Skip to main content
Log in

Repulsive gravity effects in horizon formation

Horizon remnants in naked singularities

  • Letter
  • Published:
General Relativity and Gravitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Repulsive gravity is a well known characteristic of naked singularities. In this work, we explore light surfaces and find new effects of repulsive gravity. We compare Kerr naked singularities with the corresponding black hole counterparts and find certain structures that are identified as horizon remnants. We argue that these features might be significant for the comprehension of processes that lead to the formation or eventually destruction of black hole Killing horizons. These features can be detected by observing photon orbits, particularly close to the rotation axis, which can be used to distinguish naked singularities from black holes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. https://eventhorizontelescope.org/.

  2. An interesting speculative interpretation of the super-spinner solutions explores the duality between elementary particles and BHs, with quantum BH as the link between microphysics and macrophysics [37,38,39,40,41]. In any case, the NSs, which are present in the Kerr, Reissner-Nörstrom, and Kerr-Newman spacetimes, provide a perspective of crucial interest regarding the elementary particles description in general relativity and the definition of the characteristic charge, mass, and spin-mass ratio, radius and particles number of self-gravitating objects[42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. In self-gravitating objects such as boson stars or fermion stars, the repulsive gravity factors may -n of a critical charge and particle number of the object itself [49,50,51,52,53,54].

  3. The BH formation after collapse has been associated with trapped surfaces formation, that is, a singularity without trapped surfaces is usually considered as a proof of its naked singularity nature[64,65,66,67,68,69]. Nevertheless, the non-existence of trapped surfaces after or during the gravitational collapse is not a proof of the existence of a NS. It is possible to choose a very particular slicing of spacetime during the formation of a spherically symmetric black hole where no trapped surfaces exist (see also [70, 71]).

  4. Equation \(\varDelta \omega _{\pm }=\mathbf {c}\) can be solved for the spins \(a_z^{\pm }\equiv \sqrt{\left[ {r^2 \left[ 2-\mathbf {c}^2 r (r+2)\right] \pm 2 \sqrt{r^3 \left[ r-4 \mathbf {c}^2 (r+2)\right] }}\right] / {\mathbf {c}^2 (r+2)^2}}\), where \(a_z^-=a_z^+=0\) for \(\mathbf {c}= \pm {2 \sqrt{r-2}}/{r^{3/2}}\). Furthermore, it is clear that the values of \(\mathbf {c}\) such that \(a_z^{\pm }=0\), which correspond to the Schwarzschild case, have as extreme case \(r=3M\). That is, \(a_z\) are curves with equal difference in frequency, which is null, as expected, on the horizon in the extended plane- Fig.  (2).

References

  1. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H.: Eur. Phys. J. C 81 3 258 (2021)

  2. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H.: Eur. Phys. J. C 78 1 69 (2018)

  3. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H.: Eur. Phys. J. C 79 3 209 (2019)

  4. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H.: arXiv:1910.02808 [gr-qc] (2019)

  5. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H.: arXiv:1910.04996 [gr-qc] (2019)

  6. Pugliese, D., Montani, G.: Entropy 22, 402 (2020)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pugliese, D., Stuchlik, Z.: Class. Quant. Grav. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abff97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manko, V.S., Ruiz, E.: Phys. Lett. B 791, 26–29 (2019)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al., ApJL 875 (2019) L1

  10. de Felice, F.: Mont. Notice R. astr. Soc 252, 197–202 (1991)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Felice, F., Usseglio-Tomasset, S.: Class. Quant. Grav. 8, 1871–1880 (1991)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Felice, F., Usseglio-Tomasset, S.: Gen.Rel.Grav. 24, 10 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Felice, F., Yunqiang, Y.: Class. Quant. Grav. 10, 353–364 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Felice, F., Di, L., Sigalotti, G.: Ap. J. 389, 386–391 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chakraborty, C., Patil, M., et al.: Phys. Rev. D 95(8), 084024 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanatarov, I. V., Zaslavskii, O. B.: Gen.Rel.Grav. 49 9 119 (2017)

  17. Mukherjee, S., Nayak, R.K.: Astrophys. Space Sci. 363(8), 163 (2018)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zaslavskii., O. B: Phys.Rev.D 98 10 104030 (2018)

  19. Zaslavskii, O.B.: Phys. Rev. D 100(2), 024050 (2019)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. de Felice, F.: A&A 45, 65 (1975)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Batic, D., Chin, D., Nowakowski, M.: Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1624 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Luongo, O., Quevedo, H.: Phys. Rev. D 90, 084032 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Patil, M., Joshi, P.S., Malafarina, D.: Phys. Rev. D 83, 064007 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maluf, J.W.: Gen. Rel. Grav. 46, 1734 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stuchlik, Z.: Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech 31, 129 (1980)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Gariel, J., Santos, N.O., Silk, J.: Phys. Rev. D 90, 063505 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pelavas, N., Neary, N., Lake, K.: Class. Quant. Grav. 18, 1319 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Herdeiro, C., Radu, E.: Phys. Rev. D 89(1240), 18 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stuchlik, Z., Pugliese, D., Schee, J., Kucáková, H.: Eur. Phys. J. C 75(9), 451 (2015)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Frolov, A.V., Frolov, V.P.: Phys. Rev. D 90(12), 124010 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Paranjape, M. B.: Physics Today, in Commentary&Reviews 24 May (2017)

  32. Goswami, R., Joshi, P.S., Singh, P.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 031302 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vaz, C., Witten, L.: Phys. Lett. B 442, 90 (1998)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Iguchi, H., Harada, T., Nakao, K.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 101, 1235 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Iguchi, H., Nakao, K., Harada, T.: Phys. Rev. D 57, 7262 (1998)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Iguchi, H., Harada, T., Nakao, K.I.: Prog. Theor. Phys. 103, 53 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lake, M.J., Carr, B.: JHEP 1511, 105 (2015)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Carr, B.J. arXiv:1703.08655 [gr-qc]

  39. Carr, B.J., Mureika, J., Nicolini, P.: JHEP 1507, 052 (2015)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Carr, B.J.: Springer Proc. Phys. 170, 159 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Prok, Y., et al.: [CLAS Collaboration]. Phys. Lett. B 672, 12 (2009)

  42. D. Pugliese, H. Quevedo, J. A. Rueda H. and R. Ruffini, Phys.Rev.D 88 (2013) 024053

  43. Ruffini, R., Bonazzola, S.: Phys. Rev. 187, 1767 (1969)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H., Ruffini, R.: Phys. Rev. D 83, 104052 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H., Ruffini, R.: Eur. Phys. J. C 77(4), 206 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H., Ruffini, R.: Phys. Rev. D 88, 024042 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H., Ruffini, R.: Phys. Rev. 84, 044030 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H., Ruffini, R.: Phys. Rev. D 83, 024021 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Carr, B., Mentzer, H., Mureika, J., Nicolini, P.: Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1166 (2020)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sivaram, C., Sinha, K.P.: Phys. Rev. D 16, 1975 (1977)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Salam, A., Strathdee, J.A.: Phys. Rev. D 18, 4596 (1978)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. Holzhey, C.F.E., Wilczek, F.: Nucl. Phys. B 380, 447 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Oldershaw, R.L., Cosmol, J.: 6 1361 (2010)

  54. Carr, B.J.: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28, 1340011 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Cardoso, V., Pani, P., Cadoni, M., Cavaglia, M.: Phys. Rev. D 77(124), 044 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Comins, N., Schutz, B.F.: Proc. R. Soc. A 364(1717), 211–226 (1978)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Helou, A., Musco, I., Miller, J.C.: Class. Quant. Grav. 34(13), 135012 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. Penrose, R.: Nuovo Cimento Rivista Serie , 1 (1969)

  59. Shapiro, S.L., Teukolsky, S.A.: Am. Sci. 79(4), 330–343 (1991)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Crisford, T., Santos, J.E.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 181101 (2017)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. Loeb, A.: In Search of Naked Singularities Scientific American Observations-Opinion May 3 (2020)

  62. Joshi, P.S.: Sci. Am. 300(2), 36–43 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Harada, T.: Pramana 63(4), 741–753 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. Penrose, R.: JJApA 20, 233 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Joshi, P.S., Dadhich, N., Maartens, R.: Phys. Rev. D 65, 101501 (2002)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  66. Shapiro, S.L., Teukolsky, S.A.: Philosophical Transactions: Physical Sciences and Engineering 340(1658), 365–390 (1992)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  67. Berger, B. K.: Living Reviews in Relativity 5 1 1 (2002)

  68. Bousso, R., Shahbazi-Moghaddam, A., Tomasevic, M.: Phys. Rev. D 100, 126010 (2019)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. Ziaie, A.H., Ranjbar, A., Sepangi, H.R.: Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 025010 (2015)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Joshi, P.S.: Gravitational Collapse and Spacetime Singularities. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, New York (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  71. Wald, R.M., Iyer, V.: Phys. Rev. D 44, 3719 (1991)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  72. Shapiro, S.L., Teukolsky, S.A.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 994 (1991)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  73. Apostolatos, T.A., Thorne, K.S.: Phys. Rev. D 46, 2435 (1992)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. Jacobson, T., Sotiriou, T.P.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 141101 (2009)

    ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  75. Jacobson, T., Sotiriou, T.P.: J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 222, 012041 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Barausse, E., Cardoso, V., Khanna, G.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 261102 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. Giacomazzo, B., Rezzolla, L., Stergioulas, N.: Phys. Rev. D 84, 024022 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. Wald, R.M.: Class. Quant. Grav. 16, A177 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Wald, R.M.: Living Rev. Relativ. 4(1), 6 (2001)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H.: to be submitted (2021)

  81. Chrusciel, P.T., Lopes Costa, J., Heusler, M.: Living Rev. Rel. 15, 7 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Li, Z., Bambi, C.: Phys. Rev. D 87, 124022 (2013)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H.: Eur. Phys. J. C 75(5), 234 (2015)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. Joshi P. S., Dwivedi I. H.: Phys. Rev. D 47, 5357 (1993)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by UNAM-DGAPA-PAPIIT, Grant No. 114520, Conacyt-Mexico, Grant No. A1-S-31269, and by the Ministry of Education and Science of Kazakhstan, Grant No. BR05236730 and AP05133630.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Pugliese.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pugliese, D., Quevedo, H. Repulsive gravity effects in horizon formation. Gen Relativ Gravit 53, 89 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02858-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-021-02858-4

Keywords

Navigation