Roles of Suaeda vermiculata Aqueous-Ethanolic Extract, Its Subsequent Fractions, and the Isolated Compounds in Hepatoprotection against Paracetamol-Induced Toxicity as Compared to Silymarin

Mohammed, Salman A. A.; Ali, Hussein M.; Mohammed, Hamdoon A.; Al-Omar, Mohsen S.; Almahmoud, Suliman A.; El-Readi, Mahmoud Z.; Ragab, Ehab A.; Sulaiman, Ghassan M.; Aly, Mohamed S. A.; Khan, Riaz A.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6174897

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Plant Complexes and their Isolated Compounds for Oxidative Stress and Inflammation: from Basic Research to Clinical Evidence

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 6174897 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6174897

Roles of Suaeda vermiculata Aqueous-Ethanolic Extract, Its Subsequent Fractions, and the Isolated Compounds in Hepatoprotection against Paracetamol-Induced Toxicity as Compared to Silymarin

Salman A. A. Mohammed,¹Hussein M. Ali,^1,2Hamdoon A. Mohammed ,^3,4Mohsen S. Al-Omar,^3,5Suliman A. Almahmoud,³Mahmoud Z. El-Readi,^6,7Ehab A. Ragab,⁴Ghassan M. Sulaiman,⁸Mohamed S. A. Aly,⁹and Riaz A. Khan³

Academic Editor: Antonella Smeriglio

Received31 May 2021

Revised21 Jul 2021

Accepted02 Aug 2021

Published17 Sept 2021

Abstract

Suaeda vermiculata, a halophyte consumed by livestock, is also used by Bedouins to manage liver disorders. The aqueous-ethanolic extract of S. vermiculata, its subsequent fractions, and pure compounds, i.e., pheophytin-A (1), isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (2), and quercetin (3), were evaluated for their hepatoprotective efficacy. The male mice were daily fed with either silymarin, plant aq.-ethanolic extract, fractions, pure isolated compounds, or carboxyl methylcellulose (CMC) for 7 days (/group, p.o.). On the day 7^th of the administrations, all, except the intact animal groups, were induced with hepatotoxicity using paracetamol (PCM, 300 mg/kg). The anesthetized animals were euthanized after 24 h; blood and liver tissues were collected and analysed. The serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels decreased significantly for all the S. vermiculata aq.-ethanolic extract, fraction, and compound-treated groups when equated with the PCM group (). The antioxidant, superoxide dismutase (SOD), increased significantly () for the silymarin-, n-hexane-, and quercetin-fed groups. Similarly, the catalase (CAT) enzyme level significantly increased for all the groups, except for the compound 2-treated group as compared to the CMC group. Also, the glutathione reductase (GR) levels were significantly increased for the n-butanol treated group than for the PCM group. The oxidative stress biomarkers, lipid peroxide (LP) and nitric oxide (NO), the inflammatory markers, IL-6 and TNF-α, and the kidney’s functional biomarker parameters remained unchanged and did not differ significantly for the treated groups in comparison to the PCM-induced toxicity bearing animals. All the treated groups demonstrated significant decreases in cholesterol levels as compared to the PCM group, indicating hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects. The quercetin-treated group demonstrated significant improvement in triglyceride level. The S. vermiculata aq.-ethanolic extract, fractions, and the isolated compounds demonstrated their hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects, confirming the claimed traditional use of the herb as a liver protectant.

1. Introduction

Liver disorders inflict people on a larger scale, and millions suffer worldwide. Various indigenous systems of medicine recommend a plethora of herbs and other botanical-based medicaments for treating various types of liver disorders. Several symptomatic and clinical indications are related to malfunctioning of the liver, which generally are grouped as nonalcoholic liver disorders. Primarily, oxidative stress, hepatic inflammation, and liver steatosis are considered prime causes [1]. Synthetic products, herbs, and herbal admixtures with strong antioxidant activity have been shown to reduce the sufferings and symptoms thereby exerting hepatoprotective activity [2]. However, clear-cut pieces of evidence for the hepatoprotection efficacy of the majority of the herbs are seldom and sparse.

Nonetheless, the liver protective-activity-established herbs and natural products including silymarin, glycyrrhizin, and other plant-based products have been effectively utilized as herbal concoctions and drinks [3]. The need for the bioactivity confirmation, dose, and administering frequency standardizations, together with investigations of any predictive and speculative side-effects owing to the herbs’ quality, dose, administration frequency, and mechanism of action are imperative. Consequent to the exponential increments in the use of complementary and alternative medicines, especially the herbals, also among the patients with liver disorders [4], the bioactivity standardization and safety evaluation exercises of the frequently used formulations are needed to be accelerated and well-established. In this regard, animal model-based studies have shown anti-inflammatory and antioxidation-based positive effects on the liver [5] which contributes to the improvement in the liver’s functioning. The investigations of liver biochemistry of the oxidative, antilipid-peroxidative, and inflammatory marker manifestations in the hepatic tissue have been widely used as a comparative standard for confirming proper/normal functioning of the liver [6]. The toxicity controls and prevention and the botanicals and other herbal-related liver toxicity generation products’ investigational studies play an important part in finding safe uses of the plant-based products [7]. Objectively defined bioactivity testing endpoints defined by the standardized parametric levels of biomarkers and other biochemical, physiological, and histological observations for the standardized herbal extracts and isolated pure compounds are indispensable to verify the hepatoprotective actions of the traditional herbal medicament with ample confidence. Definitive histopathological evidence as liver’s functional and biologic improvements is a step further towards activity levels and toxicological safety determinations of the products. Mechanistically, the stimulated uptake of glucose reduced serum triglycerides and hepatic cholesterol increased mitochondrial activity and ATP production, along with the reduced catabolic reactions, leading to cholesterol, bile acids, and plasma membrane’s lipid level reductions, as well as the compromised immunomodulation, have been part of the primary indicators in hepatoprotective investigations milieu [8].

The halophytic herb, Suaeda vermiculata Forssk, a member of the plant family Amaranthaceae, grows in central Saudi Arabia and other Mediterranean regions. The plant belongs to the desert halophyte category and is used by nomads as a liver-protecting agent [9–11]. Antimicrobial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activities of S. vermiculata extract, fractions, and their isolated compounds are reported. The major porphyrin-class product of the plant, pheophytin-A, has been isolated and evaluated for its antioxidant and cytotoxic effects [9, 12–14].

Recently, dose-dependent hepatoprotective action of S. vermiculata aqueous- (aq.-) ethanolic extract in the carbon tetrachloride- (CCl₄-) induced hepatotoxicity using rat models was demonstrated by us [14]. For the current study, the prophylactic action of the S. vermiculata aq.-ethanolic extract, its fractions, and isolated compounds on the paracetamol- (PCM-) induced liver toxicity in mice is investigated. The major constituents of the n-butanol (n-BuOH), ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and chloroform (CHCl₃) fractions were isolated-purified, characterized, and bioactivity evaluated. Paracetamol (PCM), also known as acetaminophen, a widely used nonprescription analgesic and antipyretic drug, that does not demonstrate liver toxicity at therapeutic doses but at elevated doses causes hepatic and renal toxicity in humans and experimental animals. PCM was used experimentally to induce liver toxicity in animal models during the current study [15]. The PCM toxicity is responsible for 50% of the acute liver failure cases in western countries [16]. A single (over) dose of PCM is known to rapidly induce hepatotoxicity [17–19] in mice, which is biomechanistically similar to the effects in humans, and is regarded clinically as a robust model [20]. Hence, mice were the preferred model compared to rats which were highly resistant to PCM-induced hepatotoxicity [18]. In this context, the current study sets out to confirm the traditionally claimed hepatoprotective activity of the plant-based tea, decoctions, and other crude formulations on the PCM-induced liver toxicity in the animal models. The current study also evaluated the safety of the plant materials’ uses at usually the higher doses as practiced by the herbalists, including Bedouins and the locals. The plant, S. vermiculata, extract’s effects on the kidneys, liver, blood sugar, and lipid levels in addition to the antioxidant and anti-inflammation actions in the PCM-induced toxicity-bearing animal models were investigated. During our previous study [14], only aq.-ethanolic extract’s activity was evaluated in the CCl₄-induced hepatotoxic conditions using rat models, while the current study investigates the PCM-induced hepatotoxicity protection by the aq.-ethanolic and its subsequent fractions, i.e., n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol, together with the compounds isolated from these fractions. The study demonstrated the hepatoprotective efficacy of these isolated compounds, i.e., pheophytin-A, quercetin, and isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside, from CHCl₃, EtOAc, and n-BuOH fractions of the plant, respectively. In addition to the liver biomarkers, antioxidants, superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase (GR), as well as oxidative stress markers, i.e., lipid peroxide (LP) and nitric oxide (NO), and inflammatory biomarkers (i.e., IL6 and TNF-α levels), were also investigated in in vivo experimental conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Reagents

All chemicals were of analytical grade. Methanol (HPLC grade) and formic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Pure paracetamol was obtained from Dr. Amin Dervish, Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; locally available silymarin tablets (Micro Labs Limited, Mumbai, India) were used as obtained.

