Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of MCAT to provide multi-objective optimization model for municipal waste management system

  • Research article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Choosing an appropriate municipal waste management method is a very complicated environmental problem in cities. This research introduces an optimization model for waste management in the southwest region of Tehran province. It was developed by a metaheuristic algorithm that was used to minimize the economic and environmental costs. Incineration, composting, recycling and landfilling waste management methods were considered. Three scenarios were developed to determine the optimum allocation of waste to each method such to fulfill the objective of overall minimum of environmental burdens and costs. A multi-objective scenario selection model was implemented by the compromise programming method in MCAT software. Considering the budget limitation and available facilities on site, optimum allocations to recycling, composting, incineration and landfilling methods were obtained as 115,486, 132,094, 71,905 and 45,516 tons/year, respectively. The results of this study indicated that the metaheuristic algorithm in MCAT software was an efficient tool in decision making about waste management systems and thus, it was suggested to municipality managers and regional planning authorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. de Souza Melaré AV, González SM, Faceli K, Casadei V. Technologies and decision support systems to aid solid-wastemanagement: a systematic review. Waste Manage. 2017;59:567–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Djamel K, Lamari S, Makri F. Use of geographic information system for management of municipal solid waste of M’sila City—Algeria. World J Environ Biosci. 2018;7:36–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singh RP, Singh P, Araujo AS, Ibrahim MH, Sulaiman O. Management of urban solid waste: Vermicomposting a sustainable option. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2011;55(7):719–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Najm MA, El-FadelM, Ayoub G, El-TahaM, Al-AwarF. An optimisation model for regional integrated solid waste management II. Model application and sensitivity analyses. Waste Manag Res. 2002;20(1):46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang N-B, Shoemaker CA, Schuler RE. Solid waste management system analysis with air pollution and leachate impact limitations. Waste Manag Res. 1996;14(5):463–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fiorucci P, Minciardi R, Robba M, Sacile R. Solid waste management in urban areas: development and application of a decision support system. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2003;37(4):301–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Giusti L. A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. Waste Manag. 2009;29(8):2227–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Galante G, Aiello G, Enea M, Panascia E. A multi-objectiveapproach to solid waste management. Waste Manag. 2010;30(8–9):1720–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghiasi H, Pasini D, Lessard L. A non-dominatedsorting hybrid algorithm for multi-objectiveoptimization of engineering problems. Eng Optim. 2011;43(1):39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng N, Zhang Q, Chen G-w, Qi C-q, Cui W-q, Zhang Y-f, et al. Optimal scenario balance of reduction in costs and greenhouse gas emissions for municipal solid waste management. J Cent South Univ. 2015;22(3):887–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeleny M. Compromise programming, Multiple criteria decision making. In: Cochrane JL, Zeleny M, editors. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press; 1973.

  12. Abrishamchi A, Ebrahimian A, Tajrishi M, Mariño MA. Case study: application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply. J Water Resour Plan Manag. 2005;131(4):326–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rathi S. Optimization model for integrated municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. Environ Dev Econ 2007;12(1):105–21.

  14. Xu Z, Elomri A, Pokharel S, Zhang Q, Ming X, Liu W. Global reverse supply chain design for solid waste recycling under uncertainties and carbon emission constraint. Waste Manag. 2017;64:358–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li P, Chen B, FSILP. Fuzzy-stochastic-intervallinear programming for supporting municipal solid waste management. J Environ Manag. 2011;92(4):1198–209.

  16. Wu J, Ma C, Zhang D, Xu Y. Municipal solid waste management and greenhouse gas emission control through an inexact optimization model under interval and random uncertainties. Eng Optim. 2018;50(11):1963–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chang N-B, Qi C, Islam K, Hossain F. Comparisons between global warming potential and cost–benefitcriteria for optimal planning of a municipal solid waste management system. J Clean Prod. 2012;20(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Minoglou M, Komilis D. Optimizing the treatment and disposal of municipal solid wastes using mathematical programming—Acase study in a Greek region. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2013;80:46–57.

  19. Yedla S, Sindhu N. Assessment of alternative disposal methods to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from municipal solid waste in India. Waste Manag Res. 2016;34(6):553–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dai C, Li Y, Huang G. A two-stagesupport-vector-regressionoptimization model for municipal solid waste management–acase study of Beijing, China. J Environ Manag. 2011;92(12):3023–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang J, Zhao R, Huang T, Wang X, Tseng M-L. Sustainable municipal solid waste disposal in the belt and road initiative: A preliminary proposal for Chengdu city. Sustainability. 2018;10(4):1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mavrotas G, Gakis N, Skoulaxinou S, Katsouros V, Georgopoulou E. Municipal solid waste management and energy production: Consideration of external cost through multi-objectiveoptimization and its effect on waste-to-energysolutions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2015;51:1205–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lyeme HA, Mushi A, Nkansah-GyekyeY. Implementation of a goal programming model for solid waste management: a case study of Dar es Salaam–Tanzania. Int J Simul Multi Design Optim. 2017;8:A2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Münster M, Meibom P. Optimization of use of waste in the future energy system. Energy. 2011;36(3):1612–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Badran M, El-HaggarS. Optimization of municipal solid waste management in Port Said–Egypt. Waste Manag. 2006;26(5):534–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yadav V, Karmakar S, Dikshit A, Bhurjee A. Interval-valuedfacility location model: An appraisal of municipal solid waste management system. J Clean Prod. 2018;171:250–63.

