ReviewAlloy design and adaptation for additive manufacture
Graphical abstract
Introduction
The triple point that occurs when we consider process, microstructure and property relationships is nowhere else more poignant than in the field of Additive Manufacturing (AM). Since the inception of the technologies which bring together energy beams and material delivery, focus has been given to the geometrical freedoms which became available to the designer. However, recent advances in the field allow us to adjust process and composition in unison to advance the properties of components built using AM technologies. We can now conceive of engineered artefacts which exhibit remarkably distinct properties as compared to their conventionally produced counterparts. This review will explore the role of adapted alloys in AM and link these to process characteristics with the purpose of providing a diverse research community with inspiration to exploit these opportunities further.
Comprehensive consideration of materials in additive manufacture has been provided by Bourell et al. previously (Bourell et al., 2017). The Bourell review provides a general introduction to all types of materials (ceramics, polymers and metals) processed by AM. Consideration is also given over here to the role of emergent systems including functional grading and the development of AM specific composite materials. It is apparent from this work that the role of materials innovation in the wider AM space is dramatic. As such, the present review will focus on metallic systems and how these are adapted for AM processes.
The precise beginnings of metal AM are difficult to pinpoint with numerous innovations being made simultaneously in both powder bed fusion (PBF) and directed energy deposition (DED). Excellent reviews by Yap et al. (2015) and Dass et al. (Dass and Moridi, 2019) explore the origins and usage of PBF and DED respectively. In unison these works highlight the rapid development of process capability alongside our understanding of the underpinning process physics. As such, this review will explore processes to a limited degree only in favour of focussing on the interplay between composition and process thermodynamics which define the microstructure and properties of materials produced by both DED and PBF.
Characteristic of the first twenty years in AM materials development has been a preference for deploying conventional materials within this process family. The current economics of AM technologies obliges researchers to concentrate on high value components which are often comprised of advanced alloys for specific applications. As such there is much evidence in the literature for exploration of commonly used alloys which benefit from the use of AM. It is challenging to highlight these individually and as such the reader is referred to comprehensive reviews in the processing via AM of the following materials Titanium (Liu and Shin, 2019), Aluminium (Aboulkhair et al., 2019), Nickel (Sanchez et al., 2021a), Iron (Bajaj et al., 2020) and Magnesium (Karunakaran et al., 2020). An authoritative review of Copper processing by AM is yet to be published but the reader is referred to experimental studies via electron beam melting (EBM) (Ramirez et al., 2011), laser PBF (LPBF) (Silbernagel et al., 2019) and DED (Zhang et al., 2021a) which underline the growing interest in Copper as an AM compatible material.
In terms of aggregating prior contributions to the literature a simple consideration of the rate of publications with time is a useful approach. Fig. 1 shows the sharp increase in the rate of publication in relation to AM of specific materials of interest to this review.
The rate of increase is remarkable, and the reader will note the dominance of exploration relating to steel, aluminium and titanium-based systems. Anecdotally interest in these materials will be driven by applications in the aerospace, biomedical and tooling sectors. It is within these sectors that the most readily available opportunities for AM technology exploitation reside.
While this review focuses on the innovations made to materials the rapid development of the machine tool technology is also worthy of consideration in this introduction. Two primary approaches are reported in the literature for the creation of macro scale components in metals. Powder bed fabrication has two primary approaches which use laser beam (King et al., 2015) or electron beam (Körner, 2016) to allow melting and resulting in localised consolidation. Similarly, DED may draw upon laser or electron beam-based approaches, but the current research activity is dominated by laser-based approaches. Hybridization of these technologies with subtractive methods has also developed prevalence in the literature with machining of DED (Dávila et al., 2020) and PBF (Pragana et al., 2021) within process now reported. This is accompanied by marked efforts to enhance process control through increased instrumentation (Everton et al., 2016). While the advancement to process technology is also central to the capability of AM it falls outside of the scope of this project in favour of concentrating on materials innovation.
