Skip to main content
Download PDF

Fibroblast growth factor 21 in dairy cows: current knowledge and potential relevance

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology volume 12, Article number: 97 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) has been identified as an important regulator of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, which plays an important role for metabolic regulation, particularly under conditions of energy deprivation or stress conditions. Dairy cows are subjected to a negative energy balance and various kinds of stress particularly during the periparturient phase and during early lactation. It has been shown that the plasma concentration of FGF21 in dairy cows is dramatically increased at parturition and remains high during the first weeks of lactation. This finding suggests that FGF21 might exert similar functions in dairy cows than in other species, such as mice or humans. However, the role of FGF21 in dairy cows has been less investigated so far. Following a brief summary of the previous findings about the function of FGF21 in humans and mice, the present review aims to present the current state of knowledge about the role of FGF21 in dairy cows. The first part of the review deals with the tissue localization of FGF21 and with conditions leading to an upregulation of FGF21 expression in the liver of dairy cows. In the second part, the influence of nutrition on FGF21 expression and the role of FGF21 for metabolic diseases in dairy cows is addressed. In the third part, findings of exogenous FGF21 application on metabolism in dairy cows are reported. Finally, the potential relevance of FGF21 in dairy cows is discussed. It is concluded that FGF21 might be of great importance for metabolic adaptation to negative energy balance and stress conditions in dairy cows. However, further studies are needed for a better understanding of the functions of FGF21 in dairy cows.

Introduction

Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) has been recognized as a novel metabolic regulator playing fundamental roles in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism [1]. FGF21 has been identified in humans and several animal species including rodents and non-human primates. However, most of the studies performed to explore the functions of FGF21 have been performed in rodents. Studies in rodents have shown that the expression of FGF21 is particularly increased in response to energy deprivation, during which FGF21 stimulates metabolic pathways dealing with energy mobilization, such as lipolysis, gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis [2, 3]. In addition, FGF21 is induced by various stress conditions such as environmental stress (cold), nutritional stress (fasting, malnutrition, high fat diet, obesity, amino acid deprivation) or exercise in order to cope with the energy consuming stress response by increasing availability of energy substrates [4]. In this context, FGF21 is understood as a hormone which, depending on the metabolic state, instructs the organism to reestablish homeostasis through actions on multiple tissues [5]. While the functions of FGF21 in humans and animal models, particularly mice, are increasingly understood, the knowledge about the role of FGF21 in livestock species is still limited. However, recent studies suggest that FGF21 may play also an important role for the metabolic regulation in transition dairy cows, because high-yielding dairy cows are typically experiencing energy deprivation and are exposed to various stress conditions during the early lactation phase [6,7,8]. Following a brief summary of the previous findings about the function of FGF21 in humans and mice, the present review aims to present the current state of knowledge about the role of FGF21 in dairy cows.

Current knowledge about FGF21 function in humans and mice

FGF21 has first been identified and described in the year 2000 by Nishimura et al. [9]. Owing to high similarity of its amino acid sequence with that of other fibroblast growth factors, FGF21 has been classified as a novel member of the FGF family which consists of 22 members. FGF21 has been later assigned to the FGF15/19 subfamily, whose members are also referred to as endocrine FGFs, because the latter representatives, unlike other FGF members, exert their effects in an endocrine manner [10]. Nevertheless, the biological effects of FGF21 can be also mediated via autocrine and paracrine pathways [11]. The liver has been identified as the main site of FGF21 production in humans and mice [12, 13]. However, in mice, unlike in humans, FGF21 is also expressed in pancreas, testes, gastrointestinal tract, brain, skeletal muscle and brown and white adipose tissue (WAT) at lower levels [13, 14]. The biological effects of FGF21 are mediated by binding to the FGF receptor (FGFR) family of tyrosine kinases, which are comprised of seven subtypes (FGFR1b, FGFR1c, FGFR2b, FGFR2c, FGFR3b, FGFR3c, FGFR4) [15]. FGF21 binds preferentially to FGFR1c und FGFR3c subtypes [16, 17]. However, FGFR1c is the only FGFR subtype which mediates a relevant activation of FGF21 [5, 18,19,20]. This has been demonstrated by the finding that genetic ablation of FGFR1 causes a complete loss of FGF21 signaling in mice [21]. In the mouse, FGFR1c is the predominant subtype of the receptor in WAT, while FGFR2c is the main subtype in the liver [11]. FGFR1c is also expressed in skeletal muscle, pancreas and brain [11]. Binding of FGF21 to the FGFRs requires the presence of its co-activator β-klotho, a transmembrane protein. FGF21 binds to the FGFRs with its N-terminus and to β-klotho with its C-terminus [22, 23]. Upon binding of β-klotho/FGF21 to the FGFR1c, a downstream signaling cascade involving mitogen-activated protein kinase and AKT signaling networks is activated [24].

The first indications about biological functions of FGF21 have been provided from a cell-based screening approach by Kharitonenkov et al. [1] showing that FGF21 stimulates glucose uptake in cultured adipocytes. Over time, several other biological functions of FGF21, which are induced under specific conditions, were reported. These FGF21 functions are described below.

Stimulation of FGF21 secretion: role of FGF21 in stress adaptation

Initial studies in mice demonstrated that energy deprivation results already within few hours in a dramatic elevation of blood FGF21 concentration, which is caused by an increased FGF21 production in the liver and to a lesser extent in other tissues, such as WAT and skeletal muscle [2, 25, 26]. Induction of FGF21 in response to energy deprivation has been proven to be caused by activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), a fatty acid sensing transcription factor also known as fasting regulator, in response to the increase of circulating non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) [2, 25, 26]. In contrast to mice, an elevation of blood FGF21 concentration in humans was observed only after a longer fasting period of at least 7 d, presumably due to the lower metabolic activity compared with mice [27, 28]. Further studies revealed, that FGF21 is not only induced during energy deprivation, but also in response to various stress stimuli. A strong induction of FGF21 especially in the liver, but also in WAT, occurs in response to diverse nutritional challenges, such as protein/amino acid deprivation and feeding of high carbohydrate (glucose/fructose) or high fat (ketotic) diets [4, 29]. FGF21 production was also reported to be induced in response to cold in WAT [30] and during exercise in skeletal muscle [31, 32]. Moreover, specific kinds of cellular stress, such as endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER stress) and mitochondrial stress, were found to cause FGF21 induction in liver and/or skeletal muscle [33,34,35]. Elevated blood FGF21 levels have been also observed in human subjects suffering from obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and fatty liver, likely as a result of increased NEFA concentrations in blood and ER stress induction in the liver [36,37,38]. As a consequence of an increased FGF21 secretion in response to different kinds of stress, different metabolic responses are triggered, such as stimulation of fatty acid oxidation, gluconeogenesis and energy expenditure and inhibition of fatty acid synthesis [4, 39]. These metabolic responses are considered as adaptative mechanisms enabling the body to combat the stress condition by improving availability of energy substrates [4].

Biochemical effects of FGF21: observations from exogenous FGF21 administration and from transgenic mice with FGF21 overexpression

To further characterize the metabolic effects of FGF21, studies, in which either recombinant (human or murine) FGF21 was administered to animal models or transgenic mice with FGF21 overexpression were used, have been conducted. In particular, studies using mouse models revealed that exogenous administration of FGF21 induces a great number of metabolic effects in both, whole body and certain tissues, which are considered as beneficial with regard to prevention or treatment of obesity and T2DM [40,41,42]. Several studies with mouse models of obesity and T2DM consistently showed that FGF21 administration reduces body mass, body fat mass and fat content in the liver [40, 43, 44]. The effects of FGF21 administration on body mass and body fat mass have been mainly attributed to an induction of energy expenditure, driven by an activation of the sympathetic nerve system followed by an increase in uncoupling protein-1 (UCP-1) in WAT and brown adipose tissue (BAT), along with an elevated rate of lipolysis in WAT and an improved utilization of fatty acids by peripheral tissues [11, 43, 45, 46]. The reduction of the fat content in the liver following exogenous FGF21 is caused mainly by an increased β-oxidation of fatty acids and a reduced de novo-fatty acid synthesis [11].

