Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of dynamic response of geosynthetic-reinforced soil-integrated bridge system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geosynthetic-reinforced soil-integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS) has obtained wide popularity recently. Despite of the abundant research on the behavior of GRS-IBS under static loading, its dynamic performance has not been investigated well, especially for the whole GRS-IBS structure. In this paper, a numerical model in finite element DBLEAVES program was built to simulate the seismic response of GRS-IBS, which was based on the experimental study performed on the whole GRS-IBS with bridge beam resting on the two opposite directional abutments. The applicability and accuracy of the GRS-IBS model was verified by the measured accelerations, lateral facing displacements, and reinforcement tensile forces. Then a variable-amplitude harmonic ground motion record was adopted for relevant parameter analysis. Both experimental and numerical results showed that smaller reinforcement spacing led to smaller lateral facing displacements and tensile forces. Besides, it was found that an increase in earthquake wave frequency and bridge span would induce the increase of acceleration response, lateral facing displacement, and tensile force in reinforcement. The necessity of the whole GRS-IBS model was suggested in the related experimental studies by the significant differences of lateral facing displacement and tensile force of reinforcement among different bridge spans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams M, Nicks J, Stabile T, Wu J, Schlatter W, Hartmann J (2012) Geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system interim implementation guide. Report No. FHWA-HRT-11-026, the US Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA, USA

  • Akhlaghi T, Nikkar A (2014) Numerical analyses of dynamic response of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall. Geosyst Eng 17(2):142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardah A, Abu-farsakh M, Voyiadjis G (2017) Numerical evaluation of the performance of a geosynthetic reinforced soil-integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS) under different loading conditions. Geotext Geomembr 45:558–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaderi R, Helwany S, Wu JTH, Meinholz P, Alizadeh V (2017) Seismic behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments with concrete block facing- an analytical study. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 4:52–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue MJ, Edil TB, Benson CH (2001) Interaction of foundry sands with geosynthetics. J Geotech Geoenviron 127(4):353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guler E, Enunlu AK (2009) Investigation of dynamic behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining structures under earthquake loads. Bull Earthq Eng 7(3):737–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helwany S, Wu JTH, Meinholz P, Alizadeh V, Ghaderi R (2017) Seismic behavior of GRS bridge abutments with concrete block facing: an experimental study. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 4:85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S (1989) Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid models in 1g gravitational fields. Soils Found 29(1):105–118

  • Lee KZZ, Chang NY, Ko HY (2010) Numerical simulation of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls under seismic shaking. Geotext Geomembr 28(4):317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling HI, Mohri Y, Leshchinsky D, Burke C, Matsushima K, Liu H (2005) Large-scale shaking table tests on modular-block reinforced soil retaining walls. J Geotech Geoenviron 131(4):465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Yang G, Ling HI (2014) Seismic response of multi-tiered reinforced soil retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 61-62:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panah AK, Yazdi M, Ghalandarzadeh A (2015) Shaking table tests on soil retaining walls reinforced by polymeric strips. Geotext Geomembr 43(2):148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren F, Zhang F, Xu C, Wang G (2016) Seismic evaluation of reinforced-soil segmental retaining walls. Geotext Geomembr 44(4):604–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghebfar M, Abu-Farsakh MY, Ardah A, Chen Q, Fernandez BA (2017a) Full-scale testing of geosynthetic-reinforced, soil-integrated bridge system. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2656(1):40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saghebfar M, Abu-farsakh M, Ardah A, Chen QA, Fernandez B (2017b) Performance monitoring of geosynthetic reinforced soil-integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS) in Louisiana. Geotext Geomembr 45(2):34–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen P, Han J, Zornberg JG, Morsy AM, Leshchinsky D, Tanyu BF, Xu C (2019) Two and three-dimensional numerical analyses of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (grs) piers. Geotext Geomembr 47(3):352–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talebi M (2016) Analysis of the field behavior of a geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system during construction and operation. Dissertation, The University of Delaware

  • Wu JTH, Ketchart K, Adams MT (2013) Two full-scale loading experiments of geosynthetic reinforced soil abutment wall. Int J Geotech Eng 2(4):305–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu C, Luo M, Shen P, Han J, Ren F (2020) Seismic performance of a whole geosynthetic reinforced soil-integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS) in shaking table test. Geotext Geomembr 48(3):315–330

  • Yazdandoust M (2017) Investigation on the seismic performance of steel-strip reinforced-soil retaining walls using shaking table test. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 97:216–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye GL (2011) DBLEAVES: user’s manual. Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye G, Ye B (2016) Investigation of overconsolidation and structural behaviour of shanghai clays by element testing and constitutive modelling. Underground Space 1(1):62–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Ye B, Noda T, Nakano M, Nakai K (2007) Explanation of cyclic mobility of soils: approach by stress-induced anisotropy. Soils Found 47(4):635–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang F, Ye B, Ye G (2011) Unified description of sand behavior. Front Archit Civil Eng China 5(2):121–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Y (2017) Numerical simulations and shaking table tests of geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutments. Dissertation, The University of California

  • Zheng Y, Fox PJ (2016) Numerical investigation of geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments under static loading. J Geotech Geoenviron 142(5):273–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 2016YFE0105800) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41772284).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors agree with this declaration and declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, C., Li, G., Yang, Y. et al. Numerical simulation of dynamic response of geosynthetic-reinforced soil-integrated bridge system. Arab J Geosci 14, 2010 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08362-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08362-y

Keywords

Navigation