Next Article in Journal
Influence of DAT1 Promotor Methylation on Sports Performance
Previous Article in Journal
De novo Assembly, Annotation, and Analysis of Transcriptome Data of the Ladakh Ground Skink Provide Genetic Information on High-Altitude Adaptation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/genes12091424
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

NOD2 Genotypes Affect the Symptoms and Mortality in the Porcine Circovirus 2-Spreading Pig Population

by
Kasumi Suzuki
1,2,3,
Hiroki Shinkai
4,
Gou Yoshioka
1,
Toshimi Matsumoto
5,
Junji Tanaka
1,
Noboru Hayashi
1,
Haruki Kitazawa
2,3,* and
Hirohide Uenishi
5,*
1
Swine and Poultry Research Department, Gifu Prefectural Livestock Research Institute, Seki 501-3924, Japan
2
Food and Feed Immunology Group, Laboratory of Animal Food Function, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan
3
Livestock Immunology Unit, International Education and Research Center for Food Agricultural Immunology (CFAI), Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8572, Japan
4
National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-0856, Japan
5
Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (NARO), Tsukuba 305-8634, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(9), 1424; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12091424
Submission received: 30 July 2021 / Revised: 9 September 2021 / Accepted: 12 September 2021 / Published: 16 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor 2 (NOD2) is an intracellular pattern recognition receptor that detects components of peptidoglycans from bacterial cell walls. NOD2 regulates bowel microorganisms, provides resistance against infections such as diarrhea, and reduces the risk of inflammatory bowel diseases in humans and mice. We previously demonstrated that a specific porcine NOD2 polymorphism (NOD2-2197A > C) augments the recognition of peptidoglycan components. In this study, the relationships between porcine NOD2-2197A/C genotypes affecting molecular functions and symptoms in a porcine circovirus 2b (PCV2b)-spreading Duroc pig population were investigated. The NOD2 allele (NOD2-2197A) with reduced recognition of the peptidoglycan components augmented the mortality of pigs at the growing stage in the PCV2b-spreading population. Comparison of NOD2 allele frequencies in the piglets before and after invasion of PCV2b indicated that the ratio of NOD2-2197A decreased in the population after the PCV2b epidemic. This data indicated that functional differences caused by NOD2-2197 polymorphisms have a marked impact on pig health and livestock productivity. We suggest that NOD2-2197CC is a PCV2 disease resistant polymorphism, which is useful for selective breeding by reducing mortality and increasing productivity.

1. Introduction

The innate immune system is armed with many types of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). PRRs detect the invasion of pathogens such as bacteria and viruses at the very early stage of infection by initiating a comprehensive immune response including T and B cell activity in acquired immunity through the induction of proinflammatory cytokines and interferons. PRRs play their roles in various cellular locations, such as the cell surface and intracellular organelles. Some examples of PRRs include Toll-like receptors (TLRs), retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I)-like helicases (RLHs), C-type lectin-like receptors (CLRs), and nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors [1]. Polymorphisms in PRRs frequently affect resistance to infectious diseases and the onset and exacerbation of autoimmune diseases in humans [2].
We have demonstrated that PRR genes have many polymorphisms that affect coding amino acids in various pig populations [3,4,5,6]. Some of these polymorphisms affect molecular functions such as PAMP recognition [7]. For instance, a TLR5 (1205C > T) polymorphism attenuates the response of TLR5 to recognize the flagellin of Salmonella Choleraesuis [8]. Similarly, the TLR5-1205T genotype has a reduced ability to detect the pathogen Salmonella Typhimurium in pigs, resulting in severe diarrhea in comparison with normal TLR5 (TLR5-1205C) indicating that this polymorphism may be used to improve disease resistance [9].
Nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs) are cytosolic PRRs that consist of an NOD, leucine-rich repeats, and a signal transduction domain. NOD1 and NOD2 are members of the NLR family that recognize key structural components of the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls. NOD1 recognizes γ-D-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelic acid (iE-DAP), which is mainly observed in gram-negative bacteria and some gram-positive bacteria [10]. NOD2 recognizes muramyl dipeptide, which is a common motif in the peptidoglycan of gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria [11].
Viral infection augments signaling through NOD1/NOD2 pathways to oppose secondary bacterial infection [12]. Furthermore, NOD2 is involved in the activation of type I interferon by the detection of single-stranded RNA derived from viruses [13,14]. NOD1 and NOD2 have polymorphisms that affect ligand recognition in pig populations. NOD1 mutations (1922G > A and 2752G > A) abrogate the recognition of the iE-DAP structure [15], while a 2197 (A > C) mutation in NOD2 promotes the recognition of muramyl dipeptide [16]. The NOD1/NOD2 polymorphisms affecting ligand recognition are broadly distributed in commercial pig populations, and are attracting interest in pig breeding strategies aimed at disease resistance.
The prevalence of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) has been observed worldwide since its first detection in Canada [17], and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) was recognized as the causal agent of PMWS [18,19]. PCR screening detected PCV2 DNA in more than 80% of pigs in farms throughout Japan [20]. Although PCV2 infection in pigs is rarely fatal, secondary infections increase the severity of the symptoms caused by PCV2-induced immunosuppression (PCV2-associated diseases; PCVAD) [21]. PCV2 infection frequently causes decreased pig growth rate and increased pig mortality at weaning and early fatting stages resulting in huge economic losses in the livestock industry [22].
In this study, the relationship between NOD2 genotypes and mortality in a Duroc pig population infected with PCV2 was investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement, Pig Population and Sampling