Administration of FGF21 to mice fed a high fat diet was found to markedly improve oral glucose tolerance and both, hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity and normalizes hyperinsulinemia and hypertriglyceridemia [39]. The improvement of insulin sensitivity has been explained by a stimulation of adiponectin secretion from WAT [47]. Adiponectin is an adipokine with antidiabetic and insulin sensitizing actions. Several studies have shown that FGF21 stimulates the secretion of adiponectin from adipocytes [42, 47,48,49]. Increased plasma concentrations of adiponectin have been consistently observed in non-human primates and humans with metabolic diseases (T2DM, obesity, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis) following treatment with various FGF21 analogs [50,51,52,53]. Adiponectin exerts its antidiabetic and insulin-sensitizing effects in part by suppressing endogenous glucose production, stimulating peripheral fatty acid uptake and enhancing catabolism of very low-density lipoproteins [11]. Normalization of hyperglycemia in diabetic mouse models was moreover reported to be caused by improving pancreatic β-cell function (due to reduction of ER stress in pancreas), reducing glycogenolysis in the liver und stimulating glucose uptake into WAT mediated by glucose transporter 1 [39, 54, 55]. In addition, a decreased preference for the intake of sugar and alcohol, but higher intake of protein as a result of FGF21 administration has been suggested to contribute to the improvement of the diabetic condition [56].

Moreover, it was shown that exogenous FGF21 improves the blood lipid profile (reduction of triglycerides and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, increase of high density lipoprotein cholesterol). Administration of FGF21 to apolipoprotein E-deficient mice reduced arteriosclerotic plaque development, likely as a consequence of a reduced hepatic cholesterol synthesis and an inhibition of inflammatory processes in vascular endothelial cells [49, 57]. Anti-inflammatory effects of exogenous FGF21 were demonstrated to be mediated by an inhibition of nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway in different tissues, particularly under pathophysiological conditions, including mouse models of fatty liver [44, 58, 59]. Furthermore, evidence has been gained that FGF21 attenuates ER stress [60, 61] and inhibits oxidative stress by stimulating nuclear factor E2 related factor-2 (Nrf2)-dependent induction of cytoprotective and antioxidative genes [62, 63]. Transgenic overexpression of FGF21 in mice was reported to increase their life span, presumably due to altering the GH/IGF-1 signaling pathway [48].

FGF21 in dairy cows

Expression of FGF21, β-klotho und FGFRs in tissues of dairy cows

Expression of FGF21 in cattle has first been reported by Carriquiry et al. [64]. These investigators observed that FGF21 expression in the liver of dairy cows is upregulated during the transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. Schoenberg et al. [65] were the first to investigate the longitudinal expression of FGF21 in liver, WAT, skeletal muscle and mammary gland of cows during transition from late gestation to early lactation. The authors observed that expression levels of FGF21 at late gestation were highest in the liver. Expression levels of FGF21 in WAT and mammary gland at late gestation were only 4% and 14%, respectively, of that in the liver, whereas no FGF21 expression was found in skeletal muscle. In addition, Schoenberg et al. [65] found that plasma levels of FGF21 dramatically increased during calving. While plasma levels of FGF21 were about 75 pg/mL during late gestation, FGF21 plasma levels reached a peak level of 1,600 pg/mL during calving. After calving, plasma levels of FGF21 decreased slowly, still being higher at d 56 postpartum than during late pregnancy. Hepatic expression of FGF21 during early lactation was 12-fold higher than during late pregnancy, whereas FGF21 expression level increased only marginally in WAT and even decreased in the mammary gland [65]. This indicates that the strong increase of plasma FGF21 concentration in dairy cows during calving was exclusively caused by FGF21 induction in the liver. Thus, these results in dairy cows are in line with the findings in mice and humans that the liver is the primary site of FGF21 synthesis [12, 13].

In order to identify the target tissues of FGF21 in cattle, Schoenberg et al. [65] analyzed the expression of β-klotho, the co-activator of FGF21, in different tissues of 6-month-old heifers. The highest expression of β-klotho was found in WAT, whereby the expression levels differed depending on the WAT localization; expression was most abundant in perirenal WAT, followed in decreasing order by omental WAT, mammary WAT and subcutaneous WAT. In the liver, expression level of β-klotho was only about 10% of that in perirenal WAT. Expression level of β-klotho in all tissues investigated including skeletal muscle and kidney accounted for < 10% of that determined in the liver. In dairy cows, the highest expression of β-klotho was demonstrated in the liver during early lactation, being 2.5-fold higher than in subcutaneous WAT [18]. However, as the expression of FGFR1c is nearly absent in the liver, the activity of FGF21 signaling in the liver of dairy cows during early lactation is very low [18]. In the liver of heifers, the expression of FGFR1c was also low, around 15- or 25-fold lower than in perirenal or subcutaneous adipose tissue [65]. This finding, together with the higher expression levels of β-klotho in WAT compared to liver, indicates that WAT tissue is the main target of FGF21 in cattle, while the liver plays a negligible role in FGF21 signaling.

Induction of FGF21 in the liver of dairy cows during early lactation

In accordance with the study from Schoenberg et al. [65], several studies showed a dramatic induction of FGF21 gene expression in the liver during early lactation [64, 66, 67], which is accompanied by a strong increase in the plasma concentration of FGF21 [68]. Based on studies in mice, it can be assumed that induction of hepatic FGF21 gene expression is primarily caused by the energy deprivation during early lactation, which causes a stimulation of lipolysis in WAT and an increase of plasma NEFA concentration. Caixeta et al. [69] showed that an increase of plasma concentrations of NEFA, induced by intravenous infusion of an intralipid solution, caused a drastic increase of liver FGF21 gene expression and plasma liver FGF21 concentration in dairy cows. This finding agrees with studies which demonstrated a strong relationship between plasma NEFA and FGF21 concentrations in dairy cows [65, 68]. NEFA are potent activators of PPARα causing an activation of hepatic PPARα during early lactation in dairy cows [66, 70, 71]. Hence, stimulated production of FGF21 during early lactation in dairy cows might be mediated by PPARα which is activated by increased plasma NEFA concentrations. This assumption is supported by observations in pigs, in which activation of hepatic PPARα is also accompanied by an increased expression of FGF21 [72, 73]. This clearly indicates that PPARα acts not only as a regulator of FGF21 expression in rodents, but also in different livestock species. Nonetheless, it can be assumed that, besides activation of PPARα, the occurrence of cellular stress also contributes to the induction of hepatic FGF21 gene expression in dairy cows. Indeed, ER stress occurs in the liver of dairy cows during early lactation and has been attributed to high levels of NEFA and the presence of oxidative stress and inflammation [74, 75].

As described above, ER stress leads to the induction of FGF21 gene expression. Gene expression of FGF21 is upregulated by the activation of PERK and IRE, two transducers of the unfolded protein response (UPR) that are triggered by ER stress [33, 76, 77]. It is therefore highly likely that ER stress is involved in the induction of FGF21 gene expression in the liver of cows during early lactation. Interestingly, feeding of polyphenols to dairy cows during early lactation reduces not only hepatic expression of genes of the ER stress-induced UPR, but also of FGF21 [78,79,80], suggesting a relationship between the occurrence of ER stress and the production of FGF21. It is well known, that an inflammatory-like condition occurs in the liver of dairy cows during early lactation, which is caused by diverse stress stimuli arising from oxidative stress, psychosocial stress, heat stress, bacterial translocation from the gastrointestinal tract, ruminal acidosis and others [7, 81, 82], and which could also contribute to FGF21 induction. In fact, a study in mice demonstrated that lipopolysacchasride (LPS) injection-induced systemic inflammation strongly stimulates hepatic FGF21 gene expression and increases plasma FGF21 levels [83]. This observation is in line with a study from Akbar et al. [84] demonstrating that LPS injection-induced systemic inflammation in dairy cows was accompanied by an increased hepatic expression of FGF21. The work from Feingold et al. [83] indicates that FGF21 induction is a potential strategy to combat the toxicity resulting from LPS injection-induced sepsis. In the study by Yu et al. [85], administration of growth hormone (GH) was reported to increase transcription of the FGF21 gene in the liver of Angus cattle. The action of GH was shown to be mediated by signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5), which directly binds to the FGF21 promotor. In the study of Yu et al. [85], it was additionally shown that an increased FGF21 expression inhibits GH-induced JAK2-STAT5 signaling in the liver, a mechanism considered as a negative feedback loop. It is known that blood GH concentrations are raising in dairy cows during early lactation, while the concentration of insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) is decreasing due to uncoupling of the somatotropic axis [86]. Considering these observations, it appears possible that an increased FGF21 expression during early lactation could be partially also mediated by increased plasma GH concentrations. Moreover, it is possible that FGF21 contributes to the uncoupling of the somatopropic axis (reduced production of IGF-1 during early lactation. A link between FGF21 and the somatotropic axis has been demonstrated in mice and cows. Transgenic mice with overexpression of FGF21 show hallmarks of a GH resistance (increased plasma GH concentrations, reduced plasma IGF-1 concentrations) [87]. GH resistance in these mice was probably induced by a reduced hepatic concentration of phosphorylated STAT5 which mediates the action of GH on gene transcription in the liver, including the expression of IGF-1 [87]. The authors of that study suggested that the induction of a GH resistance contributes to the diverse actions of FGF21 in response to nutrient deprivation. In cows, infusion of FGF21 caused an increase of GH and a decrease of IGF-1 in plasma in comparison to untreated control cows [88]. This finding supports the indication that FGF21 could contribute to GH resistance observed in cows during early lactation.

Influence of nutrition on FGF21 expression in the liver of dairy cows

Up to date, only few studies have investigated the influence of nutrition on FGF21 expression in dairy cows. Most of these studies were dealing with the influence of feeding intensity or body condition score prior to calving on FGF21 expression after calving. According to the majority of these studies, overfeeding during the dry period, which was associated with a higher BCS, caused increases of hepatic FGF21 expression and FGF21 blood concentrations in dairy cows during early lactation [67, 84, 89,90,91]. It is highly likely, that the postpartal increase of FGF21 plasma levels is caused by overfeeding-induced elevation of plasma NEFA levels during early lactation. Overfeeding during the dry period is well-known to reduce feed intake and cause a more pronounced negative energy balance during early lactation [82, 89, 90, 92]. Moreover, a higher feed intake during the prepartum period promotes the development of hepatic inflammation [82, 93]. The latter can promote the occurrence of ER stress, which itself could be a trigger of FGF21 expression [94]. Valaiti-Riboni et al. [91] reported a reduction of hepatic FGF21 expression during early lactation in dairy cows, which were overfed during the dry period, in response to supplementation of rumen-protected methionine. In this study, rumen-protected methionine was found to improve liver function, in particular the antioxidant status (increase of glutathione), and to reduce plasma levels of proinflammatory cytokines and acute phase proteins. It can be assumed, that the reduction of oxidative stress and inflammation are responsible for the decrease of hepatic FGF21 expression levels observed in cows supplemented with rumen-protected methionine. In a study from Zeitz et al. [95], a strong down-regulation of hepatic FGF21 was observed at 1 and 3 weeks postpartum in dairy cows, which were fed rumen-protected niacin during the prepartum period. In addition, the plasma NEFA levels tended to be reduced in the cows of this study, whereas no beneficial effects of rumen-protected niacin regarding occurrence of ER stress or other kinds of cellular stress could be displayed by genome-wide transcript profiling in the liver [96]. Thus, the reduced hepatic FGF21 expression in response to feeding rumen-protected niacin might be caused by decreased plasma NEFA concentrations. Akbar et al. [84] found, that supplementation of rumen-protected carnitine markedly reduces hepatic FGF21 expression in dairy cows during early lactation. Since plasma NEFA concentrations were not affected by supplemental rumen-protected carnitine, it is likely that the marked reduction of hepatic FGF21 expression was due to a lowering of hepatic triglyceride concentrations, the latter being caused by a stimulation of hepatic fatty acid β-oxidation [97]. Recent studies in mice revealed that the rate of β-oxidation plays an important role for FGF21 expression; mice with a genetic deficiency of carnitine-palmitoyl transferase (CPT)Ib in skeletal muscle or CPTII in the liver, in which β-oxidation is severely impaired, exhibit a strong upregulation of FGF21 [98, 99]. The results of the study from Lee et al. [98] suggest that upregulation of FGF21 due to CPTII deficiency is part of a systemic hormetic response, which protects mice from HFD-induced obesity and glucose intolerance. Two studies with dairy cows investigated the role of fat for hepatic FGF21 expression [64, 100]. In the study of Carriquiry et al. [64], the effect of varying the n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ratio (4.6 vs. 2.6) in the diet at late pregnancy and the beginning of lactation on the expression of FGF21 in the liver was analyzed. While the expression of FGF21 strongly increased during the transition from late pregnancy to the beginning of lactation, the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio of the diet had no influence of FGF21 expression. In contrast, in another study, supplementation with either saturated long-chain fatty acids or fish oil caused a marked reduction of hepatic FGF21 expression postpartum, despite plasma NEFA concentrations and hepatic expression of PPARα remained unchanged [100]. A possible reason for the effect of fat supplementation on hepatic FGF21 expression might be a decrease of expression of proinflammatory genes, which was particular evident in cows supplemented with fish oil. An overview of nutritional factors influencing the expression of FGF21 is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Influence of nutrition on the expression of FGF21 in the liver of dairy cows during early lactation. Negative energy balance and the occurrence of stress (ER stress, oxidative stress, inflammation) might be the main factors inducing the expression of FGF21 in the liver. Prepartum overfeeding increases hepatic expression of FGF21 in early lactation due to an increase of plasma NEFA concentrations and to an augmentation of stress as a consequence of a more severe negative energy balance. Niacin lowers FGF21 expression in dairy cows probably due to a reduction of plasma NEFA concentration. Carnitine lowers FGF21 expression in dairy cows probably due to an attenuation of fatty liver. Polyphenols, methionine and n-3 PUFA lower FGF21 expression presumably by reducing stress. For references, see text

Full size image

Role of FGF21 for metabolic diseases in dairy cows

A convincing relationship between FGF21 and the development of metabolic diseases in dairy cows has been established for fatty liver and ketosis. The development of fatty liver during early lactation is accompanied by an increased hepatic FGF21 expression and elevated blood FGF21 levels. Positive correlations between liver triglyceride concentration and plasma FGF21 concentration in dairy cows were documented in the studies from Schoenberg et al. [65] and Shen et al. [101]. These observations are in line with those from studies with human subjects. Like in cows, a strong correlation between liver triglyceride content and FGF21 plasma concentration has been reported in human subjects [102,103,104]. Based on this, the plasma FGF21 concentration has even been suggested as a surrogate marker for fatty liver in humans [105, 106]. It has been recognized that the development of a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in humans, which is frequently associated with obesity, is caused by multiple pathophysiological factors including inflammation, ER stress, oxidative stress and elevated plasma concentrations of NEFA [107]. These factors are considered to act as triggers for the induction of hepatic FGF21 expression [11, 35]. The same pathophysiological factors, such as elevated plasma NEFA levels, oxidative stress, ER stress and inflammation, can be typically found in dairy cows during early-lactation [74, 75, 108], and these factors might be involved in the development of a fatty liver and an increased production of FGF21 in the liver. Administration of FGF21 to mice was found to decrease hepatic steatosis [59]. In human subjects with NAFLD, elevated plasma FGF21 levels have been interpreted as a protective feedback signal in response to lipotoxicity arising in the liver [105]. Studies from different groups showed, that FGF21 induction prevents from hepatic lipid accumulation by stimulating AMPK-dependent lipophagy and fatty acid β-oxidation [109,110,111]. These findings suggest that an increased production of FGF21 in the liver of dairy cows during early lactation could also represent a means to protect against a strong hepatic lipid accumulation in the liver.

Regarding ketosis development, several studies demonstrated that the development of clinical ketosis is associated with increased hepatic expression and elevated plasma concentrations of FGF21 in dairy cows [68, 84]. Interventions resulting in increased plasma concentrations of the ketone body β-hydroxybutyric acid (BHBA) during lactation, like overfeeding during the prepartum period, were found to increase hepatic FGF21 expression [89]. In contrast to this, interventions causing a decrease of plasma BHBA concentration during lactation, as the case for supplementation with rumen-protected niacin, decreased expression von FGF21 in the liver of cows [95]. The association between BHBA und FGF21 is biologically plausible considering, that elevated plasma concentrations of ketone bodies and the development of clinical ketosis are promoted by a strong negative energy balance, which goes along with markedly elevated plasma NEFA concentrations. Thus, it is likely, that a strong negative energy balance acts as a trigger for the increased production of FGF21 in ketotic cows. Since FGF21 stimulates ketogenesis in an energy-deprived state [2, 3], it is likely, that FGF21 plays a central role for stimulating ketone body synthesis and ketosis development in dairy cows experiencing a strong negative energy balance. The well-established relationship between BHBA plasma concentrations and FGF21 production is in contradiction to a recent observation from Xu et al. [112] reporting a negative correlation between FGF21 and BHBA serum concentrations in cows. These authors postulated that low concentrations of FGF21 in plasma of cows are an indicator of ketosis development in cows [113]. However, the fact that ketosis is typically associated with increased lipid concentrations in the liver of cows, which mostly exhibit elevated blood FGF21 concentrations, argues against this postulation from Xu et al. [113].

