Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical and theoretical studies about in-plane impact properties of Semi-Reentrant structures

  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The in-plane impact and crushing properties have been studied for the Semi Reentrant structure (SRS) by using numerical simulations and theoretical studies. Different deformation modes during impact process could be observed under the various impact velocities, and there were three and two deformation modes in x1 and x2 directions, respectively, no matter for single or double sidewall conditions. The influence of arm length l and cell wall thickness t on the critical impact velocities of different deformation modes was investigated. With the increase of cell wall thickness, the critical velocity in both directions increased and power-law relations could be established. With the increase of inclined arms length l, the critical velocity in x1 direction was almost the constant while that in x2 direction generally decreased and was described by the power-law relationship. The influence of impact velocity on the dynamic elastic moduli was studied and the fitting curves between the normalized velocity and moduli were characterized by using piecewise functions. Moreover, the effect of impact velocity on the plateau stress, densification strain and densification strain energy were also analyzed, and related fitting expressions were obtained. Besides, theoretical models for predicting static and dynamic plateau stress and densification strain energy for SRS were established based on the previous study. The analytical model of dynamic plateau stress was then revised according to the fitting equations with a large enhancement of predicting accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tianjian L (2002) Ultralight porous metals: from fundamentals to applications. Acta Mech Sin 18(5):457–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu F et al (2009) Analytical investigation and optimal design of sandwich panels subjected to shock loading. Mater Des 30(1):91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fleck NA, Deshpande VS (2004) The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading. J Appl Mech 71(3):386–401

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu LL, Yu TX (2010) Dynamic crushing strength of hexagonal honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 37(5):467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dharmasena K et al (2009) Dynamic response of a multilayer prismatic structure to impulsive loads incident from water. Int J Impact Eng 36(4):632–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Xue Z, Hutchinson JW (2004) A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates. Int J Impact Eng 30(10):1283–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rathbun HJ et al (2006) Performance of metallic honeycomb-core sandwich beams under shock loading. Int J Solids Struct 43(6):1746–1763

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruan D et al (2003) In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs—a finite element study. Int J Impact Eng 28(2):161–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Zhang X (2009) The influence of cell micro-topology on the in-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 36(1):98–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu LL, Yu TX (2010) Dynamic crushing strength of hexagonal honeycombs. Int J Impact Eng 37(5):467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu LL, Yu TX (2013) Mechanical behavior of hexagonal honeycombs under low-velocity impact–theory and simulations. Int J Solids Struct 50(20–21):3152–3165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson LJ et al (1982) The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 382(1782):25–42

    Google Scholar 

  14. Robert F (1985) An isotropic three-dimensional structure with Poisson’s ratio = – 1. J Elast 15(4):427–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang X, Blackburn S (2002) Developing a new processing route to manufacture honeycomb ceramics with negative Poisson’s ratio. Key Eng Mater 206(213):201–204

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lakes RS, Elms K (1993) Indentability of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio foams. J Compos Mater 27(12):1193–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lakes R (1987) Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science 235:1038–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scarpa F, Ciffo LG, Yates JR (2003) Dynamic properties of high structural integrity auxetic open cell foam. Smart Mater Struct 13(1):49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Evans KE (1990) Tailoring the negative Poisson ratio. Chem Ind 20:654–657

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S (2016) Effective in-plane elastic properties of auxetic honeycombs with spatial irregularity. Mech Mater 95:204–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boldrin L et al (2016) Dynamic behaviour of auxetic gradient composite hexagonal honeycombs. Compos Struct 149:114–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xiao D et al (2019) Compression behavior of the graded metallic auxetic reentrant honeycomb: experiment and finite element analysis. Mater Sci Eng A 758:163–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang X et al (2015) The influence of cell micro-structure on the in-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Sandwich Struct Mater 17(1):26–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruan D et al (2003) In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs—a finite element study. Int J Impact Eng 28(2):161–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hou X, Deng Z, Zhang K (2016) Dynamic crushing strength analysis of auxetic honeycombs. Acta Mech Solida Sin 29(5):490–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang J et al (2018) Tensile behavior of an auxetic structure: analytical modeling and finite element analysis. Int J Mech Sci 136:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang J et al (2018) Large deformation of an auxetic structure in tension: experiments and finite element analysis. Compos Struct 184:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Imbalzano G et al (2017) Three-dimensional modelling of auxetic sandwich panels for localised impact resistance. J Sandwich Struct Mater 19(3):291–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Imbalzano G et al (2018) Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: comparisons and parametric designs. Compos Struct 183:242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reid SR, Peng C (1997) Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood. Int J Impact Eng 19(5–6):531–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu LL, Zhou MZ, Deng H (2018) Dynamic crushing response of auxetic honeycombs under large deformation: theoretical analysis and numerical simulation. Thin-Walled Struct 131:373–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hu L, You F, Yu T (2013) Effect of cell-wall angle on the in-plane crushing behaviour of hexagonal honeycombs. Mater Des 46:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee W et al (2019) Effect of auxetic structures on crash behavior of cylindrical tube. Compos Struct 208:836–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou Z, Zhou J, Fan H (2017) Plastic analyses of thin-walled steel honeycombs with re-entrant deformation style. Mater Sci Eng A 688:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dong Z et al (2019) Experimental and numerical studies on the compressive mechanical properties of the metallic auxetic reentrant honeycomb. Mater Des 182:108036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Grima JN, Oliveri L, Attard D et al (2010) Hexagonal honeycombs with zero Poisson’s ratios and enhanced stiffness. Adv Eng Mater 9(12):855–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Grima JN, Oliveri L, Attard D (2009) Paper presented at the 6th international workshop on auxetics & related systems. Bolton (UK)

  38. Davini C et al (2017) A 2D microstructure with auxetic out-of-plane behavior and non-auxetic in-plane behavior. Smart Mater Struct 26(12):125007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun DQ, Zhang WH (2008) In plane impact properties of aluminum double walled honeycomb cores. J Vib Shock 27(7):69–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3122021083) from Civil Aviation University of China. And also thanks for the early support from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (Grant No. A1896a0034) and National University of Singapore.

Funding

This study was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3122021083).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dongquan Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

For the Semi Reentrant structures (see Fig. 2c), the plateau stress could be considered as the combination of Honeycomb and Reentrarnt. The basic force diagram of Semi Reentrant structure in x1 direction is shown in Fig. 16.

When the plateau stress \({\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}\) is reached, the force applied on the top inclined arm (AB) could be expressed as:

$${P}_{U}={\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}(h+lsin\alpha )d$$
(27)

The moment of force around hinge points A and B could be expressed as:

$${{M}_{U}=P}_{U}lsin\alpha ={\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}(h+lsin\alpha )dlsin\alpha$$
(28)

When the plastic hinge points A and B plastically rotate the angle ф, the plastic work done at the hinges are:

$${W}_{U}={M}_{U}{\Phi}={\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}(h+lsin\alpha ){\Phi}dlsin\alpha$$
(29)

And this plastic work should be equal to the two times of work done by the pure plastic moment \({M}_{p}\) of the cell wall AB, and the pure plastic moment \({M}_{p}\) is generally described by,

$${M}_{p}=\frac{1}{4}{\sigma }_{y}d{t}^{2}$$
(30)

where \({\sigma }_{y}\) is the yielding stress of the cell wall materials.

Hence, the work done by pure plastic moment \({M}_{p}\) of the cell wall AB is

$${W}_{p}={M}_{p}{\Phi}=\frac{1}{4}{\Phi}{\sigma }_{y}d{t}^{2}$$
(31)

Hence, there exists following equation:

$${W}_{U}=2{W}_{p}$$
(32)

Then for the bottom inclined arm (CD) could be expressed as:

$${P}_{B}={\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}(h-lsin\beta )d$$
(33)

The moment of force around hinge points C and D could be expressed as:

$${{M}_{B}=P}_{B}lsin\beta ={\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}(h-lsin\beta )dlsin\beta$$
(34)

When the plastic hinge points C and D plastically rotate the angle ф, the plastic work done at the hinges are:

$${W}_{B}={M}_{B}{\Phi}={\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}(h-lsin\beta ){\Phi}dlsin\beta$$
(35)

And this plastic work is also equal to the two times of work done by the pure plastic moment \({M}_{p}\) of the cell wall CD:

$${W}_{B}=2{W}_{p}$$
(36)

By combining Eqs. (32) and (36), the total plastic work could be obtained for the Semi Reentrant cell,

$${W}_{T}={W}_{B}+{W}_{U}=4{W}_{p}$$
(37)

The by substituting Eqs. (29), (30) and (35), the following equation is obtained,

$${\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}\left(h+lsin\alpha \right){\Phi}dlsin\alpha +{\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}\left(h-lsin\beta \right){\Phi}dlsin\beta ={\Phi}{\sigma }_{y}d{t}^{2}$$
(38)

Thus the plateau stress in x1 direction could be arranged as follows,

$${\left({\sigma }_{0}\right)}_{1}={\sigma }_{y}{\left(\frac{t}{l}\right)}^{2}\frac{1}{2\left(\frac{h}{l}\left(sin\alpha +sin\beta \right)+{sin}^{2}\alpha -{sin}^{2}\beta \right)}\quad \left( {{\text{in}}\;x_{1} \;{\text{direction}}} \right)$$
(39)
Fig. 16
figure 16

The basic force diagram of Semi Reentrant structure in x1 direction

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, D., Lee, H.P. Numerical and theoretical studies about in-plane impact properties of Semi-Reentrant structures. Meccanica 57, 313–336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01425-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-021-01425-0

Keywords

Navigation