Abstract
The present study aimed to separate the neural activities between response inhibition and memory updating processes in the Count/Nocount task. Memory load was manipulated to investigate the memory updating process. Within each trial, participants were asked to count/withhold counting the number of O/X letters in the Count/Nocount task. The participants were asked to silently add 1 if a Count letter was presented in the low load condition, and add 2 in the high load condition. Data from 28 healthy participants showed that: (1) in both high load and low load conditions, the latencies of P2 and N2 components were shorter for the Nocount than Count trials, indicating faster attentional orienting and conflict monitoring processes for the Nocount stimuli (i.e., inhibition processes triggered by the Nocount stimuli against those response execution processes triggered by Count stimuli); (2) more positive frontal P3 amplitudes were evoked for the Nocount relative to the Count stimuli, indicating a more intensive response inhibition process for the Nocount trials; (3) a more positive parietal P3 component was evoked for the low load relative to high load condition, indicating a more intensive working memory updating process for the high load condition. This load effect was absent for the frontal P3 component, suggesting that the frontal P3 might not be associated with the memory updating process. In sum, both the cognitive inhibition process (reflected by the frontal P3 component) and working memory updating process (reflected by the parietal P3 component) appear to be involved in the Count/Nocount task.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data
Raw data related to this article can be found online in “Gao H. (2021) data for: response inhibition and memory updating in the Count/Nocount task: an ERP study. Mendeley Data, V2. https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/pphgdmxkxt/2”.
References
Anderson C, Platten CR (2011) Sleep deprivation lowers inhibition and enhances impulsivity to negative stimuli. Behav Brain Res 217(2):463–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.09.020
Aron AR, Dowson JH, Sahakian BJ, Robbins TW (2003) Methylphenidate improves response inhibition in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Biol Psychiat 54(12):1465–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00609-7
Barrett G, Neshige R, Shibasaki H (1987) Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 66(4):409–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(87)90210-0
Beste C, Willemssen R, Saft C, Falkenstein M (2010) Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: basal ganglia disease effects. Neuropsychologia 48(2):366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.023
Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108(3):624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
Bruin KJ, Wijers AA (2002) Inhibition, response mode, and stimuli probability: a comparative event-related potential study. Clin Neurophysiol 113(7):1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00141-4
Chen A, Luo Y, Wang Q, Yuan J, Yao D, Li H (2007) Electrophysiological correlates of category induction: PSW amplitude as an index of identifying shared attributes. Biol Psychol 76(3):230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.007
Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Stock AK, Beste C (2015) The impact of mental workload on inhibitory control subprocesses. Neuroimage 112:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.060
Chochon F, Cohen L, Moortele PVD, Dehaene S (1999) Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing. J Cognitive Neurosci 11(6):617–630. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892999563689
Covey TJ, Shucard JL, Violanti JM, Lee J, Shucard DW (2013) The effects of exposure to traumatic stressors on inhibitory control in police officers: a dense electrode array study using a go/nogo continuous performance task. Int J Psychophysiol 87(3):363–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.03.009
Daffner KR, Chong H, Sun X, Tarbi EC, Riis JL, Mcginnis SM, Holcomb PJ (2011) Mechanisms underlying age- and performance-related differences in working memory. J Cogn Neurosci 23(6):1298–1314. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21540
Donchin E (1981) Surprise!... Surprise? Psychophysiology 18:493–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb01815.x
Dong S, Reder LM, Yao Y, Liu Y, Chen F (2015) Individual differences in working memory capacity are reflected in different ERP and EEG patterns to task difficulty. Brain Res 1616:146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.003
Donkers FC, Van Boxtel GJ (2004) The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition. Brain Cognition 56(2):165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.04.005
Duncan J, Owen AM (2000) Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci 23(10):475–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01633-7
Eimer M (1993) Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biol Psychol 35(2):123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(93)90009-W
Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J (1999) ERP components in Go/NoGo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol 101:267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00008-6
Folstein JR, Van Petten C (2008) Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 45(1):152–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x
Gao H, Cao B, Qi M, Wang J, Zhang Q, Li F (2016) Two stages of directed forgetting: electrophysiological evidence from a short-term memory task. Psychophysiology 53(6):806–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12628
Gao H, Qi M, Zhang Q (2017) Response inhibition is more effortful than response activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. NeuroReport 28(7):404–407. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000764
Getzmann S, Wascher E, Schneider D (2018) The role of inhibition for working memory processes: ERP evidence from a short-term storage task. Psychophysiology 55(5):e13026. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13026
Hagen GF, Gatherwright JR, Lopez BA, Polich J (2006) P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects. Int J Psychophysiol 59(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.08.003
Jodo E, Kayama Y (1992) Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a go/no-go task. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 82:477–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(92)90054-L
Johnstone SJ, Dimoska A, Smith JL, Barry RJ, Pleffer CB, Chiswick D, Clarke AR (2007) The development of stop-signal and Go/Nogo response inhibition in children aged 7–12 years: performance and event-related potential indices. Int J Psychophysiol 63(1):25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.07.001
Kaufman JN, Ross TJ, Stein EA, Garavan H (2003) Cingulate hypoactivity in cocaine users during a GO-NOGO task as revealed by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 23(21):7839–7843. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00718-3
Kim YJ, Lim JA, Lee JY, Oh S, Kim SN, Kim DJ, Choi JS et al (2017) Impulsivity and compulsivity in Internet gaming disorder: a comparison with obsessive–compulsive disorder and alcohol use disorder. J Behav Addict 6(4):545–553. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.069
Kok A (1986) Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks. Biol Psychol 23(1):21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(86)90087-6
Kopp B, Mattler U, Goertz R, Rist F (1996) N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 99(1):19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-884X(96)95617-9
Lavric A, Pizzagalli DA, Forstmeier S (2004) When ‘go’ and ‘nogo’ are equally frequent: ERP components and cortical tomography. Eur J Neurosci 20(9):2483–2488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03683.x
Lenartowicz A, Escobedo-Quiroz R, Cohen JD (2010) Updating of context in working memory: an event-related potential study. Cogn Affect Behav Ne 10(2):298–315. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.2.298
Lenartowicz A, Delorme A, Walshaw PD, Cho AL, Bilder RM, McGough JJ, Loo SK (2014) Electroencephalography correlates of spatial working memory deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: vigilance, encoding, and maintenance. J Neurosci 34(4):1171–1182. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1765-13.2014
Mäntysalo S (1987) N2 and P3 of the ERP to Go and Nogo stimuli: a stimulus-response association and dissociation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol S40:227–234
McEvoy LK, Pellouchoud E, Smith ME, Gevins A (2001) Neurophysiological signals of working memory in normal aging. Cogn Brain Res 11(3):363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00009-X
Nakata H, Inui K, Nishihira Y, Hatta A, Sakamoto M, Kida T, Kakigi R et al (2004) Effects of a Go/NoGo task on event-related potentials following somatosensory stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 115(2):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2003.09.013
Nakata H, Sakamoto K, Ferretti A, Perrucci MG, Romani GL (2008) Executive functions with different motor outputs in somatosensory go/nogo tasks: an event-related functional mri study. Brain Res Bull 77(4):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.07.008
Nieuwenhuis S, Yeung N, Van Den Wildenberg W, Ridderinkhof KR (2003) Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cogn Affect Behav Ne 3(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.3.1.17
Novick JM, Trueswell JC, Thompson-Schill SL (2005) Cognitive control and parsing: reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cogn Affect Behav Ne 5(3):263–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.3758/CABN.5.3.263
Pandey AK, Kamarajan C, Tang Y, Chorlian DB, Roopesh BN, Manz N, Porjesz B et al (2012) Neurocognitive deficits in male alcoholics: an ERP/sLORETA analysis of the N2 component in an equal probability Go/NoGo task. Biol Psychol 89(1):170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.10.009
Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Weller BJ, Kopell BS et al (1985) ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60(5):423–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(85)91017-X
Polich J (2007) Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118(10):2128–2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
Potts GF, Martin LE, Burton P, Montague PR (2006) When things are better or worse than expected: the medial frontal cortex and the allocation of processing resources. J Cogn Neurosci 18(7):1112–1119. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1112
Qi M, Gao H, Liu G (2017) Effect of acute psychological stress on response inhibition: an event-related potential study. Behav Brain Res 323:32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.036
Sahan MI, Majerus S, Andres M, Fias W (2019) Functionally distinct contributions of parietal cortex to a numerical landmark task: an fMRI study. Cortex 114:28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.005
Salisbury DF, Rutherford B, Shenton ME, McCarley RW (2001) Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography. Clin Neurophysiol 112(9):1676–1684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00607-1
Salisbury DF, Griggs CB, Shenton ME, McCarley RW (2004) The NoGo P300 ‘anteriorization’ effect and response inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 115(7):1550–1558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.01.028
Savage R, Cornish K, Manly T, Hollis C (2006) Cognitive processes in children’s reading and attention: the role of working memory, divided attention, and response inhibition. Brit J Psychol 97(3):365–385. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712605X81370
Shields GS, Sazma MA, Yonelinas AP (2016) The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: a meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neurosci Biobehav R 68:651–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.038
Shucard JL, Tekok-Kilic A, Shiels K, Shucard DW (2009) Stage and load effects on ERP topography during verbal and spatial working memory. Brain Res 1254:49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.063
Simson R, Vaughan HG Jr, Ritter W (1977) The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 42(4):528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(77)90216-4
Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ (2007) Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict. Clin Neurophysiol 118(2):343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.09.027
Smith JL, Johnstone SJ, Barry RJ (2008) Movement-related potentials in the Go/No-Go task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition. Clin Neurophysiol 119(3):704–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.11.042
Smith JL, Jamadar S, Provost AL, Michie PT (2013) Motor and non-motor inhibition in the Go/No-Go task: an ERP and fMRI study. Int J Psychophysiol 87(3):244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.07.185
Verleger R, Grauhan N, Śmigasiewicz K (2016) Go and GoNoGo P3 with rare and frequent stimuli in oddball tasks: a study comparing key-pressing with counting. Int J Psychophysiol 110:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.11.009
Vogel EK, Luck SJ, Shapiro KL (1998) Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Human 24(6):1656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1656-1674
Welge-Lüssen A, Husner A, Wolfensberger M, Hummel T (2009) Influence of simultaneous gustatory stimuli on orthonasal and retronasal olfaction. Neurosci Lett 454(2):124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.002
Yuan J, Xu S, Yang J, Liu Q, Chen A, Zhu L, Li H et al (2011) Pleasant mood intensifies brain processing of cognitive control: ERP correlates. Biol Psychol 87(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.01.004
Zhou L, Thomas RD (2015) Principal component analysis of the memory load effect in a change detection task. Vision Res 110:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2015.01.028
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant number 31800953], the Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of China [Grant number 20YJC190005], and the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning province [Grant number 2019-ZD-0469].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Communicated by Melvyn A. Goodale.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Jing, J., Qi, M. et al. Response inhibition and memory updating in the count/nocount task: an ERP study. Exp Brain Res 239, 3371–3380 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06213-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06213-6