Methanation of CO2 on bulk Co–Fe catalysts
Graphical abstract
Introduction
In the recent decades active consumption of fossil fuels has led to increased emission of carbon dioxide (CO2) that constitutes one of the main components of greenhouse gases and an effective absorber of infrared radiation. Higher CO2 concentration in the air directly affects global heat exchange and causes gradual climate change. The annual increase of CO2 emission is calculated as 0.5–2 pmm that approximates 20 billion tons in absolute terms [[1], [2], [3]]. Developed technology to obtain fuel using biomass combustion might be considered to be “carbon-neutral technology” [[4], [5], [6]] when it does not increase the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere. Production of CH4 from atmospheric CO2 might also be added to the category of “carbon-neutral technology” where both methane and water are “environmentally friendly” products [7]:
At the beginning methanation was considered as a chemical approach to synthesize synthetic natural gas but a fast progress of hydrogen energy technologies during last 50 years shifted the emphasis on fuel towards pure hydrogen. Nevertheless, catalytic CO2→CH4 conversion on metal catalysts becomes more attractive because of a special interest in producing renewable fuel lowering global carbon dioxide emission. Discovered in 1897 methanation reaction (1) by the French chemists Paul Sabatier and Jean-Baptiste Senderens raises interest regarding effective CO2→CH4 conversion as well encourages further development of hydrogen technologies. From thermodynamical point of view, it would be a quite simple chemical process [[8], [9], [10], [11]]; however, very often it does not take place in practice due to kinetic limitations. Extraordinary stability of CO2 molecules and steric factor when eight electrons are involved in the elementary act of interaction between CO2 and H2 is considered to be one of the obstacles. Therefore, the presence of a catalyst that can provoke and accelerate chemical reaction (1) would be appropriate [9]. It should be noted that the presence of a certain catalyst might result in a different reaction mechanism that itself leads to the appearance of other products or their mixtures (e.g. for (1) in addition to methane another hydrocarbon would appear [8,12,13]). However, in this paper we consider highly selective methanation catalysts only.
Experimental studies have confirmed that effective catalysts for reaction (1) might be metallic Rh [14,15], Ni [[16], [17], [18], [19]], Co [20,21] and Fe [[22], [23], [24]], but because of their disadvantages (Rh is very expensive, Ni and Co can be easily sintered and oxidized, Fe has low selectivity on methane) they were not developed. The use of bimetallic compounds allows preparing a catalyst that combines the desired properties of the individual metals. High activity of Co metal in the catalytic methanation [[25], [26], [27], [28]] is very well-known. Metallic Fe plays the role of a structuring component adding stability to sintering to the bimetallic compounds [29,30] and assists the CO2 molecule splitting because of its high affinity for oxygen [31,32]. Multi-component alloys can demonstrate higher catalytic activity [23,27,30,[33], [34], [35], [36]] with respect to quantity and distribution of their components. All of these stimulate a systematic study of Co–Fe catalysts for chemical reaction (1).
In the present work catalyst efficiency of CO2→CH4 conversion was estimated using gas chromatography. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Mössbauer spectroscopy were applied for ex-situ analysis of Co–Fe catalysts after their test in the methanation reaction. Thermal programmed desorption mass spectroscopy (TPD-MS) experiments were performed to identify gaseous particles adsorbed on the surface of catalysts. Based on the experimental results, surface reaction model of CO2 methanation on Co–Fe catalysts was proposed to understand regularities in the catalytic action.
Section snippets
Materials and reagents
Hydrogen gas obtained from a hydrogen generator was used for catalysts preparation in thermogravimetric and chromatographic experiments. Gas pipelines with carbon dioxide (99.8%), helium (99.995%), and argon (99.5%) were applied as reagents, inert media and gas adsorbate, respectively. Merck's ammonia (30 wt%) and nitric acid (65 vol%) were diluted in double-distilled water to prepare 18 wt% and 20 vol% water solutions, respectively. Reagent grade metal powders of iron (99.95%) and cobalt
Results and discussion
Chemical reduction of co-precipitated Co and Fe oxides to Co–Fe powders was checked by in-situ hydrogen interaction within the temperature range of 50–500 °C. For example, TG experiment of the co-precipitated oxides obtained under the preparation of Co(93)Fe(7) powder is shown in Fig. 1S (in supplementary information). Before reduction of oxidative forms of Co and Fe within the range of 260–405 °C (region c), typical low-temperature events originated from the desorption of adsorbed water and
Conclusion
Co–Fe powders were prepared and tested as catalysts during carbon dioxide methanation. It was found experimentally that catalysts efficiency and selectivity depended mainly on the chemical composition and the reaction temperature but not on their specific surface area. The surface of the powders resembled the structure of sintered nanoparticles 20–50 nm in size. After the methanation reaction Co–Fe catalysts were analyzed using SEM, XRD, XPS and Mössbauer spectroscopy. The XPS analysis
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
Mössbauer spectroscopy measurements of Co93Fe7, Co85Fe15 and Co90Fe10, Co75Fe2, Co20Fe80, Fe100 were carried out at Uppsala University and the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, respectively. Dr. I. Saldan expresses gratitude for financial support of Mössbauer spectroscopy measurements made within his Swedish Institute Scholarship (reference number 23891/2017) under supervision of Dr. Martin Häggblad Sahlberg (Uppsala University).
References (56)
- et al.
Energy Rev
(2012) - et al.
Science
(2005) - et al.
Int J Hydrogen Energy
(2008) - et al.
J. CO2 Utilization
(2017) Comptes Rendus
(1902)- et al.
Catal. Sci. Technol.
(2016) - et al.
J Nat Gas Sci Eng
(2015) - et al.
RSC Adv
(2012)
Fuel
Catal Today
Green Chem
Appl Catal, B
J Catal
J Mol Catal Chem
Appl Catal, B
Int J Hydrogen Energy
Int J Hydrogen Energy
J Phys Chem C
J Mol Catal
Top Catal
Funct. Mater. Lett.
J. CO2 Utilization
J Am Chem Soc
Bull Chem React Eng Catal
E3S Web of Conf.
J. CO2 Utilization
Cited by (11)
Research progress of bimetallic catalysts for CO<inf>2</inf> hydrogenation to methane
2024, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyZIF-derived catalyst with inverse ZnO/Co structure for efficient CO<inf>2</inf> methanation
2024, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyCarbon dioxide methanation over Ni catalysts prepared by reduction of Ni<inf>x</inf>Mg<inf>3‒x</inf>Al hydrotalcite-like compounds: Influence of Ni:Mg molar ratio
2022, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyCitation Excerpt :To achieve acceptable reaction rates, a catalyst is required. Currently, the investigated catalysts are mainly focused on the transition metals including Ru, Rh, Pt, Ni, Co, and Fe [3,5‒16]. Among them, Ni catalyst is the most promising for industrial application because of its high activity, low cost, and wide availability.
La promoted hydrotalcite derived Ni⁃based catalysts: In situ preparation and CO<inf>2</inf> methanation performance
2024, Chinese Journal of Inorganic ChemistryThe Role of Surface Complexes in Ketene Formation from Fatty Acids via Pyrolysis over Silica: from Platform Molecules to Waste Biomass
2023, Journal of the American Chemical Society