With regards to materials innovation in AM, this is very much a rapidly moving feast. New materials are being processed successfully for the first time on a regular basis and these are being reported with increasing frequency. A comprehensive pallet of ‘processible’ materials can be found in Table 1.
It is apparent that there are a number of materials which have been processed by AM where additional work is required to verify process-material combination. Further, some widely used materials are yet to be explored in a meaningful way. It is from this basis that the present review seeks to elucidate the latest and most meaningful adaptations to alloy compositions to enhance processability.
Having identified the gaps in the literature for a review in materials technology for AM the authors propose the present review which is built around technologies to solve a simplistic problem to define to but a complex problem to address, Fig. 2.
The structure of this review is intended to provide systematic observations on the mechanics of the techniques of DED and PBF and elucidate how the characteristics of heat and mass transfer influence the processability and the resulting microstructure which are characteristic of the processes of interest. Process thermodynamics in both process types are driven by the means of energy delivery (energy beam) and mode of material delivery (powder bed, powder/wire dynamic delivery). In all processes considered in this review complete melting of the feed material takes places. When these transition into the liquid phase and form a melt-pool the specifics of the work material dictate firstly molten behaviour, cooling, recrystallisation and solidification. The literature is speckled with reports of characteristic defects associated with AM techniques (Kyogoku and Ikeshoji, 2020) and means by which to identify them (du Plessis et al., 2020) identifying the current process-material shortfalls. The authors argue here that these serve to limit the uptake of AM for industrial application and hence must be overcome. Indeed, process innovation will contribute to this but the role of material innovation will be significant. It is seemingly inevitable that alloys will require modification and adaptation such that they become more compatible with the thermodynamics associated with AM. This is explored in the early stage of this review and general observations are related to specific processes.
Following a fundamental exploration of material-process interaction this review moves review the literature pertaining to key materials of interest. Fig. 1 highlights the primary materials reported for DED and PBF in the literature. As such this review explores the augmentation reported for these materials specifically to AM. A suite of methods have been explored in the literature to adapt alloys to enhance AM product. In general alloy adaptation is undertaken for three reasons i) enhance processability/broaden process windows ii) to enhance the performance characteristics of the product material and iii) reduce the requirement for post processing by any means. The methods by which alloy augmentation can be achieved are varied and draw upon insight to fundamental materials science and are often bespoke to the ‘parent’ metal.
This review brings these together for the first time with the intention of providing a succinct resource from which scholars developing new materials or requiring strategies to process troublesome materials may find inspiration. This review will be of interest to those exploring approaches to overcome the inherent materials characteristics (in Fe, Ni, Ti, Al and high entropy alloy systems) which make them currently suboptimal in combination with the process state-of-the-art.
Section snippets
Process capability
When considering metal AM, the types of feedstock material and energy source are prime considerations. AM technologies for metallic materials can be categorized into two forms, i.e., metal powder-based, and metal wire-based technologies; whereas the energy sources used include laser beam, electron beam, and arc (Badiru et al., 2017). Table 2 gives a summary of the dominant AM technologies for the fabrication of metallic components and their deposition mode, deposition rate, and quality of
Overview of commonly process stainless steels
As discussed for all materials weldability is a primary concern in AM and Fe-based systems are no different. To achieve favourable outcomes temperature/process adjustments during the build are required (Hitzler et al., 2018). Critical observations around the usage of Fe-based alloys found in research and commercial use are listed in Table 7 (see Appendix A – Properties of Fe alloys produced by AM).
