Elsevier

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Volume 315, 15 December 2021, Pages 295-316
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta

Geochemical evidence for carbon and chlorine enrichments in the mantle source of kimberlites (Udachnaya pipe, Siberian craton)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2021.09.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Deep, carbonate-rich melts are key constituents of kimberlites and are crucial for understanding the cycle of volatile elements in the mantle. On the Siberian craton, the Udachnaya-East kimberlite hosts extremely well-preserved nodules composed of chlorides + carbonates + sulfates, that do not present any relict sedimentary textures. These salty nodules display textures that are commonly observed in quenched liquids and may thus represent the very last stage liquid of the kimberlite. Alternatively, they could represent assimilated sedimentary material, or even post-magmatic hydrothermal alteration, because kimberlites are known to ascend through the lithosphere while assimilating material from their wall rocks.

Here we focus specifically on those chloride-carbonate nodules, which are composed of 70% chloride + 30% alkali-carbonate and sulfate, and used two radiogenic systems (Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd) and the isotopic composition of sulfur, in addition to their major and trace element compositions (n = 3). We then compared the results with the same geochemical data on host kimberlites (n = 4), sedimentary cover (n = 3) and hydrothermal veins (n = 3).

Taken together, our results show that the nodules are not the product of a contamination by the Cambrian sedimentary cover. Trace element patterns of the nodules display extreme enrichments in the same elements that are relatively depleted in the host kimberlite but also in kimberlites worldwide (K, Rb, Sr, Pb), suggesting that chloride-carbonate nodules are snapshots of the latest stage liquid present in the kimberlite system. Their isotopic compositions (Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd and δ34S) are consistent with a common magmatic source with their host kimberlite. We propose that chloride-carbonate nodules record a missing compositional endmember, which could explain the trend towards more radiogenic Sr isotope ratios at nearly constant Nd signatures observed in their host kimberlite, as well as in other kimberlites worldwide. This observed trend suggests the presence of a recycled component with high Rb/Sr (such as salts or terrigenous sediments) in the mantle sampled by some kimberlites, either in the lithosphere or the asthenosphere. This study highlights that the role of alkalies and halogens may have been underestimated in the genesis of kimberlites at depths where diamonds are stable, as well as in more evolved magmatic stages. Segregations of chlorides and carbonates occur specifically in sulfate-bearing kimberlites, which may thus sample a mantle domain in which sulfates with δ34S > 0‰ are dominant. The existence of such a reservoir could explain the apparent imbalance observed between the chondritic value (δ34S of 0‰) and the negative S isotopic compositions of mantle sulfides (MORB and peridotites).

Introduction

Kimberlites are volatile-rich volcanic rocks of alkaline composition that contain abundant olivine crystals. Their parental magma originates at great depth beneath continents, in the diamond stability field (>150 km depth). Although the exact nature of their parental magma does not reach a consensus yet, there is evidence for the participation of halogens and other volatiles as well as alkaline elements in the genesis of kimberlites. Some key observations include the presence of syngenetic phlogopite inclusion in kimberlite-hosted diamonds with up to 0.5 wt% Cl (Sobolev et al., 2009), Na ± K-rich compositions of residual melts/fluids (C-O-H-Cl bearing) after olivine crystallization (Golovin et al., 2007, Kamenetsky et al., 2009, Kamenetsky et al., 2014, Giuliani et al., 2017, Abersteiner et al., 2018), as well as Na ± K-chloride inclusions in chromite, perovskite, apatite (Abersteiner et al., 2017), magmatic calcite and olivine from Udachnaya (Tomilenko et al., 2017a, Tomilenko et al., 2017b).

The presence of salts at depth raises the exciting question of volatile recycling through time, and its ultimate role on mantle metasomatism, especially upon the compositional spectrum of mantle fluids (Izraeli et al., 2001, Klein-BenDavid et al., 2007, Weiss et al., 2015, Zedgenizov et al., 2018). However, the primary origin and concentration of chlorine and other volatiles in various kimberlites worldwide is difficult to unravel because: (1) volatiles are often lost via exsolution during ascent and emplacement, as well as post-emplacement alteration (Abersteiner et al., 2017); (2) each kimberlite composition reflects some assimilation of the local lithospheric mantle directly underneath (Francis and Patterson, 2009, Tappe et al., 2011, Giuliani et al., 2020), and (3) the percolation of late stage fluids as well as the assimilation of sedimentary or crustal xenoliths during magma ascent near the surface (Kjarsgaard et al., 2009), can seriously modify the primary composition of kimberlites.

