Elsevier

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volume 132, Issue 11, November 2021, Pages 2827-2839
Clinical Neurophysiology

Influence of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on excitatory-inhibitory balance and plasticity in human motor cortex

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.07.029Get rights and content

Highlights

  • TMS measures of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission differed by BDNF Val66Met genotype.

  • An intrinsic balance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission was evident and differed according to BNDF genotype.

  • In Met allele carriers, impaired LTP- but not LTD-like ITMS plasticity was restored by calibrating for reductions in excitatory transmission.

Abstract

Objective

While previous studies showed that the single nucleotide polymorphism (Val66Met) of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) can impact neuroplasticity, the influence of BDNF genotype on cortical circuitry and relationship to neuroplasticity remain relatively unexplored in human.

Methods

Using individualised transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) parameters, we explored the influence of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on excitatory and inhibitory neural circuitry, its relation to I-wave TMS (ITMS) plasticity and effect on the excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) balance in 18 healthy individuals.

Results

Excitatory and inhibitory indexes of neurotransmission were reduced in Met allele carriers. An E/I balance was evident, which was influenced by BDNF with higher E/I ratios in Val/Val homozygotes. Both long-term potentiation (LTP-) and depression (LTD-) like ITMS plasticity were greater in Val/Val homozygotes. LTP- but not LTD-like effects were restored in Met allele carriers by increasing stimulus intensity to compensate for reduced excitatory transmission.

Conclusions

The influence of BDNF genotype may extend beyond neuroplasticity to neurotransmission. The E/I balance was evident in human motor cortex, modulated by BDNF and measurable using TMS. Given the limited sample, these preliminary findings warrant further investigation.

Significance

These novel findings suggest a broader role of BDNF genotype on neurocircuitry in human motor cortex.

Introduction

The inter-individual variability of human neuroplasticity is an area of increasing interest (Fried et al., 2017, López-Alonso et al., 2014, Ridding and Ziemann, 2010). Neuroplasticity subserves many functions including learning and memory, and may impact the success of compensatory measures in neurological disorders and response to therapy (Pearson-Fuhrhop et al., 2012). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is understood to help orchestrate synaptic plasticity and the most widely expressed neurotrophin in the mammalian brain (Park and Poo, 2013).

In-vitro and in-vivo research indicates that the influence of BDNF extends beyond neuroplasticity to more fundamental properties of synaptic transmission, and that such properties could underpin some of the effects of BDNF on neuroplasticity (Figurov et al., 1996, Gottschalk et al., 1998). More specifically, cell-slice studies indicate that BDNF has a wide array of effects on synaptic transmission at excitatory and inhibitory synapses, enhancing neurotransmitter release (Pattwell et al., 2012), increasing synaptic density (Marty et al., 2000), and promoting synaptic maturation (Bulleit and Hsieh, 2000). Interestingly, application of exogenous BDNF to BDNF knockout mice ameliorates deficits in both synaptic transmission and plasticity (Patterson et al., 1996, Pattwell et al., 2012). Moreover, BDNF antibodies only affect plasticity induction when applied prior to or during stimulation, but have no effect when applied following stimulation, suggesting that the effects of BDNF on neurotransmission may mediate its effects on neuroplasticity (Chen et al., 1999).

In addition, emerging evidence suggests that BDNF plays a role in setting the balance between excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic transmission, quantified as the excitatory to inhibitory (E/I) ratio (Singh et al., 2006). Rather than considering excitatory and inhibitory circuits in isolation, the E/I balance describes whether the strength of these circuits is balanced or potentially dysregulated. In vitro and in vivo animal research indicates that the E/I balance is crucial for maintaining postsynaptic neural firing activity within the dynamic range (Eichler and Meier, 2008, Rutherford et al., 1997, Shu et al., 2003), and for the fine tuning of oscillatory neural dynamics as well as neural computation required for higher order cognitive and network function (Denève and Machens, 2016, Gandal et al., 2012, Haider et al., 2006, Liu, 2004, Yizhar et al., 2011). This balance has been proposed as a functional cornerstone of neural circuitry (Dehghani et al., 2016), due its role in maintaining normal dynamic function within neural circuits (Deneve and Machens, 2016, Eichler and Meier, 2008, Haider et al., 2006, Rutherford et al., 1997, Shu et al., 2003, Gandal et al., 2012), while dysregulation of this balance has been noted as a common feature among neuropsychiatric disorders (Bartley and Dobrunz, 2015, Uhlhaas and Singer, 2012, Yizhar et al., 2011). These findings provide motivation to explore the relation between BDNF, neurocircuitry and plasticity in human cortex.