Effects of exogenous FGF21 on metabolism in dairy cows

The onset of lactation is associated with a strong increase in the demand of glucose for production of lactose in the mammary gland. It has been estimated, that approximately 85% of whole body glucose is transferred to the mammary gland [114]. In order to ensure a sufficient supply of the mammary gland with glucose, hormonal changes, such as reductions of insulin and the insulin-sensitizing hormone adiponectin, occur causing a status of insulin resistance [108]. Despite being important for the synthesis of lactose in the mammary gland, insulin resistance can result in unfavorable effects, such as the development of ketosis [115]. Based on studies in mice showing that exogenous FGF21 improves insulin sensitivity, a recent study investigated the effect of administration of human recombinant FGF21 both, as single injection at d 12 postpartum and chronically infused from d 14 to 23 postpartum to cows during early lactation. In this study, administration of FGF21 to the cows caused a dramatic increase of plasma FGF21 concentrations of approximately 117-fold compared to the control group [88]. As indicator of the biological activity of exogenous FGF21, the authors demonstrated an activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway in WAT. However, FGF21 administration did not affect plasma concentrations of insulin and adiponectin, synthesis of adiponectin and the time course of glucose and insulin concentration in response to a glucose tolerance test [18]. These observations are in contrast to those from studies reporting beneficial effects of exogenous FGF21 on insulin sensitivity in rodent models [60, 116]. The authors proposed, that the lack of effect of exogenous FGF21 on glucose concentration and insulin sensitivity in lactating cows was due to an insufficient supply of energy from feed intake resulting in a negative energy balance. Beneficial effects of exogenous FGF21 on insulin sensitivity have so far been reported only from animals experiencing excessive nutrition and obesity. This indicates, that the nutrition status is a major determinant of FGF21 actions. While feed intake, milk yield, energy balance and plasma NEFA concentration were not affected by exogenous FGF21, the hepatic triglyceride concentration was reduced by more than 50% compared to control cows [88]. This effect is beneficial considering that fatty liver development is commonly associated with the occurrence of postparturient disorders, such as subclinical and clinical ketosis, or poor reproductive performance [117]. A lowering of hepatic trigylceride content has been also documented in rodent NAFLD models following administration of FGF21 [43, 44]. In rodents, this effect was caused mainly by an inhibition of fatty acid synthesis and a stimulation of fatty acid oxidation [59, 98, 118]. In contrast, an inhibition of lipogenesis is unlikely to be causative for this effect in dairy cows, because cows generally exhibit a low rate of hepatic lipogenesis, which does not significantly contribute to fatty liver development [119]. Since the expression of genes involved in fatty acid transport, fatty acid activation, fatty acid oxidation and ketogenesis was not altered by exogenous FGF21, Caixeta et al. [88] suggested, that the reduction of hepatic triglyceride concentration was mainly due to an inhibition of lipolysis in WAT. To sum up, exogenous FGF21 in dairy cows exerts beneficial effects on the triglyceride concentration in the liver, but does not improve insulin sensitivity as could be expected from observations in rodent models. Thus, FGF21 is potentially useful as an agent to improve the health of dairy cows. However, due to the short half-life of FGF21 of about 3 h, the use of exogenous FGF21 in cows would require daily injections of FGF21. A further disadvantage of its regular use would probably be high costs.

Potential relevance of FGF21 in dairy cows

Despite the existence of only few studies dealing with endogenous production and functions of FGF21 in dairy cows, it can be assumed, that the functions of FGF21 in dairy cows are at least similar as in other species (human, rodents). The limited number of studies available in cows shows, that, like in mice, the expression of FGF21 is stimulated particularly during a negative energy balance. Even though direct evidence is lacking, it is very likely, that FGF21 secretion is promoted under conditions of cellular stress, such as ER stress, inflammation and oxidative stress, because nutritive factors, like polyphenols and methionine, which combat these stress conditions, were shown to reduce hepatic expression of FGF21 [78, 79, 120]. Based on this, it can be assumed, that FGF21 improves the availability of energy substrates to cope with energy deprivation or stress. In mice, FGF21 has been convincingly demonstrated to stimulate lipolysis, ketogenesis, β-oxidation and gluconeogenesis [4, 39]. In contrast to mice, it is unclear which metabolic processes and to which extent are stimulated in dairy cows. As mentioned above, exogenous application of recombinant FGF21 in cows during early lactation caused a reduction of the hepatic triglyceride concentration, but had no effect on concentrations of glucose, NEFA and BHBA in plasma [18, 88]. These findings suggested, that exogenous FGF21 did not induce additional mobilization of energy by gluconeogenesis, lipolysis or ketogenesis. However, one must keep in mind, that endogenous FGF21 production in dairy cows is very high during early lactation due to the strong negative energy balance. This could possibly be a reason for the observation, that exogenous FGF21 did not induce additional effects on lipolysis and glucose homeostasis. Recent studies in diseased animal models (such as in UCP-1 transgenic mice or in CPT-1b knockout mice) have suggested that skeletal muscle-derived FGF21 may be involved in the pathogenesis of muscle atrophy [121]. It was moreover observed that in vivo overexpression of FGF21 in muscle results in an increase of autophagy and muscle loss, and that FGF21 is essential for the loss of muscle mass during fasting in mice [122]. However, as the expression of β-klotho in skeletal muscle is very low [65, 123], it is likely that FGF21 exerted its effect on muscle proteolysis rather in an indirect than in a direct manner. Although the exact relevance of this observation is not clear, a potential FGF21 function in muscle loss could be to supply of amino acids in the fasted state as substrates for gluconeogenesis. At least during the first 2 weeks of lactation, dairy cows typically do not only mobilize energy from WAT during early lactation, but also mobilize proteins from peripheral tissues, especially skeletal muscle, by proteolysis in order to provide amino acids for both, gluconeogenesis in the liver and milk protein synthesis in the mammary gland [124]. Based on the findings in mice by Oost et al. [122], it is possible, that high plasma concentrations of FGF21 during the first weeks of lactation play a role in skeletal muscle proteolysis.

Indications in mice exist, that FGF21 could play a role for female reproduction. Owen et al. [125] have observed that female transgenic mice overexpressing FGF21 are infertile. In this study, overexpression of FGF21 was accompanied by a suppression of the vasopressin-kisspeptin signaling cascade, thereby inhibiting the proestrus surge in luteinizing hormone, leading to ovulation failure and protraction of dioestrus [125]. The observation that an increased FGF21 production induced by administration of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) resulted in ovulation failure and prolonged dioestrus supported a direct effect of FGF21 on reproductive function in mice [126]. Another study however showed that the impaired reproductive function in transgenic female mice with overexpression of FGF21 can be restored by feeding a high fat diet [127]. This study indicated that the infertility observed in FGF21 overexpressing mice is due to the increased energy expenditure and the caloric deficit resulting from high FGF21 levels. Although the findings in mice regarding direct effects of FGF21 on reproduction were controversial, a potential effect of FGF21 on female reproduction could be relevant to dairy cows, because it is well-known that dairy cows suffering from diseases associated with a strong negative energy balance, such as ketosis and fatty liver, typically show an impaired fertility [128]. It is not unlikely, that high concentrations of FGF21 in plasma of dairy cows suffering from negative energy balance or stress play a causative role for this phenomenon. Thus, future studies should investigate the potential relationship between FGF21 and reproductive function in dairy cows. A further interesting observation is that overexpression of FGF21 in mice stimulates bone mass loss mediated by PPARγ activation, while FGF21 knockout mice exhibit an increased bone mass compared to wild-type mice [129]. In addition, the physiological loss of bone mass during lactation was decreased in FGF21 knockout mice, likely as a consequence of a reduced bone resorption [130]. Although another study did not exert changes in bone mass in FGF21 knockout mice or in recombinant FGF21 treated mice [131], the data reported in literature provide at least some indication that high FGF21 plasma concentrations, as found in dairy cows during early lactation, promote the release of Ca2+ from bone mass. The mobilization of Ca2+ from bone mass is important to provide Ca2+ for milk production in the mammary gland. An insufficient mobilization of Ca2+ after calving is known to promote hypocalcemia, which is frequently found in high-yielding dairy cows [132]. Based on this, a relationship between FGF21 and development of hypocalcemia is not unlikely. Thus, future studies addressing this relationship might be of high relevance.

Conclusion

Studies in mice and humans have shown that FGF21 plays an important role in metabolic adaptation during states of energy deprivation or various conditions of stress. A key function of FGF21 is to increase the availability of energy substrates to cope with conditions of energy deprivation or stress [4]. During early lactation, dairy cows are not only in a negative energy balance, but experience various types of stress, including oxidative stress, ER stress or inflammation [7, 74, 82]. Therefore, it is possible that FGF21 might also play a role in metabolic adaptation of dairy cows during early lactation. This indication is supported by the finding, that the concentration of FGF21 in plasma is dramatically increased at parturition and remains at high levels during the first weeks of lactation [65]. The exact role of FGF21 in dairy cows is not known. However, the studies available so far show, that the production of FGF21 in the liver is mainly stimulated by a negative energy balance [65, 68]. Like in mice, FGF21 expression might be upregulated by PPARα, which is activated in the state of a negative energy balance by increased plasma concentrations of NEFA, which are released from WAT. There are moreover some indirect indications suggesting, that, like in mice, expression of FGF21 is increased by various stress conditions and, that inhibition of stress suppresses the expression of FGF21 in the liver [78, 79]. Like in mice and humans, FGF21 concentration in plasma of dairy cows is correlated with triglyceride concentration in the liver [65], suggesting, that FGF21 could be involved in the development of fatty liver syndrome. As FGF21 stimulates ketogenesis in the liver, concentrations of FGF21 in dairy cows might be also related to the development of ketosis during early lactation. Observations in mice indicate, that FGF21 could play a role for female fertility and bone loss during lactation [125, 129]. Therefore, it is possible, that high concentrations of FGF21 in plasma during lactation could be a reason for poor fertility, a phenomenon widely observed in high yielding dairy cows. Moreover, high plasma concentrations of FGF21 in the first days of lactation could be involved in the release of Ca2+ from bone required for secretion with the milk. Overall, it is likely that FGF21 not only plays an important role for metabolic adaptations in dairy cows at the onset of lactation, but might also be linked to metabolic health. A hypothetical model of the role of FGF21 in dairy cows is shown in Fig. 2. Unfortunately, there are only very few studies dealing with the potential effects and functions of FGF21 in dairy cows. In particular, further studies using recombinant FGF21 for exogenous application would be very helpful for a better understanding of the functions of FGF21 on metabolism in cattle. Improving the knowledge of the functions of FGF21 in cattle would be very useful to provide strategies for improving metabolic health in dairy cows.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hypothetical model of the relevance of FGF21 in dairy cows. Formation of FGF21 in dairy cows might be mainly induced by energy deprivation and stress. FGF21 might stimulate the release of energy substrates as a metabolic adaptation to combat energy deprivation and stress conditions. High concentrations of FGF21 could impair fertility and influence the release of calcium from bone which is mainly relevant during early lactation. FGF21 might also be involved in the development of postpartal diseases, such as fatty liver and ketosis. For references, see text

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

BHBA:

β-Hydroxybutyric acid

CPT:

Carnitine-palmitoyl transferase

ER:

Endoplasmic reticulum

FGF21:

Fibroblast growth factor 21

FGFR:

FGF receptor

GH:

Growth hormone

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

NEFA:

non-esterified fatty acids

PPAR:

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor

PUFA:

Polyunsaturated fatty acid

STAT5:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

WAT:

White adipose tissue

References

  1. Kharitonenkov A, Shiyanova TL, Koester A, Ford AM, Micanovic R, Galbreath EJ, Sandusky GE, et al. FGF-21 as a novel metabolic regulator. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1627–35. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI23606.

  2. Inagaki T, Dutchak P, Zhao G, Ding X, Gautron L, Parameswara V, et al. Endocrine regulation of the fasting response by PPARalpha-mediated induction of fibroblast growth factor 21. Cell Metab. 2007;5:415–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2007.05.003.

  3. Potthoff MJ, Inagaki T, Satapati S, Ding X, He T, Goetz R, et al. FGF21 induces PGC-1alpha and regulates carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism during the adaptive starvation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:10853–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnras.0904187106.

  4. Kim KH, Lee MS. FGF21 as a stress hormone: the roles of FGF21 in stress adaptation and the treatment of metabolic diseases. Diabetes Metab J. 2014;38:245–51. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2014.38.4.245.

  5. Flippo KH, Potthoff MJ. Metabolic messengers: FGF21. Nat Metab. 2021;3:309–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s.42255-021-00354-2.

  6. Cardoso FC, Kalscheur KF, Drackley JK. Symposium review: nutrition strategies for improved health, production, and fertility during the transition period. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103:5684–93. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17271.

  7. Bradford BJ, Yuan K, Farney JK, Mamedova LK, Carpenter AJ. Invited review: inflammation during the transition to lactation: new adventures with an old flame. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:6631–50. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9683.

  8. Drackley JK. ADSA Foundation scholar award. Biology of dairy cows during the transition period: the final frontier? J Dairy Sci. 1999;82:2259–73. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75474-3.

  9. Nishimura T, Nakatake Y, Konishi M, Itoh N. Identification of a novel FGF, FGF21, preferentially expressed in the liver. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1492:203–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4781(00)00067-1.

  10. Oulion S, Bertrand S, Escriva H. Evolution of the FGF gene family. Int J Evol Biol. 2012;2012:298147. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/298147.

  11. Tillman EJ, Rolph T. FGF21: an emerging therapeutic target for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and related metabolic diseases. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:601290. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.601290.

  12. Markan KR, Naber MC, Ameka MK, Anderegg MD, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA, et al. Circulating FGF21 is liver derived and enhances glucose uptake during refeeding and overfeeding. Diabetes. 2014;63:4057–63. https://doi.org/10.2337/db14-0595.

  13. Petryszak R, Keays M, Tang YA, Fonseca NA, Barrera E, Burdett T, et al. Expression atlas update—an integrated database of gene and protein expression in humans, animals and plants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D746–D752. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1045.

  14. Fon Tacer K, Bookout AL, Ding X, Kurosu H, John GB, Wang L, et al. Research resource: comprehensive expression atlas of the fibroblast growth factor system in adult mouse. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24:2050–64. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2010-0142.

  15. Kurosu H, Choi M, Ogawa Y, Dickson AS, Goetz R, Eliseenkova AV, et al. Tissue-specific expression of bKlotho and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor isoforms determines metabolic activity of FGF19 and FGF21. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:26687–95. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M704165200.

  16. Zhang X, Ibrahimi OA, Olsen SK, Umemori H, Mohammadi M, Ornitz DM. Receptor specificity of the fibroblast growth factor family. The complete mammalian FGF family. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:15694–700. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M601252200.

  17. Suzuki M, Uehara Y, Motomura-Matsuzaka K, Oki J, Koyama Y, Kimura M, et al. BetaKlotho is required for fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 21 signaling through FGF receptor (FGFR) 1c and FGFR3c. Mol Endocrinol. 2008;22:1006–14. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2007-0313.

  18. Krumm CS, Giesy SL, Caixeta LS, Perfield JW 2nd, Sauerwein H, Moore BL, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21) administration to early-lactating dairy cows. I. Effects on signaling and indices of insulin action. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102:11586–96. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16695.

  19. Shan Z, Alvarez-Sola G, Uriarte I, Arechederra M, Fernández-Barrena MG, Berasain C, Ju C, Avila MA Fibroblast growth factors 19 and 21 in acute liver damage. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:257. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.05.26.

  20. Degirolamo C, Sabbà C, Moschetta A. Therapeutic potential of the endocrine fibroblast growth factors FGF19, FGF21 and FGF23. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15:51–69. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2015.9.

  21. Foltz IN, Hu S, King C, Wu X, Yang C, Wang W, et al. Treating diabetes and obesity with an FGF21-mimetic antibody activating the ßklotho/FGFR1c receptor complex. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:162ra153. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3004690.

  22. Yie J, Hecht R, Patel J, Stevens J, Wang W, Hawkins N, et al. FGF21 N- and C-termini play different roles in receptor interaction and activation. FEBS Lett. 2009;583:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.11.023.

  23. Micanovic R, Raches DW, Dunbar JD, Driver DA, Bina HA, Dickinson CD et al. Different roles of N- and C- termini in the functional activity of FGF21. J Cell Physiol. 2009;219:227–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21675.

  24. Ornitz DM, Itoh N. The fibroblast growth factor signaling pathway. WIREs Dev Biol. 2015;4:215–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/wdev.176.

  25. Lundasen T, Hunt MC, Nilsson L-M, Sanyal S, Angelin B, Alexson SHE et al. PPARα is a key regulator of hepatic FGF21. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;360:437–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/bbrc.2007.06.068.

  26. Badman MK, Pissios P, Kennedy AR, Koukos G, Flier JS, Maratos-Flier E. Hepatic fibroblast growth factor 21 is regulated by PPARα and is a key mediator of hepatic lipid metabolism in ketotic states. Cell Metab. 2007;5:426–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2007.05.002.

  27. Gälman C, Lundåsen T, Kharitonenkov A, Bina HA, Eriksson M, Hafström I, et al. The circulating metabolic regulator FGF21 is induced by prolonged fasting and PPARalpha activation in man. Cell Metab. 2008;8:169–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2008.06.014.

  28. Fazeli PK, Lun M, Kim SM, Bredella MA, Wright S, Zhang Y, et al. FGF21 and the late adaptive response to starvation in humans. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:4601–11. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI83349.

  29. Martínez-Garza Ú, Torres-Oteros D, Yarritu-Gallego A, Marrero PF, Haro D, Relat J. Fibroblast growth factor 21 and the adaptive response to nutritional challenges. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4692. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20194692.

  30. Klein Hazebroek M, Keipert S. Adapting to the cold: a role for endogenous fibroblast growth factor 21 in thermoregulation? Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00389.

  31. Kim KH, Kim SH, Min YK, Yang HM, Lee JB, Lee MS. Acute exercise induces FGF21 expression in mice and in healthy humans. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63517. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063517.

  32. Cuevas-Ramos D, Almeda-Valdés P, Meza-Arana CE, Brito-Córdova G, Gómez-Pérez FJ, Mehta R, Oseguera-Moguel J, Aguilar-Salinas CA Exercise increases serum fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) levels. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038022.

  33. Schaap FG, Kremer AE, Lamers WH, Jansen PL, Gaemers IC. Fibroblast growth factor 21 is induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress. Biochimie. 2013;95:692–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biochi.2012.10.019.

  34. Kim KH, Lee MS. FGF21 as a mediator of adaptive responses to stress and metabolic benefits of anti-diabetic drugs. J Endocrinol. 2015;226:R1–16. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-15-0160.

  35. Kim SH, Kim KH, Kim HK, Kim MJ, Back SH, Konishi M, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 participates in adaptation to endoplasmic reticulum stress and attenuates obesity-induced hepatic metabolic stress. Diabetologia. 2015;58:809–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3475-6.

  36. Mraz M, Bartlova M, Lacinova Z, Michalsky D, Kasalicky M, Haluzikova D, et al. Serum concentrations and tissue expression of a novel endocrine regulator fibroblast growth factor-21 in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Clin Endocrinol. 2009;71:369–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03502.x.

  37. Chavez AO, Molina-Carrion M, Abdul-Ghani MA, Folli F, Defronzo RA, Tripathy D. Circulating fibroblast growth factor-21 is elevated in impaired glucose tolerance and type 2 diabetes and correlates with muscle and hepatic insulin resistance. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1542–6. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0684.

  38. Li L, Yang G, Ning H, Yang M, Liu H, Chen W. Plasma FGF-21 levels in type 2 diabetic patients with ketosis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82:209–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2008.07.012.

  39. Staiger H, Keuper M, Berti L, Hrabe de Angelis M, Häring HU. Fibroblast growth factor 21-metabolic role in mice and men. Endocr Rev. 2017;38:468–88. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2017-00016.

  40. Coskun T, Bina HA, Schneider MA, Dunbar JD, Hu CC, Chen Y, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 corrects obesity in mice. Endocrinology. 2008;149:6018–27. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-0816.

  41. Arner P, Pettersson A, Mitchell PJ, Dunbar JD, Kharitonenkov A, Rydén M. FGF21 attenuates lipolysis in human adipocytes - a possible link to improved insulin sensitivity. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:1725–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.04.038.

  42. Camporez JPG, Jornayvaz FR, Petersen MC, Pesta D, Guigni BA, Serr J, et al. Cellular mechanisms by which FGF21 improves insulin sensitivity in male mice. Endocrinology. 2013;154:3099–109. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2013-1191.

  43. Xu J, Lloyd DJ, Hale C, Stanislaus S, Chen M, Sivits G, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 reverses hepatic steatosis, increases energy expenditure, and improves insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obese mice. Diabetes. 2009;58:250–9. https://doi.org/10.2237/db08-0392.

  44. Bao L, Yin J, Gao W, Wang Q, Yao W, Gao X. A long-acting FGF21 alleviates hepatic steatosis and inflammation in a mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis partly through an FGF21-adiponectin-IL17A pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 2018:175:3379–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.14383.

  45. Giralt M, Gavaldà-Navarro A, Villarroya F. Fibroblast growth factor-21, energy balance and obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;418 Pt 1:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcv.2015.09.018.

  46. Owen BM, Ding X, Morgan DA, Coate KC, Bookout AL, Rahmouni K., et al. FGF21 acts centrally to induce sympathetic nerve activity, energy expenditure, and weight loss. Cell Metab. 2014;20:670–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.07.012.

  47. Lin Z, Tian H, Lam KSL, Lin S, Hoo RCL, Konishi M, et al. Adiponectin mediates the metabolic effects of FGF21 on glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity in mice. Cell Metab. 2013;17:779–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.005.

  48. Zhang Y, Xie Y, Berglund ED, Coate KC, He TT, Katafuchi T, et al. The starvation hormone, fibroblast growth factor-21, extends lifespan in mice. Elife. 2012;1:e00065. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00065.

  49. Lin Z, Pan X, Wu F, Ye D, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 prevents atherosclerosis by suppression of hepatic sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2 and induction of adiponectin in mice. Circulation. 2015;131:1861–71. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015308.

  50. Talukdar S, Zhou Y, Li D, Rossulek M, Dong J, Somayaji V, et al. A long acting FGF21 molecule, PF-05231023, decreases body weight and improves lipid profile in non-human primates and type 2 diabetic subjects. Cell Metab. 2016;23:427–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.02.001.

  51. Gaich G, Chien JY, Fu H, Glass LC, Deeg MA, Holland WL, et al. The effects of LY2405319, an FGF21 analog, in obese human subjects with type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 2013;18:333–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.c.met.2013.08.005.

  52. Sanyal A, Charles ED, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Loomba R, Harrison SA, Abdelmalek MF, et al. Pegbelfermin (BMS-986036), a PEGylated fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue, in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Lancet. 2019;392(10165):2705–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31785-9.

  53. Kaufmann A, Abuqayyas L, Denney WS, Tillmann EJ, Rolph T. AKR-001, an fc-FGF21 analog, showed sustained pharmcodynamic effects on inulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism in type 2 diabetes patients. Cell Rep Med. 2020;1:100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100057.

  54. Guo C, Zhao L, Li Y, Deng X, Yuan G. Relationship between FGF21 and drug or nondrug therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236:55–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.29879.

  55. So WY, Leung PS. Fibroblast growth factor 21 as an emerging therapeutic target for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Med Res Rev. 2016;36:672–704. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21390.

  56. Hill CM, Qualls-Creekmore E, Berthoud H-R, Soto P, Yu S, McDougal DH, et al. FGF21 and the physiological regulation of macronutrient preference. Endocrinology. 2020;161:bqaa019. https://doi.org/10.1210/endocr/bqaa019.

  57. Zeng Z, Zheng Q, Chen J, Tan X, Li Q, Ding L, Zhang R, Lin X FGF21 mitigates atherosclerosis via inhibition of NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated vascular endothelial cells pyroptosis. Exp Cell Res. 2020;393:112108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112108.

  58. Yu Y, He J, Li S, Song L, Guo X, Yao W, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) inhibits macrophage-mediated inflammation by activating Nrf2 and suppressing the NF-kB signaling pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2016;38:144–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2016.05.026.

  59. Keinicke H, Sun G, Mentzel CMJ, Fredholm M, John LM, Andersen B, et al. FGF21 regulates hepatic metabolic pathways to improve steatosis and inflammation. Endocr Connect 2020;9:755–68. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0152.

  60. Guo Q, Xu L, Liu J, Li H, Sun H, Wu S, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 reverses suppression of adiponectin expression via inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress in adipose tissue of obese mice. Exp Biol Med. 2017;242:441–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370216677354.

  61. Maruyama R, Shimuzu M, Hashidume T, Inoue J, Itoh N, Sato R. FGF21 alleviates hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress under physiologic condition. Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2018;64:200–8. https://doi.org/10.3177/jnsv.64.200.

  62. Zhang S, Yu D, Wang M, Huang T, Wu H, Zhang Y, Zhang T, et al. FGF21 attenuates pulmonary fibrogenesis through ameliorating oxidative stress in vivo and in vitro. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:1516–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.03.100.

  63. Jia H, Cheng J, Zhou Q, Peng J, Pan Y, Han H. Fibroblast growth factor 21 attenuates inflammation and oxidative stress in atherosclerotic rat via enhancing the Nrf1-ARE signaling pathway. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11:1308–17.