Based on Fig. 1, it can be concluded that the focus of Fe-based AM-material is directed to
DED of adapted Ti alloys
DED processing of Ti and Ti alloys, often results in the co-existence of columnar β-grain with an accompanying lamellar α phase. The long and thin epitaxial grown prior-β grains are considered a critical factor of the undesirable anisotropic mechanical properties in DED-fabricated titanium components limiting their deployment in service. To reduce anisotropy in mechanical properties, a range of Ti alloys have been developed to achieve grain refinement in AM processes (Mendoza et al., 2017;
General considerations when processing Ni superalloys
A superalloy is defined as a material with exceptional mechanical properties, allowing it to be used above 540 °C or 0.7 of its absolute melting point (Bowman, 2000; Donachie and Donachie, 2002). These alloys can be Iron, Cobalt or Nickel based, the latter being the most appropriate for turbochargers and engines. These Nickel superalloys can withstand high stresses up to 0.9 Tm (where Tm is typically in excess of 1000 °C). All superalloys have a face cantered cubic (FCC) matrix as this
Characteristics of Al alloys for AM
Aluminium alloys have two designations, a three-digit alloy numbering for cast alloys such as A3XX (Al-Si alloys), or a four digit alloy numbering system for wrought such as 6XXX (Al-Mg-Si) alloys. The wrought alloys traditionally have better mechanical properties and much of that advantage is derived from thermomechanical processing of cast ingots. As, mentioned in the introductory sections, the fusion-based AM processes bear marked similarities to casting techniques. The alloying approaches
Characteristics and printability of high entropy alloys
In 2004, two parallel publications on high entropy alloy (Yeh et al., 2004) or multi-principal elements alloy (Cantor et al., 2004) produced a paradigm shift in the way we look at metallic alloys. As discussed in this review so far, each class of metallic material is discussed on the basis of the anchor element. For example, in aluminum alloys, aluminum is the primary matrix or host element and alloying elements are added in this host. On the other hand, the onset of high entropy alloys (HEA)
Conclusions and future perspectives
This review has explored the state-of-the-art of new materials innovation for powder bed fusion and directed energy deposition. The authors have introduced the processes and associated peculiarities of these which renders them unfavourable for some families of materials without further attention. Typically, problematic metals for AM exhibit at least one of three characteristics i) poor melt pool behaviour ii) localised stresses upon cooling and iii) formation of unfavourable phases during
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors report no declarations of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to their respective communities without which there would be insufficient literature to consider writing a review. ATC would like to kindly acknowledge the support of Ms Sandra Dankova for help in preparation of this document.
References (435)
- et al.
Selective laser melting for manufacturing of thin-walled porous elements
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
(2015) - et al.
3D printing of Aluminium alloys: additive Manufacturing of Aluminium alloys using selective laser melting
Prog. Mater. Sci.
(2019) - et al.
Excellent strength-ductility synergy in metastable high entropy alloy by laser powder bed additive manufacturing
Addit. Manuf.
(2020) - et al.
Influence of microstructure and manganese sulfides on corrosion resistance of selective laser melted 17-4 PH stainless steel in acidic chloride medium
Corros. Sci.
(2020) - et al.
A novel method for manufacturing sintered aluminium heat pipes (SAHP)
Appl. Therm. Eng.
(2013) - et al.
Laser directed energy deposition of water-atomized iron powder: process optimization and microstructure of single-tracks
Opt. Laser Technol.
(2019) - et al.
Manufacture by selective laser melting and mechanical behavior of commercially pure titanium
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
(2014) - et al.
Recent developments and opportunities in additive manufacturing of titanium-based matrix composites: a review
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
(2018) - et al.
Additive manufacturing of a novel Ti-Al-V-Fe alloy using selective laser melting
Addit. Manuf.
(2018) - et al.
Influence mechanism of parameters process and mechanical properties evolution mechanism of maraging steel 300 by selective laser melting
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
(2017)
Laser direct deposition of AISI H13 tool steel powder with numerical modeling of solid phase transformation, hardness, and residual stresses
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
Steels in additive manufacturing: a review of their microstructure and properties
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Laser processed TiN reinforced Ti6Al4V composite coatings
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures
Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep.
Direct laser deposition of in situ Ti–6Al–4V–TiB composites
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V components by shaped metal deposition: microstructure and mechanical properties
Mater. Des.
