Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical behavior and assessment of foamed cement paste under staged cyclic loading

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foamed cement paste has been increasingly adopted recently in engineering practice due to its adjustable density and strength, excellent performance, and convenience for casting in-place. Foamed cement paste is sometimes subjected to cyclic loadings, such as traffic loading and machine vibration. However, limited studies have focused on its dynamic behavior yet. This paper conducted a series of staged cyclic compression tests on the specimen of foamed cement paste with loading frequencies of 1, 2, and 5 Hz. The results showed that an increase in load frequency decreased the peak strength. With the increase of the specimen’s density from 500, 700 to 900 kg/m3, the failure modes under cyclic loading gradually transformed from compressive failure, shear failure to splitting failure. An analytical model based on the modified Drucker-Prager Cap model was created to describe the complete backbone curve of foamed cement paste under staged cyclic loading. An empirical equation was proposed to evaluate the reduction of peak strength of foamed cement paste caused by cyclic loading relative to static loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raj A, Sathyan D, Mini KM (2019) Physical and functional characteristics of foam concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 221:787–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sang G, Zhu Y, Yang G, Zhang H (2015) Preparation and characterization of high porosity cement-based foam material. Constr Build Mater 91:133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Falliano D, De Domenico D, Ricciardi G, Gugliandolo E (2018) Experimental investigation on the compressive strength of foamed concrete: effect of curing conditions, cement type, foaming agent and dry density. Constr Build Mater 165:735–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. She W, Zheng Z, Zhang Q et al (2020) Predesigning matrix-directed super-hydrophobization and hierarchical strengthening of cement foam. Cem Concr Res 131:106029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Batool F, Bindiganavile V (2017) Air-void size distribution of cement based foam and its effect on thermal conductivity. Constr Build Mater 149:17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang Z, Zhang T, Wen Z (2015) Proportioning and characterization of Portland cement-based ultra-lightweight foam concretes. Constr Build Mater 79:390–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi X, Huang J, Su Q (2020) Experimental and numerical analyses of lightweight foamed concrete as filler for widening embankment. Constr Build Mater 250:118897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu K-W, Yue F, Su Q et al (2020) Assessment of the use of fiberglass-reinforced foam concrete in high-speed railway bridge approach involving foundation cost comparison. Adv Struct Eng 23:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219867622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang ZQ, Yang JL, Li QM (2013) An analytical model of foamed concrete aircraft arresting system. Int J Impact Eng 61:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chica L, Alzate A (2019) Cellular concrete review: new trends for application in construction. Constr Build Mater 200:637–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu K, Su Q, Ni P et al (2018) Evaluation on the dynamic performance of bridge approach backfilled with fibre reinforced lightweight concrete under high-speed train loading. Comput Geotech 104:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. She W, Du Y, Zhao G et al (2018) Influence of coarse fly ash on the performance of foam concrete and its application in high-speed railway roadbeds. Constr Build Mater 170:153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kearsley EP, Wainwright PJ (2002) The effect of porosity on the strength of foamed concrete. Cem Concr Res 32:233–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00665-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Panesar DK (2013) Cellular concrete properties and the effect of synthetic and protein foaming agents. Constr Build Mater 44:575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Su B, Zhou Z, Li Z et al (2019) Experimental investigation on the mechanical behavior of foamed concrete under uniaxial and triaxial loading. Constr Build Mater 209:41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hilal AA, Thom NH, Dawson AR (2015) On entrained pore size distribution of foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 75:227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chung S-Y, Lehmann C, Abd Elrahman M, Stephan D (2017) Pore characteristics and their effects on the material properties of foamed concrete evaluated using micro-CT images and numerical approaches. Appl Sci 7:550. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7060550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yaghoobi A, Chorzepa MG, Kim SS (2017) Mesoscale fracture analysis of multiphase cementitious composites using peridynamics. Materials 10:162. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Youssef MB, Lavergne F, Sab K et al (2018) Upscaling the elastic stiffness of foam concrete as a three-phase composite material. Cem Concr Res 110:13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen T, Ghazlan A, Kashani A et al (2018) 3D meso-scale modelling of foamed concrete based on X-ray computed tomography. Constr Build Mater 188:583–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim J-S, Chung S-Y, Han T-S et al (2020) Modeling of multiple phase solid microstructures and prediction of mechanical behaviors of foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 248:118637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kearsley EP, Mostert HF (2005) Opportunities for expanding the use of foamed concrete in the construction industry. In: Use of Foamed Concrete in Construction. Thomas Telford Publishing, pp 143–154

  23. Ramamurthy K, Kunhanandan Nambiar EK, Indu Siva Ranjani G (2009) A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete. Cement Concr Compos 31:388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rao F, Zhang Z, Ye G et al (2021) Mesostructure of foamed cement paste and its influence on macromechanical behavior. J Mater Civ Eng 33:04021114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang J-S, Huang Z-H (2000) Fatigue of cement foams in axial compression. J Mater Sci 35:4385–4391. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004813225045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Feng S, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Lei M (2020) Experimental research on the dynamic mechanical properties and damage characteristics of lightweight foamed concrete under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng 140:103558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Deng Z, Cheng H, Wang Z et al (2016) Compressive behavior of the cellular concrete utilizing millimeter-size spherical saturated SAP under high strain-rate loading. Constr Build Mater 119:96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jones MR, Zheng L (2013) Energy absorption of foamed concrete from low-velocity impacts. Mag Concr Res 65:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.12.00054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Junco C, Rodríguez A, Calderón V et al (2018) Fatigue durability test of mortars incorporating polyurethane foam wastes. Constr Build Mater 190:373–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang J, Tian G, Huang P, Chen Z (2020) Flexural performance of sisal fiber reinforced foamed concrete under static and fatigue loading. Materials 13:3098. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li H-N, Liu P-F, Li C et al (2019) Experimental research on dynamic mechanical properties of metal tailings porous concrete. Constr Build Mater 213:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang J, Su Q, Zhao W et al (2017) Experimental study on use of lightweight foam concrete as subgrade bed filler of ballastless track. Constr Build Mater 149:911–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Anggarini U, Pratapa S, Purnomo V, Sukmana NC (2019) A comparative study of the utilization of synthetic foaming agent and aluminum powder as pore-forming agents in lightweight geopolymer synthesis. Open Chem 17:629–638. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2019-0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sun C, Zhu Y, Guo J et al (2018) Effects of foaming agent type on the workability, drying shrinkage, frost resistance and pore distribution of foamed concrete. Constr Build Mater 186:833–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nambiar EKK, Ramamurthy K (2006) Influence of filler type on the properties of foam concrete. Cement Concr Compos 28:475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2005.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiang J, Lu Z, Niu Y et al (2016) Study on the preparation and properties of high-porosity foamed concretes based on ordinary Portland cement. Mater Des 92:949–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Technical Specification of the People’s Republic of China. 2012. Foamed mixture lightweight soil filling engineering. CJJ/T 177–2012. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press

  38. Zhang L, Ou Q, Zhou S (2020) Analytical study of the dynamic response of a double-beam model for a geosynthetic-reinforced embankment under traffic loads. Comput Geotech 118:103330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chango IVL, Yan M, Ling X et al (2019) Dynamic response analysis of geogrid reinforced embankment supported by CFG pile structure during a high-speed train operation. Latin Am J Solids Struct. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78255710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pham HV, Dias D (2019) 3D numerical modeling of a piled embankment under cyclic loading. Int J Geomech 19:04019010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Amran YHM, Farzadnia N, Abang Ali AA (2015) Properties and applications of foamed concrete; a review. Constr Build Mater 101:990–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaniraj SR, Havanagi VG (1999) Compressive strength of cement stabilized fly ash-soil mixtures. Cem Concr Res 29:673–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00018-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim YT, Kim HJ, Lee GH (2008) Mechanical behavior of lightweight soil reinforced with waste fishing net. Geotext Geomembr 26:512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim YT, Ahn J, Han WJ, Gabr MA (2010) Experimental evaluation of strength characteristics of stabilized dredged soil. J Mater Civ Eng 22:539–544. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Cong M, Longzhu C, Bing C (2014) Analysis of strength development in soft clay stabilized with cement-based stabilizer. Constr Build Mater 71:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Y, Guo P, Li X et al (2019) Behavior of fiber-reinforced and lime-stabilized clayey soil in triaxial tests. Appl Sci 9:900. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang S, Zhang M-H, Quek ST (2012) Mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced high-strength concrete subjected to high strain-rate compressive loading. Constr Build Mater 31:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Luo H, Paal SG (2018) Machine learning-based backbone curve model of reinforced concrete columns subjected to cyclic loading reversals. J Comput Civ Eng 32:04018042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Epackachi S, Sharma N, Whittaker A et al (2019) A cyclic backbone curve for shear-critical reinforced concrete walls. J Struct Eng 145:04019006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang B, Chen Y, Fan H, Jin F (2019) Investigation of low-velocity impact behaviors of foamed concrete material. Compos B Eng 162:491–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Han LH, Elliott JA, Bentham AC et al (2008) A modified Drucker-Prager Cap model for die compaction simulation of pharmaceutical powders. Int J Solids Struct 45:3088–3106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.01.024

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Darabi MK, Kola R, Little DN, Garg N (2020) Time-dependent Drucker-Prager-Cap model coupled with PANDA (pavement analysis using nonlinear damage approach) to predict rutting performance of flexible pavements. Constr Build Mater 244:118326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118326

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the financial support provided by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 41972272 and No. 41772281) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 22120190220).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Dr. Zhen Zhang, upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rao, F., Zhang, Z., Ye, G. et al. Mechanical behavior and assessment of foamed cement paste under staged cyclic loading. Mater Struct 54, 182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01781-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01781-z

Keywords

Navigation