Elsevier

Desalination

Volume 520, 15 December 2021, 115334
Desalination

Molecular layer deposition for the fabrication of desalination membranes with tunable metrics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115334Get rights and content

Highlights

  • MLD added an ultrathin MPD-TMC polyamide active layer to commercial NF membranes.

  • Progressive MLD systematically altered flux/rejection metrics from NF to RO values.

  • Controlled increase of MLD layer thickness increased rejection but decreased flux.

  • Atomic force microscopy revealed that MLD removed small-scale roughness features.

Abstract

The recent advancement of semiconductor devices to the near-atomic scale necessitated the development of atomic layer processing methods, including molecular layer deposition (MLD). This gas-phase deposition technique creates semipermeable polymer films with precise control of composition and thickness. Herein, MLD was used to produce thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes. Aromatic polyamide films as thin as 0.5 nm were applied to NF270 nanofiltration membranes using m-phenylenediamine and trimesoyl chloride. Within two molecular layers, desalination performance was affected. As film thickness increased to 15 nm (48 MLD cycles), performance progressed from nanofiltration to reverse osmosis metrics in terms of salt rejection and water permeance. With film thickness > 5 nm, rejection values exceeded a small sampling of commercial membranes. In all cases, a tradeoff between rejection and permeance was observed. Atomic force microscopy measurements indicate that MLD enhancement led to removal of small-scale roughness features and resulted in a root mean square roughness difference of <0.1 nm from the substrate. These initial MLD studies represent a novel processing approach that offers a potential pathway for the fabrication of membranes with finely tailored properties.

Introduction

Conventional thin-film composite (TFC) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes made with interfacial polymerization (IP) require control over a number of important processing parameters. Variations in concentration [1], [2], substrate [3], [4], [5], solvent [6] and synthesis procedure [7] impact the density, morphology, homogeneity, and thickness of the IP polyamide layer [8]. Such variability in turn can affect desalination performance, operation lifetime and fouling characteristics. While many aspects of the nanometer-scale mechanics of the solution-based film growth have been characterized, its complex nature prohibits comprehensive understanding and control over this decades-old technique [7]. As a result, current methods lean on empirical approaches rather than molecular-level design [2].

Despite these challenges, advances in fabrication have enabled the creation of RO membranes which incorporate ultrathin, chemically and morphologically controlled polyamide active layers. Such characteristics are desirable for minimal transport resistance and improved anti-fouling behavior [8], [9], [10]. The molecular layer-by-layer (mLbL) method [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] has proven effective in generating RO membranes with a dense layer as thin as 4 nm and with a root mean square (RMS) roughness of ~1 nm [16]. Free standing film growth techniques have been leveraged to create RO polyamide film thicknesses below 10 nm [1], [5], [9]. Electrospray processes have also been used to fabricate polyamide RO films as thin as 20 nm and with a RMS roughness that is indistinguishable from the substrate [17]. These complex procedures reiterate the challenge of controlling the liquid phase chemistry at a nanometer scale. While achieving impressive thickness/roughness dimensions, each of these fabrication routes still faces the limitations of IP including incomplete crosslinking and limited consistency in film thickness and density. Additionally, the mLbL and free standing film techniques are difficult to scale up for commercial production and produce films which are prone to delamination, relying on physical adhesion or interlayer materials which are susceptible at extreme pH and salt concentration [14], [15], [18]. Thus, the need remains for a scalable and robust TFC membrane synthesis technique that enables fine control of film nanostructure and thickness.

Molecular layer deposition (MLD) is a scalable, polymer thin-film deposition technique that can provide extremely thin, smooth, chemically consistent films with nanometer precision [19]. The MLD process is analogous to atomic layer deposition (ALD), differing by its use of organic precursors to incorporate molecular fragments [20]. Whereas ALD precursors typically contribute one atom into a metal or ceramic film, MLD precursors incorporate an entire organic linkage. These techniques have become instrumental in achieving nanoscale transistors and enabling previously unachievable length scales for gate oxides and other components of integrated circuits and memory devices [21], [22]. They have also been used in energy storage [23], [24] and conversion [25]. ALD and MLD offer exciting possibilities for improved membrane materials and have already been utilized for tuning pore sizes as well as affecting hydrophilicity and fouling characteristics [26].

A schematic of the MLD process is shown in Fig. 1. All-organic MLD is performed under vacuum conditions by introducing a substrate to two gas-phase organic precursors in an isolated and sequential order. Upon exposure to the initial reactant, functional groups of the precursor (e.g. acyl chlorides) react with the functional groups of the surface (e.g. amines). A layer of monomers is added to the surface by a single step of step-growth polymerization. The substrate is now terminated with a new functional end group (acyl chlorides). The precursors are chosen such that self-polymerization will not occur, ensuring self-limited growth at each exposure. Once the reaction environment is cleared of the first precursor and reaction byproducts, the surface is exposed to a second precursor with functional groups which are reactive with those of the first precursor (e.g. amines). The polymer chain-ends are again extended by one monomer in a self-limiting fashion. The reaction space is once again purged. This two-step process constitutes one MLD cycle which may be repeated for controlled growth of polymer films [20]. The formation of polymer films containing crosslinks may be achieved by use of a trifunctional precursor [27]. This sequence of self-limited, step-wise surface saturation provides many advantages. Film thickness is highly controlled, scaling linearly with increasing cycles. Films are smooth and conformal to the substrate surface [28].

MLD is capable of producing semipermeable polymer films for water purification without the use of environmentally harmful solvents; this includes the often-used aromatic polyamide made from m-phenylenediamine (MPD) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) [30], [31], [32]. Homogenous films grown with this controlled, layer-by-layer technique are ideal in view of recent work by Culp et al. which concluded that membrane resistance is the result of nanoscale variations in thickness and density [8].

In principle, MLD is very much akin to the mLbL technique: both are layer-by-layer processes which grow polymer films with monomer precision. Each method creates smooth, conformal films, but each has its own advantages. MLD exhibits more control over film thickness with a deposition rate around 0.4 nm/cycle compared to the mLbL rate of ~1 nm/cycle [13], [30]. The liquid phase mLbL may be done at ambient temperatures but requires heavy solvent usage and long cycle times. The mLbL solution chemistry is simple to perform on the lab bench but is difficult to scale for commercial production. Gas-phase MLD requires temperatures sufficient to vaporize the reactants, but the solvent-free technique can be performed with sub-second cycles times [30]. MLD is compatible with commercial scale roll-to-roll (R2R) processing and has a clear path to manufacture [33], [34]. Despite its advantages, fabrication of a robust, freestanding MLD film remains a difficult objective due to the conformal, isotropic manner of film growth. MLD precursors diffuse into pore openings and deposit material within, not across pore openings [32]. Thus, fabrication of desalination membranes using MLD has been a significant technical challenge.

This paper demonstrates that the advantages of MLD can be realized by utilizing nanofiltration (NF) TFC membranes as a suitable substrate. The existing films atop NF membranes provide sufficient transport resistance to MLD precursors which would otherwise deposit onto pore walls. FilmTec NF270 membranes were chosen as the substrate for subsequent MLD processing given their ability to withstand high temperature exposure in a vacuum. This study explores the ability to control the tradeoff between salt rejection and water permeance by altering the MLD film thickness. To the authors’ knowledge, this study represents the first demonstration of active membrane films made by gas-phase MLD.

Section snippets

Membrane materials

This work primarily utilized NF270 nanofiltration membranes which were kindly provided by DuPont Filmtec. The support layer of this TFC membrane is polysulfone (40 μm thick) on a non-woven polyester backing (120 μm thick) [35]. Polysulfone has a glass transition temperature of 190-230 °C [36]. The active layer is a semi-aromatic polyamide (270 nm thick) made via interfacial polymerization of piperazine and TMC [37], [38], [39], [40]. As indicated by the manufacturer, the maximum operating

Molecular layer deposition growth characteristics

Semipermeable aromatic polyamide films were grown with the MLD technique in the spatial reactor. The exposure time was controlled by changing the rotation speed of the drum. The samples were processed at constant rotation speeds. The rotation speeds and corresponding exposure times and purging times are specified in Table 2.

For the same rotation speed, film growth was reasonably linear with increasing cycles (Fig. 3). Films produced with an exposure time of 6 s grew at an average rate of

Conclusions

Molecular layer deposition is an attractive synthesis technique for membrane applications owing to its ability to create conformal, smooth, compositionally controlled polymer films with molecular precision [27], [32]. This work demonstrated that desalination membranes with tailor-made perm-selectivity can be achieved by enhancing NF membranes with MLD. FilmTec NF270 nanofiltration membranes were modified with MLD via application of an aromatic polyamide thin-film from the gas-phase

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Brian C. Welch: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft, Writing – Review & Editing, Visualization

Olivia M. McIntee: Validation, Investigation, Writing – Review & Editing

Tyler J. Myers: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization

Alan R. Greenberg: Conceptualization, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding Acquisition

Victor M. Bright: Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding Acquisition

Steven M. George:

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through the “Membrane Science, Engineering and Technology Center” [NSF IUCRC Award IIP 1624602] at the University of Colorado, Boulder. The authors thank James Redmond, Eliot Fang and John Emery of Sandia National Laboratories, Christina Carbrello of MilliporeSigma and Sankaranarayanan Ravichandran of the University of Colorado for helpful technical discussions. Special thanks to Prof. Anthony Straub of the University of

References (84)

  • L. Puro et al.

    Characterization of modified nanofiltration membranes by octanoic acid permeation and FTIR analysis

    Chem. Eng. Res. Des.

    (2006)
  • V. Freger et al.

    TFC polyamide membranes modified by grafting of hydrophilic polymers: an FT-IR/AFM/TEM study

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2002)
  • K. Boussu et al.

    Characterization of polymeric nanofiltration membranes for systematic analysis of membrane performance

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • T. Tsuru et al.

    Multilayered polyamide membranes by spray-assisted 2-step interfacial polymerization for increased performance of trimesoyl chloride (TMC)/m-phenylenediamine (MPD)-derived polyamide membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2013)
  • G.M. Geise et al.

