Elsevier

Chinese Journal of Catalysis

Volume 42, Issue 12, December 2021, Pages 2225-2233
Chinese Journal of Catalysis

Article
Promoting propane dehydrogenation with CO2 over Ga2O3/SiO2 by eliminating Ga-hydrides

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63900-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Due to the shortage supply of propylene and the development of shale gas, there is increased interest in on-purpose propane dehydrogenation (PDH) technology for propylene production. Ga-based catalysts have great potential in PDH, due to the high activity, low carbon deposit and deactivation. Ga-hydrides formed during PDH reduce the rate, selectivity and yield of propylene. In this contribution, CO2 is introduced into PDH as a soft oxidant to eliminate the unfavorable intermediate species Gaδ+-Hx re-generating Ga3+-O pairs, and also minimize coke deposition thereby improving the catalytic performance. In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy experiments show that CO2 can effectively eliminate Gaδ+-Hx. At different temperatures, co-feeding CO2 during PDH over Ga2O3/SiO2 catalysts with different loadings significantly improves the stability of the conversion and selectivity, especially the latter, and provide a new dimension for improving the performance of PDH process.

Introduction

Propylene is the second most utilized building block of the petrochemical industry after ethylene and is used for the synthesis of polypropylene, propylene oxide, acrylic, etc. Propylene is mainly produced by naphtha steam cracking and fluid catalytic cracking [1]. However, crackers have been converted from naphtha to ethane units, with ethane feedstocks predominantly producing ethylene, thereby reducing propylene production. At the same time, the demand for propylene has gradually increased, resulting in a shortage of propylene supply. With the development of shale gas, there is increasing interest in on-purpose technologies for propylene production, such as catalytic propane dehydrogenation (PDH) [2, 3].

Currently, PtSn/Al2O3 and Cr2O3/Al2O3 catalysts are commercially used, but challenges still exist, including insufficient C3H6 selectivity and deactivation caused by carbon deposition [1, 4]. A number of metal oxides, such as Ga2O3 [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10], ZnO [11, 12, 13], VOx [14, 15, 16, 17], MoOx [18], are also active for the PDH. Ga-based catalysts have great potential in PDH, due to the low carbon deposition and high activity. Xu et al. [9] reported that the propylene selectivity can reach 74% at propane conversion of 39% over Ga2O3/ZrO2. Szeto et al. [8] have found that the mononuclear alumina-supported Ga sites also show promising activity and high selectivity toward propylene at 550 °C.

In recent years, Ga-based catalysts have attracted more attention. SiO2 supported well-defined Ga(III) single-site catalysts have been developed, which show higher activity and selectivity towards propylene compared with other single-site catalysts based on Fe, Co, and Zn [11] [19, 20, 21, 22]. There have also been many studies on the active sites of Ga-based catalysts. Getsoian et al. [23] suggested that features previously assigned to Ga+ in XANES may also be interpreted as low-coordinate Ga3+-Hx or Ga3+-Rx species on Ga-impregnated zeolites and SiO2-supported single-site catalysts. Cybulskis et al. [24] investigated the nature of active sites for PDH on single-site Ga/SiO2, and showed that Ga3+ alkyl and hydride intermediates have a great influence on PDH performance. Only four coordinate, single-site Ga3+-O species can cleave the C–H bonds of C3H8. The less stable Gaδ+-Hx species is formed under high temperature H2 treatment, and the rate of its transformation to Ga3+-O can affect the rate of propane dehydrogenation. Rane et al. [25] studied the PDH activity of Ga+ and GaO+ in zeolite ZSM-5, and showed that the monovalent Ga+ species are more active than GaH2+ species, and compared with these cations, GaO+ cations are the most active. Phadke et al. [26] investigated mechanism of PDH over Ga/H-MFI, and reported that [GaH]2+ cations are the catalytically active centers for PDH and H2 inhibits the dehydrogenation by reaction with [GaH]2+ cations to from [GaH2]+-H+ cation pairs.

Due to its promotional effect, CO2 has been extensively used as a mild oxidant in oxidative dehydrogenation reactions. CO2 can alleviate the chemical equilibrium in oxidative dehydrogenation by the effective removal of H2 through coupling with reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction. Compared with O2, CO2 suppresses the unwanted total oxidation products due to its lower oxidizing ability. CO2 can also modify the surface and/or bulk composition of the catalyst, thereby affecting the structural, electronic, acid-base, adsorption, diffusion, and redox characteristics [27]. We speculate that the addition of CO2 in PDH may accelerate the transformation of Gaδ+-Hx species to Ga3+-O pairs to re-generate the active sites for C–H bond activation of propane, thus improving the catalytic performance. Meanwhile, the introduction of CO2 induces the change of the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) of propane dehydrogenation. Without CO2, ΔG is 8.3 kJ/mol (600 °C), while it is 15.3 kJ/mol (600 °C) after the introduction of one molar equivlent of CO2. In this work, the role of Ga-hydrides in the PDH of supported gallium oxide is studied using in situ DRIFT, and the results show the effectiveness of CO2 to eliminate Ga-hydrides. With the introduction of CO2, the dehydrogenation performance was indeed improved, especially the propylene selectivity. This work provides an effective way to improve the dehydrogenation performance of Ga2O3/SiO2 catalysts, and also provides insight into the catalytically active centers.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

The Ga2O3/SiO2 catalysts with different Ga loadings were synthesized by pH-controlled incipient wetness impregnation (pH-IWI). To prepare 3Ga2O3/SiO2, 1.5 g of Ga(NO3)3·xH2O (Aladdin) and 3.0 g of citric acid (Tian Da Corp.) were dissolved in 3.0 mL of deionized water. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 11 by adding 25% ammonium hydroxide solution (DAMAO), and the volume was adjusted to 17 mL by adding deionized water. The solution was then added dropwise to 10.0 g of silica (Aladdin, 406 m2

The effect of Ga-hydrides on C3H8 dehydrogenation

PDH was firstly carried out on the SiO2 support to investigate gas-phase thermal cracking and SiO2-induced dehydrogenation reactions, and experimental results show the contribution of these side reactions are negligible at 600 °C. The Ga2O3/SiO2 catalysts with different loadings were prepared and evaluated. As shown in Fig. 1(a), there is no obvious diffraction peak of Ga species in the XRD patterns of Ga2O3/SiO2, which indicates that Ga2O3 is highly dispersed on the surface of SiO2. As shown

Conclusions

The effect of co-feeding CO2 during propane dehydrogenation was investigated for Ga2O3/SiO2 catalysts with different Ga loadings. After H2 pretreatment, the propylene formation rate of 8Ga2O3/SiO2 increases with increasing time on stream due to the simultaneous transformation of Ga-Hx species. In situ DRIFT results show that CO2 can effectively eliminate Ga-H with the formation of CO. When CO2 is introduced to PDH, in addition to higher rates, the stability of propane conversion and propylene

References (39)

  • Z.-P. Hu et al.

    Chin. J. Catal.

    (2019)
  • B. Zheng et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • B. Xu et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • L. Benco et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2011)
  • J. Camacho-Bunquin et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2017)
  • C. Chen et al.

    Chin. J. Catal.

    (2020)
  • Z.F. Han et al.

    Chin. J. Catal.

    (2018)
  • T. Davies et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A

    (2004)
  • B. Hu et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2015)
  • N. Rane et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • M. Chen et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2008)
  • G.D. Meitzner et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1993)
  • S.E. Collins et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2002)
  • V.B. Kazansky et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2005)
  • V.B. Kazansky et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2004)
  • J. Vecchietti et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2017)
  • Z. Xie et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2019)
  • J.J.H.B. Sattler et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2014)
  • B.V. Vora

    Top. Catal.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (16)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (21902019), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0600902-4), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT20RC(5)002), LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC 2008032).

    Available online 10 September 2021

    View full text