Skip to main content
Log in

Grouping patterns of rainfed winter wheat test locations and the role of climatic variables

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Crop cultivar performance is a result of combined effects of genotype, environment and genotype × environment (G × E) interaction. To effectively generate reliable estimates of crop yield the magnitude and patterns of G × E in regional yield trials should be specified. This research aimed to (1) investigate existing possible mega-environments (ME) and suitability of test locations for winter wheat zoning, and (2) determine the role of climatic factors in clustering patterns of G × E. Winter wheat yield data from a three-year nationwide yield trial consisting of 24 genotypes grown in 24 test environments supplemented with 37 climatic factors were subjected to empirical and analytical analyses. Standard deviation-scaled genotype main effect and G × E interaction (SD-GGE) biplot methodology, factorial regression and partial least square regression were applied to both analyses. The combined ANOVA showed that the environmental effect was the main source of variation (83%), and the magnitude of G × E interaction was sixfold greater than genotype alone. The SD-GGE biplot confirmed non-repeatable patterns for grouping of test locations across years, indicating significant (P < 0.01) rank-change location-by-year interactions and existence of strong "crossover" G × E interactions. This led to the conclusion that the winter wheat growing region in Iran consists of a single but complex ME for grain yield, suggesting that high-yielding-and stable winter wheat genotypes should be developed for the entire region rather than genotypes adapted to specific agro-ecological regions. Precipitation (monthly and total) and temperature (minimum, maximum and average) accounted for 25.4% and 56.8% of total G × E.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aastveit H, Martens H (1986) ANOVA interactions interpreted by partial least squares regression. Biometrics 42:829–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado G, López M, Vargas M, Pacheco A, Rodríguez F, Burgueño J, Crossa J (2015) “META-R (Multi Environment Trial Analysis with R for Windows), Version 6.04.”, CIMMYT Research Data & Software Repository Network. https://data.cimmyt.org/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=hdl:11529/10201

  • Amenta P, D’Ambra L (2001) Generalized constrained principal component analysis. In: Borra S, Rocci R, Vichi M, Schader M (eds) Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization. Springer, Berlin, pp 137–144

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chairi F, Aparicio N, Serret MD, Araus JL (2020) Breeding effects on the genotype × environment interaction for yield of durum wheat grown after the Green Revolution: the case of Spain. Crop J 8:623–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vita P, Mastrangelo AM, Matteu L, Mazzucotelli E, Virzi N, Palumbo M, Cattivelli L (2010) Genetic improvement effects on yield stability in durum wheat genotypes grown in Italy. Field Crops Res 119:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Pozo A, Yáñez A, Matus I, Tapia G, Castillo D, Sanchez-Jardón L et al (2016) Physiological traits associated with wheat yield potential and performance under water-stress in a Mediterranean environment. Front Plant Sci 7:987

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Denis JB (1988) Two-way analysis using covariates. Statistics 19:123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1997) Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Sci 37:311–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George N, Lundy M (2019) Quantifying genotype x environment effects in long-term common wheat yield trials from an agroecologically diverse production region. Crop Sci 59:1960–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkesford M, Araus J, Park R, Calderini D, Miralles D, Shen T et al (2013) Prospects of doubling global wheat yields. Food Energy Secur 2:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Gourdji SM (2012) The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiol 160:1686–1697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Malosetti M, Bibaut JM, van Eeuwijk FA (2013) The statistical analysis of multi-environment data: modeling genotype-by-environment interaction and its genetic basis. Front Physiol 4:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi R (2018) Breeding for increased drought tolerance in wheat: a review. Crop past Sci 69:223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi R, Haghparast R, Amri A, Ceccarelli S (2010) Yield stability of rainfed durum wheat and GGE biplot analysis of multi-environment trials. Crop Pas Sci 61:92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi R, Farshadfar E, Amri A (2015) Interpreting genotype x environment interactions for grain yield of rainfed durum wheat in Iran. Crop J 3:526–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi R, Armion M, Zadhasan E, Ahmadi MM, Amri A (2018) The use of AMMI model for interpreting genotype x environment interaction in durum wheat. Exp Agric 54:670–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motzo R, Giunta F, Deidda M (2001) Factors affecting the genotype x environment interaction in spring triticale grown in a Mediterranean environment. Euphytica 121:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navabi A, Yang R, Helm J, Spaner DM (2006) Can spring wheat-growing mega-environments in the northern Great Plains be dissected for representative locations or niche adapted genotypes? Crop Sci 46:1107–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco A, Vargas M, Alvarado G, Rodríguez F, Crossa J, Burgueño J (2015) GEA-R (genotype x environment analysis with R for windows), Version 4.1. Mexico: CIMMYT. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/11529/10203

  • Rakshit S, Ganapathy KN, Gomashe SS, Rathore A, Ghorade RB, Nagesh Kumar MV et al (2012) GGE biplot analysis to evaluate genotype, environment and their interactions in sorghum multi-location data. Euphytica 185:465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramburan S, Zhou M, Labuschagne M (2012) Integrating empirical and analytical approaches to investigate genotype x environment interactions in sugarcane. Crop Sci 52:2153–2165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeboom KL, Schapaugh WT, Tuinstra MR, Vanderlip RL, Miliken GA (2008) Testing wheat in variable environments: genotype, environment, interaction effects, and grouping test locations. Crop Sci 48:317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-García M, Alvaro F, Martín-Sánchez JA, Sillero JC, Escribano J, Royo C (2012) Breeding effects on the genotype x environment interaction for yield of bread wheat grown in Spain during the 20th century. Field Crops Res 126:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-García M, Royo C, Aparicio N, Martín-Sánchez A, Álvaro F (2013) Genetic improvement of bread wheat yield and associated traits in Spain during the 20th century. J Agric Sci 151:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eeuwijk FA, Denis JB, Kang MS (1996) Incorporating additional information on genotypes and environments in models for two-way genotype by environment tables. In Kang MS, Gauch HG (eds) Genotype-by-environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  • Vargas M, Crossa J, van Eeuwijk FA, Sayre K, Reynolds MP (2001) Interpreting treatment x environment interaction in agronomy trials. Agron J 93:949–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voltas J, Lopez-Corcoles H, Borras G (2005) Use of biplot analysis and factorial regression for the investigation of superior genotypes in multi-environment Trials. Eur J Agron 22:309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W (2014) Crop variety trials: data management and analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W (2015) Mega-environment analysis and test location evaluation based on unbalanced multiyear data. Crop Sci 55:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Hunt LA (2001) Interpretation of genotype x environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci 41:19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Tinker NA (2006) Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci 86:623–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z (2000) Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot. Crop Sci 40:596–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Woods S, Cornelius PL (2007) GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Sci 47:643–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research (Grant Code: 0-15-15-005-950406) was funded by Dryland Agriculture Research Institute (DARI) of Iran. Special thanks to Dr. E. Mohammadi for making the GIS analysis. The authors thank all research assistants who directly or indirectly collaborated in carrying out this study. The authors also thank the reviewers and Associate Editor of Euphytica for comments and corrections to the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Mohammadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in the development and execution of this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roostaei, M., Jafarzadeh, J., Roohi, E. et al. Grouping patterns of rainfed winter wheat test locations and the role of climatic variables. Euphytica 217, 183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02915-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02915-8

Keywords

Navigation