Effect of laser focus shift on surface quality and density of Inconel 718 parts produced via selective laser melting
Addit. Manuf.
Processing window for laser metal deposition of Al 7075 powder with minimized defects
J. Manuf. Process.
Controlling the microstructure and properties of wire arc additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V with trace boron additions
Acta Mater.
Microstructure refinement for superior ductility of Al–Si alloy by electron beam melting
Addit. Manuf.
Precipitation in 300 grade maraging steel built by selective laser melting: aging at 510 °C for 2 h
Mater. Charact.
Additive manufacturing of tool steel by laser metal deposition
Procedia Cirp
Materials for additive manufacturing
CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol.
Single-crystal height extension by laser metal deposition of CMSX-4
Procedia Cirp
Crack propagation and fracture toughness of Ti6Al4V alloy produced by selective laser melting
Addit. Manuf.
Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Anisotropic tensile behavior of Ti–6Al–4V components fabricated with directed energy deposition additive manufacturing
Acta Mater.
Functionally graded material of 304L stainless steel and inconel 625 fabricated by directed energy deposition: characterization and thermodynamic modeling
Acta Mater.
The influence of the laser scan strategy on grain structure and cracking behaviour in SLM powder-bed fabricated nickel superalloy
J. Alloys. Compd.
Fractal scan strategies for selective laser melting of ‘unweldable’ nickel superalloys
Addit. Manuf.
Variation of texture anisotropy and hardness with build parameters and wall height in directed-energy-deposited 316L steel
Addit. Manuf.
Influence of heat treatment on microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of TiB2/Al 2024 composites fabricated by directed energy deposition
J. Mater. Res. Technol.
Laser calorimetry for assessment of melting behaviour in multi-walled carbon nanotube decorated aluminium by laser powder bed fusion
CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol.
Thermal and mechanical finite element modeling of laser forming from metal and ceramic powders
Acta Mater.
Additive manufacturing of metallic components–process, structure and properties
Prog. Mater. Sci.
Microstructure and anisotropic mechanical properties of EBM manufactured Inconel 718 and effects of post heat treatments
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) process of nickel based superalloys–A review
Mater. Today Proc.
Selective laser melting of HY100 steel: process parameters, microstructure and mechanical properties
Addit. Manuf.
Laser aided direct metal deposition of Inconel 625 superalloy: microstructural evolution and thermal stability
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Evolution of microstructure in laser deposited Al–11.28%Si alloy
Surf. Coat. Technol.
Microstructure of selective laser melted CM247LC nickel-based superalloy and its evolution through heat treatment
Mater. Charact.
Comparison of the fatigue strength between additively and conventionally fabricated tool steel 1.2344
Addit. Manuf.
Effects of defects on mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: a review focusing on X-ray tomography insights
Mater. Des.
Numerical analysis of the weldability of superalloys
Acta Mater.
Mechanical properties in the semi-solid state and hot tearing of aluminium alloys
Prog. Mater. Sci.
Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing
Mater. Des.
Effects of direct aging on near-alpha Ti–6Al–2Sn–4Zr–2Mo (Ti-6242) titanium alloy fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM)
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
Microstructure and properties of selective laser melted high hardness tool steel
Phys. Procedia
Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies
Property evaluation of 304L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting
Rapid Prototyp. J.
Cited by (47)
Research progress in laser additive manufacturing of aluminum alloys: Microstructure, defect, and properties
2024, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyMicrostructure and mechanical properties of AlTiCrFe and AlTiCrCu alloys processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
2024, Materials Science and Engineering: AHigh-temperature high-cycle fatigue performance and machine learning-based fatigue life prediction of additively manufactured Hastelloy X
2024, International Journal of FatigueAnisotropy in 3D-printed (FeCoNi)<inf>86</inf>Al<inf>7</inf>Ti<inf>7</inf> high entropy alloy
2023, Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyPartially melted powder in laser based directed energy deposition: Formation mechanism and its influence on microstructure
2023, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture