Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the nexus between critical success factors, despotic leadership, and success of renewable energy projects

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 27 September 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

The aim of this study to examine how critical success factors (CSFs) affect the project success (PS), directly and indirectly, using the despotic leadership (DL) as a mediating variable. Critical success factors with multiple dimensions, such as organizational factors, team factors, technical factors, and communication factors, were used in this study. In this study, we used a questionnaire survey approach. The data were collected from the project directors, project managers, functional managers, and team leaders working in the renewable energy project of Pakistan. For data analysis, we used the partial least squares structural equation modeling through SmartPLS 3.2. The outcomes indicate that team factors and communication factors have a positive and significant relationship with PS in the direct relationship. At the same time, organization factors and technical factors were insignificant in the direct relationship with PS. Moreover, to examine the mediating effects of despotic leadership, we have examined the indirect effects of critical success factors on PS. The findings of this study indicate that DL is not mediated between organizational factors and PS in the indirect relationship. However, DL negatively mediates between three factors (team, technical, and communication) of critical success factors on project success. This paper concludes that despotic leaders go beyond controlling and self-serving behaviour and are engaged in exploitative and unethical acts that can drain project resources, which reduce the success and sustainability of renewable energy projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Change history

References

  • Abbas J, Sağsan M (2019) Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: a structural analysis. J Clean Prod 229:611–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharjee R, Lockhart P, & Bi R. (2018). Examining the role of communication in transforming project management world. Paper presented at the 32nd Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference 2018: ANZAM 2018.

  • Afshar Jahanshahi A, Al-Gamrh B, Gharleghi B (2020) Sustainable development in Iran post-sanction: embracing green innovation by small and medium-sized enterprises. Sustain Dev 28(4):781–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baccarini D, & Collins A (2003). Critical success factors for projects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th ANZAM Conference.

  • BenYishay A, Mobarak AM (2019) Social learning and incentives for experimentation and communication. Rev Econ Stud 86(3):976–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone P, Ricart JE, Duch AI, Bernardo V, Salvador J, Piedra Peña J, Rodríguez Planas M (2019) EASIER: An evaluation model for public–private partnerships contributing to the sustainable development goals. Sustainability 11(8):2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen P, Partington D (2004) An interpretive comparison of Chinese and Western conceptions of relationships in construction project management work. Int J Proj Manag 22(5):397–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng M-Y, Wang L (2015) The mediating effect of ethical climate on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and team identification: a team-level analysis in the Chinese context. J Bus Ethics 129(3):639–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua DKH, Kog Y-C, Loh PK (1999) Critical success factors for different project objectives. J Constr Eng Manag 125(3):142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq D, Fatima T, Jahanzeb S (2019) Ingratiating with despotic leaders to gain status: the role of power distance orientation and self-enhancement motive. J Bus Ethics 171:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq D, Azeem MU, Haq IU, Bouckenooghe D (2020) The stress-reducing effect of coworker support on turnover intentions: moderation by political ineptness and despotic leadership. J Bus Res 111:12–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hoogh AH, Den Hartog DN (2008) Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: a multi-method study. Leadersh Q 19(3):297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E (2016) Analyzing the linkage between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth by considering structural break in time-series data. Renew Energy 99:1126–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloi H (2009) Relational partnerships: the importance of communication, trust and confidence and joint risk management in achieving project success. Constr Manag Econ 27(11):1099–1109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekrot B, Rank J, Kock A, Gemünden HG (2018) Retaining and satisfying project managers–antecedents and outcomes of project managers’ perceived organizational support. Int J Hum Resour Manag 29(12):1950–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farh LJ, Cheng B, Chou L (2000) A triad model of paternalistic leadership: constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychol Res Chin Soc 14:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Feger ALR, Thomas GA (2012) A framework for exploring the relationship between project manager leadership style and project success. Int J Manag 1(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham R (2002) Narratives of success and failure in systems development. Br J Manag 13(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelbard R, Carmeli A (2009) The interactive effect of team dynamics and organizational support on ICT project success. Int J Proj Manag 27(5):464–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev 31:2–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeringa SG, West BT, & Berglund PA (2017). Applied survey data analysis: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

  • Hennessy JL, & Patterson DA (2011). Computer architecture: a quantitative approach: Elsevier.

  • Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Mark Sci 43(1):115–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann D, Felfe J (2013) Moderators of the relationship between leadership style and employee creativity: the role of task novelty and personal initiative. Creat Res J 25(2):172–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland C, Light B (1999) A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE Softw 16(3):30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Xu E, Chiu W, Lam C, Farh J-L (2015) When authoritarian leaders outperform transformational leaders: firm performance in a harsh economic environment. Acad Manag Discov 1(2):180–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang BG, Tan JS (2012) Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 20(5):335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ika LA, Diallo A, Thuillier D (2012) critical success factors for world bank projects: An empirical investigation. Int J Proj Manag 30(1):105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyar AA (2020). The relation between despotic leadership and psychological well-being in project based organization. Capital University.

  • Khan N, Mirza IA, & Khalil M (2014). Renewable energy in Pakistan: status and trends. Altern Energy Dev Board (AEDB)

  • Kiazad K, Restubog SLD, Zagenczyk TJ, Kiewitz C, Tang RL (2010) In pursuit of power: the role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. J Res Pers 44(4):512–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koser M, Rasool SF, Samma M (2018) High performance work system is the accelerator of the best fit and integrated HR-practices to achieve the goal of productivity: a case of textile sector in Pakistan. Global Manag J Acad Corp Stud 8(1):10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Li EY (1997) Perceived importance of information system success factors: a meta analysis of group differences. Inf Manag 32(1):15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Song H, Sang P, Chen P-H, Liu X (2019) Review of critical success factors (CSFs) for green building projects. Build Environ 158:182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik S, & Maqbool M (2017). Energy potential of Pakistan. NFC IEFR J Eng Sci Res 1.