  64. Carriquiry M, Weber WJ, Fahrenkrug SC, Crooker BA. Hepatic gene expression in multiparous Holstein cows treated with bovine somatotropin and fed n-3 fatty acids in early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:4889–900. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1676.

  65. Schoenberg KM, Giesy SL, Harvatine KJ, Waldron MR, Cheng C, Kharitonenkov A, et al. Plasma FGF21 is elevated by the intense lipid mobilization of lactation. Endocrinol. 2011; 152:4652–61. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-1425.

  66. Schlegel G, Ringseis R, Keller J, Schwarz FJ, Windisch W, Eder K. Expression of fibroblast growth factor 21 in the liver of dairy cows in the transition period and during lactation. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2013;97:820–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396-2012.01323.x.

  67. Drong C, Bühler S, Frahm J, Hüther L, Meyer U, von Soosten D et al. Effects of body condition, monensin, and essential oils on ruminal lipopolysaccharide concentration, inflammatory markers, and endoplasmatic reticulum stress of transition dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100:2751–64. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11819.

  68. Wang J, Zhu X, She G, Kong Y, Guo Y, Wang Z, et al. Serum hepatokines in dairy cows: periparturient variation and changes in energy-related metabolic disorders. BMC Vet Res 2018;14:236. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1560-7.

  69. Caixeta LS, Giesy SL, Krumm CS, Perfield JW 2nd, Butterfield A, Schoenberg KM, et al. Effect of circulating glucagon and free fatty acids on hepatic FGF21 production in dairy cows. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017;313:R526-R534.https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00197.2017.

  70. Schlegel G, Keller J, Hirche F, Geissler S, Schwarz FJ, Ringseis R, et al. Expression of genes involved in hepatic carnitine synthesis and uptake in dairy cows in the transition period and at different stages of lactation. BMC Vet Res. 2012;8:28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-28.

  71. Osorio JS, Jacometo CB, Zhou Z, Luchini D, Cardoso FC, Loor JJ. Hepatic global DNA and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha promoter methylation are altered in peripartal dairy cows fed rumen-protected methionine. J Dairy Sci. 2016;99:234–44. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10157.

  72. Varady J, Ringseis R, Eder K. Dietary moderately oxidized oil induces expression of fibroblast growth factor 21 in the liver of pigs. Lipids Health Dis. 2012;11:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-11-34.

  73. Rosenbaum S, Ringseis R, Most E, Hillen S, Becker S, Erhardt G, et al. Genes involved in carnitine synthesis and carnitine uptake are up-regulated in the liver of sows during lactation. Acta Vet Scand. 2013;55:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-55-24.

  74. Gessner DK, Schlegel G, Ringseis R, Schwarz FJ, Eder K. Up-regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress induced genes of the unfolded protein response in the liver of periparturient dairy cows. BMC Vet Res. 2014;10:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-10-46.

  75. Ringseis R, Gessner DK, Eder K. Molecular insights into the mechanisms of liver-associated diseases in early-lactating dairy cows: hypothetical role of endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2015;99:626–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12263.

  76. Wan XS, Lu XH, Xiao YC, Lin Y, Zhu H, Ding T, et al. ATF4- and CHOP-dependent induction of FGF21 through endoplasmic reticulum stress. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:807874. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/807874.

  77. Jiang S, Yan C, Fang QC, Shao ML, Zhang YL, Liu Y, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 is regulated by the IRE1alpha-XBP1 branch of the unfolded protein response and counteracts endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced hepatic steatosis. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:29751–65. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.565960.

  78. Winkler A, Gessner DK, Koch C, Romberg FJ, Dusel G, Herzog E, et al. Effects of a plant product consisting of green tea and curcuma extract on milk production and the expression of hepatic genes involved in endoplasmic stress response and inflammation in dairy cows. Arch Anim Nutr. 2015;69:425–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2015.1093873.

  79. Gessner DK, Koch C, Romberg FJ, Winkler A, Dusel G, Herzog E, et al. The effect of grape seed and grape marc meal extract on milk performance and the expression of genes of endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation in the liver of dairy cows in early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:8856–68. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-15-0160.

  80. Gessner DK, Winkler A, Koch C, Dusel G, Liebisch G, Ringseis R, et al. Analysis of hepatic transcript profile and plasma lipid profile in early lactating dairy cows fed grape seed and grape marc meal extract. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:253. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9478.

  81. Gessner DK, Schlegel G, Keller J, Schwarz FJ, Ringseis R, Eder K. Expression of target genes of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 in the liver of dairy cows in the transition period and at different stages of lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:1038–43. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5967.

  82. Graugnard DE, Moyes KM, Trevisi E, Khan MJ, Keisler D, Drackley JK, et al. Liver lipid content and inflammometabolic indices in peripartal dairy cows are altered in response to prepartal energy intake and postpartal intramammary inflammatory challenge. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:918–35. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5676.

  83. Feingold KR, Grunfeld C, Heuer JG, Gupta A, Cramer M, Zhang T, et al. FGF21 is increased by inflammatory stimuli and protects leptin-deficient Ob/Ob mice from the toxicity of sepsis. Endocrinology. 2012;153:2689–700. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-1496.

  84. Akbar H, Batistel F, Drackley JK, Loor JJ. Alterations in hepatic FGF21, co-regulated genes, and upstream metabolic genes in response to nutrition, Ketosis and Inflammation in Peripartal Holstein Cows PLoS One 2015;10:e0139963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139963.

  85. Yu J, Zhao L, Wang A, Eleswarapu S, Ge X, Chen D, Jiang H. Growth hormone stimulates transcription of the fibroblast growth factor 21 gene in the liver through the signal transducer and activator of transcription 5. Endocrinology. 2012;153:750–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2011-1591.

  86. Lucy MC. Functional differences in the growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor axis in cattle and pigs: implications for post-partum nutrition and reproduction. Reprod Domest Anim. 2008;43 Suppl 2:31–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01140.x.

  87. Inagaki T, Lin VY, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer A. Inhibition of growth hormone signaling by the fasting-induced hormone FGF21. Cell Metab. 2008;8:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2008.05.006.

  88. Caixeta LS, Giesy SL, Krumm CS, Perfield JW 2nd, Butterfield A, Boisclair YR. Fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF21) administration to early-lactating dairy cows. II. Pharmacokinetics, whole-animal performance, and lipid metabolism. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102:11597–608. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16696.

  89. Khan MJ, Jacometo CB, Graugnard DE, Corrêa MN, Schmitt E, Cardoso F, et al. Overfeeding dairy cattle during late-pregnancy alters hepatic PPARα-regulated pathways including hepatokines: impact on metabolism and peripheral insulin sensitivity. Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2014;8:97–111. https://doi.org/10.4137/GRSB.S14116.

  90. Akbar H, Grala TM, Vailati Riboni M, Cardoso FC, Verkerk G, McGowan J, et al. Body condition score at calving affects systemic and hepatic transcriptome indicators of inflammation and nutrient metabolism in grazing dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2015; 98:1019–32. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8584.

  91. Vailati-Riboni M, Zhou Z, Jacometo CB, Minuti A, Trevisi E, Luchini DN, et al. Supplementation with rumen-protected methionine or choline during the transition period influences whole-blood immune response in periparturient dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2017;100:3958–68. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11812.

  92. Dann HM, Litherland NB, Underwood JP, Bionaz M, D'Angelo A, McFadden JW, et al. Diets during far-off and close-up dry periods affect periparturient metabolism and lactation in multiparous cows. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89:3563–77. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72396-7.

  93. Zhou Z, Bu DP, Vailati Riboni M, Khan MJ, Graugnard DE, Luo J, et al. Prepartal dietary energy level affects peripartal bovine blood neutrophil metabolic, antioxidant, and inflammatory gene expression. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:5492–505. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8811.

  94. Inagaki T. Research perspectives on the regulation and physiologic functions of FGF21 and its association with NAFLD. Front Endocrinol. 2015;6:147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00147.

  95. Zeitz JO, Weber A, Most E, Windisch W, Bolduan C, Geyer J, et al. Effects of supplementing rumen-protected niacin on fiber composition and metabolism of skeletal muscle in dairy cows during early lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101:8004–20. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14490.

  96. Ringseis R, Zeitz JO, Weber A, Koch C, Eder K. Hepatic transcript profiling in early-lactation dairy cows fed rumen-protected niacin during the transition from late pregnancy to lactation. J Dairy Sci. 2019;102:365–76. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15232.

  97. Carlson DB, McFadden JW, D'Angelo A, Woodworth JC, Drackley JK. Dietary L-carnitine affects periparturient nutrient metabolism and lactation in multiparous cows. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:3422–41. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-811.

  98. Lee J, Choi J, Selen Alpergin ES, Zhao L, Hartung T, Scafidi S, et al. Loss of hepatic mitochondrial long-chain fatty acid oxidation confers resistance to diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance. Cell Rep 2017;20:655–67.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.080.

  99. Warfel JD, Vandanmagsar B, Wicks SE, Zhang J, Noland RC, Mynatt RL. A low fat diet ameloriates pathology but retains beneficial effects associated with CPT1b knockout in skeletal muscle. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188850. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188850.

  100. Akbar H, Schmitt E, Ballou MA, Corrêa MN, Depeters EJ, Loor JJ. Dietary lipid during late-pregnancy and early-lactation to manipulate metabolic and inflammatory gene network expression in dairy cattle liver with a focus on PPARs. Gene Regul Syst Bio. 2013;7:103–123. https://doi.org/10.4137/GRSB.S12005.

  101. Shen Y, Chen L, Yang W, Wang Z. Exploration of serum sensitive biomarkers of fatty liver in dairy cows. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13574. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31845-0.

  102. Yilmaz Y, Eren F, Yonal O, Kurt R, Aktas B, Celikel CA, et al. Increased serum FGF21 levels in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Clin Investig. 2010;40:887–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02338.x.

  103. Li H, Fang Q, Gao F, Fan J, Zhou J, Wang X, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 levels are increased in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients and are correlated with hepatic triglyceride. J Hepatol. 2010;53:934–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hep.2010.05.018.

  104. Xiao F, Shi X, Huang P, Zeng X, Wang L, Zeng J, et al. Dose-response relationship between serum fibroblast growth factor 21 and liver fat content in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Metab. 2020;101221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabet.2020.101221

  105. Hui E, Xu A, Yang HB, Lam KSL. Obesity as the common soil of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes: role of adipokines. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4:413–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdi.12093.

  106. Qian LL, Wu L, Zhang L, Zhang J, Zhou J, Li YH, et al. Serum biomarkers combined with ultrasonography for early diagnosis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease confirmed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2020;41:554–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-019-0321-x.

  107. Delli Bovi AP, Marciano F, Mandato C, Siano MA, Savoia M, Vajro P. Oxidative stress in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. An updated mini review Front Med. 2021;8:595371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.595371.

  108. McFadden JW: Review: lipid biology in the periparturient dairy cow: contemporary perspectives. Animal. 2020;14:s165-s175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119003185.

  109. Byun S, Seok S, Kim Y-C, Zhang Y, Yau P, Iwamori N, et al. Fasting-induced FGF21 signaling activates hepatic autophagy and lipid degradation via JMJD3 histone demethylase. Nat Commun. 2020;11:807. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14384-z.

  110. Gao Y, Zhang W, Zeng LQ, Bai H, Li J, Zhou J, et al. Exercise and dietary intervention ameliorate high-fat diet-induced NAFLD and liver aging by inducing lipophagy. Redox Biol. 2020;36:101635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101635.

  111. Wu L, Mo W, Feng J, Li J, Yu Q, Li S, Zhang J, et al. Astaxanthin attenuates hepatic damage and mitochondrial dysfunction in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by up-regulating the FGF21/PGC-1alpha pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:3760–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15099.

  112. Xu C, Xu Q, Chen Y, Yang W, Xia C, Yu H, et al. The relationship between fibroblast growth factor-21 and characteristic parameters related to energy balance in dairy cows. BMC Vet Res. 2015;11:271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-015-0585-4.

  113. Xu C, Xu Q, Chen Y, Yang W, Xia C, Yu H. et al. FGF-21: promising biomarker for detecting ketosis in dairy cows. Vet Res Commun. 2016;40:49–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-015-9650-5.

  114. Bell AW. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. J Anim Sci. 1995;73:2804–19. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7392804x.

  115. Drackley JK, Overton TR, Douglas GN. Adaptations of glucose and long-chain fatty acid metabolism in liver of dairy cows during the periparturient period. J Dairy Sci. 2001;84:E100–12.

  116. Li H, Wu G, Fang Q, Zhang M, Hui X, Sheng B, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 increases insulin sensitivity through specific expansion of subcutaneous fat. Nat Commun. 2018;9:272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02677-9.

  117. Bobe G, Young JW, Beitz DC. Invited review: pathology, etiology, prevention, and treatment of fatty liver in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2004;87:3105–24. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73446-3.

  118. Fisher FM, Chui PC, Nasser IA, Popov Y, Cunniff JC, Lundasen T, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 limits lipotoxicity by promoting hepatic fatty acid activation in mice on methionine and choline-deficient diets. Gastroenterology. 2014;147:1073–83. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.044.

  119. Ballard FJ, Hanson RW, Kronfeld DS. Gluconeogenesis and lipogenesis in tissue from ruminant and nonruminant animals. Fed Proc. 1969;28(1):218–31.

  120. Osorio JS, Trevisi E, Ji P, Drackley JK, Luchini D, Bertoni G, Loor JJ. Biomarkers of inflammation, metabolism, and oxidative stress in blood, liver, and milk reveal a better immunometabolic status in peripartal cows supplemented with Smartamine M or MetaSmart. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:7437–50. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7679.

  121. Sun H, Sherrier M, Li H. Skeletal muscle and bone – emerging targets of fibroblast growth factor 21. Front Physiol. 2021;12:625287. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-15-0160.

  122. Oost LJ, Kustermann M, Armani A, Blaauw B, Romanello VJ. Fibroblast growth factor 21 controls mitophagy and muscle mass. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10(3):630–42. . https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12409.

  123. Ito S, Kinoshita S, Shiraishi N, Nakagawa S, Sekine S, Fujimori T, et al. Molecular cloning and expression analyses of mouse betaklotho, which encodes a novel klotho family protein. Mech Dev. 2000;98(1-2):115–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00439-1.

  124. Bell AW, Burhans WS, Overton TR. Protein nutrition in late pregnancy, maternal protein reserves and lactation performance in dairy cows. Proc Nutr Soc. 2000;59:119–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665100000148.

  125. Owen BM, Bookout AL, Ding X, Lin VY, Atkin SD, Gautron L, et al. FGF21 contributes to neuroendocrine control of female reproduction. Nat Med. 2013;19:1153–6.https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3250.

  126. Zhang Y, Cao X, Chen L, Qin Y, Xu Y, Tian Y, Chen L Exposure of female mice to perfluorooctanoic acid suppresses hypothalamic kisspeptin-reproductive endocrine system through enhanced hepatic fibroblast growth factor 21 synthesis, leading to ovulation failure and prolonged dioestrus. J Neuroendocrinol. 2020;32:e12848. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12848.

  127. Singhal G, Douris N, Fish AJ, Zhang X, Adams AC, Flier JS, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 has no direct role in regulating fertility in female mice. Mol Metab. 2016;5:690–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2016.05.010.

  128. Drackley JK, Cardoso FC. Prepartum and postpartum nutritional management to optimize fertility in high-yielding dairy cows in confined TMR systems. Animal. 2014;8 Suppl 1:5–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000731.

  129. Wei W, Dutchak PA, Wang X, Ding X, Wang X, Bookout AL, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Gerard RD, Dechow PC, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA, Wan Y Fibroblast growth factor 21 promotes bone loss by potentiating the effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:3143–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200797109.

  130. Bornstein S, Brown SA, Le PT, Wang X, DeMambro V, Horowitz MC, et al. FGF21 and skeletal remodelling during and after lactation in C57BL/6J mice. Endocrinology. 2014;155:3516–26. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-15-0160.

  131. Li X, Stanislaus S, Asuncion F, Niu Q-T, Chinookoswong N, Villasenor K, Wang J, et al. FGF21 is not a major mediator for bone homeostasis or metabolic actions of PPARα and PPARγ agonists. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32:834–45. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2014-1083.

  132. DeGaris PJ, Lean IJ. Milk fever in dairy cows: a review of pathophysiology and control principles. Vet J. 2008;176:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.12.029.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was used to write this manuscript. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Animal Nutrition and Nutrition Physiology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392, Giessen, Germany

    Klaus Eder, Denise K. Gessner & Robert Ringseis

Authors
  1. Klaus Eder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Denise K. Gessner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Ringseis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The authors’ contributions are as follows: all authors contributed equally on manuscript preparation, writing, and finalizing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and approved publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Eder.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eder, K., Gessner, D.K. & Ringseis, R. Fibroblast growth factor 21 in dairy cows: current knowledge and potential relevance. J Animal Sci Biotechnol 12, 97 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00621-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00621-y

Keywords

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

ISSN: 2049-1891