All handling of pigs and pig transport was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Gifu Prefectural Livestock Research Institute (No. R03-107).
A Sus scrofa domesticus Duroc breed population named Iris Nagara was established by the Gifu Prefectural Livestock Research Institute (GPLRI) and the Aichi Prefectural Livestock Research Center. This study was conducted using a subpopulation of Iris Nagara maintained in the facilities of GPLRI from 2008 to 2013. The population used in this study was reared separated from other pigs throughout the experiment and the genetic source thus did not change. We did not select pigs based on genotypes or disease resistance in the population. The pigs used throughout this study were maintained in the identical environment and location, and were porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-free throughout the study. The mortality and body weight at day 60 after birth of each pig was recorded. The mortality rate was calculated based on the number of deaths 60 days after birth. Vaccination of PCV2 with Circovac® (Ceva, Libourne, France) or CircoFLEX® (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany) was conducted in 151 animals born in 2012 and in those born in 2013. The remaining 949 animals were not vaccinated. Tissue and blood samples were collected at slaughter or during the rearing management procedure. Genomic DNA was extracted from the tissues and blood using an Easy DNA™ gDNA purification kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Viral DNA was extracted from blood samples using a NucleoSpin® virus mini kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany).

2.2. Comparison of Capsid Gene Sequence of PCV2

Complete sequences of the PCV2 capsid genes were amplified from genomic DNA extracted from blood using forward (5′-CCATGCCCTGAATTTCCATA-3′), and reverse (5ʹ-GGGCACCAAAATACCACTTC-3′) PCR primers [23] using an EmeraldAmp PCR master mix (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan). PCR was initiated by denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, and 90 s at 72 °C. The PCR cycles were followed by an additional extension of 10 min at 72 °C. Amplified PCR products were sequenced using an Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA analyzer with the BigDye Terminator 3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Phylogenetic analysis was performed by the neighbor-joining method [24] using the program ClustalX2 [25].

2.3. Genotypes of the NOD2 Gene

DNA fragments surrounding the NOD2 polymorphism (2197A/C) affecting molecular function were amplified using genomic DNA of the pigs with primers (forward: 5′-GGTGTCTGAGAAGGCTCTGC-3′; reverse: 5′-TTGCAGACGTTGAGACAAGG-3′) using AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific). PCR was initiated by denaturation for 10 min at 94 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C. The PCR cycles were followed by an additional extension of 5 min at 72 °C. The obtained fragments were sequenced as described above. The genotypes were confirmed using sequencing reads by automated single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection with PolyPhred [26], and manual inspection using Consed [27] after assembly by Phred basecaller and Phrap assembler [28,29].

2.4. Computational Analysis

Significant differences in mortality rates were examined using the Chi-square test. Survival rates were determined using the log-rank test. Statistical analyses were performed using R (https://www.r-project.org/, accessed on 30 July 2021)

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Differences in PCV2 Strains before and after Wasting Symptoms and Frequent Mortality

Many disorders were observed in the populations maintained in the pig facilities of the GPLRI from 2009 including wastage, diarrhea, and frequent death (Figure 1). The mortality rate of the pig population increased from 6.6% in 2008 to 33.6% in 2010. The severe epidemic settled down in 2011; however, the mortality rate did not restore the level comparable with that before the epidemic. After PCV2 vaccination, the mortality rate dropped to 5.8% in 2013 (Table 1). Male pigs showed a slightly higher mortality than female pigs, although relationships of the high mortality with PCVAD were unclear. We also evaluated the effects of the epidemic by growth retardation at day 60 after birth. The number of pigs with growth retardation increased after 2009, and more than 20% of pigs were regarded as “boney” (less than 75% of the average weight) in 2010 and 2011 (Tables S2 and S3).
PCV2a infection was detected in the pig population before the emergence of wasting symptoms, while only PCV2b was detected after wasting symptoms were observed. The detected capsid gene sequence had a high similarity to PCV2b, the virulence of which was found to be higher than that of PCV2a in a previous report [30]. Although the genotypes determined by the capsid gene do not necessarily define the virulence of PCV2 [31], genotypes switching seemed to synchronize with PCVAD emergence. We could not obtain samples suitable for the extraction of viral DNA in 2010; therefore, we could not isolate PCV2 capsid gene sequences and determine the genotype of PCV2 in samples from that year. However, the typical symptoms of PCVAD, such as growth retardation (Figure 1) and an increased pig mortality at weaning and early fatting stages, which were consecutively observed after 2009, were not observed during the period when PCV2a was detected. This suggests that PCV2b invasion was the causative event for the increased mortality rate. This strongly implied that the wasting symptoms and frequent death were due to PCVAD, caused by the invasion of the virulent PCV2b strain into the population (Figure 2).

3.2. Marked Differences in NOD2 Genotype Frequency before and after the Emergence of PCVAD

The pig population had a nonsynonymous polymorphism at position 2197 (A/C; Ser/Arg at position 733 in the deduced amino acid sequence) in the coding sequence of NOD2. In Western breeds, the majority of pigs have the NOD2-2197A allele [3] (GenBank accession number: AB426547.1), which shows weakened molecular function to recognize muramyl dipeptide. The Duroc breed frequently has the NOD2-2197C allele, which augments the recognition of ligands [16]. The reference genome sequence of Sus scrofa was constructed with a female Duroc pig [32] and had the NOD2-2197C allele, in accordance with the high frequency of NOD2-2197C in Duroc pigs [3,16].
Previous reports show that castrated male pigs were more susceptible to PCVAD than female pigs [33,34], suggesting that a sex-effect may skew the results related to the association between SNP and PCVAD susceptibility. Furthermore, we could prepare more samples of female pigs as compared to male pigs because of a preservation of samples. Therefore, we used mainly female pigs in this study. More than 80 female individuals were randomly selected from each group born in different years and genotyped for the NOD2-2197 SNP. In pigs born before and during the emergence of PCVAD symptoms, the frequency of NOD2-2197A was approximately 40%. After PCVAD emergence (2012), the NOD2-2197A frequency significantly decreased to 23% (p < 0.01) in all alleles (Table 2). Differences in mortality due to PCVAD among pigs with different NOD2 genotypes might reflect allele frequencies of the NOD2 gene of progenies. Any selection based on genetic information or disease-resistance indices was not conducted in the pig population of this study; therefore, the decrease in NOD2-2197A frequency might be caused by a high mortality of parent pigs with NOD2-2197A in 2009 to 2011. Similar results were obtained from the comparatively smaller number of male individuals (Table S4).

3.3. Significant Influence of NOD2 Genotypes on Pig Mortality during the Spread of PCV2b

The mortality rates of pigs before PCV2b invasion were comparable between the NOD2 genotypes (Figure 3a). After PCV2b invasion, approximately 40% of the pigs with NOD2-2197AA and NOD2-2197AC genotypes died within 60 days after birth in 2010. In contrast, 84% of the pigs with NOD2-2197CC genotypes survived during the same observation period (Figure 3b) (log-rank test, p = 0.02). Significant differences between the mortalities of pigs with NOD2-2197AA and NOD2-2197AC were not observed. Meanwhile, no significant difference in survival rates among pigs with different genotypes was observed following vaccination against PCV2 (Figure 3c). We also investigated the effect of NOD2 genotypes on growth retardation at day 60 after birth. Before the PCVAD epidemic in 2008, a marked difference was not observed among pigs with different NOD2 genotypes. Due to the limitation of samples because of the death of pigs due to PCVAD, significant differences between NOD2 genotypes were not observed; however, the percentage of pigs with growth retardation was markedly reduced by the NOD2-2197C allele (Figure S1).

4. Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that SNP in NOD2 markedly affected susceptibility to PCVAD in a pig population. In the investigated population, the protective effect by vaccination against PCVAD was more prominent than that by genetic selection of the SNP in the NOD2 gene. However, the results in this study indicate the possibility to improve the resistance against infectious diseases by selecting a specific allele of immune genes in pigs. Furthermore, NOD2 is involved in the immune response to both bacterial and viral infections, suggesting the possibility to improve the resistance to other diseases by selection of NOD2 alleles. We demonstrated a definite effect of NOD2-2197 polymorphisms on the recognition of bacterial components in a previous in vitro study [16]; however, the effect of the polymorphism on viral immunity has not been elucidated. Clarifying the molecular fundamentals of the protection effect against PCVAD related to NOD2 genotypes will shed light on NOD2 functioning in the viral immunity in pigs.
An NOD2 2197 polymorphism affecting ligand recognition is associated with mortality in the pig population. Infection with virulent PCV2 causes immune suppression in the host animal, which may result in secondary infection with bacteria and/or viruses into the pig population [37,38]. For example, PCV2b infection resulted in pigs becoming susceptible to secondary infection with Lawsonia intracellularis with many pigs showing emaciation, which may be caused by porcine proliferative enteritis [39].
NOD2 plays a key role in the response against bacteria by recognizing the components of bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan, with NOD2 defects causing the onset or severity of bacterial infections in experimental animal models [40,41,42]. The porcine NOD2 polymorphism (2197A/C) affects recognition of the ligand [3,16]. Therefore, the diminished response caused by the NOD2 mutation may result in the failure of protection against secondary infection, despite viral infection augmenting the expression of NOD2 and its signaling receptor RIP2 (receptor-interacting-serine/threonine-protein kinase 2) [12].
We must consider another possibility regarding the role of the NOD2 polymorphism in PCV2b infection. Several studies have indicated that NOD2 participates in the cellular immune response to viruses [13,14]. Therefore, the impaired function of NOD2 may cause immunosuppression through negatively affecting the response to PCV2b infection resulting in an insufficient response to secondary infection. Under experimental conditions, sole PCV2 infection induces diarrhea symptoms [43]; therefore, the dynamics of pathogens in the farms should be investigated in individual cases.
NOD2 recognizes bacterial peptidoglycans and induces an inflammatory response [44]. NOD2 is involved in the digestion of bacteria invading cells by autophagy processes [45,46]. Furthermore, NOD2 contributes to a decreased risk of developing Crohn’s disease by regulating excessive signal transduction by TLRs [47] and production of interleukin 10 [48,49]. Meanwhile, a loss-of-function mutation in NOD2 is a widely accepted risk factor for Crohn’s disease in humans [50,51,52]. The NOD2-2197C genotype mildly augments the molecular function of NOD2 in comparison with NOD2-2197A [16], which may contribute to a moderate immune response to exert anti-microbial activity of the hosts and avoid excessive inflammation, which exacerbates pneumonia [53]. The NOD2-2197C genotype is broadly distributed among different representative pig breeds, including Landrace, Large White, and Duroc [3]. Furthermore, NOD2-2197C is the predominant genotype in Japanese wild boars [3,16]. We previously showed that NOD2-2197C improves ligand recognition compared with other NOD2 polymorphisms in Duroc pigs commonly used in Japanese farming [16]. This suggests that the NOD2-2197C genotype does not confer a harmful effect on pig health or other economic traits, although further investigations are required.
In this study, NOD2-2197CC had a marked effect in decreasing the mortality caused by PCVAD. On the other hand, a reduction in the mortality rate of pigs with a heterozygous genotype (NOD2-22197AC) in comparison with NOD2-2197AA was not indicated in this population. The Duroc breed, which was used in this study, is mainly used for production of meat pigs by mating with crossbred white pigs; therefore, if NOD2-2197AC meat pigs show a higher disease resistance than NOD2-2197AA pigs, the selection of Duroc pigs with NOD2-2197CC will contribute to promote the production efficiency of pork meat. On the other hand, a positive effect on growth retardation by a single NOD2-2197C allele can be expected based on the data in this study, although the data was limited. Further investigation on disease resistance by a single NOD2-2197C allele should be conducted.
It is noteworthy that a difference in mortality between male and female pigs was observed in the population in this study. The mortality rate at the peak of the epidemic (2010) was not markedly different between males and females; however, in the beginning (2009) and settled-down (2011) stages of the epidemic, male pigs had a higher mortality than female pigs. Interestingly, in the settled-down stage of the epidemic (2011), pigs with growth retardation were more frequently males than females. Males might be more severely be infected than females. The number of male pigs with growth retardation was markedly smaller than that of females in 2010, when the epidemic approached the peak, possibly because the infected male pigs were dead at the early rearing stage. Differences in the effects of SNPs on disease resistance between sexes should be further investigated.
There is another NOD gene that has polymorphisms affecting its molecular function. NOD1 has two polymorphisms, NOD1-1922G/A and NOD1-2752G/A. In both of the polymorphisms, the A alleles show marked decrease of ligand recognition ability [15]. However, the two SNPs in NOD1 were not linked to each other; furthermore, a pilot study did not demonstrate an association of NOD1 SNPs with mortality rates (data not shown). Therefore, we focused on NOD2 in this study. Further analyses on the association between NOD1 polymorphisms and the resistance to infectious diseases, particularly bacterial infections, are expected to elucidate the possible contribution of NOD1 polymorphisms to disease susceptibility.
This study demonstrated the usefulness of the NOD2-2197 genotype as a DNA marker for improving disease resistance. Other DNA markers affect pig susceptibility to diarrhea by Salmonella (TLR5-1205) [8,9], while antibody production after vaccination with NLRP3-2906 promotes disease resistance pig breeding [54,55]. Genetic selection of the NOD2-2197C genotype may improve resistance to bacterial and/or viral infection, including PCV2b, contributing to the prevention of growth retardation or death during the rearing period due to an enhanced response to the ligand. This is expected to result in an increase in the productivity and quality of pork products by improving the health of the pig population.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that pigs with NOD2-2197CC are more resistant to PCVAD. A promising candidate DNA marker (NOD2-2197C) is presented for improving disease resistance and, particularly, protection against PCVAD in pig breeding. We anticipate this will result in a reduction in the hygienic costs and an improved productivity and quality of the pork. The effect of heterozygous NOD2-2197AC pigs on disease resistance should be evaluated, and further investigations are expected to show the efficacy of the DNA marker on other infectious diseases.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes12091424/s1, Table S1: Mortality of rearing pigs with NOD2-2197 genotyping data in the Duroc population, Table S2: Pigs with growth retardation (“boney pigs”) in the Duroc population, Table S3: Pigs with growth retardation (“boney pigs”) that have NOD2-2197 genotyping data in the Duroc population, Table S4: Allele frequency of NOD2-2197 in male pigs, Figure S1: Effect of NOD2-2197 genotypes on percentage of pigs with growth retardation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.S., H.S., G.Y. and H.U.; methodology, K.S., H.S., G.Y. and H.U.; formal analysis, K.S., H.S., T.M. and H.U.; investigation, K.S., H.U.; resources, K.S., G.Y., J.T. and N.H.; data curation, K.S., G.Y., J.T. and N.H.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S.; writing—review and editing, H.U.; supervision, J.T., N.H., H.K. and H.U.; project administration, H.K. and H.U.; funding acquisition, K.S., H.K. and H.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded in part by the Japan Racing Association and a project of the Bio-oriented Technology Research Advancement Institution (Research Program on the Development of Innovative Technology, No. 01002A).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures in this study were conducted under the review and approval by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Gifu Prefectural Livestock Research Institute (protocol number R03-107).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Sequence data were deposited in the DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank nucleotide database (accession numbers: LC637748-LC637754).

