Abstract
Advancements in computational and geospatial technologies have made it quite possible to conceptualize the intricacy of urban growth and land use change phenomenon. The cellular automata (CA) and geographic information system (GIS) framework-based approaches are commonly used in modeling and simulation of urban growth and land use/land cover changes, e.g., the SLEUTH model. The SLEUTH model may be affected by uncertainties arising from the model parameters, constants, structures, and elements used as input parameters. The behaviour of SLEUTH has not been tested sufficiently for the possible uncertainties of different parameters/structures and model constants so far. The present study examines the SLEUTH model performances and behavior as a function of possible uncertainty in few important model parameters using the sensitivity approach (SA). Sensitivity has been quantified in terms of relative change in five criteria, i.e., statistical measures like area, urban clusters, edges, cluster size, cluster radius, and best model fitness measure (i.e., optimal SLEUTH metrics (OSM)), overall accuracy for a range of selected important SLEUTH model, i.e., diffusive value parameter, size of the cellular neighborhood, and game of life rules. Optimal values of these model parameters/constants have been obtained through sensitivity testing for a heterogeneous and complex urban area, i.e., Pushkar town in India. The study gives insights into the effect of model parameters on the performance of the SLEUTH model in capturing different types and forms of urban growth. The study enlightens the shortcomings and contributes to enhancing the present understanding related to the CA-based SLEUTH urban growth model.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw data can be obtained from the USGS Earth Explorer (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ ). The other data that support the findings of this study can be provided by the corresponding author against a legitimate request.
Code availability
Available with author and can be provided based on genuine request.
References
Agarwal C, Green GM, Grove, JM, Evans TP, Schweik CM (2002) A review and assessment of land-use change models: dynamics of space, time, and human choice.
Akın A, Clarke KC, Berberoglu S (2014) The impact of historical exclusion on the calibration of the SLEUTH urban growth model. Int J Appl Earth Obs 27:156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.10.002
Al-shalabi M, Billa L, Pradhan B, Mansor S, Al-Sharif AA (2013a) Modelling urban growth evolution and land-use changes using GIS based cellular automata and SLEUTH models: the case of Sana’a metropolitan city, Yemen. Environ Earth Sci 70(1):425–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2137-6
Al-shalabi M, Pradhan B, Billa L, Mansor S, Althuwaynee OF (2013b) Manifestation of remote sensing data in modeling urban sprawl using the SLEUTH model and brute force calibration: a case study of Sana’a city, Yemen. J Indian Soc Remote 41(2):405–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-012-0215-6
Batty M, Xie Y (1994) From cells to cities. Environ Plann B 21(7):S31–S48. https://doi.org/10.1068/b21S031
Batty M, Xie Y (1997) Possible urban automata. Environ Plann B 24(2):175–192
Batty M, Couclelis H, Eichen M (1997) Urban systems as cellular automata. Environ Plann B 24(2):159–164
Batty M, Xie Y, Sun Z (1999) Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Comput Environ Urban 23(3):205–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(99)00015-0
Caglioni M, Pelizzoni M, Rabino GA (2006) Urban sprawl: a case study for project gigalopolis using SLEUTH model. In International Conference on Cellular Automata, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 436-445
Clark WA (1991) Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography 28(1):1–19
Clarke KC (2014) Why simulate cities? GeoJ 79(2):129–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9499-5
Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ (1998) Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 12(7):699–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588198241617
Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L (1996) Methods and techniques for rigorous calibration of a cellular automaton model of urban growth. Paper presented at the Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, Santa Fe, New Mexico.
Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L (1997) A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ Plann B 24(2): 247-261. https://doi.org/10.1068/b240247
Clarke KC, Gazulis N, Dietzel C, Goldstein NC (2007) A decade of SLEUTHing: lessons learned from applications of a cellular automaton land use change model. Classics in IJGIS: twenty years of the international journal of geographical information science and systems, 413-427.
Cousins SA (2001) Analysis of land-cover transitions based on 17th and 18th century cadastral maps and aerial photographs. Landsc Ecol 16(1):41–54
Dietzel C, Clarke KC (2006) Decreasing computational time of urban cellular automata through model portability. Geoinformatica 10(2):197–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-7579-0
Gazulis N, Clarke KC (2006) Exploring the DNA of our regions: classification of outputs from the SLEUTH model. In International Conference on Cellular Automata, 462-471. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
He C, Zhang D, Huang Q, Zhao Y (2016) Assessing the potential impacts of urban expansion on regional carbon storage by linking the LUSD-urban and InVEST models. Environ Model Softw 75:44–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.09.015
Houet T, Marchadier C, Bretagne G, Moine MP, Aguejdad R, Viguie V, Bonhomme M, Lemonsu A, Avner P, Hidalgo J, Masson V (2016) Combining narratives and modelling approaches to simulate fine scale and long-term urban growth scenarios for climate adaptation. Environ Model Softw 86:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.010
Jantz CA, Goetz SJ (2005) Analysis of scale dependencies in an urban land-use-change model. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(2):217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810410001713425
Jantz CA, Goetz SJ, Donato D, Claggett P (2010) Designing and implementing a regional urban modeling system using the SLEUTH cellular urban model. Comput Environ Urban 34(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.08.003
Jat MK, Garg PK, Khare D (2008) Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 10:26–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2007.04.002
Kanta Kumar LN, Sawant NG, Kumar S (2011) Forecasting urban growth based on GIS, RS and SLEUTH model in Pune metropolitan area. Int J Geomat Geosci 2(2):568
Karimi F, Sultana S, Babakan AS, Suthaharan S (2019) Urban expansion modeling using an enhanced decision tree algorithm. GeoInformatica 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10707-019-00377-8
Kocabas V, Dragicevic S (2006) Assessing cellular automata model behaviour using a sensitivity analysis approach. Comput Environ Urban 30(6):921–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2006.01.001
Lambin EF, Rounsevell M, Geist H (2000) Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agric Ecosyst Environ 82(1):321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00235-8
Lang T (2012) How do cities and regions adapt to socio-economic crisis? Towards an institutionalist approach to urban and regional resilience. Raumforsch Raumordn 70(4):285–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-012-0170-2
Lewis CM, Lloyd-Sherlock P (2009) Social policy and economic development in South America: an historical approach to social insurance. Econ Soc 38(1):109–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140802560587
Li X, Liu X (2006) An extended cellular automaton using case-based reasoning for simulating urban development in a large complex region. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(10):1109–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600816870
Li X, Liu X, Yu L (2014) A systematic sensitivity analysis of constrained cellular automata model for urban growth simulation based on different transition rules. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 28(7):1317–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2014.883079
Li X, Liu X, Gong P (2015) Integrating ensemble-urban cellular automata model with an uncertainty map to improve the performance of a single model. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 29(5):762–785
Li F, Wang L, Chen Z, Clarke KC, Li M, Jiang P (2018) Extending the SLEUTH model to integrate habitat quality into urban growth simulation. J Environ Manage 217: 486-498. doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.109
Liao J, Tang L, Shao G, Qiu Q, Wang C, Zheng S, Su X (2014) A neighbor decay cellular automata approach for simulating urban expansion based on particle swarm intelligence. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 28(4):720–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.869820
Liu X, Li X, Liu L, He J, Ai B (2008) A bottom-up approach to discover transition rules of cellular automata using ant intelligence. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(11-12):1247–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701757510
López E, Bocco G, Mendoza M, Duhau E (2001) Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe: a case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landsc Urban Plan 55(4):271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00160-8
Mahiny AS, Clarke KC (2013) Simulating hydrologic impacts of urban growth using SLEUTH, multi-criteria evaluation and runoff modeling. J Environ Inf 22(1):27–38
Makse HA, Havlin S, Stanley HE (1995) Modelling urban growth patterns. Nature 377(1912):779–782
Pan Y, Roth A, Yu Z, Doluschitz R (2010) The impact of variation in scale on the behavior of a cellular automata used for land use change modeling. Comput Environ Urban 34(5):400–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.03.003
Santé I, García AM, Miranda D, Crecente R (2010) Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: a review and analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 96(2):108–122
Saxena A, Jat MK (2018) Analyzing performance of SLEUTH model calibration using brute force and genetic algorithm based methods. Geocarto Int 35(3):256–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1516242
Saxena A, Jat MK (2020) Land suitability and urban growth modeling: development of SLEUTH-suitability. Comput Environ Urban Syst 81:101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101475
Saxena A, Jat MK, Clarke KC (2021a) Development of SLEUTH-density for the simulation of built-up land density. Comput Environ Urban Syst 86:101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101586
Saxena A, Jat MK, Kumar S (2021b) Sensitivity analysis and retrieval of optimum SLEUTH model parameters. Geocarto Int:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1974957
Silva EA, Clarke KC (2005) Complexity, emergence and cellular urban models: lessons learned from applying SLEUTH to two Portuguese metropolitan areas. Eur Plan Stud 13(1):93–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000312424
Silva E, Wu N (2012) Surveying models in urban land studies. J Plan Lit 27(2):139–152
Syphard AD, Clarke KC, Franklin J, Regan HM, Mcginnis M (2011) Forecasts of habitat loss and fragmentation due to urban growth are sensitive to source of input data. J Environ Manag 92(7):1882–1893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.014
Takeyama M, Couclelis H (1997) Map dynamics: integrating cellular automata and GIS through Geo-Algebra. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 11(1):73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/136588197242509
Wolfram S (1986) Theory and applications of cellular automata: including selected papers 1983-1986. World scientific.
Wu H, Zhou L, Chi X, Li Y, Sun Y (2012) Quantifying and analyzing neighborhood configuration characteristics to cellular automata for land use simulation considering data source error. Earth Sci Inf 5(2):77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-012-0097-8
Acknowledgement
We are highly indebted to the Ministry of Human Resources and Development (MHRD), India for providing a financial assistantship. Also, we acknowledge the FIST program of the DST Govt. of India for funding the research laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mahesh Kumar Jat: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing investigation, reviewing, and editing; Ankita Saxena: methodology, model development, validation, and original draft preparation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Biswajeet Pradhan
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jat, M.K., Saxena, A. SLEUTH model sensitivity testing: game of life, cellular neighborhood, and diffusivity. Arab J Geosci 14, 2014 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08380-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08380-w