Mass-number dependence of statistical model parameters and its impact on incomplete fusion fraction calculations

Alpna Ojha, Sunita Gupta, Unnati Gupta, Pushpendra P. Singh, Abhishek Yadav, Devendra P. Singh, Mohd Shuaib, B. P. Singh, and R. Prasad
Phys. Rev. C 104, 034615 – Published 14 September 2021

Abstract

Incomplete fusion processes and estimation of strength of incomplete fusion in heavy ion induced nuclear reactions have been explored for several combinations of projectile-target nuclei. Dynamics of these reactions is explained using an optical model. Parameters of the optical model affect the shape and depth of nuclear potential and hence influence the theoretical predictions. For heavy ion induced reactions, the optical model potential parameters are not unique and different sets of these parameters may be used for different ranges of mass number A and incident energy E. To explore the effect of optical model potential parameters, a comparative study of available experimental data for excitation functions of four systems, O16+Ta181, C12+Ho165, N14+Dy163, and O16+Ge74, with corresponding theoretically predicted excitation functions, made by PACE4 using different sets of optical model potential parameters, has been done. It has been observed that a single set of optical model potential parameters is not adequate for all the systems. The variations in these parameters change the theoretical cross-section predictions for various channels considerably, which in turn, change the correspondingly estimated fraction of incomplete fusion (FICF). The effect of deformation of target nuclei on fractional incomplete fusion has also been investigated for the above mentioned systems. FICF has been plotted as a function of deformation parameter (β2) of the target nuclei and it is found to increase as the deformation parameter of the corresponding target nuclei increases on either side of the intrinsic spherical symmetry.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 6 April 2021
  • Revised 20 July 2021
  • Accepted 4 August 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.034615

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Alpna Ojha1,*, Sunita Gupta1, Unnati Gupta2, Pushpendra P. Singh3, Abhishek Yadav4, Devendra P. Singh5, Mohd Shuaib6, B. P. Singh6, and R. Prasad6

  • 1Department of Physics, Agra College, Agra 282002, India
  • 2Amity Institute of Nuclear Science & Technology, Amity University Campus, Noida 201313, India
  • 3Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Ropar, Punjab 140001, India
  • 4Department of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India
  • 5Department of Physics, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248007, India
  • 6Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Physics Department, A.M.U. Aligarh 202002, India

  • *iwa2008@rediffmail.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 104, Iss. 3 — September 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×