Abstract
This work presents a detailed wind tunnel investigation into the nature of the unsteady flow mechanisms that dictate the aerodynamic forces acting on prime-mover trailer heavy vehicles fitted with various passive flow control devices. This work builds on the current understating of the wake flow physics of heavy vehicles that until now has primarily been developed from studies utilising highly simplified geometries or time-averaged findings with realistic geometries. Unsteady base-surface and wake pressure measurements reveal how the time-averaged and unsteady flow field responds to the addition of passive aerodynamic devices that have been shown to be effective on operational heavy vehicles for improving fuel economy and reducing emissions. In comparing turbulent wake statistics and unsteady modes the time-averaged and unsteady flow response is linked directly to the measured changes in the aerodynamic drag coefficient thorough surface pressure and force measurement. The large variation in the wake structure and dynamics observed between test configurations highlights the importance of considering the detailed geometry of heavy vehicles when looking to develop advanced aerodynamic control devices that would provide benefits above and beyond those focused on in this study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, J. R. (2015). The slipstream and wake structure of high-speed trains. Ph.D. Dissertation. Monash University. Melbourne, Australia.
Berkooz, G., Holmes, P. J. and Lumley, J. L. (1993). The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 25, 1, 539–575.
Burton, D., McArthur, D., Sheridan, J. and Thompson, M. (2013). Contribution of add-on components to the aerodynamic drag of a cab-over truck-trailer combination vehicle. SAE Int. J. Commercial Vehicles 6, 2013-01-2428, 477–485.
Castelain, T., Michard, M., Szmigiel, M., Chacaton, D. and Juvé, D. (2018). Identification of flow classes in the wake of a simplified truck model depending on the underbody velocity. J. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 175, 352–363.
Chen, J., Haynes, B. S. and Fletcher, D. F. (2000). Cobra probe measurements of mean velocities, reynolds stresses and higher-order velocity correlations in pipe flow. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 21, 4, 206–217.
Cooper, K. R. and Leuschen, J. (2005). Model and full-scale wind tunnel tests of second-generation aerodynamic fuel saving devices for tractor-trailers. SAE Technical Paper No. 2005-01-3512.
Duell, E. G. and George, A. R. (1999). Experimental study of a ground vehicle body unsteady near wake. SAE Trans. 108, 6, 1589–1602.
Haff, J. (2015). A comparative study of engineering tools in heavy vehicle aerodynamics. Ph.D. Dissertation. Technische Universität Ilmenau. Ilmenau, Germany.
Hooper, J. D. and Musgrove, A. R. (1997). Reynolds stress, mean velocity, and dynamic static pressure measurement by a four-hole pressure probe. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 15, 4, 375–383.
Lanser, W., Ross, J. C. and Kaufman, A. E. (1991). Aerodynamic performance of a drag reduction device on a full-scale tractor/trailer. SAE Trans., 2688–3627.
Leuschen, J. and Cooper, K. R. (2006). Full-scale wind tunnel tests of production and prototype, second-generation aerodynamic drag-reducing devices for tractor-trailers. SAE Technical Paper No. 2006-01-3456.
Lumley, J. L. (1967). The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. Atmospheric Turbulence and Radio Wave Propagation.
McArthur, D., Burton, D., Thompson, M. and Sheridan, J. (2016). On the near wake of a simplified heavy vehicle. J. Fluids and Structures, 66, 293–314.
McArthur, D., Burton, D., Thompson, M. and Sheridan, J. (2018). An experimental characterisation of the wake of a detailed heavy vehicle in cross-wind. J. Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 175, 364–375.
McArthur, D. J., Burton, D., Thompson, M. and Sheridan, J. (2013). Development of a wind tunnel test section for evaluation of heavy vehicle aerodynamic drag at a scale of 1:3. SAE Int. J. Commercial Vehicles 6,2, 2013-01-2455, 522–528.
Roshko, A. (1955). On the wake and drag of bluff bodies. J. Aeronautical Sciences 22, 2, 124–132.
Van Raemdonck, G., Cojocaru, M. and Van Tooren, M. (2009). Time dependant pressure analysis of a bluff body with the aid of proper orthogonal decomposition. 14thInt. Conf. Fluid Flow Technologies. Budapest, Hungary.
Varon, E., Eulalie, Y., Edwige, S., Gilotte, P. and Aider, J. L. (2017). Control of the chaotic dynamics of a turbulent 3D wake. arXiv: 1712.00416.
Volpe, R., Devinant, P. and Kourta, A. (2014). Unsteady experimental characterization of the natural wake of a squareback Ahmed model. ASME 4thJoint US-European Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting collocated with the ASME 12thInt. Conf. Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels. Chicago, IL, USA.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported under the Australian Research Council’s Linkage Projects funding scheme (project number LP0991170).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McArthur, D., Burton, D., Crouch, T. et al. Wake Flows of Highly Detailed Heavy Vehicles. Int.J Automot. Technol. 22, 1227–1243 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-021-0108-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-021-0108-1