2.2. Plant Materials, Extraction, Fractionation, and Column Chromatographic Separations of the Major Constituents

The plants’ whole herbs were collected in October 2019 from Buraydah, Qassim, KSA, and identified by Prof. Dr. Ahmed El-Oglah, Department of Biological Sciences, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan. The plant material was compared to the authentic sample available in the herbarium of the College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, under the herbarium deposit # 78. The plant material (1.5 kg) was dried in shade and grinded to a coarse powder, which was exhaustively extracted three times with 70% aqueous-ethanol () using the cold maceration technique under stirring for 24 h for each cycle. The hydroalcoholic extract was filtered and evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure at a temperature < 40°C, yielding 86.3 g of the dried extract. Approximately, 50 g of the dried extract was suspended in 1 L of distilled water and fractionated between n-hexane, CHCl₃, EtOAc, and n-BuOH, in sequence, which resulted in 6.5 g, 4.5 g, 7 g, and 11 g of n-hexane, CHCl₃, EtOAc, and n-BuOH fractions, respectively. About 1.0 g of the CHCl₃ fraction was chromatographed over Sigel column chromatography (Sigel CC) eluted with n-hexane : ethyl acetate (100 : 0 to 70 : 30) to give five subfractions of A to E. Subfraction A (250 mg) was further purified on sephadex LH-20 using methanol as eluent to give compound 1 (120 mg). About 2.0 g of the n-BuOH fraction was subjected to Sigel CC using CHCl₃ : MeOH (90 : 10 to 60 : 40) as eluent to give three major fractions A, B, and C. Fraction B (780 mg) was subjected to sephadex LH-20 gel filtration chromatography, followed by Sigel CC to give seven fractions (BA-BG). Fraction BD (300 mg) was subjected to RP-C₁₈ CC (Starta® C₁₈-E50g/150 ml, Giga, USA) eluted with 40-80% methanol, followed by preparative TLC (CHCl₃ : MeOH : H₂O (80 : 20 : 2)) to yield compound 2 (170 mg) as a yellow amorphous powder. A part of the EtOAc fraction (2.0 g) was subjected to several Sigel CC and sephadex LH-20 filtration to yield compound 3 (135 mg) (Scheme 1, Supplementary file). The isolated compounds were subjected to ¹H and ¹³C-NMR and HR-MS spectroscopic analyses to confirm their identities (Spectral data available in the Supplementary file).

2.3. Acute Toxicity Studies and Sample Size

Acute toxicity was performed according to the OECD guidelines [21, 22]. In brief, 12-weeks-old male mice (), weighing g and overnight fasted, were randomly given single 4 g/kg dose of either aq.-ethanol extract, or n-hexane, CHCl₃, EtOAc, and n-BuOH fractions (/group) through oral (p.o.) route. Mice were monitored for abnormal conduct and movements during the first three days while any deaths were followed up to 2 weeks [22]. The experiments’ required sample size was established by the and AST values of the PCM-induced hepatotoxic and PCM-induced hepatotoxicity-treated animal groups, as reported earlier [23]. A two-tail option provided effect size as 4.27 on G Power V.3.1.9.4 software [24], while to obtain the statistical power (1-β err prob) of 80% and a specific α error probability of 0.05, the least animal size per group was .

2.4. Experimental Animal Groups

The study was conducted as per the Animal Research: Reporting In vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) statement [25].

2.4.1. Hepatoprotective Effect of S. vermiculata Aqueous-Ethanolic Extract, Fractions, and Isolated Compounds in PCM-Induced Liver Toxicity

Male, 8-weeks-old, naïve C57BL/6 mice (), weighing g, were obtained from the animal house facility, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia, with 3 mice/cage, one week before the beginning of the animal studies. The animals were maintained at 25°C with a relative humidity of ~65%. The institutional Research Ethics Committee approved the experimental procedure and the animal care (Approval ID 2019-CP-8), as per the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Mice were distributed at random into nine groups (/group). The intact mice (group I) was not treated, while the other mouse groups received p.o. once daily with 0.5% carboxyl methylcellulose (CMC, negative control, group II), 100 mg/kg silymarin (positive control, group III), 100 mg/kg pheophytin-A (group IV), 100 mg/kg isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (group V), 100 mg/kg quercetin (group VI), or 400 mg/kg aq.-ethanolic extract, 400 mg/kg n-butanol fraction, 400 mg/kg ethyl acetate fraction, 400 mg/kg chloroform fraction, and 400 mg/kg n-hexane fraction (groups VII-XI), for 7 days, followed by the induction of hepatotoxicity in the overnight fasted animals [26] using single intraperitoneal (i.p.) dose of the PCM (300 mg/kg) [17–19, 26] that was dissolved in warm normal saline (i). Twenty-four hours after PCM administration, blood [27] and tissue samples were collected from the sacrificed animals [17, 28].

Percentage hepatotoxic protection was determined using the formula below [29]: where , , and are the of hepatotoxin, toxin treated with the tested sample, and control, respectively.

The liver tissues were homogenized, and the supernatant was obtained for measuring oxidant, antioxidant, and inflammatory markers.

2.5. Estimation of Serum Levels of AST, ALT, TP, and Creatinine

The concentration of ALT, AST, TP, and creatinine (Crescent Diagnostics, KSA; #CZ902L for ALT, #CZ904L for AST, and # 604 for creatinine) in plasma samples was estimated as described earlier [14].

2.6. Determination of Serum Levels of Glucose, Cholesterol, and Triglycerides

Glucose, cholesterol, and triglyceride levels (Crescent Diagnostics Company; #605, #603, and #611) were measured according to the method described earlier [14].

2.7. Determination of Oxidants and Antioxidant Levels

The CAT enzymatic activity was assayed in serum by the colorimetric method wherein the catalase reacted with the known amount of excess hydrogen peroxide. The remaining hydrogen peroxide reacts with 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzene sulfonic acid and 4-aminophenazone forming a chromophore that gave color at 520 nm [30]. The SOD levels in the liver tissue were assayed also using a colorimetric method which depended upon the enzyme’s potency in inhibiting the phenazine methosulfate-mediated reduction of the nitro blue tetrazolium dye. The absorbances were measured at 560 nm for 5 minutes for control and tissue samples [31]. The GR was assayed in liver-tissue samples by another colorimetric method based on reducing the dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzene acid with reduced glutathione, producing a yellow color that was checked at 405 nm [32]. Lipid peroxide (malondialdehyde) levels were determined in serum samples by the colorimetric method, where the reaction between the malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid under acidic conditions at 95°C for 30 minutes produced thiobarbituric acid-based pink products, which were assayed at 534 nm [33]. Serum NO was also measured by colorimetric determination that represented one of the final products of the NO in vivo conditions, in addition to the nitrate. The addition of Griess reagents converted nitrite into a deep purple azo compound that was measured at 540 nm [34]. All the oxidant and antioxidant reagents were provided by the Biodiagnostic Company, Cairo, Egypt.

2.8. Determination of Interleukin 6 (IL6) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha (TNF-α)

IL6 and TNF-α were assayed in liver tissue homogenates by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) kits (Cloud Clone Corp Company, USA). The microplate’s measurements were at 450 nm (Microplate Reader, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data are represented as the (SEM). Two-way ANOVA followed by a post hoc Tukey multigroup comparison assessed variations among the groups, and was considered significant on GraphPad Prism 8.0.2. [35]. Normality of the data was obtained using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Major Constituents

The whole plant, S. vermiculata, was used for aq.-ethanolic extraction, followed by further fractionations of the aq.-ethanolic extract into different solvent-based fractions. The major constituents were isolated by repetitive column chromatographic (CC) purification techniques involving silica gel-based normal, and reverse-phase (RP) silica gel-based CCs, preparative TLC (Thin Layer Chromatography), and finally gel filtration (Sephadex LH-20) techniques. The compounds, pheophytin-A (1), isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (2), and quercetin (3), isolated from various fractions, were fully characterized by their ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectral data and the HR-MS analyses and their comparison with the reported values. The isolation and characterization of compound 1, pheophytin-A, followed the previously reported method [9]. Compound 2 was isolated in a pure form as yellow amorphous powder from the n-BuOH fraction. The ¹H NMR spectrum of compound 2 showed the proton signal pattern for the C3-glycosylated flavonols by exhibiting two single protons at δ_H 6.21 and 6.41 assigned for the C6 and C8 protons of the flavonol structure, respectively. The ABX system of protons resonating at δ_H 7.95 (br s), δ_H 7.64 (d, J =8.5 Hz), and δ_H 6.94 (dd, and 8.5 Hz) showed their presence at C2, C5, and C6, respectively. The ¹H NMR spectrum also exhibited two proton doublets at δ_H 5.22 ( Hz) and δ_H 4.54 ( Hz), assigned to the glucose and rhamnose anomeric protons, respectively. The ¹³C NMR spectrum of compound 2 resembled the carbon signal pattern of the glycosylated flavonol based upon comparison with literature data. In addition, HR-MS analyses of compound 2 showed a molecular ion peak (M^+.) as [M-H]^- at 623.16113 (C₂₈H₃₂O₁₆); therefore, the compound was identified as a flavonol glycoside; isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (2) [36, 37]. Compound (3) was isolated from the EtOAc fraction as a yellowish powder. The ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectral data were typically identical to the reported values for quercetin [38]. HR-MS analysis confirmed the compound’s identity, which showed the molecular ion peak at 303.04924 [M+H]⁺, compatible with the molecular formula of quercetin. The presence of compounds 1-3 (Figure 1) has been confirmed by the previous LC-MS analysis of the S. vermiculata aq.-ethanolic extract. The relatively higher occurrences of these compounds (1, 2, and 3) as confirmed by the LC-MS in the aq.-ethanolic extract were at 23.69, 4.37, and 12.45%, respectively [14].

3.2. Acute Toxicity and Dose Selection

Among all the animal groups, 2 EtOAc and 1 n-hexane fraction-fed mice died on days 2 and 3 of the dose administrations, respectively, during oral drug administrations. The acute toxicity results conducted for 2 weeks were similar to the previously reported [14]. The results indicated safety at the administered dose. Corresponding to Hedge and Sterner scale, 10% (400 mg/kg) of the given dose was chosen for further experiments [39].

3.3. Hepatoprotective Activity of the S. vermiculata Aqueous-Ethanolic Extract, Fractions, and Isolated Compounds

For the hepatoprotective experiments, the AST and ALT biomarkers, the negative control group was significantly elevated () compared to the intact group (Table 1). The increased ALT and AST enzymatic levels were attributed to hepatic cell damage and necrosis due to the liver toxicity induced by the PCM, as also reported in previous studies. Also, the PCM toxicity led to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and LP releases causing oxidative stress [40, 41]. All the S. vermiculata aq.-ethanolic extract and fraction-fed groups showed a significant decrease in both the ALT and AST enzymatic activities as compared with the PCM alone group. Similarly,the isolated compounds; pheophytin-A, isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside, and quercetin fed-groups demonstrated significant reductions in ALT and AST levels than the PCM-fed group demonstrated significant reductions in ALT and AST levels than the PCM-fed group. The administrations of these materials demonstrated hepatoprotective effects as indicated by the improvements in liver functions, and a significant decrease () in liver-enzyme activities, as compared to the PCM-fed injury group, was observed. The protective effects of the aq.-ethanolic extract and fractions may be attributed to their antioxidative as well as anti-inflammatory effects. The renal biomarkers, i.e., urea, and creatinine levels remained unchanged. The TP (total proteins), creatinine, and glucose level values also remained nearly unchanged in S. vermiculata aq.-ethanolic extract and fraction-fed groups or the isolated compounds, i.e., pheophytin-A (1), isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside (2), and quercetin (3), in comparison to the negative group, as competitively maintained near the referral standard product, silymarin, a well-known liver-protecting natural product (Tables 1 and 2).

