Abstract
Gender harassment is prevalent in contexts where women are underrepresented and negatively stereotyped, yet instances of gender harassment are often discounted as unimportant and inconsequential. The current research presents an examination of gender harassment operating on a male-majority university campus in the form of a sex-based slur known as the “Princess Syndrome.” Across two studies, the present research investigated the prevalence, meaning, and adverse consequences of the label. Study 1 indicated that the label was widespread at the university: 70% of participants had heard of the label, nearly half had used the label, and 1 out of 4 female participants had been targeted by the label. Inductive content analysis of open-ended responses revealed that the label was a derogatory term used to insult and degrade women by stigmatizing women as manipulative, exploitative, and stuck up. In Study 2, participants read about and rated a female student who was either labeled with the “Princess Syndrome” or not. Consistent with predictions, participants were more likely to discount the female student’s success in an engineering course as due to external factors (e.g., luck), rated her as less competent, and were less likely to choose to work with her on a team project when she was labeled with the “Princess Syndrome” than when she was not labeled. Results contribute to a growing body of literature demonstrating that sex-based slurs matter and suggest that slurs such as the “Princess Syndrome” may constitute a consequential yet understudied source of gender harassment for undergraduate women in STEM that reinforces and maintains gender inequity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Begany, J. J., & Milburn, M. A. (2002). Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: Authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 3(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/1524-9220.3.2.119
Berdahl, J. L. (2007a). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. The Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159319
Berdahl, J. L. (2007b). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425
Carnaghi, A., & Bianchi, M. (2017). Derogatory group labeling. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.435
Carnaghi, A., & Maass, A. (2007). In-group and out-group perspectives in the use of derogatory group labels: Gay versus fag. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(2), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X07300077
Chan, D. K., Chow, S. Y., Lam, C. B., & Cheung, S. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 362–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00451.x
Charlesworth, T. E., & Banaji, M. R. (2019). Gender in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Issues, causes, solutions. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(37), 7228–7243. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0475-18.2019
Connor, R. A. (2019). Derogatory gendered labels: On Twitter and in the lab (Publication No. 13883735) [Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University]. Proquest Dissertations Publishing.
Corbett, C., & Hill, C. (2015). Solving the equation: The variables for women’s success in engineering and computing. American Association of University Women. https://www.aauw.org/app/uploads/2020/03/Solving-the-Equation-report-nsa.pdf
Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159376
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
Cross, S., & Bagilhole, B. (2002). Girls’ jobs for the boys? Men, masculinity and non-traditional occupations. Gender, Work, and Organization, 9(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00156
Cundiff, J. L. (2018). Subtle barriers and bias in STEM: How stereotypes constrain women’s STEM participation and career progress. In J. T. Nadler & M. R. Lowery (Eds.), War on women in the United States: Beliefs, tactics, and the best defenses (pp. 97–116). ABC-CLIO, LLC.
Cundiff, J. L., Zawadzki, M. J., Danube, C. L., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Using experiential learning to increase the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful: The WAGES intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 703–721. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12087
Dall’Ara, E., & Maass, A. (1999). Studying sexual harassment in the laboratory: Are egalitarian women at higher risk? Sex Roles, 41(9–10), 681–704. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018816025988
D’Augelli, A. R. (1992). Lesbian and gay male undergraduates’ experiences of harassment and fear on campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626092007003007
de Oliveira Laux, S. H., Ksenofontov, I., & Becker, J. C. (2015). Explicit but not implicit sexist beliefs predict benevolent and hostile sexist behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(6), 702-715. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2128
Deaux, K., & Emswiller, T. (1974). Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(1), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035733
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
Diehl, C., Rees, J., & Bohner, G. (2012). Flirting with disaster: Short-term mating orientation and hostile sexism predict different types of sexual harassment. Aggressive Behavior, 38(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21444
Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
Dionisi, A. M., Barling, J., & Dupre, K. E. (2012). Revisiting the comparative outcomes of workplace aggression and sexual harassment. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 398–408. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029883
Dresden, B. E., Dresden, A. Y., Ridge, R. D., & Yamawaki, N. (2018). No girls allowed: Women in male-dominated majors experience increased gender harassment and bias. Psychological Reports, 121(3), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117730357
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109
Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
Eidelman, S., & Biernat, M. (2003). Derogating black sheep: Individual or group protection? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 602–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00042-8
Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Embrick, D. G., & Henricks, K. (2013). Discursive colorlines at work: How epithets and stereotypes are racially unequal. Symbolic Interaction, 36(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.51
Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of perceived female sexual empowerment: Development and validation of the Sex is Power Scale. Gender Issues, 30, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-013-9114-6
Fasoli, F., Maass, A., & Carnaghi, A. (2015). Labelling and discrimination: Do homophobic epithets undermine fair distribution of resources? British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12090
Fasoli, F., Paladino, M. P., Carnaghi, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., & Bain, P. G. (2016). Not “just words”: Exposure to homophobic epithets leads to dehumanizing and physical distancing from gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2148
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.31
Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A. (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development: Studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01018.x
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (1995). Ambivalence and stereotypes cause sexual harassment: A theory with implications for organizational change. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01311.x
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Cortina, L. M. (2018). Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women's private and public lives (pp. 215–234). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000060-012
Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.578
Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Ormerod, A. J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and academic context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00797.x
Fleming, M. A., Petty, R. E., & White, P. H. (2005). Stigmatized targets and evaluation: Prejudice as a determinant of attribute scrutiny and polarization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271585
Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., & White, K. B. (2004). First- and second-generation measures of sexism, rape myths and related beliefs, and hostility toward women: Their interrelationships and association with college students’ experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 10(3), 236-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801203256002
Ford, T. E., Boxer, C. F., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J. R. (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humor. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022
Ford, T. E., Wentzel, E. R., & Lorion, J. (2001). Effects of exposure to sexist humor on perceptions of normative tolerance of sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(6), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.56
Forgas, J. P., & Laham, S. M. (2017). Halo effects. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in judgement, thinking and memory (2nd ed., pp. 276–290). Routledge.