  27. Bonomo F, Durán G, Larumbe F, Marenco J. A method for optimizing waste collection using mathematical programming: a Buenos Aires case study. Waste Manag Res. 2012;30(3):311–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Louati A. Modeling municipal solid waste collection: A generalized vehicle routing model with multiple transfer stations, gather sites and inhomogeneous vehicles in time windows. Waste Manag. 2016;52:34–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Arribas CA, Blazquez CA, Lamas A. Urban solid waste collection system using mathematical modelling and tools of geographic information systems. Waste Manag Res. 2010;28(4):355–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Santibañez-Aguilar JE, Ponce-OrtegaJM, González-Campos JB, Serna-González M, El-HalwagiMM. Optimal planning for the sustainable utilization of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag. 2013;33(12):2607–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ng WPQ, Lam HL, Varbanov PS, Klemeš JJ. Waste-to-energy(WTE)network synthesis for municipal solid waste (MSW). Energy Convers Manag. 2014;85:866–74.

  32. Tan ST, Lee CT, Hashim H, Ho WS, Lim JS. Optimal process network for municipal solid waste management in Iskandar Malaysia. J Clean Prod. 2014;71:48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Erfani SMH, Danesh S, Karrabi SM, Shad R. A novel approach to find and optimize bin locations and collection routes using a geographic information system. Waste Manag Res. 2017;35(7):776–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ahani M, Arjmandi R, Hoveidi H, Ghodousi J, Lavasani MM. A multi-objectiveoptimization model for municipal waste management system in Tehran city, Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2019;16(10):5447–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mofid-Nakhaee E, Barzinpour F. A multi-compartmentcapacitated arc routing problem with intermediate facilities for solid waste collection using hybrid adaptive large neighborhood search and whale algorithm. Waste Manag Res. 2019;37(1):38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Babaee Tirkolaee E, Abbasian P, Soltani M, Ghaffarian SA. Developing an applied algorithm for multi-tripvehicle routing problem with time windows in urban waste collection: A case study. Waste Manag Res. 2019;37(1_suppl):4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Waste Management Act. http://www.vertic.org/media/National%20Legislation/Iran/IR_Law_Waste_Management.pdf, 2004.

  38. Marinoni O, Higgins A, Hajkowicz S, Collins K. The multiple criteria analysis tool (MCAT): A new software tool to support environmental investment decision making. Environ Model Softw. 2009;24(2):153–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bausch JC, Bojórquez-Tapia L, Eakin H. Agro-environmentalsustainability assessment using multicriteria decision analysis and system analysis. Sustain Sci. 2014;9(3):303–19.

  40. Bournaris T, Papathanasiou J, Manos B, Kazakis N, Voudouris K. Support of irrigation water use and eco-friendlydecision process in agricultural production planning. Oper Res Int Journal. 2015;15(2):289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystem. Multi Criteria Analysis Tool (MCAT)user guide (beta version). Australia: St Lucia Qld; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Land AH, Doig AG. An automatic method for solving discrete programming problems. 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958–2008. Berlin: Springer; 2010. pp. 105–32.

  43. Hajkowicz S, Collins K. A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag. 2007;21(9):1553–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Glover F. Tabu search—partI. ORSA J Comput. 1989;1(3):190–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Toth P, Martello S. Knapsack problems: Algorithms and computer implementations. UK: Wiley; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Saaty T. The analytic hierarchy process. Agricultural economics review. New York: Mcgraw Hill; 1980; 70.

  47. Chen C-J, Huang C-C. A multiple criteria evaluation of high-techindustries for the science-basedindustrial park in Taiwan. Inf Manag. 2004;41(7):839–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hafeez K, Zhang Y, Malak N. Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ. 2002;76(1):39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rezaei-Moghaddam K, Karami E, Environment. A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. Dev Sustain. 2008;10(4):407–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. European Commission. A study on economic valuation of environment externalities from landfill disposal and incineration of waste. Final main report. Luxembourg City: European Commission; 2000.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Robatkarim Waste Management Organization Science for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nematollah Khorasani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm no conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farzaneh, G., Khorasani, N., Ghodousi, J. et al. Application of MCAT to provide multi-objective optimization model for municipal waste management system. J Environ Health Sci Engineer 19, 1781–1794 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00733-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00733-7

Keywords

Navigation