Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of weight loss on treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus chemotherapy have become the standard first line of treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have explicitly focused on the impact of weight loss on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Thus, we evaluated the clinical implications of weight loss on the survival outcomes in patients who received this treatment.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy from December 2018 to December 2020. Significant weight loss was defined as an unintentional weight loss of 5% or more over 6 months. We evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with or without weight loss.

Results

Among the 80 included patients, 37 (46%) had weight loss, and were associated with a lower objective response rate (30 vs 51%, P < 0.05), poorer PFS (2.3 vs 12.0 months, P < 0.05), and poorer OS (10.8 vs 23.9 months, P < 0.05) than those without weight loss. The Cox proportional-hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of weight loss were 1.77 (1.01–3.10) for PFS and 2.90 (1.40–6.00) for OS, with adjustments for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, PD-L1 tumour proportion score, histology, and central nervous system metastases.

Conclusion

Pre-treatment weight loss may reduce treatment efficacy and shorten survival time in patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy. Early evaluation and intervention for weight loss might improve oncological outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and material are available on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Mok TSK, Wu YL, Kudaba I et al (2019) Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for previously untreated, PD-L1-expressing, locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-042): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 393:1819–1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32409-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaverdian N, Lisberg AE, Bornazyan K et al (2017) Previous radiotherapy and the clinical activity and toxicity of pembrolizumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: a secondary analysis of the KEYNOTE-001 phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol 18:895903. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30380-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reck M, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG et al (2019) Updated analysis of KEYNOTE-024: Pembrolizumab versus Platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumour proportion score of 50% or greater. J Clin Oncol 37:537–546. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.00149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D et al (2017) Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 389:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S et al (2018) Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 378:2078–2092. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1801005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D et al (2018) Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 379:2040–2051. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1810865

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F et al (2018) Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 378:2288–2301. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fearon K, Arends J, Baracos V (2013) Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baracos VE, Martin L, Korc M et al (2018) Cancer-associated cachexia. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4:17105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roch B, Coffy A, Jean-Baptiste S et al (2020) Cachexia – sarcopenia as a determinant of disease control rate and survival in non-small lung cancer patients receiving immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Lung Cancer 143:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nishioka N, Uchino J, Hirai S et al (2019) Association of sarcopenia with and efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Med 8:450. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8040450

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Miyawaki T, Naito T, Kodama A et al (2020) Desensitizing effect of cancer cachexia on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced NSCLC. JTO Clin Res Rep 1:100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2020.100020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J et al (2016) The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 11:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz LH, Litière S, de Vries E et al (2016) RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: from the RECIST committee. Eur J Cancer 62:132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Langer CJ, Socinski MA, Patel JD et al (2016) Isolating the role of bevacizumab in elderly patients with previously untreated nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 39:441–447. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000000163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kenmotsu H, Yamamoto N, Yamanaka T et al (2020) Randomized phase III study of Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin Versus Vinorelbine Plus Cisplatin for completely resected stage II to IIIA nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 38:2187–2196. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.02674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okamoto I, Nokihara H, Nomura S et al (2020) Comparison of Carboplatin plus Pemetrexed followed by Maintenance Pemetrexed with Docetaxel monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 6:e196828. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6828