The PCM-fed group demonstrated significantly increased cholesterol and decreased triglyceride levels as compared with the intact group. The PCM toxicity caused oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation, leading to increased cholesterol levels. These results are in conformity with the previously reported study [42]. All the treated groups demonstrated decreased cholesterol levels than the PCM-induced toxic animal group, thereby indicating the hepatoprotective and antioxidative effects of the plant materials. The quercetin-treated group demonstrated significant improvement in triglyceride level compared to the PCM-fed group. The silymarin, aq.-ethanolic extract, and the isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside groups also demonstrated improvements in triglyceride levels, but these were not significant. The improvements in lipid profile in the quercetin-treated group were attributed to its hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects, as also mentioned by a similar study reported earlier [43].

The total hepatoprotective percentage for the liver markers was also determined. The PCM-induced negative control animals’ group (CMC (carboxyl methylcellulose)) was considered at 0% protection, while the intact group was considered to have 100% hepatoprotection. The hepatoprotection percentage was observed by measuring various biomarkers according to their maintained levels and compared with the controls (Figure 2). There is maintenance of the percent levels of the biomarkers in the aq.-ethanolic extract, fractions, and the isolated product-fed groups, as compared to the referral standard, silymarin. It confirmed the hepatoprotective properties of the aq.-ethanolic extract, fractions, and isolated products of the plant, S. vermiculata, which is in full consonant with the traditionally claimed hepatoprotective effects of the plant, including from the previous study that demonstrated the hepatoprotection using S. vermiculata ethanolic extract in CCl₄-induced liver injury models [14].

3.4. Antioxidant Activity of S. vermiculata Aqueous-Ethanolic Extract, Fractions, and Isolated Compounds

Oxidative stress is considered to play significant roles in PCM-induced liver and renal damages in experimental animals [44, 45]. The oxidative stress is mitigated using endogenous antioxidants, or free radical scavengers, e.g., plant extracts, and flavonoids [46]. As compared to the intact group, the PCM-administered group demonstrated significantly lowered antioxidant SOD and CAT enzymatic activity levels, which are crucial in ROS elimination. The significant decreases in the SOD and CAT activities demonstrated depleted antioxidant potentials in the PCM group which was attributed to the consumption of SOD and CAT during ROS detoxification [47]. The isolated compounds, quercetin (3) of S. vermiculata, silymarin, and n-hexane fraction, demonstrated significantly higher SOD values than the PCM group. Similarly, isolated compounds (1 and 3), aq.-ethanolic extract, all fractions, and silymarin-fed groups demonstrated significantly increased CAT enzymatic activity as compared to the PCM group. The quercetin’s increased SOD and CAT enzymatic activity levels were in agreement with the previous study confirming its antioxidant role [47]. According to the previous study, the PCM-administered group demonstrated significantly reduced GR levels, as compared to the intact group [48]. The aq.-ethanolic extract and n-butanol fraction-treated groups demonstrated a significant increase in the GR levels, as compared to the PCM-fed group, while the remaining groups, including silymarin, did not improve the GR levels, as compared to the PCM-fed group. The NO is reported to demonstrate a peak value 24 hr after the PCM administration [45], and the current NO data is in conformity with the previous data demonstrating a significant increase in the PCM group when equated to the intact group. All the tested and treated groups did not demonstrate any significant difference in NO as compared to PCM. The LP which triggers cellular injury through membrane enzyme and receptor deactivation, including protein cross-linking and fragmentation [49], was statistically not different among all the studied groups (Table 3). The previous study reported by us also showed the antioxidant effects of the S. vermiculata ethanolic extract through in vitro free radical scavenging parameter [14], while the current result demonstrated the in vivo antioxidant effects of the plant aq.-ethanolic extract, fractions, and the isolated compounds. The antioxidant effects of S. vermiculata were also previously reported [50], and the extracts’ antioxidant effect was attributed to the high contents of flavonoids and related polyphenols [51]. Similarly, the antioxidant activity of quercetin was also detected in both the in vivo and in vitro PCM-induced liver toxicity models [43]. Nonetheless, the elevated NO levels lead to deleterious reaction with superoxide anion (O₂^-) thereby generating peroxynitrite radical (ONOO−). The simultaneous production of NO and O₂^- is expected during the inflammation and other pathological conditions, while ONOO⁻, being a potent oxidant, attacks multiple biological targets [52]. The NO scavenging effects on O₂^- are suggested to be a mechanism by which the host tissues are protected from the deleterious effects of O₂^- and O₂^--derived ROS [53].

