Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A multi-scale, multi-species approach highlights the importance of urban greenspace and pond design for amphibian communities

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanisation threatens species through habitat loss, isolation and fragmentation. Greenspace in urban landscapes often provides connectivity and habitat for wetland-dependent species. Accessible greenspace measures the combined effects of movement barriers (e.g., roads) and the total amount of greenspace on populations. I determined whether accessible greenspace was a better predictor of amphibian occupancy at ponds than the total amount of greenspace, and at what spatial scale. I also assessed the relative importance of habitat variables at the local pond-scale. Frog surveys were conducted at 65 ponds distributed along an urban–rural gradient over two breeding seasons in the greater Melbourne region, Australia. Accessible greenspace was mapped around ponds at varying spatial scales (250 m – 2000 m) using potential barriers to amphibian movement. The best-ranked multi-species occupancy model included the proportion of total greenspace within a 1000-m radius of a pond and four local-scale covariates (presence of mosquitofish, pond permanence, vertical pond walls and water conductivity). There was no support for models containing accessible greenspace. There was a positive relationship between the probability of community and species-level occupancy and total greenspace within 1000 m of a pond. There was a negative relationship between mean community occupancy and the presence of a vertical pond wall at a site. There was no apparent effect of barriers on occupancy, indicating that urban areas may be more permeable for movement by some species than predicted. Individual species responses demonstrated that management actions are required at fine and broad spatial scales to benefit amphibian communities in urban landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Code availability

Model code is available by contacting AJH.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank staff from the Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Royal Botanic Gardens Cranbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne City Council and other local council staff for facilitating access to ponds. Kirsten Parris provided guidance on site selection and frog surveys. Amy Hahs provided access to GIS spatial layers. Geoff Heard and Eliza Poole assisted with fieldwork. The Baker Foundation provided generous support for fieldwork. Data analysis and writing was supported by the Balaton Limnological Research Institute. Fieldwork was approved by the University of Melbourne Animal Ethics Committee (register no. 0706488) and was conducted under research permit no. 10004319 (Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment).

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by The Baker Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AJH designed the study, acquired funding, collected and analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Hamer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Fieldwork was approved by the University of Melbourne Animal Ethics Committee (register no. 0706488) and was conducted under research permit no. 10004319 (Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

There are no conflicts of interest or competing interests to declare.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 275 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamer, A.J. A multi-scale, multi-species approach highlights the importance of urban greenspace and pond design for amphibian communities. Urban Ecosyst 25, 393–409 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01162-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01162-y

Keywords

Navigation