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ross PJ, Ashley S, Norton A et al (2004) Do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for lung cancers? Br J Cancer 90:1905–1911. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel JD, Pereira JR, Chen J et al (2016) Relationship between efficacy outcomes and weight gain during treatment of advanced, non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol 27:1612–1619. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Naito T, Okayama T, Aoyama T et al (2017) Skeletal muscle depletion during chemotherapy has a large impact on physical function in elderly Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 17:571. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3562-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin L, Baracos VE et al (2015) Diagnostic criteria for the classification of cancer-associated weight loss. J Clin Oncol 33:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.56.1894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morel H, Raynard B et al (2018) Prediagnosis weight loss, a stronger factor than BMI, to predict survival in patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer 126:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jizu Z, Sean K, Deborah K et al (2018) Association of baseline body mass index (BMI) with overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) treated with nivolumab (N) and pembrolizumab (P). J Clin Oncol 36:6553–6553. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.6553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kimura M, Naito T, Kenmotsu H et al (2015) Prognostic impact of cancer cachexia in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 23:1699–1708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2534-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fujio T, Nakashima K, Naito T et al (2019) Platinum combination chemotherapy is poorly tolerated in malnourished advanced lung cancer patients with poor performance status. Nutr Cancer 71:767–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2018.1559941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyawaki E, Naito T, Nakashima K et al (2020) Management of anorexia prevents skeletal muscle wasting during cisplatin-based chemotherapy for thoracic malignancies. JCSM Clinical Reports 5:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/crt2.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Doroshow DB, Bhalla S, Beasley MB et al (2021) PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 18:345–362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41571-021-00473-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Flint TR, Fearon DT, Janowitz T (2017) Connecting the metabolic and immune responses to cancer. Trends Mol Med 23:451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2017.03.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Flint TR, Janowitz T, Connell CM et al (2016) Tumor-induced IL-6 reprograms host metabolism to suppress anti-tumour immunity. Cell Metab 24:672–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.10.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaplanov I, Carmi Y, Kornetsky R et al (2019) Blocking IL-1beta reverses the immunosuppression in mouse breast cancer and synergizes with anti-PD-1 for tumour abrogation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U. S A 116:1361–1369. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812266115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bertrand F, Montfort A, Marcheteau E et al (2017) TNF alpha blockade overcomes resistance to anti-PD-1 in experimental melanoma. Nat Commun 8:2256. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02358-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Teng MW, Ngiow SF, Ribas A, Smyth MJ (2015) Classifying cancers based on T-cell infiltration and PD-L1. Cancer Res 75:2139–2145. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nishie K, Yamamoto S, Nagata C et al (2017) Anamorelin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with cachexia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 112:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Temel JS, Abernethy AP, Currow DC et al (2016) Anamorelin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and cachexia (ROMANA 1 and ROMANA 2): results from two randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 17:519–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00558-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TM and TN wrote the manuscript and researched data. TN reviewed and edited the manuscript. KM is a professional biostatistician and responsible for statistical analysis. All authors reviewed, approved the final version of the manuscript, and certified that they comply with the ethical guidelines for publishing in the Supportive care in Cancer.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tateaki Naito.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The ethical review board of our institution approved the study (registration no. J2020-176–2020-1). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or with comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

For this type of study, formal consent is not required. However, we also employed an opt-out method to obtain consent for this study by posting a document about this study. The document has been approved by the institutional ethics review board of Shizuoka Cancer Center.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Taichi Miyawaki — Declarations of interest: none.

Dr. Naito, Dr. Yabe, Dr. Kodama, Dr. Nishioka, Dr. Eriko Miyawaki, Dr. Mori — Declarations of interest: none.

Dr. Mamesaya reports personal fees from AstraZeneca KK, Pfizer Japan, Inc.; personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from MSD K.K.; personal fees from TAIHO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; and personal fees from ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., outside the submitted work.

Dr. Kobayashi reports personal fees from Eli Lilly K.K, personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical, personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Omori reports personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca K.K., Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and MSD, which are unrelated to the submitted work.

Dr. Wakuda reports grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Eli Lilly K.K.; personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, personal fees from MSD; grants from Novartis; grants from Abbvie; and grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Ono reports grants from Taiho Pharmaceutical, grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and grants from Novartis Pharma K.K., outside the submitted work.

Dr. Kenmotsu reports grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.; personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.; personal fees from Boeringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Eli Lilly K.K; personal fees from Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.; personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb; personal fees from MSD; grants and personal fees from Novartis Pharma K.K.; grants and personal fees from Daiichi-Sankyo Co., Ltd.; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K.; personal fees from Pfizer; and personal fees from Taiho Pharma, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Murakami reports personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Novartis Pharma K.K., Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly K.K., and MSD, which are unrelated to the submitted work.

Dr. Harada reports personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceutical Co. during the conduct of the study as well as personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceutical Co., AstraZeneca K.K., Brain Labo Co., and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. and grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund, which are unrelated to the submitted work.

Dr. Kazuhisa Takahashi reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K., Pfizer Japan, Inc., Eli Lilly K.K., MSD, and Boehringer Ingelheim as well as grants from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Japan K.K., SHIONOGI & CO., LTD., and Novartis Pharma K.K., which are unrelated to the submitted work.

Dr. Toshiaki Takahashi reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca KK, Pfizer Japan, Inc.; grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; grants and personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; grants and personal fees from MSD K.K.; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, Inc.; grants and personal fees from Pfizer Japan, Inc.; and personal fees from Roche Diagnostics K.K., outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miyawaki, T., Naito, T., Yabe, M. et al. Impact of weight loss on treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 30, 1633–1641 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06572-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06572-4

Keywords

Navigation