Skip to main content
Log in

A Model of Technology Incidental Learning Effects

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increases in technology use, among youth and adults, are concerning given the volume of information produced and disseminated in the modern world. Conceptual models have been developed to understand how people manage the large volume of information encountered during intentional learning activities with technology. What, if anything, do people learn when they happen upon news and other information while using technology for purposes other than learning? Questions like this highlight the need to understand incidental learning, i.e., learning that occurs when people, who are pursuing a goal other than learning such as entertainment, encounter information that leads to a change in thinking or behavior. In this article, we integrate theory and research from multiple scholarly literatures into the Technology Incidental Learning Effects (TILE) model, which provides a framework for future research on how incidental learning occurs and what factors affect this process. Current research on incidental learning can be informed by educational psychology scholarship on dual-processing, motivation, interest, source evaluation, and knowledge reconstruction. The TILE model points to many promising future directions for research with direct implications for modern society, including the need to better understand how and why people move from merely noticing to engaging with incidentally exposed information as well as how to help people successfully manage the large amounts of information they encounter when using technology for purposes other than learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wardle (2019) argued the term “fake news” is vague and that there are, in fact, three relevant types of problematic information: misinformation, which is false (e.g., unintentionally incorrect headlines); malinformation, which is intended to harm (e.g., revenge porn); and disinformation, which is both false and intended to harm (e.g., fabricating information to manipulate public opinion). Acknowledging these differences, in this article, we will use the term “misinformation” to include all of these types.

  2. The authors thank one of the anonymous reviews of this article for their suggestion to include this connection.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey A. Greene.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

The views of the authors are their own and do not purport to reflect the position of the United States Military Academy, the Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Greene, J.A., Copeland, D.Z. & Deekens, V.M. A Model of Technology Incidental Learning Effects. Educ Psychol Rev 33, 883–913 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09575-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09575-5

Keywords

Navigation