Materials Today Chemistry
Volume 22, December 2021, 100552
Journal home page for Materials Today Chemistry

Dielectric polarization of cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide)—phenomenology

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100552Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The dielectric behavior as fluctuation-dissipation behavior in thermodynamics sense of cross-linked PEO is discussed.

  • The dielectric behavior is reflected in permittivity, real part of conductivity, dipole moment and finally loss modulus.

  • Electric properties of polymers can be understood from the transport properties-molecular interactions relationship.

Abstract

Results of dielectric relaxation studies will be discussed. It turns out that competition of electric and structural relaxation coins permittivity and as a result conductivity mechanism at low temperature. It dominates long-ranging relaxation in the molten state. In the opposite limit of temperature, cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) with low mesh size can be transferred into super-cooled liquid state. Then, PEO behaves like a hydrogen-bonded liquid since crystallization is strongly suppressed. As a result, one observes slow Debye-like relaxation at low temperature. Beyond the low-frequency region, there appears an extended region between crossings of impedance components, where Z′ ≈ Z″ at acceptable approximation. It is coined by damped oscillation under action of the electric field. These effects lessen with increasing mesh size of the sample as clearly shown by M″(ω) spectra. The dipole moment of the PEO samples in molten state decreases only slightly with increasing mesh size.

Introduction

We are going to discuss dielectric properties of neat cross-linked poly(ethylene oxide), PEO(S–M), having different mesh sizes from molar mass M = 400 g/mol up to 6000 g/mol [1]. Properties are determined in a wide range of temperature. It turns out that dielectric responses are frequency dependent and thermally activated at high temperature.

Poly(ethylene oxide) is a polar polymer carrying longitudinal dipoles along the backbone. We may say one monomer represents a molecular dipole. Alignment of dipoles in an electric field leads to orientation polarization which is lifting thermal disorder. Thus, we expect that orientation of dipoles contributes to macroscopic polarization in the system. We mention in parenthesis, there is also a dipole component transverse to the field. However, its relaxation is quite fast and outside the frequency range of impedance spectroscopy.

There are two phases in PEO(S–M) samples below melting point, crystalline PEO and an elastomeric, liquid-like phase. The latter is not in equilibrium at low temperature owing to locked-in entropy of high molar mass polymers. Electric conductivity in polymers cannot be seen as Frenkel or Schottky mechanism [2,3]. Fluctuation–dissipation effects might be more adequate for describing conductivity in amorphous polymer phase [4].

Cross-linked PEO comprises permanent and reversible associations due to extended hydrogen bonding. The latter develop and decay in time scales of impedance spectroscopy. Experiments show that interactions between more or less disordered networks in amorphous phase allow for long-ranging motion of charged entities as well as strictly local relaxation. Both modes rule conductance of pure polymer systems, that is, one may observe long-ranging electric relaxation at very low and high temperature as well as strictly localized motions of charged entities. Hence, weak bonds underpin fluctuation–dissipation effects. There are quite a number of studies dealing with relationship between electric conductivity and structural relaxation in polymers [[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]]. Some low molar masses, polar polymers, display electric properties can be readily assigned to polymer electrolytes. It is well known that electric conductivity can be observed preferably in amorphous continuous phase region of the semi-crystalline material. In high molar mass PEO (106 g/mol), one observes at melting temperature a jump of conductivity by two orders of magnitude [19]. The transition in conductivity Δσ does not appear in low molar mass PEO as we will see later in conductivity function over frequency.

Electric conductivity of neat PEO as a function of temperature displays a jump Δσ > 0 at melting temperature due to disappearing of crystalline domains at sufficiently high temperature or formation of continuous amorphous phase. In PEO with high cross-linking density, in some cases, the close-meshed network or cross-linked PEO with short ethylene oxide sequence prevents crystallization [13,20]. In this study, relaxation behavior of neat cross-linked PEO, formed by chains of low molar mass, will be elucidated.

Properties of PEO solutions are ruled by hydrogen bonding interactions in some cases [14]. Liquids which are rich in hydrogen bonding, e.g., monohydroxy alcohol and water, tend to clustering or formation of supra-molecular structures in super-cooled liquid state. Very often, these liquids show slow Debye-like dielectric relaxation in this condition [[15], [16], [17], [18]]. It is obvious that cross-linked PEO with different mesh sizes may display similar behavior if it can be transferred into super-cooled amorphous state. This is possible for the PEO network with the lowest molar mass of the ethylene oxide sequence, where crystallization can be prevented even at low temperatures [20]. Accordingly, two random networks in cross-linked PEO can be observed. One chemical in nature, the other one is rooted in hydrogen bonds leading to the formation of supra-molecular structures. These two networks respond differently to external changes. We will highlight in this study, chemical and physical network behave more or less separately in the neat system at low temperature.