3.5. Effect of S. vermiculata on Inflammatory Markers

The inflammatory cytokines, IL6 and TNF-α, respectively, are vital to the β-cell functional regulation. Their increased levels are associated with the elicitation of various diseases [54]. For the PCM-induced liver toxicity model, the levels of these cytokines are reported to increase, indicating the advancement of liver damages [55]. During the current study, the TNF-α values decreased significantly in the PCM-fed group than in the intact group, while all the treated groups, including silymarin, demonstrated no change in its levels when compared to the PCM-fed group. The IL-6 did not demonstrate any significant difference among all the groups as compared to the PCM-fed group (Table 4). As observed earlier, the administration of ethanolic extract of S. vermiculata in a carrageenan-induced paw edema inflammation model decreased the inflammation [14, 56]. In contrast, in the current study, the inflammatory marker IL6 and TNF-α levels remained insignificant for the aq.-ethanolic extract as well as other fractions in addition to the 3 isolated compounds from the S. vermiculata.

Previous studies have demonstrated that one-week preadministration of the extract before the PCM-induced liver toxicity does not interfere with the P450 activity required for acetaminophen metabolism [57]. In our previous study, the effect of aq.-ethanolic extract after one-week administration on normal animals did not demonstrate any significant changes in the liver, kidney, and cardiac markers as compared to the intact animals [14]. There are no studies available that demonstrate hepatoprotection from PCM-induced liver toxicity using pheophytin-A and the flavonol glycoside, isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside in mice. This is the first report in this connection. However, quercetin has previously been demonstrated to improve liver markers, antioxidant activities, and reduction of LP and inflammatory markers in liver toxicity [47, 58, 59]. The current study also reiterates the quercetin role in liver protection.

4. Conclusion

The paracetamol (PCM) overdose induced liver injury and caused hepatic cell damage through elevations of AST and ALT enzymatic activities as compared to the intact group observed. The PCM group also increased the oxidative stress by elevating the nitric oxide (nitrite) levels and decreasing the antioxidant SOD, CAT, and GR levels as compared with the control. The TNF-α values also decreased significantly in the PCM-induced toxicity group when compared to the intact group. Thus, the current study demonstrated the hepatoprotective potency of the S. vermiculata aq.-ethanolic extract, fractions, and their major constituents, i.e., pheophytin-A, a flavonol glycoside, isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside, and quercetin. The aq.-ethanolic extract, fraction, and the isolated compound, protective effects were confirmed by significant reductions in AST and ALT enzymatic activities as equated to the PCM-fed toxicity-bearing mice. The aq.-ethanolic extract, fraction, and the isolated compound treatments also decreased the oxidative stress induced by the PCM-generated toxicity through the elevation of antioxidant enzymatic activities of SOD and CAT. Also, the improvement of lipid profile with no adverse effects on the liver, kidney, and glucose markers was observed. The ongoing data on the potentials of the antioxidants, levels of biomarkers, and comparable liver-protective effects, equated to the referral standard, silymarin, confirmed the plant’s role in hepatoprotection. The safety of the extract and fractions, at higher doses, also confirmed the plant materials to be safe. Therefore, the plant materials’ consumption by locals can be considered nontoxic within the tested dose level.

Data Availability

All the data were provided in the manuscript and supplementary file.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the Qassim University, represented by the Deanship of Scientific Research under the grant (pharmacy-2019-2-2-I-5606) during the academic year 1440 AH/2019 AD.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Qassim University, represented by the Deanship of Scientific Research, on the financial support for this research under the number (pharmacy-2019-2-2-I-5606) during the academic year 1440 AH/2019 AD.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary file includes four tables (Tables S1 to S4) that describe the raw data related to the demonstrated biological activities of S. vermiculata. The file also includes nine figures (Figures S1 to S9) that showed the NMR and mass spectra of the isolated compounds. Besides, one scheme that describes the extraction and chromatographic separation of isolated compounds is also provided in the Supplementary file. (Supplementary Materials)

References

N. Chalasani, Z. Younossi, J. E. Lavine et al., “The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association,” Hepatology, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 2005–2023, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Musso, M. Cassader, and R. Gambino, “Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: emerging molecular targets and therapeutic strategies,” Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 249–274, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Schuppan, J. Jia, B. Brinkhaus, and E. G. Hahn, “Herbal products for liver diseases: a therapeutic challenge for the new millennium,” Hepatology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1099–1104, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Henson, C. L. Brown, S.-C. Chow, and A. J. Muir, “Complementary and alternative medicine use in United States adults with liver disease,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 564–570, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Lam, F. Cheung, H. Y. Tan, N. Wang, M. Yuen, and Y. Feng, “Hepatoprotective effects of Chinese medicinal herbs: a focus on anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative activities,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 465, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ferramosca, M. Di Giacomo, and V. Zara, “Antioxidant dietary approach in treatment of fatty liver: new insights and updates,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 23, no. 23, pp. 4146–4157, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. J. Navarro, I. Khan, E. Björnsson, L. B. Seeff, J. Serrano, and J. H. Hoofnagle, “Liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements,” Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 363–373, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Stickel and D. Schuppan, “Herbal medicine in the treatment of liver diseases,” Digestive and Liver Disease, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 293–304, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Mohammed, M. S. al-Omar, M. Z. el-Readi, A. H. Alhowail, M. A. Aldubayan, and A. A. H. Abdellatif, “Formulation of ethyl cellulose microparticles incorporated pheophytin A isolated from Suaeda vermiculata for antioxidant and cytotoxic activities,” Molecules, vol. 24, no. 8, p. 1501, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Mohammed, M. S. Al-Omar, M. S. A. Aly, and M. M. Hegazy, “Essential oil constituents and biological activities of the halophytic Plants,Suaeda VermiculataForssk andSalsola CyclophyllaBakera growing in Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Essential Oil-Bearing Plants, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 82–93, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. A. Mohammed, “The valuable impacts of halophytic genus Suaeda; nutritional, chemical, and biological values,” Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1044–1057, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. al-Tohamy, S. S. Ali, K. Saad-Allah et al., “Phytochemical analysis and assessment of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of some medicinal plant species from Egyptian flora,” Journal of Applied Biomedicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 289–300, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Mahasneh, J. A. Abbas, and A. A. El-Oqlah, “Antimicrobial activity of extracts of herbal plants used in the traditional medicine of Bahrain,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 251–253, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. A. Mohammed, R. A. Khan, M. Z. el-Readi et al., “Suaeda vermiculata aqueous-ethanolic extract-based mitigation of CCl₄-induced hepatotoxicity in rats, and HepG-2 and HepG-2/ADR cell-lines-based cytotoxicity evaluations,” Plants, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 1291, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Forouzandeh, M. M. E. Azemi, I. Rashidi, M. Goudarzi, and H. Kalantari, “Study of the protective effect of Teucrium polium L. extract on acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice,” Iran J Pharm Res, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 123–129, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Lee, “Acute liver failure,” Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. McGill, C. D. Williams, Y. Xie, A. Ramachandran, and H. Jaeschke, “Acetaminophen-induced liver injury in rats and mice: comparison of protein adducts, mitochondrial dysfunction, and oxidative stress in the mechanism of toxicity,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 264, no. 3, pp. 387–394, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Lu, C. Zhang, Y.-H. Chen et al., “Immature mice are more susceptible than adult mice to acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kelava, I. Ćavar, and F. Čulo, “Influence of small doses of various drug vehicles on acetaminophen-induced liver injury,” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 960–967, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jaeschke, Y. Xie, and M. R. McGill, “Acetaminophen-induced liver injury: from animal models to humans,” Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 153–161, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
OECD, OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, Guideline 425: Acute Oral Toxicity-Up-and-Down Procedure, OECD, Paris, 2006.
E. A. H. Mohamed, C. P. Lim, O. S. Ebrika, M. Z. Asmawi, A. Sadikun, and M. F. Yam, “Toxicity evaluation of a standardised 50% ethanol extract of Orthosiphon stamineus,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 358–363, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Araya, B. A. Adamu, G. Periasamy, B. Sintayehu, and M. Gebrelibanos Hiben, “_In vivo_ hepatoprotective and _In vitro_ radical scavenging activities of _Cucumis ficifolius_ A. rich root extract,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 242, p. 112031, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, A. G. Lang, and A. Buchner, “GPower 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences,” Behavior Research Methods, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 175–191, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Kilkenny, W. J. Browne, I. C. Cuthill, M. Emerson, and D. G. Altman, “Improving bioscience research reporting: the arrive guidelines for reporting animal research,” PLoS Biology, vol. 8, no. 6, p. e1000412, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. McGill and H. Jaeschke, “Animal models of drug-induced liver injury,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1865, no. 5, pp. 1031–1039, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Bhat, R. Shrivastava, M. Y. Malla et al., “Hepatoprotective activity of Argemone mexicana Linn against toxic effects of carbon tetrachloride in rats,” World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 4037–4048, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. C. Mossanen and F. Tacke, “Acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury in mice,” Laboratory Animals, vol. 49, 1_suppl, pp. 30–36, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. G. Meharie, G. G. Amare, and Y. M. Belayneh, “Evaluation of hepatoprotective activity of the crude extract and solvent fractions of Clutia abyssinica (Euphorbiaceae) leaf against CCl4-induced hepatotoxicity in mice,” Journal of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. Volume 12, pp. 137–150, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Aebi, “[13] Catalase in vitro,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 105, pp. 121–126, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nishikimi, N. Appaji Rao, and K. Yagi, “The occurrence of superoxide anion in the reaction of reduced phenazine methosulfate and molecular oxygen,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 849–854, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Beutler, O. Duron, and B. Kelly, “Improved method for the determination of blood glutathione,” The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 61, pp. 882–888, 1963.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Kei, “Serum lipid peroxide in cerebrovascular disorders determined by a new colorimetric method,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 1978.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Montgomery and J. F. Dymock, “Determination of nitrite in water. Royal Soc Chemistry Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Milton Rd, Cambridge Cb4 0wf,” The Journal of medical laboratory technology, vol. 22, pp. 111–118, 1961.
View at: Google Scholar
B. R. Kirkwood and J. A. C. Sterne, Essential Medical Statistics, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2010.
M. Olszewska, “Flavonoids from prunus serotina ehrh,” Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 127–133, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Güvenalp, H. Özbek, T. Ünsalar, C. Kazaz, and D. Lö, “Iridoid, flavonoid, and phenylethanoid glycosides from Wiedemannia orientalis,” Turkish Journal of Chemistry, vol. 30, pp. 391–400, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
T. J. Mabry, K. R. Markham, and M. B. Thomas, “The NMR spectra of flavonoids,” The Systematic Identification of Flavonoids, Springer, pp. 274–343, 1970.
View at: Google Scholar
OECD, Test No. 425: Acute Oral Toxicity: Up-and-Down Procedure, OECD publishing, Paris, France, 2008.
T. Kamiyama, C. Sato, J. Liu, Tajiri, Miyakawa, and Marumo, “Role of lipid peroxidation in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity: comparison with carbon tetrachloride,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. D. Ray, V. R. Mumaw, R. R. Raje, and M. W. Fariss, “Protection of acetaminophen-induced hepatocellular apoptosis and necrosis by cholesteryl hemisuccinate,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 279, pp. 1470–1483, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Elkomy, M. Aboubakr, A. Soliman, A. Abdeen, A. Abdelkader, and H. Hekal, “Paracetamol induced hepatic toxicity and amelioration by cinnamon in rats,” International Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 4, no. 2, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Tzankova, D. Aluani, M. Kondeva-Burdina et al., “Hepatoprotective and antioxidant activity of quercetin loaded chitosan/alginate particles _in vitro_ and _in vivo_ in a model of paracetamol-induced toxicity,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 92, pp. 569–579, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Jaeschke, T. R. Knight, and M. L. Bajt, “The role of oxidant stress and reactive nitrogen species in acetaminophen hepatotoxicity,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 279–288, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ghosh, J. Das, P. Manna, and P. C. Sil, “Acetaminophen induced renal injury via oxidative stress and TNF-α production: therapeutic potential of arjunolic acid,” Toxicology, vol. 268, no. 1-2, pp. 8–18, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Parmar, P. H. Vashrambhai, and K. Kalia, “Hepatoprotective activity of some plants extract against paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in Wistar rats,” Journal of Herbal Medicine and Toxicology, vol. 4, pp. 101–106, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
M. I. Yousef, S. A. M. Omar, M. I. El-Guendi, and L. A. Abdelmegid, “Potential protective effects of quercetin and curcumin on paracetamol-induced histological changes, oxidative stress, impaired liver and kidney functions and haematotoxicity in rat,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 3246–3261, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. To, “Lophirones B and C attenuate acetaminophen-induced liver damage in mice: studies on hepatic, oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 497–505, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Luqman and S. I. Rizvi, “Protection of lipid peroxidation and carbonyl formation in proteins by capsaicin in human erythrocytes subjected to oxidative stress,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 303–306, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. A. Diab, T. Donia, and K. M. Saad-Allah, “Characterization, antioxidant, and cytotoxic effects of some Egyptian wild plant extracts,” Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Khan, M. R. Khan, S. Sahreen, and M. Ahmed, “Assessment of flavonoids contents and in vitro antioxidant activity of Launaea procumbens,” Chemistry Central Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. O. Abdel-Zaher, R. H. Abdel-Hady, M. M. Mahmoud, and M. M. Y. Farrag, “The potential protective role of alpha-lipoic acid against acetaminophen- induced hepatic and renal damage,” Toxicology, vol. 243, no. 3, pp. 261–270, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Beckman, T. W. Beckman, J. Chen, P. A. Marshall, and B. A. Freeman, “Apparent hydroxyl radical production by peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from nitric oxide and superoxide,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 1620–1624, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Rieckmann, J. M. Tuscano, and J. H. Kehrl, “Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in B-lymphocyte function,” Methods, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 128–132, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Rasool, E. P. Sabina, S. R. Ramya et al., “Hepatoprotective and antioxidant effects of gallic acid in paracetamol-induced liver damage in mice,” The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 638–643, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. al-Omar, M. S. M. Sajid, N. S. Alnasyan et al., “The halophytic plant, Suaeda vermiculata Forssk extracts reduce the inflamed paw edema and exert potential antimicrobial activity,” Pakistan Journal of Botany, vol. 53, no. 1, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Pang, L. Shi, Y. Sheng et al., “Caffeic acid attenuated acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity by inhibiting ERK1/2-mediated early growth response-1 transcriptional activation,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 260, pp. 186–195, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Pang, Z. Zheng, L. Shi et al., “Caffeic acid prevents acetaminophen-induced liver injury by activating the Keap1-Nrf2 antioxidative defense system,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 91, pp. 236–246, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Girish, B. C. Koner, S. Jayanthi, K. Ramachandra Rao, B. Rajesh, and S. C. Pradhan, “Hepatoprotective activity of picroliv, curcumin and ellagic acid compared to silymarin on paracetamol induced liver toxicity in mice,” Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 735–745, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Salman A. A. Mohammed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

524

Downloads

750

Citations