Google Scholar

116.

M. A. Belkin and F. Capasso, “New frontiers in quantum cascade lasers: high performance room temperature terahertz sources,” Phys. Scr., 90 118002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/90/11/118002 PHSTBO 0031-8949 Google Scholar

117.

S. Jung et al., “Terahertz difference-frequency quantum cascade laser sources on silicon,” Optica, 4 38 –43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000038 Google Scholar

118.

L. Li et al., “Terahertz quantum cascade lasers with

> 1 W

output powers,” Electron. Lett., 50 (4), 309 –311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2013.4035 ELLEAK 0013-5194 Google Scholar

119.

B. S. Williams et al., “High-power terahertz quantum cascade lasers,” Electron. Lett., 42 (2), 89 –91 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20063921 ELLEAK 0013-5194 Google Scholar

120.

X. Wang et al., “High-power terahertz quantum cascade lasers with 0.23 W in continuous wave mode,” AIP Adv., 6 (7), 075210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959195 AAIDBI 2158-3226 Google Scholar

121.

K. Fujita et al., “Recent progress in terahertz difference-frequency quantum cascade laser sources,” Nanophotonics, 7 (11), 1795 –1817 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2018-0093 Google Scholar

122.

D. H. Auston, K. P. Cheung and P. R. Smith, “Picosecond photoconducting hertzian dipoles,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 45 (3), 284 –286 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.95174 Google Scholar

123.

P. R. Smith, D. H. Auston and M. C. Nuss, “Subpicosecond photoconducting dipole antennas,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 24 (2), 255 –260 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/3.121 IEJQA7 0018-9197 Google Scholar

124.

C. Fattinger and D. Grischkowsky, “Terahertz beams,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 54 (6), 490 –492 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.100958 Google Scholar

125.

D. Auston, “Picosecond optoelectronic switching and gating in silicon,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 26 (3), 101 –103 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.88079 Google Scholar

126.

N. M. Burford and M. O. El-Shenawee, “Review of terahertz photoconductive antenna technology,” Opt. Eng., 56 (1), 010901 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.1.010901 Google Scholar

127.

D. Lavrukhin et al., “Shaping the spectrum of terahertz photoconductive antenna by frequency-dependent impedance modulation,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., 34 (3), 034005 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/aaff31 SSTEET 0268-1242 Google Scholar

128.

A. Yachmenev et al., “Metallic and dielectric metasurfaces in photoconductive terahertz devices: a review,” Opt. Eng., 59 (6), 061608 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.6.061608 Google Scholar

129.

A. Yachmenev et al., “Arsenides-and related III–V materials-based multilayered structures for terahertz applications: carious designs and growth technology,” Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater., 66 (2), 100485 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2020.100485 PCGMED 0960-8974 Google Scholar

130.

C. Berry et al., “Significant performance enhancement in photoconductive terahertz optoelectronics by incorporating plasmonic contact electrodes,” Nat Commun, 4 1622 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2638 Google Scholar

131.

S. Yang et al., “7.5% optical-to-terahertz conversion efficiency offered by photoconductive emitters with three-dimensional plasmonic contact electrodes,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 4 (5), 575 –581 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2014.2342505 Google Scholar

132.

S. Lepeshov et al., “Enhancement of terahertz photoconductive antenna operation by optical nanoantennas,” Laser Photonics Rev., 11 (1), 1600199 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201600199 Google Scholar

133.

D. Lavrukhin et al., “Terahertz photoconductive emitter with dielectric-embedded high-aspect-ratio plasmonic grating for operation with low-power optical pumps,” AIP Adv., 9 (1), 015112 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5081119 AAIDBI 2158-3226 Google Scholar

134.

D. Lavrukhin et al., “Plasmonic photoconductive antennas for terahertz pulsed spectroscopy and imaging systems,” Opt. Spectrosc., 126 580 –586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X19050199 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar

135.

D. Lavrukhin et al., “Emission efficiency of terahertz antennas with conventional topology and metal metasurface: a comparative analysis,” Opt. Spectrosc., 128 1018 –1025 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X20070103 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar

136.

A. Rice et al., “Terahertz optical rectification from <110> zinc-blende crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 64 (11), 1324 –1326 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.111922 Google Scholar

137.

A. Schneider et al., “Generation of terahertz pulses through optical rectification in organic dast crystals: theory and experiment,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 23 1822 –1835 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.23.001822 JOBPDE 0740-3224 Google Scholar

138.

M. Venkatesh et al., “Generation of efficient THz radiation by optical rectification in DAST crystal using tunable femtosecond laser pulses,” Indian J. Phys., 91 319 –326 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-016-0927-5 Google Scholar

139.

K.-L. Yeh et al., “Generation of

10 μ J

ultrashort terahertz pulses by optical rectification,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 90 (17), 171121 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2734374 Google Scholar

140.

D. Jang et al., “Scalable terahertz generation by large-area optical rectification at 80 TW laser power,” Opt. Lett., 44 5634 –5637 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.005634 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

141.

F. Meyer et al., “Single-cycle, MHz repetition rate THz source with 66 mW of average power,” Opt. Lett., 45 2494 –2497 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.386305 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

142.

C. Vicario et al., “High efficiency THz generation in DSTMS, DAST and OH1 pumped by Cr:forsterite laser,” Opt. Express, 23 4573 –4580 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.004573 Google Scholar

143.

C. P. Hauri et al., “Strong-field single-cycle THz pulses generated in an organic crystal,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 99 (16), 161116 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3655331 Google Scholar

144.

