Skip to main content
Log in

Age-Related Variability of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) Song in Natural and Urban Environments

  • ZOOLOGY
  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The age-related variability of the frequency and structural–temporal parameters of the advertising song of Ficedula hypoleuca males in natural habitats and the urban environment were analysed. In the natural habitats, the range of male song frequencies, the maximal frequency, the number of figures, and the length of the song decreased from the third year of life. Similar age-related song changes in urban birds are observed earlier, from the second year of life. Urban birds have shown that the higher minimum song frequency increases with age, adapting the song to noise pollution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Adret-Hausberger, M., Güttinger, H.R., and Merkel, F.W., Individual life history and song repertoire changes in a colony of starlings (Sturnus vulgaris), Ethology, 1990, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Artem’ev, A.V., Populyatsionnaya ekologiya mukholovki-pestrushki v severnoi zone areala (Population Ecology of the Pied Flycatcher in the Northern Part of Its Range), Moscow: Nauka, 2008.

  3. Bastrikova, A.E. and Gashkov, S.I., Differences in the advertising song of male pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca Pall.) of different ages, Printsipy Ekol., 2016, vol. 5, no. 3(19), p. 25.

  4.  Bastrikova, A.E. and Gashkov, S.I., Frequency-time characteristics of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) song under conditions of anthropogenic noise pollution, in Ekologiya i evolyutsiya: novye gorizonty: materialy Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma, posvyashchennogo 100-letiyu akademika S.S. Shvartsa, Ekaterinburg, 1–5 aprelya 2019 g. (Proceedings of the International Symposium Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of Academician S.S. Shvarts “Ecology and Evolution: New Horizons,” Yekaterinburg, April 1–5, 2019), Yekaterinburg, 2019, pp. 12–14.

  5. Beme, I.R., Goretskaya, M.Ya., and Moskalenko, V.N., Immunization with a non-replicating antigen leads to changes in song characteristics and the level of corticosterone in passerine birds, Dokl. Biol. Sci., 2014, vol. 454, pp. 19–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger-Tal, O. and Saltz, D., Invisible barriers: anthropogenic impacts on inter-and intra-specific interactions as drivers of landscape-independent fragmentation, Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B, 2019, vol. 374, no. 1781, art. 20180049.

  7. Catchpole, C.K. and Slater, P.J.B., Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations, New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2008.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Desrochers, A., Age and foraging success in European blackbirds—variations between and within individuals, Anim. Behav., 1992, vol. 43, pp. 885–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eens, M., Pinxten, R., and Verheyen, R., No overlap in song repertoire size between yearling and older starlings, Sturnus vulgaris, Ibis, 1992, vol. 134, pp. 72–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eriksson, D. and Wallin, L., Male bird song attracts females—a field experiment, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1986, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 297–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Espmark, Y.O. and Lampe, H.M., Variations in the song of the pied flycatcher within and between breeding seasons, Bioacoustic, 1993, vol. 5, pp. 33–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Galeotti, P., Saino, N., Perani, E., Sacchi, R., and Moller, A.R., Age-related song variation in male barn swallows, Ital. J. Zool., 2001, vol. 68, pp. 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garamszegi, L.Z., Heylen, D., Moller, A.P., Eens, M., and De Lope, F., Age-dependent health status and song characteristics in the barn swallow, Behav. Ecol., 2005, vol. 16, pp. 580–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garamszegi, L.Z., Török, J., Hegyi, G., Szöllõsi, E., Rosivall, B., and Eens, M., Age-dependent expression of song in the collared flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis, Ethology, 2007, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gashkov, S.I., Relationship with the territory of birth and reproduction of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca Pall.) on the eastern periphery of the range, Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ., Suppl., 2003, no. 8, pp. 35–40.

  16. Grinkov, V.G. and Gashkov, S.I., Living on the edge: new data about the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) breeding in Western Siberia, Russia, Vogelwarte, 2003, vol. 42, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grinkov, V.G., Bauer, A., Gashkov, S.I., Sternberg, H., and Wink, M., Diversity of social-genetic relationships in the socially monogamous pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) breeding in Western Siberia, PeerJ, 2018, vol. 6, pp. e6059–e6059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hill, S.D., Aryal, A., Pawley, M.D., and Ji, W., So much for the city: urban-rural song variation in a widespread Asiatic songbird, Integr. Zool., 2018, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ioganzen, V.G., Observations on nesting of the pied flycatcher (Muscicapa atricapilla Linn.) in the vicinity of Tomsk, Ornitol. Vestn., 1914, no. 4, pp. 293–295.

