Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Know Your Model: A brief history of making mutant mouse genetic models

For over a century, researchers have used mice as models and adapted many new methods to create novel mutations in them. In the past 100+ years, we have gone from breeding strains for selected traits to inducing random mutations throughout the genome to creating designer alleles with multiple functions. Each method offers opportunities and challenges for researchers as they try to address specific research questions with mouse models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Alleles Entered in MGI Per Generation Method Per Year from 1911 -2019.

References

  1. Durham, F. J. Genet 1, 159–178 (1911).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lathrop, A. & Loeb, L. J. Exp. Med. 22, 646–673 (1915).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Little, C. Am Nat. 1, 335–349 (1916).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunn, L. Am Nat. 54, 465–495 (1920).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shoji, H. et al. Exp. Anim. 64, 171–9 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zdarsky, E., Favor, J. & Jackson, I. J. Genetics 126, 443–9 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamada, T. et al. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 10799–807 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Little, C. & Bagg, H. Am J. Roentgenol 10, 975–989 (1923).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, D. Radiat Res. 19, 184–185 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Batchelor, A. L., Phillips, R. J. & Searle, A. G. Mutat. Res. 3, 218–29 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mallon, A.-M. et al. Genome Res. 14, 1888–901 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Falconer, D. Mouse News Lett 1S, 4 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ehling, U. H., Favor, J., Kratochvilova, J. & Neuhäuser-Klaus, A. Mutat. Res. 92, 181–92 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jaenisch, R. Cell 12, 691–6 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaenisch, R. et al. Cell 24, 519–29 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nour, M., Quiambao, A. B., Al-Ubaidi, M. R. & Naash, M. I. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 15–22 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perry, M. N., Bello, S. M. & Smith, C. L. Lab Anim. (NY). 49, 187–189 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, R. S. et al. Science 245, 1234–6 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schwartzberg, P. L., Goff, S. P. & Robertson, E. J. Science 246, 799–803 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Koller, B. H. & Smithies, O. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 8932–5 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zijlstra, M., Li, E., Sajjadi, F., Subramani, S. & Jaenisch, R. Nature 342, 435–8 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson, S., Clarke, A. R., Pow, A. M., Hooper, M. L. & Melton, D. W. Cell 56, 313–21 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Austin, C. P. et al. Nat. Genet. 36, 921–4 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Friedrich, G. & Soriano, P. Genes Dev. 5, 1513–23 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Horie, K. et al. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 9189–207 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dupuy, A. J., Akagi, K., Largaespada, D. A., Copeland, N. G. & Jenkins, N. A. Nature 436, 221–6 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Keng, V. W. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 264–74 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Costa, J. R. et al. Genome Editing Using Engineered Nucleases and Their Use in Genomic Screening. Assay Guidance Manual (2004).

  29. Savic, D. et al. Genome Res. 21, 1417–25 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Panda, S. K. et al. Genetics 195, 703–13 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Flemr, M. et al. Cell 155, 807–16 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mashiko, D. et al. Sci. Rep. 3, 3355 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Livet, J. et al. Nature 450, 56–62 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Turan, S. et al. J. Mol. Biol. 407, 193–221 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaul, A., Chen, Y.-H., Emnett, R. J., Gianino, S. M. & Gutmann, D. H. Genesis 51, 708–16 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MGD is supported by program project grant HG000330 from the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan M. Bello.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bello, S.M., Perry, M.N. & Smith, C.L. Know Your Model: A brief history of making mutant mouse genetic models. Lab Anim 50, 263–266 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-021-00853-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-021-00853-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing