Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 343, January 2022, 125976
Bioresource Technology

The characteristics of multi-substrates (low and high C/N) anaerobic digestion: focus on energy recovery and the succession of methanogenic pathway

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125976Get rights and content

Highlights

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion of common rural wastes (human feces (HF), food waste (FW) and lawn grass (LG)) were studied considering the specific methane yield, process parameters and microbial characteristics (mainly microbial community and pathogenic bacteria). The results showed that co-digestion of multiple substrates obtained high digestion performance when the total solid (TS) was 4%. The optimal co-digestion ratio of HF, FW, and LG was 33–56%, 21–38% and 20–40%, respectively. The digestion system containing HF underwent ammonia inhibition, which leads to the succession of the methanogenesis pathway from the acetoclastic pathway to the hydrogenotrophic pathway. Simultaneously, the dominant methanogenic archaea changed from Methanosaeta to Methanobacterium and Methanosarcina. Co-digestion reduced Salmonella's absolute concentration. The recovered energy and nitrogen could meet 52–109 % energy demand of rural community and all nitrogen demand in lawn fertilization, respectively. The main rural organic wastes could be recycled by anaerobic digestion, considering the flexibility of substrate ratio.

Introduction

Compared with city, the distribution of rural communities is relatively scattered, which leads that large-scale centralized collection and treatment of organic waste is challenging and uneconomical. Until now, most of the rural communities don’t reasonably treat organic wastes such as food waste (FW), human feces (HF), and grass. Therefore, the mode of microcirculation of rural organic wastes should be constructed. Anaerobic digestion is a traditional way to treat organic wastes and produce bio-energy (Cai et al., 2018). It has apparent advantages in constructing microcirculation of rural organic wastes. First, anaerobic digestion can treat all kinds of organic wastes, especially those with high water content. Second, the scale of anaerobic digestion ranges from household biogas to large-scale biogas projects. Therefore, it can meet the need of communities with different population sizes. Third, the products and by-products can be supplied to rural communities to realize the entire cycle and zero waste of rural organic wastes.

In China, the rural population reached 560 million (Lee et al., 2015). Although the amount of HF varies from person to person due to the difference in diet, the average consumption of HF per person per day is about 400 g based on fresh weight, which means that about 82 million tons of HF are generated in rural area each year (Kim et al., 2019, Colón et al., 2015). HF was the main crop fertilizer before chemical fertilizers were popularized in China. However, the direct use of HF as fertilizer has certain environmental risks. This way is contrary to the increasing requirements of people for the quality of the living environment. In 2019, China proposed a “toilet revolution” action plan for rural livability. The original toileting way (dry latrine) will be changed, and centralized treatment of HF will replace the previous way (mainly random stacking). In some villages, wastewater source separation systems (separating domestic wastewater and HF) are gradually promoted and applied. Source separation system provided support for the centralized treatment of HF in the countryside.

HF consists mainly of fat, protein, and undecomposed food. Therefore, it is theoretically feasible to treat HF by anaerobic digestion. Some previous studies have demonstrated the anaerobic digestion characteristics of HF (Kim et al., 2019, Qin et al., 2010). For instance, Kim et al. (2019) reported that methane production potential of HF reached 350 mL g−1 VSfeed. However, the anaerobic mono-digestion of HF still faces two issues, which should be taken seriously. First, the carbon to nitrogen (C/N) of HF is less than 10, which is lower than the optimal C/N (20–30) (Qin et al., 2010). Low C/N may lead to high total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentration and then cause ammonia inhibition (Fuchs et al., 2018, Zheng et al., 2021). The most effective strategy to alleviate ammonia inhibition is co-digestion with other high C/N substrates (Cai et al., 2021a). LG (lawn grass) and FW are common high C/N substrates in rural areas (Cai et al., 2021b). The feasibility and characteristics of multi-substrates digestion still need to be further explored. Second, previous study showed that HF contained intestinal pathogens such as Salmonella and E. coli, which pose a huge threat to human health (Hanabara and Ueda, 2016). Anaerobic digestion can remove pathogenic bacteria to a certain extent (Pandey et al., 2016). In the digestion system, microorganisms compete for substrates. Theoretically, pathogenic bacteria will be in a vulnerable situation when the digestion efficiency is high. Therefore, co-digestion of these substrates should have higher removal efficiency of pathogenic bacteria than mono-digestion of HF. Although relevant studies have reported the characteristics of co-digestion of HF with other substrates such as straw, cattle manure and food waste. However, these previous studies generally focus on digestion performance. There are few comprehensive studies about the effect of substrate ratio on the succession of microorganisms and methanogenesis pathways and the removal rate of pathogenic bacteria.

This research aims to explore the possibility of constructing a microcirculation system of organic wastes (mainly HF, FW, and LG) using anaerobic digestion in rural communities. The digestion characteristics of mono- and co-digestion of HF, LG and FW, including the methane production potential, the change of metabolites and physicochemical properties, and the feature of microorganisms (mainly the composition of bacteria and archaea and removal rate of pathogenic intestinal bacteria), were studied. These experimental results will offer theoretical support for the recycling and zero waste of organic wastes in rural areas.

Section snippets

Human feces, food waste, lawn grass and inoculum

HF was taken from the public toilets of the West Campus of China Agricultural University (CAU), and then feces and urine were mixed at the ratio of 1:5 (w/w based on fresh weight). The LG was taken from the lawn of CAU. It was the grass clippings produced by the lawn mowing machine. The LG was dried at 80  °C, followed by natural air drying. And then, it was crushed using a grinder (FW100, Taisite, Tianjin, China) and was filtered using a sieve with a particle of 0.85 mm mesh size. After that,

The specific methane yield of mono- and co-digestion of HF, LG and FW

Fig. 1(a-c) showed the specific methane potential of mono-digestion under different feeding TS conditions. Under 1%, 2%, 3% and 4% TS conditions, the cumulative methane production of HF were 251.3, 256.1, 216.6, and 46.5 mL g−1 TS, respectively. At 3% TS, the cumulative methane yield of HF was significantly lower than that of 1% and 2% TS. This may be because of the high TAN concentration (>2 g L−1) in HF (Yang et al., 2018). The cumulative methane yield of FW at 2%, 4%, and 6% TS were 417.8,

Conclusion

The optimal ratio of HF, FW, and LG is 33–56%, 21–38%, and 20–40% based on methane production. Co-digestion makes the digestion parameters (mainly pH, alkalinity, and nutrients) in a suitable range, which leads to the improvement of methane yield. High TAN concentration causes the succession of methanogenesis pathway from the acetoclastic pathway to syntrophic acetate oxidation-hydrogenotrophic pathway, and the dominant methanogens change from Methanosaeta to Methanobacterium and Methanosarcina

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The current research was supported by the National Key research and Development program of China (Grant number: 2019YFC0408700).

References (47)

  • J. Kim et al.

    Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste, human feces, and toilet paper: Methane potential and synergistic effect

    Fuel.

    (2019)
  • M.B. Kurade et al.

    Acetoclastic methanogenesis led by methanosarcina in anaerobic co-digestion of fats, oil and grease for enhanced production of methane

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2019)
  • Y. Lee et al.

    Changes in physical activity and cognitive decline in older adults living in the community

    Age.

    (2015)
  • L. Li et al.

    Anaerobic digestion of food waste: a review focusing on process stability

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2018)
  • Z. Lv et al.

    Effects of various feedstocks on isotope fractionation of biogas and microbial community structure during anaerobic digestion

    Waste Manage.

    (2019)
  • R. Millati et al.

    Pretreatment technologies for anaerobic digestion of lignocelluloses and toxic feedstocks

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2020)
  • J. Palatsi et al.

    Influence of adsorption and anaerobic granular sludge characteristics on long chain fatty acids inhibition process

    Water Res.

    (2012)
  • P.K. Pandey et al.

    Simulating the effects of mesophilic anaerobic and aerobic digestions, lagoon system, and composting on pathogen inactivation

    Ecological Engineering.

    (2016)
  • R. Rajagopal et al.

    A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2013)
  • S.R. Smith et al.

    Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes

    Waste Manage.

    (2005)
  • N. Soobhany

    Preliminary evaluation of pathogenic bacteria loading on organic Municipal Solid Waste compost and vermicompost

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2018)
  • A.O. Wagner et al.

    Survival of bacterial pathogens during the thermophilic anaerobic digestion of biowaste: laboratory experiments and in situ validation

    Anaerobe.

    (2008)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Evaluation of artificial neural network models for online monitoring of alkalinity in anaerobic co-digestion system

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (30)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equally to the work.

    View full text