The influence of BDNF can be studied in human via the common single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at nucleotide 196 (G/A), which is associated with decreased activity dependent secretion of BDNF due to a valine-to-methione substitution at codon 66 (Val66Met) (Egan et al., 2003). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a non-invasive method for the investigation of neurocircuitry and plasticity, and their relation, in human cortex. TMS measures probing excitatory and inhibitory neurocircuitry include, amongst others, short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF) and short and long interval intracortical inhibition (SICI, LICI), which are considered to index the strength of gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) and B (GABAB) receptor mediated inhibition respectively (for review see Cash and Ziemann, 2021, Paulus et al., 2008). Neuroplasticity may be studied via a variety of TMS protocols, and while the systems-level effects of TMS may not be identical to those examined in classical single cell paradigms, there are common features (Thickbroom, 2007, Ziemann et al., 2008). Accordingly, the persistent increases (long term potentiation, LTP) and decreases (long term depression, LTD) in excitability observed in cell-slice studies are referred to as LTP- and LTD-like when studied using TMS. Interestingly, both rodent and human studies indicate that the extent to which BDNF influences plasticity varies across different stimulation paradigms. For example, cell slice studies indicate that higher BDNF levels promote the plastic effects of theta burst stimulation (TBS), but not continuous high frequency stimulation (Akaneya et al., 1997, Chen et al., 1999, Figurov et al., 1996, Kang et al., 1997). In human motor cortex, the plastic effects of TBS appear to be reliably modulated by BDNF genotype (Antal et al., 2010, Cheeran et al., 2008), whereas the relationship appears to be weaker or even absent for transcranial direct current stimulation (Antal et al., 2010, Di Lazzaro et al., 2012, Loo et al., 2018), conventional repetitive TMS (Hwang et al., 2015) and quadri-pulse stimulation (Nakamura et al., 2011).

In the present work, we examined a plasticity paradigm termed I-wave TMS (ITMS). ITMS plasticity is understood to be mediated by SICF excitatory circuitry (Cash et al., 2009, Cash et al., 2013, Cash et al., 2016, Thickbroom et al., 2006). This link provides a unique and attractive opportunity to investigate the relationship between BDNF effects on neural circuit properties and cortical plasticity. In short, ITMS involves repeated delivery of paired pulse stimuli, and LTP- or LTD-like effects are induced depending on whether stimuli are repeatedly timed to coincide with SICF phases of increased (1.5 ms interstimulus interval, ISI) or decreased neural excitability (2 ms ISI) (Cash et al., 2013). By individualising these intervals to match the timing of the subject-specific SICF peak (∼1.5 ms) or trough (∼2ms), ITMS LTP- and LTD-like effects can be further enhanced (Cash et al., 2016, Sewerin et al., 2011). On this basis, ITMS is understood to be mediated by a process termed phase dependent plasticity, in which plastic effects depend on whether stimulation is delivered during moments of increased or decreased neural excitability (Cash et al., 2013).

In the present study we investigated whether the influence of BDNF extends beyond neuroplasticity to more fundamental neural circuit properties. More specifically, we assessed in motor cortex (i) the impact of BDNF Val66Met genotype on paired-pulse measures of excitatory and inhibitory signalling (SICF, SICI, LICI), (ii) introduce a TMS measure of the E/I balance, based on indexes of excitatory and inhibitory transmission (i.e. SICF, SICI) which operate on a similar (rapid) time-scale, and examine the influence of BDNF genotype on this balance and (iii) assessed the impact of BDNF genotype on excitatory and depressive forms of ITMS plasticity and (iv) investigated whether a higher threshold for plasticity induction in Met allele carriers could be related to reduced excitatory neurotransmission and therefore negated by compensatory increases in TMS intensity.

Section snippets

Participants

We studied 18 healthy volunteers: 9 Val homozygotes (4 female; aged 35 ± 2 years) and 9 Met allele carriers (5 female; aged 33 ± 4 years), two of whom were Met/Met homozygotes. All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the protocol had the approval of the University Health Network (Toronto) Research Ethics Board.

