Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fibroepithelial tumours of the breast—a review

  • Review and Perspectives
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fibroepithelial tumours of the breast are biphasic neoplasms composed of both epithelial and stromal elements, including the common fibroadenoma and the infrequent phyllodes tumour. The admixture of epithelium and stroma in the fibroadenoma shows intra- and pericanalicular patterns, and may display a variety of histological changes. Fibroadenoma variants include the cellular, juvenile, myxoid and complex forms. The cellular fibroadenoma may be difficult to distinguish from the benign phyllodes tumour. Stromal mitotic activity can be increased in fibroadenomas in the young and pregnant patients. Phyllodes tumours, neoplasms with the potential for recurrence, show an exaggerated intracanalicular growth pattern with broad stromal fronded architecture and stromal hypercellularity. They are graded into benign, borderline and malignant forms based on histological assessment of stromal features of hypercellularity, atypia, mitotic activity, overgrowth and the nature of the tumour borders. Classification of phyllodes tumours is imperfect, compounded by tumour heterogeneity with overlapping microscopic features among the different grades, especially in the borderline category. Malignant phyllodes tumours can metastasise and cause death. Determining which phyllodes tumours may behave aggressively has been difficult. The discovery of MED12 mutations in the pathogenesis of fibroepithelial tumours, together with other gene abnormalities in the progression pathway, has allowed refinements in diagnosis and prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable

Code availability (software application or custom code)

Not applicable

References

  1. Shin SJ, Rosen PP (2007) Bilateral presentation of fibroadenoma with digital fibroma-like inclusions in the male breast. Arch Pathol Lab Med 131:1126–1129. https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165(2007)131[1126:BPOFWD]2.0.CO;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pike AM, Oberman HA (1985) Juvenile (cellular) adenofibromas. A clinicopathologic study. Am J Surg Pathol 9:730–736. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198510000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thike AA, Brogi E, Harada O, Oyama T, Tse G (2019) Fibroadenoma. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed) Breast Tumours. 5th edn. IARC, Lyon, pp 168–171

  4. Nassar A, Visscher DW, Degnim AC, Frank RD, Vierkant RA, Frost M, Radisky DC, Vachon CM, Kraft RA, Hartmann LC, Ghosh K (2015) Complex fibroadenoma and breast cancer risk: a Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease Cohort Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 153:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3535-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Carney JA, Toorkey BC (1991) Myxoid fibroadenoma and allied conditions (myxomatosis) of the breast. A heritable disorder with special associations including cardiac and cutaneous myxomas. Am J Surg Pathol 15:713–721. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199108000-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lozada JR, Burke KA, Maguire A, Pareja F, Lim RS, Kim J, Gularte-Merida R, Murray MP, Brogi E, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS, Geyer FC (2017) Myxoid fibroadenomas differ from conventional fibroadenomas: a hypothesis-generating study. Histopathology 71:626–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chougule A, Bal A, Rastogi P, Das A (2015) Recurrent phyllodes tumor in the male breast in a background of gynaecomastia. Breast Dis 35:139–142. https://doi.org/10.3233/BD-140393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ward RM, Evans HL (1986) Cystosarcoma phyllodes. A clinicopathologic study of 26 cases. Cancer 58:2282–2289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tse G, Koo JS, Thike AA (2019) Phyllodes tumour. In: WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (ed) Breast Tumours. 5th edn. IARC: Lyon, pp 172–176

  10. Bacchi CE, Wludarski SC, Lamovec J, Ben Dor D, Ober E, Salviato T, Zanconati F, De Maglio G, Pizzolitto S, Sioletic S, Falconieri G (2016) Lipophyllodes of the breast. A reappraisal of fat-rich tumors of the breast based on 22 cases integrated by immunohistochemical study, molecular pathology insights, and clinical follow-up. Ann Diagn Pathol 21:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2015.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cimino-Mathews A, Sharma R, Illei PB, Vang R, Argani P (2014) A subset of malignant phyllodes tumors express p63 and p40: a diagnostic pitfall in breast core needle biopsies. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000301

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bansal M, Chen J, Wang X (2018) Focal anomalous expression of cytokeratin and p63 in malignant phyllodes tumor: a comparison with spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 26:198–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000000453

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller KE, Tafe LJ, de Abreu FB, Peterson JD, Wells WA, Barth RJ, Marotti JD (2015) Benign phyllodes tumor of the breast recurring as a malignant phyllodes tumor and spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma. Hum Pathol 46:327–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2014.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim SZ, Ng CCY, Rajasegaran V, Guan P, Selvarajan S, Thike AA, Nasir N, Koh VCY, Tan BKT, Ong KW, Teh BT, Tan PH (2019) Genomic profile of breast sarcomas: a comparison with malignant phyllodes tumours. Breast Cancer Res Treat 174:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-5067-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim SZ, Selvarajan S, Thike AA, Nasir ND, Tan BK, Ong KW, Tan PH (2016) Breast sarcomas and malignant phyllodes tumours: comparison of clinicopathological features, treatment strategies, prognostic factors and outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 159:229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3946-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Deb RA, Matthews P, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Pinder SE (2001) An audit of “equivocal” (C3) and “suspicious” (C4) categories in fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Cytopathology 12:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2303.2001.00332.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yii N, Read T, Tan CC, Ng SL, Bennett I (2018) Diagnosing phyllodes tumours of the breast: how successful are our current preoperative assessment modalities? ANZ J Surg 88:988–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.14815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jara-Lazaro AR, Akhilesh M, Thike AA, Lui PC, Tse GM, Tan PH (2010) Predictors of phyllodes tumours on core biopsy specimens of fibroepithelial neoplasms. Histopathology 57:220–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03607.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Resetkova E, Khazai L, Albarracin CT, Arribas E (2010) Clinical and radiologic data and core needle biopsy findings should dictate management of cellular fibroepithelial tumors of the breast. Breast J 16:573–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.01013.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yasir S, Gamez R, Jenkins S, Visscher DW, Nassar A (2014) Significant histologic features differentiating cellular fibroadenoma from phyllodes tumor on core needle biopsy specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 142:362–369. https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPZUZ96RESGPUP

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee AH, Hodi Z, Ellis IO, Elston CW (2007) Histological features useful in the distinction of phyllodes tumour and fibroadenoma on needle core biopsy of the breast. Histopathology 51:336–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02786.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan JM, Douglas-Jones AG, Gupta SK (2010) Analysis of histological features in needle core biopsy of breast useful in preoperative distinction between fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour. Histopathology 56:489–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03514.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsang AK, Chan SK, Lam CC, Lui PC, Chau HH, Tan PH, Tse GM (2011) Phyllodes tumours of the breast - differentiating features in core needle biopsy. Histopathology 59:600–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03939.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee AH (2008) Recent developments in the histological diagnosis of spindle cell carcinoma, fibromatosis and phyllodes tumour of the breast. Histopathology 52:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02893.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chia Y, Thike AA, Cheok PY, Yong-Zheng Chong L, Man-Kit Tse G, Tan PH (2012) Stromal keratin expression in phyllodes tumours of the breast: a comparison with other spindle cell breast lesions. J Clin Pathol 65:339–347. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200377

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee AHS, James J, Whisker L, Rakha EA, Ellis IO (2021) Which lesions with a radiological or core biopsy diagnosis of fibroadenoma should be excised? Ann R Coll Surg Engl (In press)

  27. Youk JH, Kim H, Kim EK, Son EJ, Kim MJ, Kim JA (2015) Phyllodes tumor diagnosed after ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision: should it be followed by surgical excision? Ultrasound Med Biol 41:741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.11.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tan BY, Acs G, Apple SK, Badve S, Bleiweiss IJ, Brogi E, Calvo JP, Dabbs DJ, Ellis IO, Eusebi V, Farshid G, Fox SB, Ichihara S, Lakhani SR, Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Richardson AL, Sahin A, Schmitt FC, Schnitt SJ, Siziopikou KP, Soares FA, Tse GM, Vincent-Salomon A, Tan PH (2016) Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review. Histopathology 68:5–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12876

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu Y, Chen Y, Zhu L, Cartwright P, Song E, Jacobs L, Chen K (2019) Local recurrence of benign, borderline, and malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 26:1263–1275. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07134-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barth RJ Jr (2019) Borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors: how often do they locally recur and is there anything we can do about it? Ann Surg Oncol 26:1973–1975. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07278-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tan EY, Tan PH, Yong WS, Wong HB, Ho GH, Yeo AW, Wong CY (2006) Recurrent phyllodes tumours of the breast: pathological features and clinical implications. ANZ J Surg 76:476–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03754.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Borhani-Khomani K, Talman ML, Kroman N, Tvedskov TF (2016) Risk of local recurrence of benign and borderline phyllodes tumors: a Danish population-based retrospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1543–1548. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-5041-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cowan ML, Argani P, Cimino-Mathews A (2016) Benign and low-grade fibroepithelial neoplasms of the breast have low recurrence rate after positive surgical margins. Mod Pathol 29:259–265. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moutte A, Chopin N, Faure C, Beurrier F, Ho Quoc C, Guinaudeau F, Treilleux I, Carrabin N (2016) Surgical management of benign and borderline phyllodes tumors of the breast. Breast J 22:547–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moo TA, Alabdulkareem H, Tam A, Fontanet C, Lu Y, Landers A, D’Alfonso T, Simmons R (2017) Association between recurrence and re-excision for close and positive margins versus observation in patients with benign phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 24:3088–3092. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5955-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosenberger LH, Thomas SM, Nimbkar SN, Hieken TJ, Ludwig KK, Jacobs LK, Miller ME, Gallagher KK, Wong J, Neuman HB, Tseng J, Hassinger TE, King TA, Jakub JW (2021) Contemporary multi-institutional cohort of 550 cases of phyllodes tumors (2007–2017) demonstrates a need for more individualized margin guidelines. J Clin Oncol 39:178–189. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.02647

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tan PH (2021) Fibroepithelial lesions revisited: implications for diagnosis and management. Mod Pathol 34:15–37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0583-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Piscuoglio S, Ng CK, Murray M, Burke KA, Edelweiss M, Geyer FC, Macedo GS, Inagaki A, Papanastasiou AD, Martelotto LG, Marchio C, Lim RS, Ioris RA, Nahar PK, Bruijn ID, Smyth L, Akram M, Ross D, Petrini JH, Norton L, Solit DB, Baselga J, Brogi E, Ladanyi M, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS (2016) Massively parallel sequencing of phyllodes tumours of the breast reveals actionable mutations, and TERT promoter hotspot mutations and TERT gene amplification as likely drivers of progression. J Pathol 238:508–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ng CCY, Md Nasir ND, Loke BN, Tay TKY, Thike AA, Rajasegaran V, Liu W, Lee JY, Guan P, Lim AH, Chang KTE, Gudi MA, Madhukumar P, Tan BKT, Tan VKM, Wong CY, Yong WS, Ho GH, Ong KW, International Fibroepithelial Consortium, Yip GWC, Bay BH, Tan P, Teh BT, Tan PH (2021) Genetic differences between benign phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas revealed through targeted next generation sequencing. Mod Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00787-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yeong J, Thike AA, Ng CC, Md Nasir ND, Loh K, Teh BT, Tan PH (2017) A genetic mutation panel for differentiating malignant phyllodes tumour from metaplastic breast carcinoma. Pathology 49:786–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2017.07.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lien HC, Huang CS, Yang YW, Jeng YM (2016) MED12 exon 2 mutation as a highly sensitive and specific marker in distinguishing phyllodes tumours from other spindle neoplasms of the breast. APMIS 124:356–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ng CC, Tan J, Ong CK, Lim WK, Rajasegaran V, Nasir ND, Lim JC, Thike AA, Salahuddin SA, Iqbal J, Busmanis I, Chong AP, Teh BT, Tan PH (2015) MED12 is frequently mutated in breast phyllodes tumours: a study of 112 cases. J Clin Pathol 68:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2015-202896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yoon N, Bae GE, Kang SY, Choi MS, Hwang HW, Kim SW, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Gong G, Lee HJ, Bae YK, Lee A, Cho EY (2016) Frequency of MED12 mutations in phyllodes tumors: inverse correlation with histologic grade. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 55:495–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou P, Zhang Q, Zhu J, Li P (2021) Molecular characterization of pleomorphic liposarcomatous differentiation in malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: a case report. Pathol Res Pract 224:153489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2021.153489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mitus J, Adamczyk A, Majchrzyk K, Kowalik A, Rys J, Niemiec J (2020) Comparison of mutation profile between primary phyllodes tumors of the breast and their paired local recurrences. Pol J Pathol 71:7–12. https://doi.org/10.5114/pjp.2020.94899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Md Nasir ND, Ng CCY, Rajasegaran V, Wong SF, Liu W, Ng GXP, Lee JY, Guan P, Lim JQ, Thike AA, Koh VCY, Loke BN, Chang KTE, Gudi MA, Lian DWQ, Madhukumar P, Tan BKT, Tan VKM, Wong CY, Yong WS, Ho GH, Ong KW, International Fibroepithelial C, Tan P, Teh BT, Tan PH (2019) Genomic characterisation of breast fibroepithelial lesions in an international cohort. J Pathol 249:447–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.5333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sim Y, Ng GXP, Ng CCY, Rajasegaran V, Wong SF, Liu W, Guan P, Nagarajan S, Ng WY, Thike AA, Lim JCT, Nasir N, Tan VKM, Madhukumar P, Yong WS, Wong CY, Tan BKT, Ong KW, Teh BT, Tan PH (2019) A novel genomic panel as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for the characterization and profiling of breast Fibroepithelial lesions. BMC Med Genomics 12:142. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-019-0588-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Koh VCY, Ng CCY, Bay BH, Teh BT, Tan PH (2019) The utility of a targeted gene mutation panel in refining the diagnosis of breast phyllodes tumours. Pathology 51:531–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2019.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Xie SN, Cai YJ, Ma B, Xu Y, Qian P, Zhou JD, Zhao FG, Chen J (2019) The genomic mutation spectrums of breast fibroadenomas in Chinese population by whole exome sequencing analysis. Cancer Med 8:2372–2379. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Tay TKY, Guan P, Loke BN, Nasir NDM, Rajasegaran V, Thike AA, Lian D, Chang KTE, Teh BT, Ng CCY, Tan PH (2018) Molecular insights into paediatric breast fibroepithelial tumours. Histopathology 73:809–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kim JY, Yu JH, Nam SJ, Kim SW, Lee SK, Park WY, Noh DY, Nam DH, Park YH, Han W, Lee JE (2018) Genetic and clinical characteristics of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Transl Oncol 11:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2017.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Garcia-Dios DA, Levi D, Shah V, Gillett C, Simpson MA, Hanby A, Tomlinson I, Sawyer EJ (2018) MED12, TERT promoter and RBM15 mutations in primary and recurrent phyllodes tumours. Br J Cancer 118:277–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Nozad S, Sheehan CE, Gay LM, Elvin JA, Vergilio JA, Suh J, Ramkissoon S, Schrock AB, Hirshfield KM, Ali N, Ganesan S, Ali SM, Miller VA, Stephens PJ, Ross JS, Chung JH (2017) Comprehensive genomic profiling of malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 162:597–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4156-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu SY, Joseph NM, Ravindranathan A, Stohr BA, Greenland NY, Vohra P, Hosfield E, Yeh I, Talevich E, Onodera C, Van Ziffle JA, Grenert JP, Bastian BC, Chen YY, Krings G (2016) Genomic profiling of malignant phyllodes tumors reveals aberrations in FGFR1 and PI-3 kinase/RAS signaling pathways and provides insights into intratumoral heterogeneity. Mod Pathol 29:1012–1027. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2016.97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tan WJ, Cima I, Choudhury Y, Wei X, Lim JC, Thike AA, Tan MH, Tan PH (2016) A five-gene reverse transcription-PCR assay for pre-operative classification of breast fibroepithelial lesions. Breast Cancer Res 18:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0692-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Gatalica Z, Vranic S, Ghazalpour A, Xiu J, Ocal IT, McGill J, Bender RP, Discianno E, Schlum A, Sanati S, Palazzo J, Reddy S, Pockaj B (2016) Multiplatform molecular profiling identifies potentially targetable biomarkers in malignant phyllodes tumors of the breast. Oncotarget 7:1707–1716. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6421

  57. Tan J, Ong CK, Lim WK, Ng CC, Thike AA, Ng LM, Rajasegaran V, Myint SS, Nagarajan S, Thangaraju S, Dey S, Nasir ND, Wijaya GC, Lim JQ, Huang D, Li Z, Wong BH, Chan JY, McPherson JR, Cutcutache I, Poore G, Tay ST, Tan WJ, Putti TC, Ahmad BS, Iau P, Chan CW, Tang AP, Yong WS, Madhukumar P, Ho GH, Tan VK, Wong CY, Hartman M, Ong KW, Tan BK, Rozen SG, Tan P, Tan PH, Teh BT (2015) Genomic landscapes of breast fibroepithelial tumors. Nat Genet 47:1341–1345. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cani AK, Hovelson DH, McDaniel AS, Sadis S, Haller MJ, Yadati V, Amin AM, Bratley J, Bandla S, Williams PD, Rhodes K, Liu CJ, Quist MJ, Rhodes DR, Grasso CS, Kleer CG, Tomlins SA (2015) Next-gen sequencing exposes frequent MED12 mutations and actionable therapeutic targets in phyllodes tumors. Mol Cancer Res 13:613–619. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-14-0578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Tan WJ, Lai JC, Thike AA, Lim JC, Tan SY, Koh VC, Lim TH, Bay BH, Tan MH, Tan PH (2014) Novel genetic aberrations in breast phyllodes tumours: comparison between prognostically distinct groups. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:635–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2982-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ang MK, Ooi AS, Thike AA, Tan P, Zhang Z, Dykema K, Furge K, Teh BT, Tan PH (2011) Molecular classification of breast phyllodes tumors: validation of the histologic grading scheme and insights into malignant progression. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129:319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-1204-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms Valerie Koh and Ms Diyana Nasir, Research Officers, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Singapore General Hospital, for assistance in technical formatting and with Table 3, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed in the drafting of the manuscript and have approved the final version for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Puay Hoon Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lerwill, M.F., Lee, A.H.S. & Tan, P.H. Fibroepithelial tumours of the breast—a review. Virchows Arch 480, 45–63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03175-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03175-6

Keywords

Navigation