Garcia-Retamero, R., & López-Zafra, E. (2006). Prejudice against women in male-congenial environments: Perceptions of gender role congruity in leadership. Sex Roles, 55(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9068-1
Gibson, J. L., & Gore, J. S. (2015). You’re ok until you misbehave: How norm violations magnify the attractiveness devil effect. Gender Issues, 32(4), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-015-9142-5
Gilbert, D. T. (1989). Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 189–211). Guilford Press.
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 33, pp. 115–188). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80005-8
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J., Abrams, D., Masser, B., Adetoun, B., Osagie, J., Akande, A., Alao, A., Brunner, A., Willemsen, T. M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T., Six-Materna, I., Expósito, F., & Lopez, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
Goodman, J. A., Schell, J., Alexander, M. G., & Eidelman, S. (2008). The impact of a derogatory remark on prejudice toward a gay male leader. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(2), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00316.x
Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1985). The effect of an overheard ethnic slur on evaluations of the target: How to spread a social disease. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90006-X
Greenhaus, J. H., & Parasuraman, S. (1993). Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: An examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(2), 273–297. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1993.1034
Guttentag, M., & Secord, P. F. (1983). Too many women?: The sex ratio question. Sage Publications.
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., & Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing … or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Heilman, M. E., & Haynes, M. C. (2005). No credit where credit is due: Attributional rationalization of women’s success in male-female teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.905
Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2013). When sexism and feminism collide: The sexual harassment of feminist working women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313482873
Holland, K. J., & Cortina, L. M. (2016). Sexual harassment: Undermining the wellbeing of working women. In M. Connerley & J. Wu (Eds.), International handbooks of quality-of-life: Handbook on well-being of working women (pp. 83–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9897-6_6
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3700093
Kabat-Farr, D., & Cortina, L. M. (2014). Sex-based harassment in employment: New insights into gender and context. Law and Human Behavior, 38(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000045
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. Basic Books.
King, E. B., Hebl, M. R., George, J. M., & Matusik, S. F. (2010). Understanding tokenism: Antecedents and consequences of a psychological climate of gender inequity. Journal of Management, 36(2), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328508
Kirkland, S. L., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1987). Further evidence of the deleterious effects of overheard derogatory ethnic labels: Derogation beyond the target. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287132007
Konrad, A. M., Winter, S., & Gutek, B. A. (1992). Diversity if work group sex composition: Implications for majority and minority members. In P. Tolbert (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations: A research annual (Vol. 10, pp. 115–140). JAI Press.
Krings, F., & Facchin, S. (2009). Organizational justice and men’s likelihood to sexually harass: The moderating role of sexism and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013391
Langhout, R., Bergman, M. E., Cortina, L. M., Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., & Williams, J. (2005). Sexual harassment severity: Assessing situational and personal determinants and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(5), 975–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02156.x
Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 32, pp. 1–62). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80003-9
Leskinen, E. A., Cortina, L. M., & Kabat, D. B. (2011). Gender harassment: Broadening our understanding of sex-based harassment at work. Law and Human Behavior, 35(25). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9241-5
Leskinen, E. A., Rabelo, V. C., & Cortina, L. M. (2015). Gender stereotyping and harassment: A “catch-22” for women in the workplace. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000040
Loredo, C., Reid, A., & Deaux, K. (1995). Judgments and definitions of sexual harassment by high school students. Sex Roles, 32(1–2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544756
Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 853–870. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.853
MacDougall, M., Riley, S. C., Cameron, H. S., & McKinstry, B. (2008). Halos and horns in the assessment of undergraduate medical students: A consistency-based approach. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3(2), 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/3381836
Madon, S., Willard, J., Guyll, M., & Scherr, K. C. (2011). Self-fulfilling prophecies: Mechanisms, power, and links to social problems. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(8), 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00375.x
Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to Qualitative Research in Mathematics Education: Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 365–380). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13
Mays, V. M., Cochran, S. D., & Barnes, N. W. (2007). Race, race-based discrimination, and health outcomes among African Americans. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190212
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Sexual harassment of women: Climate, culture, and consequences in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24994
Nielsen, L. B. (2002). Subtle, pervasive, harmful: Racist and sexist remarks in public as hate speech. Journal of Social Issues, 58(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00260
Pascoe, E. A., & Smart Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016059
Piggot, M. (2004). Double jeopardy: Lesbians and the legacy of multiple stigmatized identities [Unpublished undergradute thesis]. Psychology Strand at Swinburne University of Technology. https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/file/4a7c253c-86df-4891-9420-8ac639834d5a/1/Margaret%20Piggott%20Thesis.pdf
Plemenitaš, K. (2017). Metaphorical elements in gendered slurs. British and American Studies, 23, 207–217. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=593687
Pryor, J. B., Giedd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01309.x
Ridgeway, C. L. (2014). Why status matters for inequality. American Sociological Review, 79(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413515997
Robnett, R. D. (2016). Gender bias in STEM fields: Variation in prevalence and links to STEM self-concept. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315596162
Rodin, J., & Langer, E. J. (1980). Aging labels: The decline of control and the fall of self-esteem. Journal of Social Issues, 36(2), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1980.tb02019.x
Rospenda, K. M., Richman, J. A., & Shannon, C. A. (2009). Prevalence and mental health correlates of harassment and discrimination in the workplace: Results from a national study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(5), 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508317182
Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50(7–8), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd
Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 401. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.401
Schultz, V. (1998). Reconceptualizing sexual harassment. Yale Law Journal, 107(6), 1683–1796. https://doi.org/10.2307/797337
Siebler, F., Sabelus, S., & Bohner, G. (2008). A refined computer harassment paradigm: Validation, and test of hypotheses about target characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00404.x
Simpson, R. (2004). Masculinity at work: The experiences of men in female dominated occupations. Work, Employment, and Society, 18(2), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500172004042773
Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (1999). Reactions to a Black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.885
Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: She’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1329–1342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200263002
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(9), 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.656
Sojo, V. E., Wood, R. E., & Genat, A. E. (2016). Harmful workplace experiences and women’s occupational well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(1), 10–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684315599346
Spangler, E., Gordon, M. A., & Pipkin, R. M. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of Kanter’s hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.1086/226745
Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00200
Swim, J. K., Mallett, R., Russo-Devosa, Y., & Stangor, C. (2005). Judgments of sexism: A comparison of the subtlety of sexism measures and sources of variability in judgments about sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 406–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00240.x
Tang, C.S.-K., Yik, M. S. M., Cheung, F. M. C., & Choi, P.-K. (1995). How do Chinese college students define sexual harassment? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626095010004008
The Oredigger. (2015). Sex survey results: GPA Analysis. http://oredigger.net/2015/02/sex-survey-results-gpa-analysis/
Thorndike, E. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663
Warner, L. R., Settles, I. H., & Shields, S. A. (2018). Intersectionality theory in the psychology of women. In C. B. Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: History, theory, and battlegrounds (pp. 521–539). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000059-027
Weinberg, E. (2012, March 28). Explore feelings on RIBS. The Polytechnic. https://poly.rpi.edu/2012/03/28/explore_feelings_on_ribs/
Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/3096961
Williams, K. D., & Carter-Sowell, A. R. (2009). Marginalization through social ostracism: Effects of being ignored and excluded. In F. Butera & J. M. Levine (Eds.), Coping with minority status: Responses to exclusion and inclusion (pp. 104–122). Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M. W., & Ceci, S. J. (2015). National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(17), 5360–5365. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418878112
Williams, J. C., Li, S., Rincon, R., & Finn, P. (2016). Climate control: Gender and racial bias in engineering? Center for Work Life Law and Society of Women Engineers. https://worklifelaw.org/publications/Climate-Control-Gender-And-Racial-Bias-In-Engineering.pdf
Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 127–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00067.x
Word, C. O., Zanna, M., & Cooper, J. (1974). The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90059-6
Yoder, J. D. (2002). 2001 Division 35 Presidential Address: Context matters: Understanding tokenism processes and their impact on women’s work. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00038
Acknowledgement
This research was presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues in San Diego, CA, June 2019. I wish to thank Stephanie Dukes for her assistance coding open-ended responses, as well as the editor and anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and feedback on previous drafts. Data is available on the Open Science Framework website at https://osf.io/vhgkj/?view_only=a4f1b1fdb8b643cd961b4b6fc91c2343.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
The author certifies that the research was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Missouri University of Science and Technology, and that the research was conducted in accordance with APA ethical guidelines, including informed consent from all research participants. The author declares that they have no conflict of interest. This research did not receive any funding.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cundiff, J.L. The “Princess Syndrome”: An Examination of Gender Harassment on a Male-Majority University Campus. Sex Roles 85, 587–605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01243-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-021-01243-4