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Miyoko Miyamoto (Institute of Agrobiological Sciences, NARO) for her technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brubaker, S.W.; Bonham, K.S.; Zanoni, I.; Kagan, J.C. Innate Immune Pattern Recognition: A cell biological perspective. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 33, 257–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Skevaki, C.; Pararas, M.; Kostelidou, K.; Tsakris, A.; Routsias, J.G. Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptors and susceptibility to infectious diseases. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 180, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kojima-Shibata, C.; Shinkai, H.; Morozumi, T.; Jozaki, K.; Toki, D.; Matsumoto, T.; Kadowaki, H.; Suzuki, E.; Uenishi, H. Differences in distribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms among intracellular pattern recognition receptors in pigs. Immunogenetics 2009, 61, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Morozumi, T.; Uenishi, H. Polymorphism distribution and structural conservation in RNA-sensing Toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8 in pigs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2009, 1790, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shinkai, H.; Tanaka, M.; Morozumi, T.; Eguchi-Ogawa, T.; Okumura, N.; Muneta, Y.; Awata, T.; Uenishi, H. Biased distribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in porcine Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1), TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, and TLR6 genes. Immunogenetics 2006, 58, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Uenishi, H.; Shinkai, H. Porcine Toll-like receptors: The front line of pathogen monitoring and possible implications for disease resistance. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2009, 33, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Uenishi, H.; Shinkai, H.; Morozumi, T.; Muneta, Y. Genomic survey of polymorphisms in pattern recognition receptors and their possible relationship to infections in pigs. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2012, 148, 69–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shinkai, H.; Suzuki, R.; Akiba, M.; Okumura, N.; Uenishi, H. Porcine Toll-like receptors: Recognition of Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis and influence of polymorphisms. Mol. Immunol. 2011, 48, 1114–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Muneta, Y.; Arai, N.; Yakabe, Y.; Eguchi, M.; Shibahara, T.; Sakuma, A.; Shinkai, H.; Uenishi, H.; Hirose, K.; Akiba, M. In vivo effect of a TLR5 SNP (C1205T) on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in weaned, specific pathogen-free Landrace piglets. Microbiol. Immunol. 2018, 62, 380–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Chamaillard, M.; Hashimoto, M.; Horie, Y.; Masumoto, J.; Qiu, S.; Saab, L.; Ogura, Y.; Kawasaki, A.; Fukase, K.; Kusumoto, S.; et al. An essential role for NOD1 in host recognition of bacterial peptidoglycan containing diaminopimelic acid. Nat. Immunol. 2003, 4, 702–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Moran, T.; Swanson, E.; Julian, C.; Harris, J.; Bonen, D.K.; Hedl, M.; Nicolae, D.L.; Abraham, C.; Cho, J.H. Regulation of IL-8 and IL-1β expression in Crohn’s disease associated NOD2/CARD15 mutations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2004, 13, 1715–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kim, Y.G.; Park, J.H.; Reimer, T.; Baker, D.P.; Kawai, T.; Kumar, H.; Akira, S.; Wobus, C.; Nuñez, G. Viral infection augments Nod1/2 signaling to potentiate lethality associated with secondary bacterial infections. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 9, 496–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lupfer, C.; Thomas, P.G.; Kanneganti, T.D. Nucleotide oligomerization and binding domain 2-dependent dendritic cell activation is necessary for innate immunity and optimal CD8+ T Cell responses to influenza A virus infection. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 8946–8955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Sabbah, A.; Chang, T.H.; Harnack, R.; Frohlich, V.; Tominaga, K.; Dube, P.H.; Xiang, Y.; Bose, S. Activation of innate immune antiviral responses by Nod2. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 1073–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shinkai, H.; Matsumoto, T.; Toki, D.; Okumura, N.; Terada, K.; Uenishi, H. Porcine NOD1 polymorphisms with impaired ligand recognition and their distribution in pig populations. Mol. Immunol. 2015, 63, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jozaki, K.; Shinkai, H.; Tanaka-Matsuda, M.; Morozumi, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Toki, D.; Okumura, N.; Eguchi-Ogawa, T.; Kojima-Shibata, C.; Kadowaki, H.; et al. Influence of polymorphisms in porcine NOD2 on ligand recognition. Mol. Immunol. 