Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How can urban agglomeration market integration promote urban green development: evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Green development of cities has been gaining attention worldwide, especially in urban agglomerations, where market integration is promoting. However, it is not clear whether the market integration in urban agglomerations is conducive to promote the green development of cities. Hence, this research aims to address this question. This research employed the data of 100 cities in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2006 to 2019 and a comprehensive analytic framework including a panel threshold model to explore the impact of urban agglomeration market integration on urban green development and the nonlinear adjustment mechanism. The main findings are shown below: (1) urban agglomerations market integration was found to be significant to promote green development of the city, but there are two dimensions: the horizontal dimension and the efficiency dimension, (2) the optimal dimensions for urban agglomeration market integration to promote green development of the city were found has regional and urban heterogeneity. Therefore, it is necessary for the city to formulate differentiated green development strategies, (3) when human capital advancement and knowledge sharing intervene, urban agglomeration market integration will have a “jumping” threshold impact on green development of the city through the level path; and under the adjustment of environmental regulations and the green transformation mechanism of the industrial structure, the influence of the urban agglomeration market integration on the efficiency of urban green development presents a “U-shaped” threshold characteristic, (4) lastly, the conclusions enlighten urban agglomeration market integration and heterogeneous green development model for approaching a better performance in urban green development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any researcher wishing to use them for noncommercial purposes without breaching participant confidentiality.

References

  • Akinci M (2017) Inequality and economic growth: trickle-down effect revisited. Dev Policy Rev 36:O1–O24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antal M (2014) Green goals and full employment: are they compatible? Ecol Econ 107(nov.):276–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashoka M, Fang-Yi W (1997) Explaining industrial growth in coastal China: economic reforms … and what else? World Bank Econ Rev 2:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse K, Verbeke A (2003) Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strateg Manag J 24:453–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Chen D (2018) Smog pollution, government governance and high-quality economic development. Econ Res 53(02):20–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Cong Z (2017) Better play the role of the government in regional market integration. Financ Trade Econ 038(002):5–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen M, Ying Qin Y, Li N (2019) Analysis on the dynamic evolution of cross-regional knowledge flow and innovation cooperation network. Sci Res 37(12):2252–2264

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Q, Yang J, Zhang X, Hu S (2020) Characteristics, models and dynamic mechanisms of polluting enterprises/industry transfer. Geogr Res (7):1511–1533

  • Deng W, Song Y, Chen X (2019) Evaluation of the effect of regional integration on economic growth in the underdeveloped areas of the Yangtze River Delta——an empirical study based on DID. East China Econ Manag 7

  • Deniau JF, Lister L (1962) The common market. Sci Soc 26(2):245–24

  • Dou J, Cui S (2018) Does the integration of the domestic market promote the transfer of polluting industries? Ind Econ Res (04):76–87

  • Feng Y, Dong X, Zhao X, Zhu A (2020) Evaluation of urban green development transformation process for Chinese cities during 2005–2016. J Clean Prod 266:121707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Liao R (2021) Polycentric or monocentric, which kind of spatial structure is better for promoting the green economy? Evidence from Chinese urban agglomerations

  • Jong M, Lalenis K, Mamadouh V (2002) The theory and practice of institutional transplantation. Springer, Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee J (2004) Trade, knowledge spillover and economic growth. J Int Logist Trade 1(2):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JY, Deng XZ, Liu WD, Hai-Ying LI, Kruk R, Thompson D, Wang P, Bai X (2013) Conceptual framework of green development in Western China. China Population, Resources and Environment

  • Liu Y, Zhang X, Pan X, Ma X, Tang M (2020) The spatial integration and coordinated industrial development of urban agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. cities 104:102801

  • Lu M, Chen Z (2009) Economic growth in segmented markets-why economic opening may intensify local protection? Economic Research (03):42–52

  • Luo D, Liang L, Wang Z, Chen L, Zhang F (2021) Exploration of coupling effects in the economy–society–environment system in urban areas: case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration. Ecol Indic 128(11):107858

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton B (2000) How much can regional integration do to unify China's markets? how far across the river

  • Oglu S (2021) Application of topsis method with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Sci Rev 1(36)

  • Ottaviano G, Puga D (1998) Agglomeration in the global economy: a survey of the ‘new economic geography’. World Econ 21:707–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park A, Yang D, Shi X, Yuan J (2010) Exporting and firm performance: Chinese exporters and the Asian financial crisis. Rev Econ Stat 92(4):822–842 

  • Parsley DC, Wei SJ (2001) Explaining the border effect: the role of exchange rate variability, shipping costs, and geography. J Int Econ 55

  • Qian Y, Liu J, Cheng Z, Forrest JY-L (2021) Does the smart city policy promote the green growth of the urban economy? Evidence from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res

  • Qiu S, Wang Z, Liu S (2021) The policy outcomes of low-carbon city construction on urban green development: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment conducted in China. Sustain Cities Soc 66:102699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding SJ (2010) The empirics of new economic geography. J Reg Sci 50:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1989) Human capital and growth: theory and evidence. Carn-Roch Conf Ser Public Policy 32(1):251–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AKHAO, Brand W, Hanson AH (1960) The strategy of economic development. Econ J 70(279):590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun L-y, Miao C-l, Yang L (2017) Ecological-economic efficiency evaluation of green technology innovation in strategic emerging industries based on entropy weighted TOPSIS method. Ecol Indic 73:554–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Chen L, Li H (2018) Evaluation of green growth efficiency loss based on market segmentation——verification of nonlinear mechanism. China's population, resources and environment

  • Trippl M, Maier G (2010) Knowledge spillover agents and regional development. Pap Reg Sci 89(2):229–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Tao X, Zhu B (2016) Provincial green economic efficiency of China: a non-separable input-output SBM approach. Appl Energy

  • Wang Y, Xu N, Xi R, Zhang Y (2019) Evaluation system study on national green development demonstration area ——taking Pearl River Delta region as an example. environmental science and management

  • Wenzheng LI, Liu Y, Zhang X, Deng C (2019) Spatial-temporal evolution of urban green development level and its obstacle factors in Shaanxi Province. Research of Soil and Water Conservation

  • Yamauchi F (2007) Social learning, neighborhood effects, and investment in human capital: evidence from green-revolution India. J Dev Econ 83:37–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Guo H, Chen L, Liu X, Gu M, Ke X (2019) Regional analysis of the green development level differences in Chinese mineral resource-based cities. Resour Policy:61

  • Ying G, Yin H, Jiang Y, Yin X (2014) Border trade and regional integration. Rev Dev Econ 18(2):300–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youlu H, Deng TQ, Liangyu J (2019) Can financial subsidies promote the "greening" of enterprises?——based on the research of China's heavily polluting listed companies. Econ Manag 41(04):5–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Wang L, Yang Q, Ye S (2015) Background of the Yangtze River Economic Belt development strategy and geography interpretation of its innovative development. Prog Geogr 34(11):1368–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang ZY, Luo XH (2019) Measurement of urban green development efficiency. Urban Problems

  • Zhang J, Chang Y, Zhang L, Li D (2018) Do technological innovations promote urban green development?—a spatial econometric analysis of 105 cities in China. J Clean Prod 182(MAY 1):395–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang K, Shao S, Fan S (2020) Market integration and environmental quality: evidence from the Yangtze river delta region of China. J Environ Manag 261(May1):110208.110201–110208.110217

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao L, Zhao ZQ (2014) Projecting the spatial variation of economic based on the specific ellipses in China. Sci Geogr Sin 33(3):478–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao LD, Zhang L, Le XU, Ming-Zhao HU, Economics SO (2016) Mechanism of human capital,industrial structure adjustment and green development efficiency. China Population,Resources and Environment

  • Zhou L, Zhou C, Che L, Wang B (2020) Spatio-temporal evolution and influencing factors of urban green development efficiency in China. J Geogr Sci 30(5):724–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S, He C, Ying L (2014) Going green or going away: environmental regulation, economic geography and firms' strategies in China's pollution-intensive industries. Geoforum 55(aug.):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No.20FJLB018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China

    Bin Liao & Lin Li

Authors
  1. Bin Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lin Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Bin Liao: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing original draft, software, formal analysis writing, review, and editing, project, administration, validation, visualization; Lin Li: resources, funding acquisition, and supervision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bin Liao or Lin Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

There are no ethical issues in this article.

Informed consent

All participants have an informed consent form.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Downstream urban agglomeration (41): Shanghai, Nanjing, Wuxi, Changzhou, Suzhou, Nantong, Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Taizhou, Yancheng, Xuzhou, Lianyungang, Huai’an, Suqian, Hangzhou, Ningbo, Huzhou, Wenzhou, Jiaxing, Shaoxing, Jinhua, Zhoushan, Lishui, Quzhou, Taizhou, Hefei, Wuhu, Bengbu, Huainan, Ma’anshan, Huaibei, Tongling, Anqing, Huangshan, Fuyang Suzhou, Chuzhou, Lu’an, Xuancheng, Chizhou, Bozhou; Midstream Urban agglomeration(28): Wuhan, Ezhou, Huangshi, Xiangyang, Yichang, Xiaogan, Huanggang, Xianning, Jingzhou, Jingmen, Changsha, Zhuzhou, Xiangtan, Yueyang, Yiyang, Changde, Hengyang, Loudi, Nanchang, Jiujiang, Jingdezhen, Yingtan, Xinyu, Yichun, Pingxiang, Shangrao, Fuzhou, Ji’an; upper urban agglomeration (31): Chongqing, Chengdu, Zigong, Luzhou, Panzhihua, Bazhong, Guangyuan, Deyang, Mianyang, Suining, Neijiang, Leshan, Nanchong, Meishan, Yibin, Guang’an, Dazhou, Ya’an, Ziyang, Guiyang, Zunyi, Liupanshui, Anshun, Kunming, Qujing, Yuxi, Zhaotong, Baoshan, Lijiang, Pu’er, Lincang; core cities of urban agglomerations (11): Shanghai, Nanjing, Hangzhou, Hefei, Wuhan, Changsha, Nanchang, Chongqing, Chengdu, Guiyang, Kunming; provincial adjacent cities of urban agglomerations(44): Lianyungang, Xuzhou, Wuxi, Nantong, Yangzhou, Suqian, Ningbo, Shaoxing, Wenzhou, Jiaxing, Quzhou, Wuhu, Lu’an, Fuyang, Suzhou, Huangshan, Anqing, Xuancheng, Huangshi, Xiangyang, Huanggang, Xianning, Jingzhou, Zhuzhou, Yueyang, Changde, Jiujiang, Jingdezhen, Pingxiang, Shangrao, Fuzhou, Panzhihua, Guangyuan, Yibin, Luzhou, Dazhou, Nanchong, Guang’an, Suining, Zigong, Zunyi, Qujing, Zhaotong, Lijiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, ., Li, L. How can urban agglomeration market integration promote urban green development: evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 10649–10664 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16490-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16490-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation