Abstract
As crowdfunding has emerged as a popular source of funding for new ventures, budding entrepreneurs often struggle to deliver a convincing pitch to attract backers. We adopt an n-gram language model to analyze narratives of over 21,000 film projects from Kickstarter and find that the choice of words is critical to crowdfunding success. Using penalized logistic regression, we identify the relative power of phrases to predict funding outcome, resulting in a dramatic reduction in error rate. Consistent with the language expectancy theory, the linguistic analyses show that successful projects usually include words that reflect the credibility of project creators and meaningful social interactions, whereas failed projects exude negativism or uncertainty. While good word choices vary among movie genres, words of lower cognitive complexity dampen the chances of funding. These findings have broad implications for text analysis and natural language generation for persuasive marketing communications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
https://www.statista.com/outlook/335/100/crowdfunding/worldwide#market-revenue
https://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats
References
Allison, T. H., Davis, B. C., Webb, J. W., & Short, J. C. (2017). Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 707–725.
Austin, B. A., & Gordon, T. F. (1987). Movie genres: Toward a conceptualized model and standardized definitions. In B. A. Austin (Ed.), Current research in film: Audiences, economics, and law, 3 (pp. 12–33). Ablex.
Averbeck, J. M., & Miller, C. (2014). Expanding language expectancy theory: The suasory effects of lexical complexity and syntactic complexity on effective message design. Communication Studies, 65(1), 72–95.
Basuroy, S., Chatterjee, S., & Ravid, S. A. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The Box Office Effects of Film Critics, Star Power, and Budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 103–117.
Berscheid, E., & Hatfield, E. H. (1978). Interpersonal Attraction, 2nd. Addison-Wesley.
Berger, J., Humphreys, A., Ludwig, S., Moe, W. W., Netzer, O., & Schweidel, D. A. (2020). Uniting the tribes: Using text for marketing insight. Journal of Marketing, 84(1), 1–25.
Bond, G. D., & Lee, A. Y. (2005). Language of lies in prison: Linguistic classification of prisoners’ truthful and deceptive natural language. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 313–329.
Burgoon, M., Denning, V. P., & Roberts, L. (2002). Language expectancy theory, In J. P. Dillard, & M. Pfau (Eds.), The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, Sage Publications, 117–36.
Burgoon, M., Jones, S. B., & Stewart, D. (1975). Toward a message-centered theory or persuasion: Three empirical investigations of language intensity. Human Communication Research, 1, 240–256.
Burtch, G., Ghose, A., & Wattal, S. (2013). An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 499–519.
Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and Practice. Allyn and Bacon.
Desai, K. K., & Basuroy, S. (2005). Interactive influence of genre familiarity, star power, and critics’ reviews in the cultural goods industry: The case of motion pictures. Psychology & Marketing, 22(3), 203–223.
Duerr, S. & Gloor, P. A. (2021). Persuasive natural language generation-A literature review, MIT Center for Collective Intelligence.
Edwards, S. M., Lee, J., & La Ferle, C. (2009). Does place matter when shopping online? Perceptions of similarity and familiarity as indicators of psychological distance. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(1), 35–50.
Eliashberg, J., Hui, K., & Zhang, J. (2007). From storyline to box office: A new approach for green-lighting movie scripts. Management Science, 53(6), 881–893.
Groom, C. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2005). The language of love: Sex, sexual orientation, and language use in online personal advertisements. Sex Roles, 52(7–8), 447–461.
Gunsch, M. A., Brownlow, S., Haynes, S. E., & Mabe, Z. (2000). Differential linguistic content of various forms of political advertising. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 27–42.
Huang, S., Pickernell, D., Battisti, M., & Nguyen, T. (2021). Signaling entrepreneurs’ credibility and project quality for crowdfunding success: Cases from the Kickstarter and Indiegogo environments. In Press.
Liang, T., Wu, P., & Huang, C. (2019). Why funders invest in crowdfunding projects: Role of trust from the dual-process perspective. Information & Management, 56(1), 70–84.
Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17–35.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 415-44
Netzer, O., Lemaire, A., & Herzenstein, M. (2019). When words sweat: Identifying signals for loan default in the text of loan applications. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(6), 960–980.
Parhankangas, A., & Renko, M. (2017). Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 32, 215–236.
Pasupathi, M. (2007). Telling and the remembered self: Linguistic differences in memories for previously disclosed and previously undisclosed events. Memory, 15(3), 258–270.
Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., Boyd, R. L., & Francis, M. E. (2015), Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2015, Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.
Sochay, S. (1994). Predicting the performance of motion pictures. Journal of Media Economics, 7, 1–20.
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.
Tibshirani, R. (1997). The lasso method for variable selection in the cox model. Statistics in Medicine, 16(4), 385–395.
Wang, N., Li, Q., Liang, H., Ye, T., & Ge, S. (2018). Understanding the importance of interaction between creators and backers in crowdfunding success. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 27, 106–117.
Xiang, D., Zhang, L., Tao, Q., Wang, Y., & Ma, S. (2019). Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: An empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(6), 1046–1063.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, L., Cui, G., Bao, Z. et al. Speaking the same language: the power of words in crowdfunding success and failure. Mark Lett 33, 311–323 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-021-09595-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-021-09595-3