2009, 47, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Harding, J.S.; Clark, E.G. Recognition and diagnosing postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). Swine Health Prod. 1997, 5, 201–203. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, J.; Clark, E.; Haines, D.; West, K.; Krakowka, S.; Kennedy, S.; Allan, G.M. Porcine circovirus-2 and concurrent infections in the field. Vet. Microbiol. 2004, 98, 159–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Morozov, I.; Sirinarumitr, T.; Sorden, S.D.; Halbur, P.G.; Morgan, M.K.; Yoon, K.J.; Paul, P.S. Detection of a novel strain of porcine circovirus in pigs with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 2535–2541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kawashima, K.; Katsuda, K.; Tsunemitsu, H. Epidemiological investigation of the prevalence and features of postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in Japan. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 2007, 19, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Meng, X.J. Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2): Pathogenesis and interaction with the immune system. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2013, 1, 43–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Madson, D.M.; Opriessnig, T. Effect of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) infection on reproduction: Disease, vertical transmission, diagnostics and vaccination. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2011, 12, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Koike, F.; Murata, S.; Oi, M.; Murakami, M. Genotypes of porcine circovirus 2 detected from healthy pigs in Japan, 2015. J. Jpn. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2017, 70, 650–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saitou, N.; Nei, M. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4, 406–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nickerson, D.A.; Tobe, V.O.; Taylor, S.L. PolyPhred: Automating the detection and genotyping of single nucleotide substitutions using fluorescence-based resequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 2745–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Gordon, D.; Abajian, C.; Green, P. Consed: A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ewing, B.; Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ewing, B.; Hillier, L.; Wendl, M.C.; Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 1998, 8, 175–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Grau-Roma, L.; Crisci, E.; Sibila, M.; Lopez-Soria, S.; Nofrarias, M.; Cortey, M.; Fraile, L.; Olvera, A.; Segales, J. A proposal on porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) genotype definition and their relation with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) occurrence. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 128, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Opriessnig, T.; Ramamoorthy, S.; Madson, D.M.; Patterson, A.R.; Pal, N.; Carman, S.; Meng, X.J.; Halbur, P.G. Differences in virulence among porcine circovirus type 2 isolates are unrelated to cluster type 2a or 2b and prior infection provides heterologous protection. J. Gen. Virol. 2008, 89, 2482–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Groenen, M.A.; Archibald, A.L.; Uenishi, H.; Tuggle, C.K.; Takeuchi, Y.; Rothschild, M.F.; Rogel-Gaillard, C.; Park, C.; Milan, D.; Megens, H.J.; et al. Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution. Nature 2012, 491, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Grau-Roma, L.; Fraile, L.; Segales, J. Recent advances in the epidemiology, diagnosis and control of diseases caused by porcine circovirus type 2. Vet. J. 2011, 187, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rodriguez-Arrioja, G.M.; Segales, J.; Calsamiglia, M.; Resendes, A.R.; Balasch, M.; Plana-Duran, J.; Casal, J.; Domingo, M. Dynamics of porcine circovirus type 2 infection in a herd of pigs with postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2002, 63, 354–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bao, F.; Mi, S.; Luo, Q.; Guo, H.; Tu, C.; Zhu, G.; Gong, W. Retrospective study of porcine circovirus type 2 infection reveals a novel genotype PCV2f. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Davies, B.; Wang, X.; Dvorak, C.M.; Marthaler, D.; Murtaugh, M.P. Diagnostic phylogenetics reveals a new Porcine circovirus 2 cluster. Virus Res. 2016, 217, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Dorr, P.M.; Baker, R.B.; Almond, G.W.; Wayne, S.R.; Gebreyes, W.A. Epidemiologic assessment of porcine circovirus type 2 coinfection with other pathogens in swine. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2007, 230, 244–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ouyang, T.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Ren, L. Co-infection of swine with porcine circovirus type 2 and other swine viruses. Viruses 2019, 11, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Järveots, T.; Saar, T.; Põdersoo, D.; Rüütel-Boudinot, S.; Sütt, S.; Tummeleht, L.; Suuroja, T.; Lindjärv, R. Lawsonia intracellularis and Porcine Circovirus type-2 infection in Estonia. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2016, 19, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Divangahi, M.; Mostowy, S.; Coulombe, F.; Kozak, R.; Guillot, L.; Veyrier, F.; Kobayashi, K.S.; Flavell, R.A.; Gros, P.; Behr, M.A. NOD2-deficient mice have impaired resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection through defective innate and adaptive immunity. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 7157–7165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hruz, P.; Zinkernagel, A.S.; Jenikova, G.; Botwin, G.J.; Hugot, J.P.; Karin, M.; Nizet, V.; Eckmann, L. NOD2 contributes to cutaneous defense against Staphylococcus aureus through α-toxin-dependent innate immune activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 12873–12878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kobayashi, K.S.; Chamaillard, M.; Ogura, Y.; Henegariu, O.; Inohara, N.; Nuñez, G.; Flavell, R.A. Nod2-dependent regulation of innate and adaptive immunity in the intestinal tract. Science 2005, 307, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Opriessnig, T.; Madson, D.M.; Roof, M.; Layton, S.M.; Ramamoorthy, S.; Meng, X.J.; Halbur, P.G. Experimental reproduction of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2)-associated enteritis in pigs infected with PCV2 alone or concurrently with Lawsonia intracellularis or Salmonella typhimurium. J. Comp. Pathol. 2011, 145, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Inohara, N.; Ogura, Y.; Fontalba, A.; Gutierrez, O.; Pons, F.; Crespo, J.; Fukase, K.; Inamura, S.; Kusumoto, S.; Hashimoto, M.; et al. Host recognition of bacterial muramyl dipeptide mediated through NOD2. Implications for Crohn’s disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 5509–5512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Cooney, R.; Baker, J.; Brain, O.; Danis, B.; Pichulik, T.; Allan, P.; Ferguson, D.J.; Campbell, B.J.; Jewell, D.; Simmons, A. NOD2 stimulation induces autophagy in dendritic cells influencing bacterial handling and antigen presentation. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Homer, C.R.; Richmond, A.L.; Rebert, N.A.; Achkar, J.P.; McDonald, C. ATG16L1 and NOD2 interact in an autophagy-dependent antibacterial pathway implicated in Crohn’s disease pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 2010, 139, 1630–1641.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Watanabe, T.; Kitani, A.; Murray, P.J.; Wakatsuki, Y.; Fuss, I.J.; Strober, W. Nucleotide binding oligomerization domain 2 deficiency leads to dysregulated TLR2 signaling and induction of antigen-specific colitis. Immunity 2006, 25, 473–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Noguchi, E.; Homma, Y.; Kang, X.; Netea, M.G.; Ma, X. A Crohn’s disease-associated NOD2 mutation suppresses transcription of human IL10 by inhibiting activity of the nuclear ribonucleoprotein hnRNP-A1. Nat. Immunol. 2009, 10, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Wagener, J.; Malireddi, R.K.; Lenardon, M.D.; Köberle, M.; Vautier, S.; MacCallum, D.M.; Biedermann, T.; Schaller, M.; Netea, M.G.; Kanneganti, T.D.; et al. Fungal chitin dampens inflammation through IL-10 induction mediated by NOD2 and TLR9 activation. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Caruso, R.; Warner, N.; Inohara, N.; Nuñez, G. NOD1 and NOD2: Signaling, host defense, and inflammatory disease. Immunity 2014, 41, 898–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hugot, J.P.; Chamaillard, M.; Zouali, H.; Lesage, S.; Cézard, J.P.; Belaiche, J.; Almer, S.; Tysk, C.; O’Morain, C.A.; Gassull, M.; et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature 2001, 411, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ogura, Y.; Bonen, D.K.; Inohara, N.; Nicolae, D.L.; Chen, F.F.; Ramos, R.; Britton, H.; Moran, T.; Karaliuskas, R.; Duerr, R.H.; et al. A frameshift mutation in NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature 2001, 411, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Waites, K.B.; Talkington, D.F. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 697–728, table of contents. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Shinkai, H.; Terada, K.; Toki, D.; Tohno, M.; Uenishi, H. Q969R polymorphism in NLRP3 is associated with immune responses to vaccination against bacterial infections in pigs. Anim. Sci. J. 2018, 89, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tohno, M.; Shinkai, H.; Toki, D.; Okumura, N.; Tajima, K.; Uenishi, H. Identification of the Q969R gain-of-function polymorphism in the gene encoding porcine NLRP3 and its distribution in pigs of Asian and European origin. Immunogenetics 2016, 68, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 12 01424 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative symptoms of PCVAD observed in the pig population. Photographs (a) and (b) show littermates. Pigs indicated by red rectangles demonstrated typical growth retardation in comparison with other littermates.
Figure 1. Representative symptoms of PCVAD observed in the pig population. Photographs (a) and (b) show littermates. Pigs indicated by red rectangles demonstrated typical growth retardation in comparison with other littermates.
Genes 12 01424 g001
Genes 12 01424 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of complete coding sequences of PCV2 capsid gene detected in the pig population (sample A–G) and representative sequences derived from different genotypes of PCV2 [35,36]. Birth dates of the samples and accession numbers in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank nucleotide databases of the capsid gene sequences are as follows: A, 3 April 2007/LC637748.1; B, 29 October 2008/LC637749.1; C, D, E and F, 18 February 2009/LC637750.1, LC637751.1, LC637752.1, LC637753.1; G, 13 April 2012/LC637754.1. Bootstrap values for 10,000 replicates are shown as percentages beside the branches. The scale of the branch length is shown at the top of the figure.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of complete coding sequences of PCV2 capsid gene detected in the pig population (sample A–G) and representative sequences derived from different genotypes of PCV2 [35,36]. Birth dates of the samples and accession numbers in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank nucleotide databases of the capsid gene sequences are as follows: A, 3 April 2007/LC637748.1; B, 29 October 2008/LC637749.1; C, D, E and F, 18 February 2009/LC637750.1, LC637751.1, LC637752.1, LC637753.1; G, 13 April 2012/LC637754.1. Bootstrap values for 10,000 replicates are shown as percentages beside the branches. The scale of the branch length is shown at the top of the figure.
Genes 12 01424 g002
Genes 12 01424 g003 550
Figure 3. Survival curves of pigs before the invasion of PCV2b in 2008 (a), after invasion in 2010 (b), and after vaccination against PCV2 in 2012 (c). Survival rates of pig populations with AA, AC, and CC are indicated by dashed, dotted, and solid lines, respectively. The legend indicates the numbers of animals investigated with the respective genotypes.
Figure 3. Survival curves of pigs before the invasion of PCV2b in 2008 (a), after invasion in 2010 (b), and after vaccination against PCV2 in 2012 (c). Survival rates of pig populations with AA, AC, and CC are indicated by dashed, dotted, and solid lines, respectively. The legend indicates the numbers of animals investigated with the respective genotypes.
Genes 12 01424 g003
Table
Table 1. Mortality of rearing pigs in the Duroc population.
Table 1. Mortality of rearing pigs in the Duroc population.
Birth
Year		MaleFemaleTotal
TotalDeadDead/
Total (%)		TotalDeadDead/
Total (%)		TotalDeadDead/Total (%)
2008128107.813075.4258176.6
20091363022.11292317.82655320.0
20101163933.61013433.72177333.6
2011861011.67879.01641710.4
201296
(71)		12
(5)		12.5
(7.0)		100
(80)		6
(5)		6.0
(6.3)		196
(151)		18
(10)		9.2
(6.6)
2013142
(142)		8
(8)		5.6
(5.6)		153
(153)		9
(9)		5.9
(5.9)		295
(295)		17
(17)		5.8
(5.8)
Numbers of animals inoculated with the PCV2 vaccine are indicated in parentheses. Numbers limited to those with genotyping data for NOD2-2197 are indicated in Table S1.
Table
Table 2. Allele frequency of NOD2-2197 in the Duroc population.
Table 2. Allele frequency of NOD2-2197 in the Duroc population.
Birth YearAAACCCFrequency of a Allele (%)
200820752946.4
200923654442.9
201010583139.4
20112236 *2349.4
2012830 **62 ††23.0 ‡‡
Randomly chosen female pigs born between 2008 and 2012 were genotyped. The numbers of animals with the respective genotypes are shown. The frequency of NOD2-2197A in all chromosomes of each group is also indicated. Significant decreases (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01) and increases (††, p < 0.01) of the alleles compared to those in 2008 are highlighted. A significant change in the frequency of the NOD2-2197A allele compared with that in 2008 is shown by a double dagger (‡‡, p < 0.01).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suzuki, K.; Shinkai, H.; Yoshioka, G.; Matsumoto, T.; Tanaka, J.; Hayashi, N.; Kitazawa, H.; Uenishi, H. NOD2 Genotypes Affect the Symptoms and Mortality in the Porcine Circovirus 2-Spreading Pig Population. Genes 2021, 12, 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12091424

AMA Style

Suzuki K, Shinkai H, Yoshioka G, Matsumoto T, Tanaka J, Hayashi N, Kitazawa H, Uenishi H. NOD2 Genotypes Affect the Symptoms and Mortality in the Porcine Circovirus 2-Spreading Pig Population. Genes. 2021; 12(9):1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12091424

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suzuki, Kasumi, Hiroki Shinkai, Gou Yoshioka, Toshimi Matsumoto, Junji Tanaka, Noboru Hayashi, Haruki Kitazawa, and Hirohide Uenishi. 2021. "NOD2 Genotypes Affect the Symptoms and Mortality in the Porcine Circovirus 2-Spreading Pig Population" Genes 12, no. 9: 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12091424

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop