Skip to main content
Log in

Sequential-Anaerobic and Sequential-Aerobic Bioleaching of Metals (Ni, Mo, Al and V) from Spent Petroleum Catalyst in Stirred Tank Batch Reactor: A Comparative Study

  • Original research article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spent petroleum catalyst as a repository of several toxic metals is recommended for metal removal before safe disposal. To evaluate an effective biotechnological approach for metal removal, a comparative study between sequential-aerobic and sequential-anaerobic bioleaching processes was conducted for the removal of metals from crushed-acetone-pretreated spent petroleum catalyst. The SEM–EDX and XPS analysis confirmed the presence of Ni, Al, Mo and V in their oxidic and sulphidic forms in spent catalyst. The bioleaching experiments were performed in stirred tank batch reactors (2.5 L), temperature 30 °C, pH 1.4 and stirring speed 250 rpm for the period of 160 h. Sulfuric acid acted as lechant for both sequential-aerobic (Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans oxidised sulfur to sulfuric acid aerobically) and sequential-anaerobic (Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans oxidised sulphur to sulfuric acid coupled with the ferric reduction to ferrous anaerobically) bioleaching studies. The higher Ni and V extractions compared to Al and Mo for all the studies were due to increased solubility of Ni and V, and supported by XPS which showed marginal signs of Ni and V peaks in leach residues compared to feed spent catalyst. At the end (320 h), sequential-aerobic bioleaching was resulted to 99% Ni, 65% Al, 90% Mo and 99% V extraction quite more effective than sequential-anaerobic bioleaching (88% Ni, 28% Al, 33% Mo and 77% V) and sequential-control leaching (94% Ni, 20% Al, 40% Mo and 57% V). Although anaerobic bioleaching a possible approach, aerobic condition was found to be more suitable for sulfuric acid generation by A. ferrooxidans and high yield. So aerobic bioleaching is recommended to be favourable approach compared to anaerobic counterpart for future study and extrapolation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ferreira PF, Servulo EFC, Da Costa ACA, Ferreira DM, Godoy MLDP, Oliveira FJS (2017) Bioleaching of metals from a spent diesel hydrodesulfurization catalyst employing Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans FG-01. Braz J Chem Eng 34:119–129. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-6632.20170341s20150208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marafi M, Stanislaus A (2008) Spent catalyst waste management: A review: Part I—Developments in hydroprocessing catalyst waste reduction and use. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:859–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Olalere OA, Olunusi OS, Olatunji AJ, Twibi Farag AS (2016) A bioleaching regeneration and recovery of spent refinery catalyst using adapted microorganisms. J Adv Chem Eng 6:1–19. https://doi.org/10.4172/2090-4568.1000158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeng L, Cheng CY (2009) A literature review of the recovery of molybdenum and vanadium from spent hydrodesulphurisation catalysts: Part I: Metallurgical processes. Hydrometallurgy 98:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2009.03.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Das S, Deshavath NN, Goud VV, Dasu VV (2019) Bioleaching of Al from spent fluid catalytic cracking catalyst using Aspergillus species. Biotechnol Rep 23:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2019.e00349 

    Google Scholar 

  6. Noori Felegari Z, Nematdoust Haghi B, Amoabediny G, Mousavi SM, Amouei Torkmahalleh M (2014) An optimized integrated process for the bioleaching of a spent refinery processing catalysts. Int J Environ Res 8:621–634. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJER.2014.757 

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pradhan D, Mishra D, Kim DJ, Ahn JG, Chaudhury GR, Lee SW (2010) Bioleaching kinetics and multivariate analysis of spent petroleum catalyst dissolution using two acidophiles. J Hazard Mater 175:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.159 

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pradhan D, Pattanaik A, Samal DPK, Sukla LB, Kim DJ (2020) Recovery of Mo, V and Ni from spent catalyst using leaching and solvent extraction. Mater Today Proc 30:322–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Xin B, Zhang D, Zhang X, Xia Y, Wu F, Chen S, Li L (2009) Bioleaching mechanism of Co and Li from spent lithium-ion battery by the mixed culture of acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing and iron-oxidizing bacteria. Bioresour Technol 100:6163–6169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.06.086 

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Srichandan H, Mohapatra RK, Parhi PK, Mishra S (2019) Bioleaching approach for extraction of metal values from secondary solid wastes: A critical review. Hydrometallurgy 189:105122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2019.105122 

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vardanyan A, Vyrides L (2019) Acidophilic bioleaching at high dissolved organic compunds: Inhibitaion and strategies to counteract this. Miner Eng 143:105943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.105943 

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao H, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Qian L, Sun M, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Kim H, Qiu G (2019) The dissolution and passivation mechanism of chalcopyrite in bioleaching: an overview. Miner Eng 136:140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2019.03.014 

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pradhan D, Sukla LB, Pattanaik A, Samal DPK, Biswal T, Badjena SK (2021) Improvement in metal dissolution from spent catalyst by adapted Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 11:7794–7803. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC111.77947803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pradhan D (2021) Bioleaching of Cu and Zn from complex sulfide using an isolated iron oxidizing bacteria. Lett Appl NanoBioscience 10:1825–1832. https://doi.org/10.33263/LIANBS101.18251832 

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rohwerder T, Gehrke T, Kinzler K, Sand W (2013) Bioleaching review part A. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 63:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-003-1448-7 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Asghari I, Mousavi SM, Amiri F, Tavassoli S (2013) Bioleaching of spent refinery catalysts: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res 19:1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zegeye A, Mustin C, Jorand F (2010) Bacterial and iron oxide aggregates mediate secondary iron mineral formation: green rust versus magnetite. Geobiology 8:209–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00238.x 

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Plessis CA, Slabbert W, Hallberg KB, Johnson DB (2011) Ferredox: a biohy- drometallurgical processing concept for limonitic nickel laterites. Hydrometallurgy 109:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.07.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Srichandan H, Singh S, Kim DJ, Lee SW (2013) A comparative study of metal extraction from spent catalyst using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Int J Mater Metallurg Eng 7:430–434. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1062824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Srichandan H, Pathak A, Singh S, Blight K, Kim DJ, Lee SW (2014) Sequential leaching of metals from spent refinery catalyst in bioleaching–bioleaching and bioleaching–chemical leaching reactor: comparative study. Hydrometallurgy 150:130–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.09.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pathak A, Srichandan H, Kim DJ (2019) Column bioleaching of metals from refinery spent catalyst by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans: Effect of operational modifications on metal extraction, metal precipitation, and bacterial attachment. J Environ Manage 242:372–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Srichandan H, Singh S, Blight K, Pathak A, Kim DJ, Lee S, Lee SW (2015) An integrated sequential biological leaching process for enhanced recovery of metals from decoked spent petroleum refinery catalyst: a comparative study. Int J Miner Process 134:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2014.11.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bagdigian RM, Meyerson AS (1986) The adsorption of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on coal surfaces. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:467–479. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260280402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DiSpirito AA, Dugan RR (1983) Tuovinen, O.H. Sorption of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans to particulate material. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:1163–1168. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260250422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vandevivere P, Kirchman DL (1993) Attachment stimulates exopolysaccharide synthesis by a bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:3280–3286. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.59.10.3280-3286.1993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Vyas S, Ting YP (2019) Effect of ultrasound on bioleaching of hydrodesulphurization spent catalyst. Environ Technol Inno 14:100310. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ETI.2019.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Srichandan H, Pathak A, Kim DJ, Lee SW (2014) Optimization of two-step bioleaching of spent petroleum refinery catalyst by Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans using response surface methodology. J Environ Sci Health A 49:1740–1753. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2014.951264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vyas S, Das S, Ting YP (2020) Predictive modeling and response analysis of spent catalyst bioleaching using artificial neural network. Bioresour Technol Rep 9:10038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mishra D, Ahn JG, Kim DJ, RoyChaudhury G, Ralph DE (2009) Dissolution kinetics of spent petroleum catalyst using sulfur oxidizing acidophilic microorganisms. J Hazard Mater 167:1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Srichandan H, Singh S, Pathak A, Kim DJ, Lee SW, Heyes G (2014) Bioleaching of metals from spent refinery petroleum catalyst using moderately thermophilic bacteria: Effect of particle size. J Environ Sci Health A 49:807–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2014.882211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Srichandan H, Kim DJ, Gahan CS, Singh S, Lee SW (2013) Bench-scale batch bioleaching of spent petroleum catalyst using mesophilic iron and sulfur oxidizing acidophiles. Korean J Chem Eng 30:1076–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0017-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pal S, Pradhan D, Das T, Sukla LB, Roy Chaudhury G (2010) Bioleaching of low-grade uranium ore using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Indian J Microbiol 50:75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-010-0015-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh S, Sukla LB, Mishra BK (2011) Extraction of copper from Malanjkhand low-grade ore by Bacillus stearothermophillus. Indian J Microbiol 51:477–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0073-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (2011-00123), South Korea. Authors are thankful to Dr. Dong Jin Kim, Korean Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), South Korea for technical support in the work. The support and assistance provided by KIIT-BDTC, Odisha are highly acknowledged.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) (2011–00123), South Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haragobinda Srichandan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors disclose no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 3751 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srichandan, H., Mishra, S., Singh, P.K. et al. Sequential-Anaerobic and Sequential-Aerobic Bioleaching of Metals (Ni, Mo, Al and V) from Spent Petroleum Catalyst in Stirred Tank Batch Reactor: A Comparative Study. Indian J Microbiol 62, 70–78 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-021-00978-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-021-00978-8

Keywords

Navigation