On the Siberian craton, the Udachnaya-East kimberlite preserves a rare, dry (H2O < 0.5 wt%) and serpentine-free rock type with anomalously high contents of chlorine (up to 6.1 wt%), alkalies (Na2O + K2O up to 10 wt%) and sulfur (S up to 0.50 wt%), referred to as a “salty” kimberlite (Kamenetsky et al., 2012, D’Eyrames et al., 2017). This salty kimberlite contains nodules composed of carbonate, chloride and sulfate, whose origin is a matter of debate and could be either: (1) the segregation by immiscibility from a liquid initially derived from melting of the mantle (Maas et al., 2005, Kamenetsky et al., 2007a, Kamenetsky et al., 2007b, Kamenetsky et al., 2014), (2) the assimilation of sediments or crustal xenoliths by the ascending magma (Kopylova et al., 2013), or (3) a post-magmatic hydrothermal alteration (Kopylova et al., 2013). According to sulfur isotopic compositions, abundant sulfates found in the salty kimberlite of Udachnaya-East derive from an oxidized, sulfate-bearing mantle source (Kitayama et al., 2017). Such mantle domains, if confirmed, would represent a little explored but significant reservoir in the global geochemical cycle of volatile elements.

In this study, we investigated the genetic link between the chloride-carbonate nodules and their host kimberlite, as well as their possible sources (asthenosphere, lithosphere, granitic crust or sediments). For this purpose, we used a combination of two radiogenic systems (Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd) and the stable isotopic composition of sulfur in chloride-carbonate nodule, salty kimberlite, as well as hydrothermal salts, sulfates, a regional brine and the only salt-bearing host sediment found in drill holes in the area. Our results exclude the Cambrian sedimentary cover as a source of chloride-carbonate nodules and instead support a mantle origin. Calculations of age-corrected 87Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd ratios as well as S isotopes allowed us to evaluate possible scenarios for the source of salts in nodules and kimberlites.

Section snippets

Geological setting

The Udachnaya-East kimberlite is located in the Daldyn kimberlite field (Aldan province) in the central part of the Siberian craton (Fig. 1). At the craton scale, several kimberlite emplacements from early Devonian to late Jurassic have been reported (Sun et al., 2014). In the Aldan province however kimberlite emplacement ages mostly range from 340 to 360 Ma, with minor occurrences in the intervals 420–400 and 600–500 Ma. The oldest recorded ages (600–500 Ma) may represent older mantle material

Sample description

Chloride-carbonate nodules were collected from stockpiles of salty kimberlite mined from 460 to 500 m depths. They are rounded or angular, range in size from 3 to 10 cm, and consist of 30 to 70% of carbonate, the remaining part being chlorides (Table 1). They do not present any relic sedimentary textures, indicating that they were completely molten before they crystallized in the kimberlite. The samples present intergrowths of randomly oriented sheets of chloride and carbonates (Fig. 2a and b).

Whole rock major and trace element analyses

Pieces of chloride-carbonate nodules were selected from the interior of the nodules, to avoid contamination by the surrounding kimberlite groundmass. Samples from hydrothermal veins were also selected free of kimberlitic material. Samples of rock powders and brine were analysed for major and trace element geochemistry by the SARM laboratory (Service d’Analyses des Roches et des Minéraux, Vandœuvre-Les-Nancy, France). Major element analyses were carried out using an inductively coupled-plasma

Major and trace element compositions

Major element compositions are reported in Table 2 and presented in Fig. 3. Three salty kimberlite samples have on average, 30 wt.% MgO, 8.5 wt.% CO2, 26 wt.% SiO2, 8 wt.% FeO total and their major element compositions are consistent with a mixture between olivine, alkali-carbonates and chlorides. One sample (UV12-119; Table 2) deviates from the general trend, indicating a possible contribution from phlogopite (Fig. 3a and b). Chloride-carbonate nodules have from 17 to 19 wt.% CO2, 10 to 14

Why the Cambrian sedimentary cover is not the source of chloride-carbonate nodules

Chloride-carbonate nodules are much more enriched in alkalies (Na + K > 20 wt.%, Fig. 3d–f) and Cl (Fig. 3e) compared to the wall-rock Chukuck sediment (0.10 wt.% Na + K and 0.35 wt.% Cl). They are also more enriched in S (1–5 wt.%) compared to the Chukuck sediment (1.7 wt.% S) or brine precipitates (S ≤ 0.11 wt.%; Fig. 3d), thus Cambrian Chukuck suite sediments and brines cannot be their only sulfur source.

In terms of trace elements, hydrothermal veins and brine precipitates (Fig. 5c) are

Chloride-carbonate nodules derived from the kimberlitic mantle source

The combination of major, trace element, Rb-Sr, Sm-Nd and S-isotopes indicates that chloride-carbonate nodules are magmatic products derived from a moderately depleted mantle source. Our results exclude the possibility that these chloride-carbonate nodules are xenoliths from the Cambrian sedimentary cover or crystallized from Cambrian brines infiltrating the kimberlite. They support the hypothesis that alkali-carbonates and their associated chlorides and sulfates in salty kimberlites have a

Research data

Research Data associated with this article can be accessed at: https://doi.org/10.24396/ORDAR-70. Otelo research data repository (ORDaR) has been used for this contribution.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sebastian Tappe and two anonymous reviewers for their time and the quality of their critical comments that helped us improving the initial version of our manuscript, as well as Jeffrey G. Catalano and Rajdeep Dasgupta for the editorial handling. We are grateful to Catherine Zimmerman, Aimeryc Schumacher, Laurie Reisberg, Christiane Parmentier and Damien Cividini for their help in the clean lab and radiogenic isotope analyses at CRPG. Equally, we would like to

References (75)

  • V.S. Kamenetsky et al.

    Chlorine from the mantle: Magmatic halides in the Udachnaya-East kimberlite, Siberia

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2009)
  • V.S. Kamenetsky et al.

    Towards a new model for kimberlite petrogenesis: evidence from unaltered kimberlites and mantle minerals

    Earth-Sci. Rev.

    (2014)
  • V.S. Kamenetsky et al.

    Ultrafresh salty kimberlite of the Udachnaya-East pipe (Yakutia, Russia): a petrological oddity or fortuitous discovery?

    Lithos

    (2012)
  • Y. Kitayama et al.

    Co-magmatic sulfides and sulfates in the Udachnaya-East pipe (Siberia): a record of the redox state and isotopic composition of sulfur in kimberlites and their mantle sources

    Chem. Geol.

    (2017)
  • B.A. Kjarsgaard et al.

    Geochemistry of hypabyssal kimberlites from Lac de Gras, Canada: comparisons to a global database and applications to the parent magma problem

    Lithos

    (2009)
  • O. Klein-BenDavid et al.

    Fluid inclusions in diamonds from the Diavik mine, Canada and the evolution of diamond-forming fluids

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2007)
  • M.G. Kopylova et al.

    Origin of salts and alkali carbonates in the Udachnaya East kimberlite: insights from petrography of kimberlite phases and their carbonate and evaporite xenoliths

    J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res.

    (2016)
  • M.G. Kopylova et al.

    Salts in southern Yakutian kimberlites and the problem of primary alkali kimberlite melts

    Earth-Sci. Rev.

    (2013)
  • J. Labidi et al.

    Multiple sulfur isotope composition of oxidized Samoan melts and the implications of a sulfur isotope “ mantle array ” in chemical geodynamics

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2015)
  • J. Labidi et al.

    Sulfur isotope budget (32S, 33S, 34S and 36S) in Pacific-Antarctic ridge basalts: a record of mantle source heterogeneity and hydrothermal sulfide assimilation

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (2014)
  • W.F. McDonough et al.

    The composition of the Earth

    Chem. Geol.

    (1995)
  • A. Michard et al.

    Nd isotopes in French Phanerozoic shales: external vs. internal aspects of crustal evolution

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1985)
  • D.G. Pearson et al.

    Re-Os, Sm-Nd, and Rb-Sr isotope evidence for thick Archaean lithospheric mantle beneath the Siberian craton modified by multistage metasomatism

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1995)
  • C. Pin et al.

    Concomitant separation of strontium and samarium-neodymium for isotopic analysis in silicate samples, based on specific extraction chromatography

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1994)
  • C. Pin et al.

    Sequential separation of light rare-earth elements, thorium and uranium by miniaturized extraction chromatography: application to isotopic analyses of silicate rocks

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1997)
  • H.H. Schock et al.

    Rubidium and cesium distribution in salt minerals—I. Experimental investigations

    Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta

    (1971)
  • N.V. Sobolev et al.

    Syngenetic phlogopite inclusions in kimberlite-hosted diamonds: implications for role of volatiles in diamond formation

    Russ. Geol. Geophys.

    (2009)
  • J. Sun et al.

    Repeated kimberlite magmatism beneath Yakutia and its relationship to Siberian flood volcanism: insights from in situ U-Pb and Sr–Nd perovskite isotope analysis

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2014)
  • S. Tappe et al.

    A fresh isotopic look at Greenland kimberlites: cratonic mantle lithosphere imprint on deep source signal

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2011)
  • S. Tappe et al.

    Asthenospheric source of Neoproterozoic and Mesozoic kimberlites from the North Atlantic craton, West Greenland: new high-precision U-Pb and Sr–Nd isotope data on perovskite

    Chem. Geol.

    (2012)
  • S. Tappe et al.

    Sources and mobility of carbonate melts beneath cratons, with implications for deep carbon cycling, metasomatism and rift initiation

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2017)
  • S. Tappe et al.

    Geodynamics of kimberlites on a cooling Earth: clues to plate tectonic evolution and deep volatile cycles

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2018)
  • S. Tappe et al.

    Origins of kimberlites and carbonatites during continental collision–insights beyond decoupled Nd-Hf isotopes

    Earth-Sci. Rev.

    (2020)
  • S. Tappe et al.

    The tungsten-182 record of kimberlites above the African superplume: Exploring links to the core-mantle boundary

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2020)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    Eolian dust forcing of river chemistry on the northeastern Tibetan Plateau since 8 Ma

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (2017)
  • A. Abersteiner et al.

    Was crustal contamination involved in the formation of the serpentine-free Udachnaya-East kimberlite? New insights into parental melts, liquidus assemblage and effects of alteration

    J. Petrol.

    (2018)
  • A.M. Agashev et al.

    Geochemistry and origin of the Mirny field kimberlites, Siberia

    Mineral. Petrol.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (6)

    View full text