  • Maqbool R (2018) Efficiency and effectiveness of factors affecting renewable energy projects; an empirical perspective. Energy 158:944–956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqbool R, Sudong Y (2018) Critical success factors for renewable energy projects; empirical evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 195:991–1002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqbool R, Sudong Y, Manzoor N, Rashid Y (2017) The impact of emotional intelligence, project managers’ competencies, and transformational leadership on project success: an empirical perspective. Proj Manag J 48(3):58–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maqbool R, Deng X, Ashfaq S (2020) Success of renewable energy projects under the financial and non-financial performance measures. Sustain Dev 28(5):1366–1375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nauman S, Fatima T, Haq IU (2018) Does despotic leadership harm employee family life: exploring the effects of emotional exhaustion and anxiety. Front Psychol 9:601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PMI, A. (2013). guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide). Paper presented at the Project Management Institute.

  • Prabhakar GP (2008) What is project success: a literature review. Int J Bus Manag 3(9):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasool SF, Maqbool R, Samma M, Zhao Y, Anjum A (2019) Positioning depression as a critical factor in creating a toxic workplace environment for diminishing worker productivity. Sustainability 11(9):2589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasool SF, Wang M, Zhang Y, Samma M (2020) Sustainable work performance: the roles of workplace violence and occupational stress. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(3):912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasool SF, Wang M, Tang M, Saeed A, Iqbal J (2021) How Toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: the mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(5):2294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roby DD, Lyons DE, Craig DP, Collis K, Visser GH (2003) Quantifying the effect of predators on endangered species using a bioenergetics approach: Caspian terns and juvenile salmonids in the Columbia River estuary. Can J Zool 81(2):250–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeh A, Zwikael O, & Dvir D (2019). Organizational support as an efficient mechanism for enhancing high risk projects success. Paper presented at the 2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET).

  • Sarwar A, Khan MM, Mujtaba BG (2017) Despotic leadership, workplace ostracism and knowledge hoarding: a serial mediation model. SAM Adv Manag J (07497075) 82(4):4–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrnhur AJ, Levy O, Dvir D (1997) Mapping the dimensions of project success. Proj Manag J 28(2):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan PA, Cowell R, Ellis G, Sherry-Brennan F, Toke D (2015) Promoting community renewable energy in a corporate energy world. Sustain Dev 23(2):96–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhakar GP (2012). A model of critical success factors for software projects. J Enterp Inform Manag

  • Top M, Akdere M, Tarcan M (2015) Examining transformational leadership, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and organizational trust in Turkish hospitals: public servants versus private sector employees. Int J Hum Resour Manag 26(9):1259–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang EW (1998) Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantage for doing business in China? Acad Manag Perspect 12(2):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uz Zaman Q, Wang Z, Zaman S, Rasool SF (2021) Investigating the nexus between education expenditure, female employers, renewable energy consumption and CO2 emission: Evidence from China. J Clean Prod 312:127824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters GD (2019) Social control versus social learning: Self-efficacy for future academic success and peer delinquency as mediators of the parental support–delinquency relationship. Crim Justice Rev 44(2):101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Zaman S, Rasool SF, Uz Zaman Q, Amin A (2020) Exploring the relationships between a toxic workplace environment, workplace stress, and project success with the moderating effect of organizational support: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Risk Manage Healthcare Policy 13:1055–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerveld E (2003) The Project Excellence Model®: linking success criteria and critical success factors. Int J Proj Manag 21(6):411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams T (2016) Identifying success factors in construction projects: a case study. Proj Manag J 47(1):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wüste A, Schmuck P (2012) Bioenergy villages and regions in Germany: an interview study with initiators of communal bioenergy projects on the success factors for restructuring the energy supply of the community. Sustainability 4(2):244–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu P, Chan EH-W, Qian QK (2011) Success factors of energy performance contracting (EPC) for sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit (BEER) of hotel buildings in China. Energy Policy 39(11):7389–7398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaigham NA, Nayyar ZA (2010) Renewable hot dry rock geothermal energy source and its potential in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(3):1124–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Z-Y, Zuo J, Zillante G, Wang X-W (2010) Critical success factors for BOT electric power projects in China: thermal power versus wind power. Renew Energy 35(6):1283–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper is financially supported by the International Mobilities for Research Activities at the University of Hradec Králové, Czech Republic (Grant No. CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.O/18_O53/0017841). It is also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71673179).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Linzhi Science and Technology, Group Co., Ltd, Foshan, Guangdong Province, 528251, People’s Republic of China

    Bowei Wang, Samma Faiz Rasool, Yan Zhao, Madeeha Samma & Javed Iqbal

  2. Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, 50003, Czech Republic

    Samma Faiz Rasool

  3. School of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Institute, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, People’s Republic of China

    Samma Faiz Rasool

Authors
  1. Bowei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samma Faiz Rasool
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Madeeha Samma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Javed Iqbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Samma Faiz Rasool conceptualized the research idea and drafted the paper. Bowei Wang and Yan Zhao supervise this research project. Madeeha Samma work on the literature review and research methodology. Javed Iqbal helps in data collection and data analysis.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Samma Faiz Rasool, Yan Zhao or Madeeha Samma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participants

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Rasool, S.F., Zhao, Y. et al. Investigating the nexus between critical success factors, despotic leadership, and success of renewable energy projects. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 10388–10398 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16441-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16441-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation