Effect of pulsed electric fields pretreatment on juice expression and quality of chicory

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102842Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Pulsed electric fields (PEF)-assisted pressing (P) for extraction of chicory juice was studied.

  • Juice expression yield and pressing kinetic rate were enhanced after PEF pretreatment.

  • PEF-P and P-PEF-P modes resulted in an increase of 9% higher than P mode.

  • Cake mixing and smaller cossettes favored to extraction of chicory juice.

  • PEF-P treated smaller chicory cossettes has lower turbidity and higher inulin content.

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of pulsed electric fields (PEF) and freeze thawing (FT) pretreatments on juice yield and quality from chicory by pressing (P). The four different modes (P, PEF-single bondP, FT-P and P-PEF-P) were compared. The effects of pressing mode, PEF conditions, cossettes size on the juice yield, and total soluble matter (°Bx), conductivity, pH, turbidity in expressed juices were evaluated. The pressing kinetics for different modes were also investigated. For studied modes, the highest juice yield and kinetic rate were obtained for FT-P mode, the lowest was P mode. PEF-P and P-PEF-P modes resulted in the same juice yield, an increase of 9% higher than P mode. A 600 V/cm of intensity and 0.2 s duration were optimal PEF conditions with desired energy consumption. Moreover, cake mixing and relative small-sized cossettes allowed improving juice yield assisted by PEF-P mode. Quality analysis showed that expressed juice from smaller cossettes by PEF-P mode has lower turbidity and higher inulin content.

Introduction

Chicory is an agricultural residue whose roots contain a high inulin content (≈ 40%) (Chinyelu, Karabo, & Chilaka, 2017; Perovi, Aponjac, Koji, Krulj, & Ili, 2020). Inulin is a popular polysaccharide-based nutraceutical, and it has been associated in fat replacement, calorie reduction and health keeping (Chaito, Judprasong, & Puwastien, 2016; Maumela, Rensburg, Chimphango, & Grgens, 2019). Currently, chicory roots are grown commercially for inulin production, besides its high content of inulin, it contains regular root and good tolerance to cold (Zhu et al., 2016).

The industrial production of inulin from chicory consists mainly on two steps: extraction and purification (Zhu et al., 2016). The extraction of juice is a crucial step influencing all the transformation process for production of inulin. Because large amount of inulin existed in chicory root can transfer into the juice during the process of extraction. Zhu et al. (Zhu et al., 2013) have also reported that the extracted chicory juice contain 9–11% of inulin and 8.5–12% soluble matter content (°Bx). Furthermore, they have demonstrated a good linear correlation between the inulin content and the value of °Bx in the extracted chicory juice. The value of °Bx in extracted juice can be roughly considered as the content of inulin during the extraction process (Zhu, Bals, Grimi, & Vorobiev, 2012).

Traditionally, chicory roots are firstly cut into homogeneous slices, then inulin-containing juice is produced through diffusion of slices using water at 70–80 °C during 1–2 h (Zhu et al., 2012). This thermal diffusion leads to the breakage of cellular membranes and tissue denaturation, making intensive inulin transfer into the chicory juice. However, high temperature and prolonged duration also leads to impurities release into the extracted juice resulting in complicated juice purification. Besides to the extraction by solvent (diffusion), extraction by pressure (pressing) is another important technique widely used for inulin-containing juice production (Yu, Gouyo, Grimi, Bals, & Vorobiev, 2016). Such treatment can damage cell walls of chicory tissues (Grimi, Praporscic, Lebovka, & Vorobiev, 2007). The intracellular juice, which is initially bounded inside cellular chicory tissue, can be expressed after the cell rupture. Since pressing is a kind of extraction technology without solvent usage, it may be a promising technology to produce the undiluted juice and the high nutritional valued pulp. However, the usual pressing equipment produces rather turbid and impure juices, and their further clarification is required (Grimi et al., 2007).

In this line, alternative extraction techniques assisted by enzymes (Sherpa, 2011; Stein-Chisholm, Finley, Losso, & Beaulieu, 2017), freezing thawing (Nadulski et al., 2016; Nadulski, Grochowicz, Sobczak, & Panasiewicz, 2015), ultrasound-assisted extraction (Lin et al., 2019), or pulsed electric fields (PEF) (Grimi, Mamouni, Lebovka, Vorobiev, & Vaxelaire, 2011; Grimi et al., 2007; El Kantar et al., 2018) are also developed. Several studies have shown the positive effect of PEF treatment on both juice yield and juice quality (Grimi, Lebovka, Vorobiev, & Vaxelaire, 2009; El Kantar et al., 2018; Loginova, Shynkaryk, Lebovka, & Vorobiev, 2010; Mhemdi, Bals, Grimi, & Vorobiev, 2012). These authors confirmed the juice extracted alternatively, with PEF treatment, contain less impurity than juice obtained by using conventional methods. PEF causes a temporary or complete electroporation of cell membranes increasing the membrane permeability and facilitating the passage of intracellular components to the surrounding juice (Yu et al., 2016). Especially in our previously study, the PEF has been applied to assist diffusion of inulin from chicory roots at moderate temperature (Zhu et al., 2012). A 600 V/cm of PEF intensity and a 10 ms of PEF duration were evidenced to decrease diffusion temperature from 75 °C to 60 °C with comparable inulin juice yield and purity. Additionally, the effects of PEF assisted pressing on apple juice yield, turbidity and phenolic content was investigated by (Grimi et al., 2011). In their study, efficiency of the PEF application for acceleration of the juice extraction and improvement in qualitative characteristics of the PEF-expressed juices was demonstrated.

The extraction efficiency of juice from different sizes of chicory cossettes can be improved by using PEF assisted pressing protocols. However, to the best of our knowledge, such studies on chicory roots are scarce at the present. The main aim of this work was to study the impact of different individual and combined PEF and pressing protocols on extraction efficiency of juice from different sizes of chicory cossettes. Freeze thawing pretreatment was used as a maximal conference due to its complete cell denaturation. The data were compared for four different protocols (pressing, PEF-pressing, freeze thawing-pressing and pressing-PEF-pressing). The pressing kinetics and juice quality (total soluble matter, conductivity, pH and turbidity) were also investigated in this work. Attention was also focused on the effects of electrical parameters (electric field intensity, PEF treatment duration) on the ratio of juice yield to energy consumption.

Section snippets

Plant material

The field-grown roots of the commercial chicory (Cichorium intybus) were provided by COSUCRA, Belgium. The samples were stored at 4 °C before experiments. The storage time never exceed 10 days. In order to exclude the effects related to heterogeneity of materials, samples of uniform size, and color were selected for the experiments. Juice expression experiments were carried out with the fine-cut cossettes of 2 different sizes: S1 (3 × 5 × 70 mm3) and S2 (1 × 1.5 × 20 mm3). Cossettes were

Effect of pressure on juice yield

Fig. 3 presents the juice yield, Y, at different applied pressures for pressing (P), PEF-pressing (PEF-single bondP) and freeze thawing-pressing (FT-P) modes of extraction from S1 cossettes (3 × 5 × 70 mm3). Here, PEF treatment was done at E = 600 V/cm, tPEF = 100 ms, and the pressing time was 30 min. For individual P mode, the juice yield increased with the increase of applied pressure. The augmentation of pressure from 1 bar to 5 bar resulted in ≈ 4-fold higher juice yield.

It was observed that PEF

Conclusion

This study compares the juice yield obtained from four different modes: P, PEF-single bondP, FT-P and P-PEF-P for two sizes of chicory cossettes (S1 > S2). The juice extraction efficiency and pressing kinetic rate arranged in the row of P < PEF-P < FT-P were observed for both S1 and S2 cossettes, when pressing was applied at 5 bar for 30 min. The smaller cossettes size (S2) demonstrated the higher juice yield and pressing kinetic rate. Interestingly, the application of PEF-P and P-PEF-P modes resulted in

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support of Outstanding young and middle-aged science and technology innovation team in Hubei Province (T2020012), Scientific and Technology Project of Enshi Tujia & Miao Autonomous Prefecture (XYJ2020000021) and Key Innovation Team in Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, 2020.

References (23)

Cited by (6)

  • Pulsed electric field as a promising technology for solid foods processing: A review

    2023, Food Chemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    It was reported that chlorophyll A and B contents were negligible in PEF-pretreated custard apple leaf extract (Ahmad Shiekh, Odunayo Olatunde, Zhang, Huda & Benjakul, 2021). On the other hand, compared to conventional squeezing, the juice yield of PEF-treated chicory was increased by approximately 23 %, and the juice produced had lower turbidity and higher inulin content (Zhang, Vorobiev, Zhu & Grimi, 2021). Furthermore, for squeezed juice, PEF (3 kV/cm) was used to pretreat the whole citrus fruits (orange, pomelo, and lemon), which not only increased the concentration of polyphenols in the juice but also increased the yield of juice (El Kantar et al., 2018).

  • Pulsed electric field (PEF): Avant-garde extraction escalation technology in food industry

    2022, Trends in Food Science and Technology
    Citation Excerpt :

    HVED treatment gave better extraction yield than PEF in every study that researchers had carried out (Barba, Grimi, & Vorobiev, 2015; Boussetta et al., 2009; Loncaric et al., 2020; Roselló-Soto et al., 2015). In the extraction of carbohydrates from Parachlorealla kessleri, HVED approach resulted in better extraction efficiency than PEF at various specific energy inputs (99–205 kJ/g) (Zhang, Vorobiev, Zhu, & Grimi, 2021). HVED showed high cell wall disintegration than PEF treatment which was the primary reason for the higher extraction yield than PEF treatment.

View full text