  20. Ioganzen, G.E., Tomsk pied flycatcher, Ornitol. Vestn., 1916, no. 2, p. 101.

  21. Irwin, D., Song variation in avian ring species, Evolution, 2000, vol. 54, pp. 998–1010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ivanitskii, V.V., Antipov, V.A., and Marova, I.M., Thrush nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) in Moscow and Moscow oblast: urban noise affects the frequency parameters of the song, Zool. Zh., 2014, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 1123–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ivanova, M.N., The relationship between the type of color, age, and acoustic characteristics of the song in males of the pied flycatcher, Ornitologiya, 1998, vol. 28, nos. 1–2, pp. 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson, L.S. and Searcy, W.A., Female attraction to male song in house wrens (Troglodytes aedon), Behaviour, 1996, vol. 133, pp. 357–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kiefer, S., Sommer, C., Scharff, C., Kipper, S., and Mundry, R., Tuning towards tomorrow? Common nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos change and increase their song repertoires from the first to the second breeding season, J. Avian Biol., 2009, vol. 40, pp. 231–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koval’, Z.V., Assessment of noise pollution of the Kirovskii district of Tomsk, M.S. Thesis, Tomsk: Tomsk State Univ., 2019.

  27. Krebs, J.R., The significance of song repertoires: the Beau Geste hypothesis, Anim. Behav., 1977, vol. 25, pp. 475–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuranov, B.D., Breeding biology of the urbanized population of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca), Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2007, no. 297, pp. 192–200.

  29. Kuranov, B.D., Maintenance of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca at the eastern boundary of its range, Russ. Ornitol. Zh., 2017, vol. 26, no. 1425, pp. 1291–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lundberg, A. and Alatalo, R.V., The Pied Flycatcher, London: Poyser, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Luther, D.A. and Baptista, L., Does urban noise influence the cultural evolution of bird songs?, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2010, vol. 277, рр. 469–473.

  32. Luther, D.A. and Derryberry, E.P., Birdsongs keep pace with city life: changes in song over time in an urban songbird affects communication, Anim. Behav., 2012, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1059–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald, M.V., Function of song in Scott’s seaside sparrow, Ammodramus maritimus peninsulae, Anim. Behav., 1989, vol. 38, pp. 468–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mendes, S., Colino-Rabanal, V.J., and Peris, S.J., Diferencias en el canto de la ratona común (Troglodytes musculus) en ambientes con distintos niveles de influencia humana, El hornero, 2011, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Møller, A.P., Henry, P.Y., and Erritzøe, J., The evolution of song repertoires and immune defence in birds, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2000, vol. 267, no. 1439, pp. 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Moran, M.D., Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies, Oikos, 2003, vol. 100, pp. 403–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mountjoy, D.J. and Lemon, R.E., Song as an attractant for male and female European starlings, and the influence of song complexity on their response, Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1991, vol. 28, pp. 97–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nakagawa, S., A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias, Behav. Ecol., 2004, vol. 15, pp. 1044–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nemeth, E. et al., Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 2013, vol. 280, no. 1754, pp. 1–7.

  40. Nowicki, S., Searcy, W.A., and Hughes, M., The territory defense function of song in song sparrows: a test with the speaker occupation design, Behaviour, 1998, vol. 135, pp. 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ojanen, M., A method for age determination of pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in spring, Acta Reg. Soc. Scien. Litter. Gothoburg. Zool., 1987, vol. 14, pp. 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Opaev, A.S., The main directions of the divergence of cryptic bird species: a case study of the “thrush warbler” complex, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Inst. Probl. Ecol. Evol., Russ. Acad. Sci., 2010.

  43. Perneger, T.V., What’s wrong with Bonferroni adjustments, Brit. Med. J., 1998, vol. 316, pp. 1236–1238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Roca, I.T., Desrochers, L., Giacomazzo, M., Bertolo, A., Bolduc, P., Deschesnes, R., Martin, C.A., Rainville, V., Rheault, G., and Proulx, R., Shifting song frequencies in response to anthropogenic noise: a meta-analysis on birds and anurans, Behav. Ecol., 2016, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1269–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Slabbekoorn, H. and Peet, M., Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise—great tits hit the high notes to ensure that their mating calls are heard above the city’s din, Nature, 2003, vol. 424, pp. 267–268.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Smith, D.G., An experimental analysis of the function of red-winged blackbird song, Behaviour, 1976, vol. 56, pp. 136–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Smith, D.G., Male singing ability and territory integrity in red-winged blackbirds Agelaius phoeniceus, Behaviour, 1979, vol. 68, pp. 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sokolov, L.V., Filopatriya i dispersiya ptits (Philopatry and Dispersal of Birds), Tr. Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1991, vol. 230, pp. 1–232.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vysotskii, V.G., Determination of the age of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) in the breeding season, in Fauna i ekologiya ptits Evrazii (Fauna and Ecology of Birds of Eurasia), Tr. Akad. Nauk Zool. Inst. SSSR, 1989, vol. 197, pp. 49–52.

Download references

Funding

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project no. 20-34-90080.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. E. Bastrikova.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastrikova, A.E., Gashkov, S.I. & Moskvitina, N.S. Age-Related Variability of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) Song in Natural and Urban Environments. Biol Bull Russ Acad Sci 48, 607–615 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359021050046

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359021050046

Keywords:

Navigation