S. Tripathi et al., “A fiber-laser pumped, high-power terahertz wave source based on optical rectification of femtosecond pulses in 4-dimethylamino-n-methyl-4-stilbazolium tosylate crystal,” Appl. Phys. Express, 6 (7), 072703 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.6.072703 Google Scholar

145.

D. S. Sitnikov et al., “Cell proliferation under intense pulses of terahertz radiation,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1787 012030 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1787/1/012030 JPCSDZ 1742-6588 Google Scholar

146.

A. V. Ovchinnikov et al., “A source of THz radiation with electric field strength of more than 1 MV cm-1 on the basis of 100-Hz femtosecond Cr: forsterite laser system,” Quantum Electron., 48 554 –558 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1070/QEL16681 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar

147.

M. Agranat et al., “Damage in a thin metal film by high-power terahertz radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 120 (8), 085704 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.085704 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

148.

C. Vicario et al., “Generation of 0.9-mJ THz pulses in DSTMS pumped by a

Cr : {Mg}_{2} {SiO}_{4}

laser,” Opt. Lett., 39 (23), 6632 –6635 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.006632 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

149.

D. Sitnikov, I. Ilina and A. Pronkin, “Experimental system for studying bioeffects of intense terahertz pulses with electric field strength up to

3.5 MV / cm

,” Opt. Eng., 59 (6), 061613 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.59.6.061613 Google Scholar

150.

D. Sitnikov et al., “System for long-term irradiation of living cell culture with high-intensity THz pulses,” High Temp., 58 36 –43 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0018151X20010174 HITEA4 0018-151X Google Scholar

151.

T. Idehara et al., “The gyrotrons as promising radiation sources for THz sensing and imaging,” Appl. Sci., 10 (3), 980 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030980 Google Scholar

152.

M. Thumm, “Gyro-devices and their applications,” in IEEE Int. Vacuum Electron. Conf., 521 –524 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVEC.2011.5747105 Google Scholar

153.

N. Kumar et al., “A review on the sub-THz/THz gyrotrons,” Infrared Phys. Technol., 76 38 –51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2016.01.015 IPTEEY 1350-4495 Google Scholar

154.

T. Idehara et al., “A THz gyrotron FU CW III with a 20T superconducting magnet,” in 33rd Int. Conf. Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves, 1 –2 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMW.2008.4665652 Google Scholar

155.

T. Idehara and S. P. Sabchevski, “Development and application of gyrotrons at FIR UF,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 46 (7), 2452 –2459 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2017.2775678 ITPSBD 0093-3813 Google Scholar

156.

M. Thumm, “State-of-the-art of high-power gyro-devices and free electron masers,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 41 1 –140 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-019-00631-y Google Scholar

157.

R. J. Temkin, “Development of terahertz gyrotrons for spectroscopy at MIT,” Terahertz Sci. Technol., 1 1 –9 (2014). Google Scholar

158.

Y. Tatematsu et al., “Development of second harmonic gyrotrons, gyrotron FU CW GII and Gyrotron FU CW GIII, equipped with internal mode converters,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 35 (2), 169 –178 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-014-0048-1 Google Scholar

159.

T. Saito et al., “Performance test of CW 300 GHz gyrotron FU CW I,” Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves, 28 (12), 1063 –1078 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-007-9291-z IJIWDO 0195-9271 Google Scholar

160.

V. E. Zapevalov et al., “High-power oscillator of continuous electromagnetic radiation with a frequency of 300 GHz,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 50 (6), 420 –428 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-007-0039-3 RPQEAC 0033-8443 Google Scholar

161.

M. Y. Glyavin et al., “Terahertz gyrotrons: state of the art and prospects,” J. Commun. Technol. Electron., 59 (8), 792 –797 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226914080075 JTELEJ 1064-2269 Google Scholar

162.

K. Sakamoto et al., “Development of 100 GHz band high power gyrotron for fusion experimental reactor,” in 18th Int. Atomic Energy Agency Fusion Energy Conf., (2001). Google Scholar

163.

M. Y. Glyavin, A. G. Luchinin and G. Y. Golubiatnikov, “Generation of 1.5-kW, 1-THz coherent radiation from a gyrotron with a pulsed magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 015101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.015101 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

164.

M. Y. Glyavin and A. G. Luchinin, “Powerful terahertz gyrotrons based on pulsed magnets,” Terahertz Sci. Technol., 2 (4), 150 –155 (2009). https://doi.org/10.11906/TST.150-155.2009.12.16 Google Scholar

165.

A. Ramundo-Orlando and G. P. Gallerano, “Terahertz radiation effects and biological applications,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 30 1308 –1318 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-009-9561-z Google Scholar

166.

T. T. L. Kristensen et al., “Modeling terahertz heating effects on water,” Opt. Express, 18 4727 –4739 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.004727 Google Scholar

167.

O. Spathmann et al., “Numerical computation of temperature elevation in human skin due to electromagnetic exposure in the THz frequency range,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 5 (6), 978 –989 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2476962 Google Scholar

168.

U. Malik et al., “Heat transfer and mapping of THz radiation absorption in biological tissue using mathematica based simulink transform,” Malays. J. Fundamental Appl. Sci., 14 500 –508 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjfas.v14n4.1074 Google Scholar

169.

W. Liu et al., “Thermal analysis of cornea heated with terahertz radiation,” Appl. Sci., 9 (5), 917 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050917 Google Scholar

170.

H. Hintzsche et al., “Terahertz radiation induces spindle disturbances in human-hamster hybrid cells,” Radiat. Res., 175 (5), 569 –574 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1667/RR2406.1 RAREAE 0033-7587 Google Scholar

171.

S. Koyama et al., “Twenty four-hour exposure to a 0.12 THz electromagnetic field does not affect the genotoxicity, morphological changes, or expression of heat shock protein in HCE-T cells,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 13 (8), 793 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13080793 Google Scholar

172.

I. Echchgadda et al., “Terahertz radiation: a non-contact tool for the selective stimulation of biological responses in human cells,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 6 (1), 54 –68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2504782 Google Scholar

173.

V. Fedorov, S. Popova and A. Pisarchik, “Dynamic effects of submillimeter wave radiation on biological objects of various levels of organization,” Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves, 24 (8), 1235 –1254 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024801304083 IJIWDO 0195-9271 Google Scholar

174.

H. Fröhlich, “Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems,” Int. J. Quantum Chem., 2 (5), 641 –649 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560020505 IJQCB2 0020-7608 Google Scholar

175.

A. Davydov, “The theory of contraction of proteins under their excitation,” J. Theor. Biol., 38 (3), 559 –569 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(73)90256-7 JTBIAP 0022-5193 Google Scholar

176.

V. Kislov, N. Devyatkov and O. Betskii, “Low intensity millimeter waves in medicine and biology,” Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 28 (1and2), 247 –268 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v28.i12.420 CRBEDR 0278-940X Google Scholar

177.

H. Fröhlich, “The biological effects of microwaves and related questions,” Adv. Electron. Electron Phys., 53 85 (1980). Google Scholar

178.

H. Fröhlich, Biological Coherence and Response to External Stimuli, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1988). Google Scholar

179.

I. V. Lundholm et al., “Terahertz radiation induces non-thermal structural changes associated with fröhlich condensation in a protein crystal,” Struct. Dyn., 2 (5), 054702 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4931825 Google Scholar

180.

J. Preto, “Classical investigation of long-range coherence in biological systems,” Chaos: Interdis. J. Nonlinear Sci., 26 (12), 123116 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4971963 Google Scholar

181.

J. Preto, “Semi-classical statistical description of fröhlich condensation,” J. Biol. Phys., 43 167 –184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10867-017-9442-y Google Scholar

182.

Z. Zhang, G. S. Agarwal and M. O. Scully, “Quantum fluctuations in the Fröhlich condensate of molecular vibrations driven far from equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 122 158101 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.158101 PRLTAO 0031-9007 Google Scholar

183.

B. Alexandrov et al., “DNA breathing dynamics in the presence of a terahertz field,” Phys. Lett. A, 374 (10), 1214 –1217 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.12.077 PYLAAG 0375-9601 Google Scholar

184.

S. M. Chitanvis, “Can low-power electromagnetic radiation disrupt hydrogen bonds in dsDNA?,” J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys., 44 (18), 2740 –2747 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.20910 JPBPEM 0887-6266 Google Scholar

185.

A. Bugay, “Interaction of terahertz radiation with DNA,” Nanosystems, 3 (1), 51 –55 (2012). Google Scholar

186.

H. Cheon et al., “Detection and manipulation of methylation in blood cancer DNA using terahertz radiation,” Sci. Rep., 9 6413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42855-x Google Scholar

187.

G. N. Kulipanov et al., “Novosibirsk free electron laser-facility description and recent experiments,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 5 (5), 798 –809 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2015.2453121 Google Scholar

188.

D. S. Sitnikov et al., “Studying the effect of high-power coherent terahertz pulses on mesenchymal stem cells,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1147 012060 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1147/1/012060 JPCSDZ 1742-6588 Google Scholar

189.

L. V. Titova, F. A. Hegmann, O. Kovalchuk, “Biological effects of broadband terahertz pulses,” Terahertz Biomedical Science and Technology, 241 –264 1st ed.CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014). Google Scholar

190.

L. David, M. G. Martin and H. Martina, “Solvation dynamics of biomolecules: modeling and terahertz experiments,” HFSP J., 2 (6), 314 –323 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2976/1.2976661 HJFOA5 1955-2068 Google Scholar

191.

Z. Zhu et al., “Transition to a superpermeation phase of confined water induced by a terahertz electromagnetic wave,” J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 11 (1), 256 –262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03228 JPCLCD 1948-7185 Google Scholar

192.

“Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz),” Health Phys., 118 (5), 483 –524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001210 HLTPAO 0017-9078 Google Scholar

193.

“ICNIRP Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Laser Radiation of Wavelengths between 180 nm and

1, 000 μ m

,” Health Phys., 105 (3), 271 –295 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e3182983fd4 HLTPAO 0017-9078 Google Scholar

194.

M. Simkó and M.-O. Mattsson, “5G wireless communication and health effects: a pragmatic review based on available studies regarding 6 to 100 GHz,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16 3406 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183406 Google Scholar

195.

L. Hardell, R. Nyberg and O. Kovalchuk, “Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation,” Mol. Clin. Oncol., 12 (3), 247 –257 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2020.1984 Google Scholar

196.

K. Li et al., “Relationship between power density and surface temperature elevation for human skin exposure to electromagnetic waves with oblique incidence angle from 6 GHz to 1 THz,” Phys. Med. Biol., 64 (6), 065016 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab057a PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

197.

