Skip to main content
Log in

Two grain beetle species, one resource, different patterns of genetic structure: implications for management

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Pest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rhyzopertha dominica and Tribolium castaneum are key pests of stored grains globally. These two species often occur together in infestations, and are seldom found outside the agricultural environment. Understanding the movement of these beetle pests is crucial for the development of management strategies, in particular to prevent the spread of phosphine resistance, which is a serious issue in many countries. We sampled both of these beetle species from farm silos across Australia, and used microsatellite markers to assess whether these two pests sharing the same resource show similar patterns of genetic diversity and genetic structure. Both species had high levels of genetic diversity, and showed some evidence of genetic structure across Australia, but the patterns of genetic structure differed across the two species. Specifically, our results suggest that there is significant gene flow in T. castaneum across Australia, with the clear isolation-by-distance pattern indicating that active flight may play an important role in determining genetic structure in this species. The significant movement of T. castaneum beetles across Australia will likely result in the continued spread of phosphine resistance alleles across Australia, leading to increased incidence of strongly resistance populations. Less gene flow was evident in R. dominica, suggesting movement of these beetles among localities is more restricted. Our results demonstrate that pests mostly sharing the same resources can significantly differ in their genetic structure and genetic diversity, suggesting species-specific management practices are essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the farming enterprises across Australia for allowing access to their land, as well as Andrew Ridley, Jo Holloway, Rob Emery, and Philip Burrill, for providing samples.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Australia–India Strategic Research Grand Challenge Funded (GCF010006) project entitled “Ensuring food security: harnessing science to protect our grain harvest from insect threats”, jointly sponsored by the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, India, and the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research, Canberra, Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. A. McCulloch.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to publication of this manuscript.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Additional information

Communicated by Christos G. Athanassiou.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 86 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCulloch, G.A., Daglish, G.J. & Walter, G.H. Two grain beetle species, one resource, different patterns of genetic structure: implications for management. J Pest Sci 95, 959–969 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-021-01430-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-021-01430-y

Keywords

Navigation