BDNF genotyping/ genetic analysis

Each participant donated 30 mL of whole blood. DNA was extracted using the high-salt technique previously described (Lahiri

RMT and SI1mV

There were no significant differences between Val/Val and Met groups in RMT (49 ± 4 and 49 ± 4% MSO respectively; P = 0.89) or the intensity required to generate 1 mV peak-to-peak MEP amplitude (62 ± 5 and 68 ± 5% MSO respectively; P = 0.44; Table 1).

LICI

There was a significant effect of CS intensity (F(2,17.4) = 30.0, P < 0.01, d = 1.23, β = 0.69), group (F(1,23.8) = 7.3, P < 0.05 d = 1.10, β = 0.59) and their interaction on LICI (F(2,17.4) = 3.8, P < 0.05, d = 0.44, β = 0.14). This reflects the

Discussion

These findings provide initial evidence that the influence of BDNF in human extends beyond neuroplasticity to more fundamental aspects of synaptic transmission. Our data indicate a relation between BDNF genotype and the strength of excitatory and inhibitory neural circuitry, as indexed using TMS. To demonstrate circuit specificity, we utilised ISI curves for SICF and intensity curves for LICI. Our data across 18 participants further indicate that a balance between the strength of excitatory and

Limitations

A limitation with the present work is the relatively small sample size. While this appeared comparable to and justified based on prior work (section 2.1.3), the findings should be considered as preliminary and require replication in larger samples. A range of parameters can be employed to measure SICI and SICF and these often vary across studies. We carefully selected paired-pulse parameters to avoid floor or ceiling effects, as these would otherwise reduce capacity to detect between-group

Conclusions

These findings provide initial evidence that the influence of BDNF in human extends beyond neuroplasticity to more fundamental aspects of synaptic transmission. Furthermore, the results provide novel evidence that it may be possible to compensate for reductions in TMS plasticity by individually adjusting for reduced excitatory transmission. Our data indicate that a balance between the strength of excitatory and inhibitory circuits (E/I ratio) may be an intrinsic feature of human motor cortex

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank all participants. We thank Dr Anurika De Silva at the University of Melbourne for helpful discussions.

Funding

RFHC received support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number DFF211888) and Australian Research Council (DE200101708). KU was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number 201010DFF-236001-172378). This work was also supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant number FDN 154292). In the last 3 years, ZJD received research and equipment in-kind support for an investigator-initiated study through Brainsway Inc and Magventure Inc. ZJD has

References (114)

  • C.K. Loo et al.

    International Randomized-Controlled Trial Of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation In Depression

    Brain Stimul

    (2018)
  • V. López-Alonso et al.

    Inter-Individual Variability In Response To Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms

    Brain Stimul

    (2014)
  • B. Luscher et al.

    Gabaergic Control Of Depression-Related Brain States

    Adv Pharmacol

    (2015)
  • L. Minichiello et al.

    Mechanism Of Trkb-Mediated Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • K. Nakamura et al.

    Quadri-Pulse Stimulation (Qps) Induced Ltp/Ltd Was Not Affected By Val66met Polymorphism In The Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (Bdnf) Gene

    Neurosci Lett

    (2011)
  • R.C. Oldfield

    The Assessment And Analysis Of Handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory

    Neuropsychologia

    (1971)
  • G.M. Opie et al.

    Age-Related Changes In Late Synaptic Inputs To Corticospinal Neurons And Their Functional Significance: A Paired-Pulse Tms Study

    Brain Stimul

    (2020)
  • M. Orth et al.

    The Variability Of Intracortical Inhibition And Facilitation

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2003)
  • S.L. Patterson et al.

    Rose Jc, Kandel Er. Recombinant Bdnf Rescues Deficits In Basal Synaptic Transmission And Hippocampal Ltp In Bdnf Knockout Mice

    Neuron

    (1996)
  • W. Paulus et al.

    State Of The Art: Pharmacologic Effects On Cortical Excitability Measures Tested By Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Brain Stimul

    (2008)
  • S.H. Peurala et al.

    Interference Of Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition (Sici) And Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation (Sicf)

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2008)
  • A.F. Schinder et al.

    Postsynaptic Target Specificity Of Neurotrophin-Induced Presynaptic Potentiation

    Neuron

    (2000)
  • Y. Akaneya et al.

    Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Enhances Long-Term Potentiation In Rat Visual Cortex

    J Neurosci

    (1997)
  • A. Antal et al.

    Towards Unravelling Task-Related Modulations Of Neuroplastic Changes Induced In The Human Motor Cortex

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2007)
  • A. Artola et al.

    Different Voltage-Dependent Thresholds For Inducing Long-Term Depression And Long-Term Potentiation In Slices Of Rat Visual Cortex

    Nature

    (1990)
  • A. Artola et al.

    Long-Term Potentiation And Nmda Receptors In Rat Visual Cortex

    Nature

    (1987)
  • P. Baldelli et al.

    Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Enhances Gaba Release Probability And Nonuniform Distribution Of N- And P/Q-Type Channels On Release Sites Of Hippocampal Inhibitory Synapses

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • A. Balkowiec et al.

    Activity-Dependent Release Of Endogenous Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor From Primary Sensory Neurons Detected By Elisain Situ

    J Neurosci

    (2000)
  • A.F. Bartley et al.

    Short-Term Plasticity Regulates The Excitation/Inhibition Ratio And The Temporal Window For Spike Integration In Ca1 Pyramidal Cells

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2015)
  • D.H. Benninger et al.

    Intermittent Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation For Treatment Of Parkinson Disease

    Neurology

    (2011)
  • R.F.H. Cash et al.

    Thickbroom Gw. Neuromodulation By Paired-Pulse Tms At An I-Wave Interval Facilitates Multiple I-Waves

    Exp Brain Res

    (2009)
  • R.F.H. Cash et al.

    The Influence Of Sensory Afferent Input On Local Motor Cortical Excitatory Circuitry In Humans

    J Physiol

    (2015)
  • R.F.H. Cash et al.

    Evidence For High-Fidelity Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Of Human Motor Cortex

    J Neurophysiol

    (2013)
  • R.F.H. Cash et al.

    Augmenting Plasticity Induction In Human Motor Cortex By Disinhibition Stimulation

    Cereb Cortex

    (2016)
  • R.F.H. Cash et al.

    Characterization Of Glutamatergic And Gabaa-Mediated Neurotransmission In Motor And Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Using Paired-Pulse Tms-Eeg

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2017)
  • R.F.H. Cash et al.

    Inhibitory And Disinhibitory Effects On I-Wave Facilitation In Motor Cortex

    J Neurophysiol

    (2011)
  • R.F.H. Cash et al.

    Paired-Pulse TMS Interactions

  • Cheeran B, Talelli P, Mori F, Koch G, Suppa A, Edwards M, Et Al. A Common Polymorphism In The Brain-Derived...
  • G. Chen et al.

    Relative Contribution Of Endogenous Neurotrophins In Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation

    J Neurosci

    (1999)
  • L Christiansen et al.

    Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Enhances Corticospinal Synaptic Plasticity In Humans

    Elife

    (2018)
  • J. Cirillo et al.

    Differential Modulation Of Motor Cortex Excitability In Bdnf Met Allele Carriers Following Experimentally Induced And Use-Dependent Plasticity

    Eur J Neurosci

    (2012)
  • J. Cirillo et al.

    Motor Cortex Plasticity Induced By Paired Associative Stimulation Is Enhanced In Physically Active Individuals

    J Physiol

    (2009)
  • A. Conte et al.

    Effects Of Attention On Inhibitory And Facilitatory Phenomena Elicited By Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation In Healthy Subjects

    Exp Brain Res

    (2008)
  • A. Conte et al.

    Attention Influences The Excitability Of Cortical Motor Areas In Healthy Humans

    Exp Brain Res

    (2007)
  • Z.J. Daskalakis et al.

    The Mechanisms Of Interhemispheric Inhibition In The Human Motor Cortex

    J Physiol

    (2002)
  • Dehghani N, Peyrache A, Telenczuk B, Le Van Quyen M, Halgren E, Cash Ss, Et Al. Dynamic Balance Of Excitation And...
  • S. Denève et al.

    Efficient Codes And Balanced Networks

    Nat Neurosci

    (2016)
  • NS Desai et al.

    Bdnf Regulates The Intrinsic Excitability Of Cortical Neurons

    Learn Mem

    (1999)
  • V. Di Lazzaro et al.

    The Effects Of Prolonged Cathodal Direct Current Stimulation On The Excitatory And Inhibitory Circuits Of The Ipsilateral And Contralateral Motor Cortex

    J Neural Transm (Vienna)

    (2012)
  • V.D. Lazzaro et al.

    Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation At Intensities Below Active Motor Threshold Activates Intracortical Inhibitory Circuits

    Exp Brain Res

    (1998)
  • Cited by (6)

    View full text