Elsevier

Advanced Powder Technology

Volume 32, Issue 11, November 2021, Pages 4110-4119
Advanced Powder Technology

Original Research Paper
Experimental study on influence of adsorption equilibrium time on methane adsorption isotherm and Langmuir parameter

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2021.09.015Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Pore structures of coal sample with different particle sizes are investigated.

  • The impact of equilibrium judgment criteria on adsorption test is investigated.

  • The equilibrium judgment criteria affects the calculation of Langmuir parameters.

  • The disequilibrium adsorption data satisfies the Langmuir equation.

Abstract

The aim of this work was to examine the impact of equilibrium judgment criteria on adsorption test of samples with different adsorption kinetics and determine how long it takes for different particle size samples to attain equilibrium adsorption data. The adsorption data of coal samples with three different particle sizes was obtained by manometric method at the different time intervals. High pressure CH4 adsorption equilibrium measurements and low pressure N2 and CO2 adsorption measurements were carried out for coal samples of eight various particle sizes. The results demonstrated that both the equilibrium and disequilibrium adsorption data satisfied the Langmuir equation. The Langmuir volume (VL) increased on the equilibrium time increase and it became more remarkable with increasing particle size. The Langmuir pressure (PL) showed an opposite and more obvious trend. When the particle size of the coal sample decreased from 2 to 4 to <0.074 mm, the adsorption equilibrium time (AET) required for the adsorption isotherm testing declined rapidly from 389 to 5 h. This research is of some enlightening significance for comparing the adsorption characteristics of samples with different adsorption kinetics (adsorbent, temperature, particle size, etc.).

Graphical abstract

During the adsorption test of samples with different adsorption kinetics (adsorbent, temperature, particle size, etc.), using the same equilibrium judgment criteria might give a false perception of the adsorption characteristics of different samples.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (35KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Coalbed methane (CBM), as a clean and high–efficiency energy source, is composed primarily of methane [1]. The energy released in the combustion of 1 m3 of methane is 35.9 million Joules, which is equivalent to the combustion of 1.2 kg of standard coal [2]. For the primary gas production in CBM reservoirs, understanding the adsorption characteristic of CBM is of great importance, and the storage capacity is among important parameters for the coal reservoir's evaluation. Over the few past decades, the Langmuir parameters (VL and PL) obtained by fitting the adsorption data using the Langmuir equation were extensively used to describe the occurrence of the CBM [3], [4], [5], [6].

As is widely known, the manual grinding and mechanical crushing can damage the complex pore structure of coal [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], which means that such coal particle samples cannot represent the adsorption characteristics of coal and the occurrence regularity of CBM under in situ conditions. On the other hand, the bigger the particle size, the slower the adsorption process occurs and the adsorption equilibrium time is longer [13], [14], [15]. Therefore, an important problem related to the adsorption measurements on coal samples is the particle size selection for the experiments. In recent years, it is remarkable that various equilibrium judgment criteria were used to measure the adsorption isotherms of different samples in previous publications (see Table 1) [13], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], and, particularly, the random or same equilibrium time was used in the adsorption test for coal samples of different particle sizes. In this case, the bigger the sample, the more representative it is for the natural in situ conditions [24], [25], [26]. It also means that it is more difficult for large particle samples to obtain realistic adsorption data [12], [13], [14], [27].

The adsorption isotherm of coal sample is composed of a series of isothermal adsorption points. These adsorption data points can be measured by gravimetric or manometric methods. With the gravimetric method, a high precision balance is used to measure the change in the sample’s weight when the sample adsorbs gas [28], [29]. With the manometric method, the adsorbed volume of gas can be calculated by subtracting the volume of gas occupying the free volume after adsorption equilibrium is reached from the total volume of gas which was present in the reference cell [24]. In adsorption measurement, there are many factors that may affect the measurement of the adsorbed volume of gas. Lutynski [24] divided them into three categories: intrinsic properties, extrinsic properties, and other factors. The intrinsic properties mainly include content of organic and mineral matter, type of clay minerals, macerals content, and so on [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. The extrinsic properties mainly include temperature of the sample under analysis, moisture content and particle size of the sample [8], [37], [38], [39]. There are also other factors that may affect the measurement, such as the accuracy of the setup, the compressibility factor, and the time to attain adsorption equilibrium [4], [23], [40]. Among the intrinsic and extrinsic properties, many achievements were made in the previous study [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39]. However, the effects of equilibrium time on the adsorption measurement have not received much attention, which determines whether the measured adsorption data are equilibrium or disequilibrium adsorption data. The equilibrium adsorption isotherm is the cornerstone for studying adsorption characteristics and it plays a particularly important role. Scholars found that the adsorption capacity of large particle samples is always low when studying the adsorption properties of samples with different particle sizes [24], [41], [42]. Lutynski [24] thought that this phenomena can be attributed to the fact that the adsorption kinetics is the fastest for fine particles and the complete adsorption may not have occurred for coarser particles. However, it was only a conjecture and no further study was conducted on the effect of equilibrium time on the adsorption capacity of large particle samples.

To attain equilibrium adsorption is the key for the adsorption test of different particle size samples. It is widely known that methane migration within the coal can be generally categorized into three processes, i.e., seepage, diffusion, and adsorption [43], [44]. The diffusion rate restricts the rapid attaining equilibrium adsorption [45]. This study does not look at the kinetics of adsorption. It only considers the influence of equilibrium time on the measured adsorption data from the perspective of adsorption measurement, and how long it takes for different particle size samples to attain equilibrium adsorption data. Therefore, the adsorption isotherms of coal samples with three different particle sizes (0.2–0.25, 0.5–1.0 and 2.0–4.0 mm), which all consisted of six isothermal adsorption points, were obtained at different time intervals (6, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 144 h) to explore the influence of the equilibrium time on the Langmuir parameters. The adsorption equilibrium tests of coal samples with eight various particle sizes were performed to determine the adsorption equilibrium time (AET) which is the shortest adsorption contact time (ACT) that allows the methane molecules to fully enter the coal matrix. The measured results may have a certain significance in the actual adsorption test.

Section snippets

Material

The coal samples used in this study were collected directly from the working face of the Daning coal mine in Shanxi, China. The coal samples were transported to the laboratory, crushed and sieved into the following particle sizes through a set of screens sequentially: < 0.074, 0.074–0.125, 0.125–0.2, 0.2–0.25, 0.25–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–2.0 and 2.0–4.0 mm.

Experimental setup and procedure

Proximate analysis was conducted for moisture, ash, volatile material, and fixed carbon according to the China National Standard GB/T 212–2008

Impact of the equilibrium time of methane adsorption on the Langmuir parameters

During the test, different ACTs were used to obtain the adsorption data of the samples with various particle sizes via the manometric method. The uncertainty of methane adsorption volume measurement was 2–4%. The adsorption isotherms are shown for coal samples with three particle sizes (2–4 mm, 0.5–1 mm, and 0.2–0.25 mm) in Fig. 2. The Langmuir parameters and R2 are presented in Table 3.

With the increase in ACT, the measured VL increased and PL decreased when the methane adsorption did not

Conclusions

In this study, both the equilibrium and disequilibrium adsorption data measured at different time intervals satisfied the Langmuir equation. For the Langmuir parameters calculated from the equilibrium and disequilibrium adsorption data, the VL values increased and the PL values decreased as the equilibrium time increased, and it became more remarkable with increasing particle size of samples. The equilibrium time interval during the adsorption test had a great influence on the calculation of

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51874294, 52034008) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2021YCPY0206).

References (65)

  • B. Hu et al.

    Effects of equilibrium time and adsorption models on the characterization of coal pore structures based on statistical analysis of adsorption equilibrium and disequilibrium data

    Fuel

    (2020)
  • J.J. Chaback et al.

    Sorption of nitrogen, methane, carbon dioxide and their mixtures on bituminous coals at in-situ conditions

    Fluid Phase Equilib.

    (1996)
  • A. Busch et al.

    Investigation of high-pressure selective adsorption/desorption behaviour of CO2 and CH4 on coals: an experimental study

    Int. J. Coal Geol.

    (2006)
  • S. Day et al.

    Supercritical gas sorption on moist coals

    Int. J. Coal Geol.

    (2008)
  • M. Lutynski et al.

    Characteristics of carbon dioxide sorption in coal and gas shale – The effect of particle size

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2016)
  • C. Guan et al.

    The temperature effect on the methane and CO2 adsorption capacities of Illinois coal

    Fuel

    (2018)
  • D. Zhao et al.

    Experimental study on gas desorption characteristics for different coal particle sizes and adsorption pressures under the action of pressured water and superheated steam

    J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.

    (2019)
  • M. Lutynski et al.

    Characteristics of carbon dioxide sorption in coal and gas shale–The effect of particle size

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2016)
  • S. Lu et al.

    Gas time-dependent diffusion in pores of deformed coal particles: model development and analysis

    Fuel

    (2021)
  • M. Chen et al.

    Methane adsorption behavior on shale matrix at in-situ pressure and temperature conditions: measurement and modeling

    Fuel

    (2018)
  • P.J. Crosdale et al.

    Coalbed methane sorption related to coal composition

    Int. J. Coal Geol.

    (1998)
  • Y. Zhou et al.

    Theoretical insight into the enhanced CH4 desorption via H2O adsorption on different rank coal surfaces

    J. Energy Chem.

    (2016)
  • M. Meng et al.

    Adsorption characteristics of supercritical CO2/CH4 on different types of coal and a machine learning approach

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2019)
  • M. Yan et al.

    Factors influencing the gas adsorption thermodynamic characteristics of low-rank coal

    Fuel

    (2019)
  • M. Zhang et al.

    Influence of reservoir properties on the adsorption capacity and fractal features of shales from Qinshui coalfield

    J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.

    (2019)
  • X. Xu et al.

    Experimental comparisons of multiscale pore structures between primary and disturbed coals and their effects on adsorption and seepage of coalbed methane

    J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.

    (2019)
  • B. Wang et al.

    Pore structure characteristics of low- and medium-rank coals and their differential adsorption and desorption effects

    J. Petrol. Sci. Eng.

    (2018)
  • A. Busch et al.

    CBM and CO2-ECBM related sorption processes in coal: a review

    Int. J. Coal Geol.

    (2011)
  • H. Guo et al.

    Experimental study on the effect of moisture on low-rank coal adsorption characteristics

    J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng.

    (2015)
  • M. Mastalerz et al.

    Significance of analytical particle size in low-pressure N2 and CO2 adsorption of coal and shale

    Int. J. Coal Geol.

    (2017)
  • H. Han et al.

    Influence of particle size on gas-adsorption experiments of shales: An example from a Longmaxi Shale sample from the Sichuan Basin, China

    Fuel

    (2016)
  • L. Si et al.

    Modeling and experiment for effective diffusion coefficient of gas in water-saturated coal

    Fuel

    (2021)
  • Cited by (19)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text