I. Laakso et al., “Human exposure to pulsed fields in the frequency range from 6 to 100 GHz,” Phys. Med. Biol., 62 6980 –6992 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa81fe PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

198.

K. Sasaki et al., “Monte Carlo simulations of skin exposure to electromagnetic field from 10 GHz to 1 THz,” Phys. Med. Biol., 62 6993 –7010 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa81fc PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

199.

Z. Vilagosh, A. Lajevardipour and A. W. Wood, “Computational absorption and reflection studies of normal human skin at 0.45 THz,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 417 –431 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.377424 Google Scholar

200.

A. Matei et al., “Far-infrared spectra of amino acids,” Chem. Phys., 316 (1), 61 –71 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.04.033 CMPHC2 0301-0104 Google Scholar

201.

W. Yi et al., “Broadband terahertz spectroscopy of amino acids,” Instrum Sci. Technol., 45 (4), 423 –439 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2016.1270961 Google Scholar

202.

O. P. Cherkasova et al., “Terahertz spectroscopy of biological molecules,” Radiophys. Quantum Electron., 52 518 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11141-009-9152-9 RPQEAC 0033-8443 Google Scholar

203.

S. Fan et al., “The growth of biomedical terahertz research,” J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 47 374009 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/37/374009 JPAPBE 0022-3727 Google Scholar

204.

G. Acbas et al., “Optical measurements of long-range protein vibrations,” Nat. Commun., 5 3076 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4076 Google Scholar

205.

B. M. Fischer, M. Walther and P. U. Jepsen, “Far-infrared vibrational modes of DNA components studied by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy,” Phys. Med. Biol., 47 3807 –3814 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/21/319 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

206.

F. Wang et al., “Terahertz spectra of DNA nucleobase crystals: a joint experimental and computational study,” Spectrochim. Acta Part A, 179 255 –260 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2017.02.037 SAMCAS 1386-1425 Google Scholar

207.

A. Markelz, A. Roitberg and E. Heilweil, “Pulsed terahertz spectroscopy of DNA, bovine serum albumin and collagen between 0.1 and 2.0 THz,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 320 (1), 42 –48 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00227-X CHPLBC 0009-2614 Google Scholar

208.

G. Kaur, X.-C. Zhang, “Nonlinear interaction of amino acids and proteins with terahertz waves,” Terahertz Biomedical Science and Technology, 211 –240 1 ed.CRC Press, Boca Raton (2014). Google Scholar

209.

I. Litvinov et al., “Portable uncooled shutterless camera operating in the long-wavelength infrared range; part I: camera calibration,” Proc. SPIE, 11457 114570O (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2565945 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

210.

I. Litvinov et al., “Portable uncooled shutterless camera operating in the long-wavelength infrared range; part II: digital image processing,” Proc. SPIE, 11457 114570P (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2567077 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

211.

O. P. Cherkasova et al., “Influence of terahertz laser radiation on the spectral characteristics and functional properties of albumin,” Opt. Spectrosc., 107 534 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X09100063 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar

212.

O. P. Cherkasova et al., “Terahertz radiation influence on peptide conformation,” Proc. SPIE, 6727 672721 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.752431 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

213.

E. F. Nemova et al., “A study on molecular mechanisms of terahertz radiation interaction with biopolymers based on the example of bovine serum albumin,” Biophysics (Nagoya-shi), 65 410 –415 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000635092003015X Google Scholar

214.

A. Homenko et al., “Effects of 100 GHz radiation on alkaline phosphatase activity and antigen-antibody interaction,” Bioelectromagnetics, 30 (3), 167 –175 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20466 BLCTDO 0197-8462 Google Scholar

215.

A. A. Greschner et al., “Room-temperature and selective triggering of supramolecular DNA assembly/disassembly by nonionizing radiation,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 141 (8), 3456 –3469 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b10355 JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar

216.

V. M. Govorun et al., “Far-infrared radiation effect on the structure and properties of proteins,” Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves, 12 1469 –1474 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883879 IJIWDO 0195-9271 Google Scholar

217.

S. Yamazaki et al., “Propagation of THz irradiation energy through aqueous layers: demolition of actin filaments in living cells,” Sci. Rep., 10 9008 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65955-5 Google Scholar

218.

T. Kawasaki, K. Tsukiyama and A. Irizawa, “Dissolution of a fibrous peptide by terahertz free electron laser,” Sci. Rep., 9 10636 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47011-z Google Scholar

219.

H. Cheon et al., “Effective demethylation of melanoma cells using terahertz radiation,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 4931 –4941 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.004931 Google Scholar

220.

H. Cheon et al., “Terahertz molecular resonance of cancer DNA,” Sci. Rep., 6 37103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37103 Google Scholar

221.

S.-Y. Jeong et al., “Determining terahertz resonant peaks of biomolecules in aqueous environment,” Opt. Express, 28 3854 –3863 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.381529 Google Scholar

222.

Y. H. Tao et al., “Reproducibility of terahertz peaks in a frozen aqueous solution of 5-methylcytidine,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 42 588 –606 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-021-00793-8 Google Scholar

223.

O. Cherkasova, M. Nazarov and A. Shkurinov, “Study of blood and its components by terahertz pulsed spectroscopy,” EPJ Web Conf., 195 10003 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201819510003 EWCPBI 2100-014X Google Scholar

224.

O. Cherkasova et al., “Analysis of blood plasma at terahertz frequencies,” Opt. Spectrosc., 120 50 –57 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X16010069 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar

225.

M. Nazarov et al., “A complex study of the peculiarities of blood serum absorption of rats with experimental liver cancer,” Opt. Spectrosc., 126 721 –729 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X19060183 OPSUA3 0030-400X Google Scholar

226.

H. Chen et al., “Quantify glucose level in freshly diabetic’s blood by terahertz time-domain spectroscopy,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 39 399 –408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-017-0462-2 Google Scholar

227.

S. Ilyina et al., “On the possible role of water in the transmission of millimeter-wave radiation to biological objects,” Biophysics (Nagoya-shi), 24 (3), 513 –518 (1979). Google Scholar

228.

A. G. Khamoyan, E. Y. Shevela and E. R. Chernykh, “Investigation of possibility of submillimeter laser using as instrument for diagnostics in medicine,” Proc. SPIE, 6734 673404 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.753111 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

229.

A. Munzarova, A. Kozlov and E. Zelentsov, “Effect of terahertz laser irradiation on red blood cells aggregation in healthy blood,” Vestnik NSU Phys. Ser., 8 (2), 117 –123 (2013). Google Scholar

230.

A. V. Deryugina et al., “Electrokinetic and biochemical changes in erythrocytes under the action of terahertz range electromagnetic waves,” Biophysics (Nagoya-shi), 62 (6), 914 –918 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350917060033 Google Scholar

231.

A. A. Angeluts et al., “Study of terahertz-radiation-induced DNA damage in human blood leukocytes,” Quantum Electron., 44 247 –251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1070/QE2014v044n03ABEH015337 QUELEZ 1063-7818 Google Scholar

232.

A. Gapeev, N. Romanova and N. Chemeris, “Changes in the chromatin structure of lymphoid cells under the influence of low-intensity extremely high-frequency electromagnetic radiation against the background of inflammatory process,” Biophysics (Nagoya-shi), 56 (4), 688 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350911040087 Google Scholar

233.

O. Zeni et al., “Cytogenetic observations in human peripheral blood leukocytes following in vitro exposure to THz radiation: a pilot study,” Health Phys., 92 (4), 349 –357 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000251248.23991.35 HLTPAO 0017-9078 Google Scholar

234.

M. Scarfì et al., “THz exposure of whole blood for the study of biological effects on human lymphocytes,” J. Biol. Phys., 29 171 –176 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024440708943 Google Scholar

235.

A. Doria et al., “THz radiation studies on biological systems at the ENEA FEL facility,” Infrared Phys. Technol., 45 339 –347 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2004.01.014 IPTEEY 1350-4495 Google Scholar

236.

A. Korenstein-Ilan et al., “Terahertz radiation increases genomic instability in human lymphocytes,” Radiat. Res., 170 224 –234 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0944.1 RAREAE 0033-7587 Google Scholar

237.

G. J. Wilmink et al., “Determination of death thresholds and identification of terahertz (THz)-specific gene expression signatures,” Proc. SPIE, 7562 75620K (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.844917 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

238.

G. Wilmink et al., “Terahertz radiation preferentially activates the expression of genes responsible for the regulation of plasma membrane properties,” in Int. Conf. Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 12442107 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/irmmw-THz.2011.6104966 Google Scholar

239.

J. E. Grundt et al., “Terahertz radiation triggers a signature gene expression profile in human cells,” in Int. Conf. Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 12442108 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/irmmw-THz.2011.6104967 Google Scholar

240.

I. Echchgadda et al., “Terahertz stimulate specific signaling pathways in human cells,” in 39th Int. Conf. Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 14770846 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz.2014.6956140 Google Scholar

241.

Scientific Committee on Emerging Newly Identified Health Risks, “Opinion on potential health effects of exposure to electromagnetic fields,” Bioelectromagnetics, 36 (6), 480 –484 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21930 BLCTDO 0197-8462 Google Scholar

242.

G. J. Wilmink et al., “Quantitative investigation of the bioeffects associated with terahertz radiation,” Proc. SPIE, 7562 75620L (2010). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.844916 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

243.

G. J. Wilmink et al., “In vitro investigation of the biological effects associated with human dermal fibroblasts exposed to 2.52 THz radiation,” Lasers Surg. Med., 43 (2), 152 –163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20960 LSMEDI 0196-8092 Google Scholar

244.

A. D. Amicis et al., “Biological effects of in vitro THz radiation exposure in human foetal fibroblasts,” Mutation Res./Genetic Toxicol. Environ. Mutagenesis, 793 150 –160 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2015.06.003 Google Scholar

245.

V. Franchini et al., “Study of the effects of 0.15 terahertz radiation on genome integrity of adult fibroblasts,” Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 59 (6), 476 –487 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22192 EMMUEG 0893-6692 Google Scholar

246.

O. Cherkasova et al., “Studying the effect of 0.14 THz radiation on human dermal fibroblasts,” AIP Conf. Proc., 2098 (1), 020004 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5098148 APCPCS 0094-243X Google Scholar

247.

N. Yaekashiwa et al., “Investigation of the non-thermal effects of exposing cells to 70–300 GHz irradiation using a widely tunable source,” J. Radiat. Res., 59 (2), 116 –121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrx075 Google Scholar

248.

N. Yaekashiwa et al., “Verification of non-thermal effects of 0.3–0.6 THz-waves on human cultured cells,” Photonics, 6 33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics6010033 Google Scholar

249.

R. Williams et al., “The influence of high intensity terahertz radiation on mammalian cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation,” Phys. Med. Biol., 58 373 –391 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/2/373 PHMBA7 0031-9155 Google Scholar

250.

N. Bourne et al., “The effects of terahertz radiation on human keratinocyte primary cultures and neural cell cultures,” Alternatives Lab. Animals, 36 (6), 667 –684 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/026119290803600610 AALADQ Google Scholar

251.

H. Hintzsche et al., “Terahertz electromagnetic fields (0.106 THz) do not induce manifest genomic damage in vitro,” PLoS One, 7 e46397 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046397 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

252.

H. Hintzsche et al., “Terahertz radiation at 0.380 THz and 2.520 THz does not lead to DNA damage in skin cells in vitro,” Radiat. Res., 179 (1), 38 –45 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3077.1 RAREAE 0033-7587 Google Scholar

253.

I. Echchgadda et al., “Effects of different terahertz frequencies on gene expression in human keratinocytes,” Proc. SPIE, 9321 93210Q (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2082542 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

254.

R. Clothier and N. Bourne, “Effects of THz exposure on human primary keratinocyte differentiation and viability,” J. Biol. Phys., 29 179 –185 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024492725782 Google Scholar

255.

L. Titova et al., “Intense THz pulses cause H2AX phosphorylation and activate DNA damage response in human skin tissue,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 4 (4), 559 –568 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.000559 Google Scholar

256.

C. M. Hough et al., “Genomic mechanisms of THz-induced cancer dysregulation in human skin,” in 44th Int. Conf. Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 1 –3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/IRMMW-THz.2019.8874132 Google Scholar

257.

C. M. Hough et al., “Global gene expression in human skin tissue induced by intense terahertz pulses,” Terahertz Sci. Technol., 11 (1), 28 –33 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11906/TST.028-033.2018.03.03 Google Scholar

258.

C. Hough et al., “Topology-based prediction of pathway dysregulation induced by intense terahertz pulses in human skin tissue models,” J. Infrared Millimeter Terahertz Waves, 39 887 –898 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10762-018-0512-4 Google Scholar

259.

C. Hough et al., “Intense terahertz pulses inhibit ras signaling and other cancer-associated signaling pathways in human skin tissue models,” J. Phys. Photonics, 3 (3), 034004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7647/abf742 Google Scholar

260.

K.-T. Kim et al., “High-power femtosecond-terahertz pulse induces a wound response in mouse skin,” Sci. Rep., 3 2296 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02296 Google Scholar

261.

Y. Hwang et al., “In vivo analysis of THz wave irradiation induced acute inflammatory response in skin by laser-scanning confocal microscopy,” Opt. Express, 22 11465 –11475 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.011465 Google Scholar

262.

J. S. Olshevskaya et al., “Effect of terahertz electromagnetic waves on neurons systems,” in IEEE Region 8 Int. Conf. Comput. Technol. Electr. and Electron. Eng., 210 –211 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBIRCON.2008.4602607 Google Scholar

263.

J. S. Olshevskaya et al., “Cell membrane permeability under the influence of terahertz (submillimeter) laser radiation,” Vestnik NSU. Ser. Phys., 5 (4), 177 (2010). Google Scholar

264.

J. S. Olshevskaya et al., “Influence of terahertz (submillimeter) laser radiation on neurons in vitro,” I.P. Pavlov J. Higher Nervous Activity, 59 (3), 353 –539 (2009). Google Scholar

265.

T. Zapara, S. Treskova and A. Ratushniak, “Effect of antioxidants on the interaction of terahertz (submillimeter) laser radiation and neuronal membrane,” J. Surf. Invest., 9 869 –871 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1027451015050195 JSIXBV 1027-4510 Google Scholar

266.

M. Borovkova et al., “Investigation of terahertz radiation influence on rat glial cells,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 8 273 –280 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.000273 Google Scholar

267.

M. V. Tsurkan et al., “Changing growth of neurites of sensory ganglion by terahertz radiation,” Proc. SPIE, 8261 82610S (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.909350 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

268.

P. Perera et al., “PC 12 pheochromocytoma cell response to super high frequency terahertz radiation from synchrotron source,” Cancers (Basel), 11 162 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11020162 Google Scholar

269.

V. Pikov et al., “Modulation of neuronal activity and plasma membrane properties with low-power millimeter waves in organotypic cortical slices,” J. Neural Eng., 7 045003 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/7/4/045003 1741-2560 Google Scholar

270.

V. Pikov and P. H. Siegel, “Millimeter wave-induced changes in membrane properties of leech Retzius neurons,” Proc. SPIE, 7883 788356 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.875758 PSISDG 0277-786X Google Scholar

271.

S. Romanenko et al., “Effects of millimeter wave irradiation and equivalent thermal heating on the activity of individual neurons in the leech ganglion,” J. Neurophysiol., 112 (10), 2423 –2431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00357.2014 Google Scholar

272.

S. Romanenko et al., “Millimeter wave radiation activates leech nociceptors via TRPV1-like receptor sensitization,” Biophys. J., 116 (12), 2331 –2345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.04.021 Google Scholar

273.

S. Shang et al., “0.1 THz exposure affects primary hippocampus neuron gene expression via alternating transcription factor binding,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 3729 –3742 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.426928 Google Scholar

274.

S. Romanenko et al., “Ex vivo effect of 60 GHz MMW radiation on leech neuron intracellular calcium alteration,” in IEEE Ukrainian Microwave Week, 612 –616 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/UkrMW49653.2020.9252579 Google Scholar

275.

A. Bogomazova et al., “No DNA damage response and negligible genome-wide transcriptional changes in human embryonic stem cells exposed to terahertz radiation,” Sci. Rep., 5 7749 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07749 Google Scholar

276.

T. Tachizaki et al., “Terahertz pulse-altered gene networks in human induced pluripotent stem cells,” Opt. Lett., 45 6078 –6081 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.402815 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar

277.

J. Bock et al., “Mammalian stem cells reprogramming in response to terahertz radiation,” PLoS One, 5 e15806 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015806 POLNCL 1932-6203 Google Scholar

278.

B. S. Alexandrov et al., “Non-thermal effects of terahertz radiation on gene expression in mouse stem cells,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 2 2679 –2689 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.2.002679 Google Scholar

279.

B. S. Alexandrov et al., “Specificity and heterogeneity of terahertz radiation effect on gene expression in mouse mesenchymal stem cells,” Sci. Rep., 3 1184 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01184 Google Scholar

280.

Y. Lei, W. Chen and A. Mulchandani, “Microbial biosensors,” Anal. Chim. Acta, 568 (1), 200 –210 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2005.11.065 ACACAM 0003-2670 Google Scholar

281.

E. V. Demidova et al., “Studying the non-thermal effects of terahertz radiation on E. coli/pKatG-GFP biosensor cells,” Bioelectromagnetics, 34 (1), 15 –21 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21736 BLCTDO 0197-8462 Google Scholar

282.

E. V. Demidova et al., “Impact of terahertz radiation on stress-sensitive genes of E. coli cell,” IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol., 6 (3), 435 –441 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2532344 Google Scholar

283.

S. Peltek et al., “Stress-induced systems in Escherichia coli and their response to terahertz radiation,” Russian J. Genetics Appl. Res., 7 858 –868 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079059717080019 Google Scholar

284.

D. S. Serdyukov et al., “Study on the effects of terahertz radiation on gene networks of Escherichia coli by means of fluorescent biosensors,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 5258 –5273 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.400432 Google Scholar

285.

D. S. Serdyukov et al., “Fluorescent bacterial biosensor E. coli/pTdcR-TurboYFP sensitive to terahertz radiation,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 705 –721 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.412074 Google Scholar

286.

A. Mazhorova et al., “Label-free bacteria detection using evanescent mode of a suspended core terahertz fiber,” Opt. Express, 20 (5), 5344 –5355 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.005344 Google Scholar

287.

A. Berrier et al., “Selective detection of bacterial layers with terahertz plasmonic antennas,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 3 (11), 2937 –2949 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002937 Google Scholar

288.

S. Park et al., “Detection of microorganisms using terahertz metamaterials,” Sci. Rep., 4 4988 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04988 Google Scholar

289.

D. Datta et al., “Terahertz vibrational signature of bacterial spores arising from nanostructure decorated endospore surface,” J. Biophotonics, 11 (7), e201700398 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201700398 Google Scholar

290.

S. Boev et al., “A study of the effect of terahertz electromagnetic radiation on microbial cell viability,” Biophysics (Nagoya-shi), 64 416 –423 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350919030059 Google Scholar

291.

L. Yu et al., “The medical application of terahertz technology in non-invasive detection of cells and tissues: opportunities and challenges,” RSC Adv., 9 (17), 9354 –9363 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA10605C Google Scholar

292.

T. Nagatsuma, G. Ducournau and C. Renaud, “Advances in terahertz communications accelerated by photonics,” Nat. Photonics, 10 371 –379 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.65 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

293.

H. Guerboukha et al., “Planar porous components for low-loss terahertz optics,” Adv. Opt. Mater., 7 (15), 1900236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201900236 2195-1071 Google Scholar

294.

M. Islam et al., “Terahertz optical fibers,” Opt. Express, 28 (11), 16089 –16117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.389999 Google Scholar

295.

K. Zaytsev et al., “Overcoming the Abbe diffraction limit using a bundle of metal-coated high-refractive-index sapphire optical fibers,” Adv. Opt. Mater., 8 (18), 2000307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202000307 2195-1071 Google Scholar

296.

A. Gavdush et al., “Proof of concept for continuously-tunable terahertz bandpass filter based on a gradient metal-hole array,” Opt. Express, 28 (18), 26228 –26238 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.401608 Google Scholar

297.

V. E. Ulitko et al., “Nanoporous

{SiO}_{2}

based on annealed artificial opals as a favorable material platform of terahertz optics,” Opt. Mater. Express, 10 (9), 2100 –2113 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.402185 Google Scholar

298.

G. Katyba et al., “Sapphire waveguides and fibers for terahertz applications,” Prog. Cryst. Growth Charact. Mater., 67 (3), 100523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2021.100523 PCGMED 0960-8974 Google Scholar

299.

V. Ulitko et al., “Opal-based terahertz optical elements fabricated by self-assembly of porous

{SiO}_{2}

nanoparticles,” Opt. Express, 29 (9), 13764 –13777 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.422637 Google Scholar

300.

V. A. Batanov et al., “Compact Raman

{CH}_{3} F

,

{NH}_{3}

optically pumped FIR laser,” Int. J. Infrared Millim. Waves, 11 435 –442 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01010440 IJIWDO 0195-9271 Google Scholar

301.

S. Yamazaki et al., “Actin polymerization is activated by terahertz irradiation,” Sci. Rep., 8 9990 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28245-9 Google Scholar

Biography

Olga P. Cherkasova is a professor at Novosibirsk State Technical University and a head of the Laboratory of Biophysics at the Institute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia. Her research interests include interaction between THz radiation and biological objects, as well as applications of THz technology for diagnosis of diabetes, malignant, and benign neoplasms with different nosologies and localizations.

Danil S. Serdyukov graduated from the Department of Natural Sciences of the Novosibirsk State University, Russia. He is a junior researcher at the Institute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia. His research interests include development of the fluorescent cellular biosensors, as well as studies of their interactions with THz radiation.

Eugenia F. Nemova graduated from the Department of Physics of the Novosibirsk State University, Russia. She is a junior researcher at the Institute of Laser Physics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia. Her research interests include studies of the THz-radiation effects on conformations of biopolymers. Her research skills are supplemented by popular science communication and teaching science for children.

Alexander S. Ratushnyak, Dr. S., is a head of Biomedical Informatics Laboratory at the Institute of Computational Technologies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. His research interests include interaction of THz radiation with neurons.

Anna S. Kucheryavenko is a junior researcher in the Laboratory of Shaped Crystals of the Institute of Solid State Physics of RAS, Chernogolovka, and in the Laboratory of Submillimeter Spectroscopy of the Prokhorov General Physics Institute of RAS, Moscow. Her current research interests include medical instruments and THz technologies in medical diagnosis and therapy. She is a member of SPIE.

Irina N. Dolganova is a research assistant in the Laboratory of Shaped Crystals of the Institute of Solid State Physics of RAS, Chernogolovka, and in the Institute for Regenerative Medicine of Sechenov University, Moscow. She received her PhD in 2017. Her current research interests include medical instruments and optical and THz technologies in medical diagnosis and treatment. She is a member of SPIE.

Guofu Xu received his BSc degree in optical information science and technology from the Army Engineering University of PLA, China, in 2012, and his MEng degree in electrical theory and advanced technology from Hefei University of Technology, China, in 2019. He is currently pursuing his PhD under the supervision of Prof. Maksim Skorobogatiy at Polytechnique Montréal, where he is involved in the development of optical waveguide components for THz applications.

Maksim Skorobogatiy, Dr., P. Eng., graduated from MIT in 2001 with a PhD in physics and from MIT with the MSc in electrical engineering in 2000. He is currently a full professor at Polytechnique Montréal, Canada, where he holds a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in ubiquitous THz photonics. In 2017, he was elevated to fellow of the Optical Society of America for his pioneering contributions to the development of microstructured and photonic crystal fibers.

Igor V. Reshetov is a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He holds a Doctor of Science degree in the medical sciences. He is currently a professor and head of the Cluster Oncology Department, as well as a practicing surgeon at Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. His research interests include plastic and reconstructive microsurgery in oncology, head and neck tumors, including technologies for treatment, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and development of novel technologies for medical diagnosis of human body malignancies.

Peter S. Timashev graduated from Lomonosov Moscow State University of Fine Chemical Technologies, Moscow, Russia. He received his PhD from Karpov Institute of Physical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia, in 2004, and his DSc degree in 2016. He is the director of both Sechenov Biomedical Science and Technology Park and the Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia. He is an author of more than 200 publications and 11 patents and is a laureate of the Moscow Government Prize.

Igor E. Spektor received his PhD in engineering sciences at Moscow Technical Institute of Forestry in 1997 for his research work in the Space Research and Development Center, Korolev, Moscow region, Russia, where he studied the methods and instruments of the intense heat flow measurements. Since 1998, he has been with the A.M. Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (GPI RAS), Moscow, Russia. He is a head of the Department of Submillimeter Spectroscopy at GPI RAS. His research interests include components, instruments, and methods of BWO dielectric spectroscopy and imaging, as well as THz-pulsed spectroscopy.

Kirill I. Zaytsev holds a PhD in optics engineering. He is a head of the Laboratory of Broadband Dielectric Spectroscopy at Prokhorov General Physics Institute of RAS, an associate professor at Bauman Moscow State Technical University, and a senior researcher at Sechenov University. His research interests include applied physics, optics and biophotonics, terahertz science and technology, dielectric spectroscopy, inverse problems in optics, computational electrodynamics, and optical engineering. He is a member of SPIE.

Valery V. Tuchin is a corresponding member of the RAS, head of optics and biophotonics, director of Science Medical Center at Saratov State University. He is a fellow of SPIE and OSA, an honored scientist of the Russian Federation, an honored professor of Finland, and a recipient of the SPIE Joseph W. Goodman Book Writing Award (2016), the Michael S. Feld Biophotonics Award (2019), and the medals of D.S. Rozhdestvensky (2018), and A. M. Prokhorov (2021). His works have been cited over 32,000 times.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.

Citation Download Citation

Olga P. Cherkasova, Danil S. Serdyukov, Eugenia F. Nemova, Alex S. Ratushnyak, Anna S. Kucheryavenko, Irina N. Dolganova, Guofu Xu, Maksim Skorobogatiy, Igor V. Reshetov, Peter S. Timashev, Igor E. Spektor, Kirill I. Zaytsev, and Valery V. Tuchin "Cellular effects of terahertz waves," Journal of Biomedical Optics 26(9), 090902 (30 September 2021). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.090902

Received: 31 May 2021; Accepted: 8 September 2021; Published: 30 September 2021

Access the abstract

JOURNAL ARTICLE
53 PAGES

DOWNLOAD PAPER SAVE TO MY LIBRARY