    Water permeability and water/salt selectivity tradeoff in polymers for desalination

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2011)
  • A. Deshmukh et al.

    Desalination by forward osmosis: identifying performance limiting parameters through module-scale modeling

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2015)
  • M. Mänttäri et al.

    Effect of temperature and membrane pre-treatment by pressure on the filtration properties of nanofiltration membranes

    Desalination

    (2002)
  • S. Jiang et al.

    A review of reverse osmosis membrane fouling and control strategies

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • C.Y. Tang et al.

    Probing the nano- and micro-scales of reverse osmosis membranes—a comprehensive characterization of physiochemical properties of uncoated and coated membranes by XPS, TEM, ATR-FTIR, and streaming potential measurements

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • E.M. Vrijenhoek et al.

    Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2001)
  • X. Yan et al.

    Preparation of porous polymer membranes using nano- or micro-pillar arrays as templates

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • J.R. Werber et al.

    Acyl-chloride quenching following interfacial polymerization to modulate the water permeability, selectivity, and surface charge of desalination membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2017)
  • M.O. Mavukkandy et al.

    Thin film deposition techniques for polymeric membranes– a review

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2020)
  • T.J. Myers et al.

    Smoothing surface roughness using Al2O3 atomic layer deposition

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2021)
  • C.M. Schmidt et al.

    Relating nanofiltration membrane morphology to observed rejection of saccharides

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2020)
  • P. Xu et al.

    Viability of nanofiltration and ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for multi-beneficial use of methane produced water

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2006)
  • Q. Li et al.

    Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by biopolymers in wastewater secondary effluent: role of membrane surface properties and initial permeate flux

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • S. Karan et al.

    Sub–10 nm polyamide nanofilms with ultrafast solvent transport for molecular separation

    Science

    (2015)
  • J.R. Werber et al.

    Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes

    Nat. Rev. Mater.

    (2016)
  • T.E. Culp et al.

    Nanoscale control of internal inhomogeneity enhances water transport in desalination membranes

    Science

    (2021)
  • Z. Jiang et al.

    Water transport through ultrathin polyamide nanofilms used for reverse osmosis

    Adv. Mater.

    (2018)
  • P.M. Johnson et al.

    Molecular layer-by-layer deposition of highly crosslinked polyamide films

    J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys.

    (2012)
  • H. Qian et al.

    Ultrathin films of organic networks as nanofiltration membranes via solution-based molecular layer deposition

    Langmuir

    (2012)
  • J.-E. Gu et al.

    Molecular layer-by-layer assembled thin-film composite membranes for water desalination

    Adv. Mater.

    (2013)
  • W. Choi et al.

    Tailor-made polyamide membranes for water desalination

    ACS Nano

    (2015)
  • M.R. Chowdhury et al.

    3D printed polyamide membranes for desalination

    Science

    (2018)
  • H. Zhou et al.

    Fabrication of organic interfacial layers by molecular layer deposition: present status and future opportunities

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A

    (2013)
  • S.M. George et al.

    Surface chemistry for molecular layer deposition of organic and hybrid organic-inorganic polymers

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2009)
  • J. Sheng et al.

    Review article: atomic layer deposition for oxide semiconductor thin film transistors: advances in research and development

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A

    (2018)
  • M. Junige et al.

    Area-selective molecular layer deposition of nylon 6,2 polyamide: growth on carbon and inhibition on silica

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A

    (2021)
  • C. Ban et al.

    Molecular layer deposition for surface modification of lithium-ion battery electrodes

    Adv. Mater. Interfaces

    (2016)
  • Y. Zhao et al.

    Atomic/molecular layer deposition for energy storage and conversion

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2021)
  • Cited by (18)

    • Research progress on removal methods of Cl<sup>-</sup>from industrial wastewater

      2023, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      Wu et al. [118] investigated the efficiency of four commercially available NF membranes (NF, NF90, NF270, DK) (membrane flux 18.59, 16.9, 13.52, 47.32 L·m−2·h−1) for desalination of reclaimed water rate of the other three membranes was 14–35%. Welch et al. [119] prepared smooth, compositionally controllable polymer films on NF270 films (membrane flux 5 L·m−2·h−1) to improve desalination performance using molecular layer deposition. The NaCl removal rate of the modified NF270 membrane increased from 25% to 98% after 48 molecular layer deposition cycles.

    • Scaling electrospray based additive manufacturing of polyamide membranes

      2022, Journal of Membrane Science Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      Electrospray printing has since been applied to fabricate nanofiltration membranes using PIP-TMC as monomers (Kang et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2021; Qian et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022) and mixed matrix membranes for gas separations (Elsaidi et al., 2021). In addition, other techniques, such as layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly (Gu et al., 2013) and molecular layer deposition (MLD) (Welch et al., 2021) of TFC-PA membranes, have been developed that exhibit nm-scale control of the membrane thickness. All these techniques provide tunability in terms of membrane thickness (which affects permeance) and surface roughness (which affects membrane fouling propensity) and thus are important towards development of membranes with tunable characteristics not afforded through interfacial polymerization.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text