Understanding of electric properties of polymers will be only possible when the relationship between transport properties and molecular interactions becomes transparent. This includes both internal clustering in the polymer as well as segmental interaction. Thus, the key point remains unraveling of complex interplay among molecular structure, hydrogen bond networks, and dynamics of charge transport. We see it chiefly as fluctuation–dissipation of electric field in dielectric system. In low molar mass, dilute aqueous electrolytes containing totally dissociated species, conductivity, and diffusivity are related by the famous Nernst-Einstein equation [21]. In the context of salt-free polymer electrolytes where competition between internal clustering and interaction between chain segments appear this framework might be replaced by fluctuations of electric field [22].

In this work, dynamics in neat cross-linked PEO with different mesh sizes will be discussed. It is the aim of this study to make this behavior more transparent by comparison of dielectric spectra of cross-linked PEO with different molar masses of the ethylene oxide sequence. Impedance spectroscopy is suitable to study dynamic electric properties of these systems. Data will be analyzed in terms of complex impedance ε∗, electric modulus , and conductivity. Description of the basic quantities and formalisms is discussed by Chan and Kammer [23].

Section snippets

Experimental [1]

Preparation of materials and applied procedures are described elsewhere [[24], [25], [26]]. We give here only a brief resume. The following discussion focuses primarily on cross-linked PEO having mesh sizes of M = 0.4, 1, and 6 kg/mol. They are encoded by PEO(S–M).

PEO(S–0.4 k)

We start with the system having the lowest mesh size, PEO(S–0.4 k). Fig. 1 presents permittivity vs. frequency for different temperatures. The maximum in Z″ at fmax, displayed under action of an oscillating electric field, gives the main relaxation, which originates from orientation of dipoles, and is born by interplay of samples’ resistance and capacitance. Development of double layer (or onset of electrode polarization) is visible as minimum of Z″ as a function of f with fmin < fmax as

Discussion

Relaxation at high temperature or in the molten state is universal with respect to mesh size. However, it depends quite specific on molar mass of the samples at low temperature reflecting crystallinity in the different networks [i.e., PEO(S–1 k) and PEO(S–6 k)]. Characteristic frequency fminZ" can be seen only at increasing temperature, T ≥ −30 °C, 0 °C, and 20 °C, respectively, in samples with increasing mash size. The sample with the lowest mesh size can be transferred in the super-cooled

Conclusion

Permittivity, electric conductivity, and dipole moment in mean field approximation have been discussed. We may state that, one observes depending on increasing influence of crystalline PEO at low temperature different modes in dynamics of relaxation. They are slow Debye-like relaxation, damped oscillation and strictly trapped dielectric relaxation. Loss modulus M″ (due to its proportionality to Z′) gives electric relaxation, that is, it is coined by non-local motion. Resonance occurs when

CRediT author statement

Chin Han Chan: Conceptualization and Editing; Hans-Werner Kammer: Writing, Visualization and Reviewing; Joerg Kressler: Data used in the following discussion were kindly provided by Prof. Joerg Kressler and his students, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany; accordingly, outlines under Experimental are quoted for information of the reader. It gives entirely activities of Kressler and his group for preparation of samples and spectroscopic measurements. Martin-Luther University

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Presentation, analysis, and discussion of impedance spectra are based on data provided by Professor Jörg Kressler and his students, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany. Authors express their thanks for collecting and granting of the data.

References (32)

  • Y. Choo et al.

    Prog. Polym. Sci.

    (2020)
  • R.J. Sengwa et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2018)
  • L.M. Carvalho et al.

    Eur. Polym. J.

    (2000)
  • Y. Golitsyn et al.

    Polymer

    (2019)
  • J. Kressler

    Data Used in the Following Discussion Were Kindly provided by Prof. Joerg Kressler and His Students, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany; Accordingly, Outlines under Experimental Are Quoted for Information of the Reader. It Gives Entirely Activities of Kressler and His Group for Preparation of Samples and Spectroscopic Measurements

    (2016)
  • J. Frenkel

    Z. Phys.

    (1926)
  • W.J. Moore et al.

    Grundlagen der Physikalischen Chemie

    (2011)
  • R. Kubo

    J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.

    (1957)
  • N. Lou et al.

    Macromolecules

    (2013)
  • B.K. Money et al.

    Solid State Ionics

    (2014)
  • C. Do et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2013)
  • C. Jangu et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. C

    (2015)
  • C.H. Chan et al.

    Polymers

    (2020)
  • S. Choudhury et al.

    Nat. Commun.

    (2019)
  • E.E. Dormidontova

    Macromolecules

    (2002)
  • M.A. Floriano et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1989)
  • View full text