Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prion strains associated with iatrogenic CJD in French and UK human growth hormone recipients

Acta Neuropathologica Communications volume 9, Article number: 145 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Treatment with human pituitary-derived growth hormone (hGH) was responsible for a significant proportion of iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (iCJD) cases. France and the UK experienced the largest case numbers of hGH-iCJD, with 122 and 81 cases respectively. Differences in the frequency of the three PRNP codon 129 polymorphisms (MM, MV and VV) and the estimated incubation periods associated with each of these genotypes in the French and the UK hGH-iCJD cohorts led to the suggestion that the prion strains responsible for these two hGH-iCJD cohorts were different. In this study, we characterized the prion strains responsible for hGH-iCJD cases originating from UK (n = 11) and France (n = 11) using human PrP expressing mouse models. The cases included PRNP MM, MV and VV genotypes from both countries. UK and French sporadic CJD (sCJD) cases were included as controls. The prion strains identified following inoculation with hGH-iCJD homogenates corresponded to the two most frequently observed sCJD prion strains (M1CJD and V2CJD). However, in clear contradiction to the initial hypothesis, the prion strains that were identified in the UK and the French hGH-iCJD cases were not radically different. In the vast majority of the cases originating from both countries, the V2CJD strain or a mixture of M1CJD + V2CJD strains were identified. These data strongly support the contention that the differences in the epidemiological and genetic profiles observed in the UK and France hGH-iCJD cohorts cannot be attributed only to the transmission of different prion strains.

Introduction

Prion diseases (otherwise known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies) are a group of transmissible neurodegenerative disorders that occur naturally in man and a range of other mammalian species, including scrapie in sheep and goats, and chronic wasting disease in deer and elk. Prion diseases are characterized by the accumulation of a misfolded form of the normal cellular prion protein (PrPC) in the central nervous system (CNS) [1]. This misfolded protein (commonly referred to as PrPSc) is considered to be the major, if not the only, component of the transmissible agents or prions that are responsible for these diseases [2]. Serial passage of sheep scrapie in mice by intracerebral inoculation identified the presence of distinct strains of the transmissible agent based on the individual biological properties in the mice that become stable on serial passage [3]. These properties include the disease incubation period and neuropathological phenotype, particularly the distribution and severity of spongiform change in the brain. In the apparent absence of any nucleic acid associated with the transmissible agent, these variations in strain properties have been accounted for by conformational variability in PrPSc that is self-propagating [2].

Human prion diseases occur in sporadic, genetic and acquired forms. The commonest of these is the sporadic form of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (sCJD), which has a worldwide distribution at a remarkably consistent incidence of 1–2 cases per million population per annum. The acquired forms of human prion disease include kuru, iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (iCJD) and variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (vCJD) [4].

The clinicopathological phenotype of human prion diseases is variable, particularly in sCJD. One major determinant of this variability is the naturally occurring polymorphism at codon 129 in the human prion protein gene (PRNP), which can encode either methionine (M) or valine (V), resulting in three possible genotypes: MM, MV and VV. The second major determinant is the isoform of the protease-resistant core of PrPSc (referred to as PrPres) which may be detected by Western blot analysis in brain tissue from affected patients. PrPres occurs as two major isoforms in sCJD cases that differ in the molecular weight of the unglycosylated fragments, designated Type 1 (21 kDa) and Type 2 (19 kDa). Distinct subtypes of sCJD have been recognized according to their clinical and neuropathological features, which largely correspond to the six possible codon 129 genotype/PrPres type combinations (MM1, MV1, VV1, MM2, MV2 and VV2) [5]. However, both type 1 and type 2 PrPres can be detected within either the same or different brain areas in up to 35% of sCJD patients [6, 7]. It has been proposed that the different sCJD subtypes could result from the propagation of different strains of sCJD prions in patients. Experimental transmissions of sCJD brain homogenates to transgenic mice have demonstrated the existence of at least five strains of sCJD prions [8,9,10,11,12,13].

Although the precise relationship between prion strain diversity and the clinicopathological subtypes of sCJD remains imperfectly characterized, two strains named M1CJD and V2CJD seem to account for the most frequent forms of sCJD; M1CJD is predominantly found in the brain of MM/MV1 sCJD patients, while the V2CJD strain is generally found in VV/MV2 sCJD patients [8, 9, 11, 14]. However, in up to 35% of sCJD patients the co-existence of both M1CJD and V2CJD strains was demonstrated by bioassay [11].

The first reported case of iatrogenic CJD (iCJD), occurring in a recipient of a corneal graft from a donor who had died from sCJD, was published in 1974 [15]. Since then, cases of iCJD have also been identified in small numbers of patients on whom neurosurgical instruments or intracerebral electrodes previously used on the brains of patients with CJD were subsequently used [16]. Larger numbers of iCJD cases (over 200 in each group) have occurred in patients inoculated with human pituitary-derived growth hormone (hGH), and in patients who received an implant of lyophilised human dura mater (hDM) during neurosurgery. Treatment of primary or secondary growth hormone deficiency in children with hGH was commenced initially in the 1950s on a small scale in a few countries. The subsequent clinical success of this treatment resulted its use on a much larger scale and in more countries. The first case of iCJD in a patient treated with hGH was reported in 1985, since when the use of hGH has ceased in many countries and replacement therapy with biosynthetic growth hormone was instigated [16].

The incidence of hGH-iCJD varies from country to country and appears to be related to the scale of the local hGH production process and the likelihood of prion contamination in the selection of autopsy cases for pituitary collection, e.g. the collection of pituitary glands from elderly patients. Since 1985, over 240 cases of iCJD in hGH recipients have been reported in several countries, with the largest numbers of cases occurring in France and the United Kingdom (UK). Four cases of iCJD in human pituitary gonadotrophin recipients have also occurred, all in Australia; one of these patients died in the UK [16].

Overall, 1849 patients from the UK and Ireland were treated with hGH produced in the UK from 1959 until 1985. Since 1985, 81 deaths from iCJD have occurred in this cohort. It has been established that one particular preparation of UK pituitary-derived hGH (the Hartree-modified Wilhelmi (HWP) preparation) had been administered to all hGH recipients who had developed iCJD, albeit from different batches, in varying quantities and over different time periods [17]. In France, 122 cases of iCJD in 1443 hGH recipients have occurred between 1991 and 2019. All were treated between December 1983 and July 1985, which has been identified as a high- risk period for hGH-iCJD in France [18, 19].

Deaths from hGH-iCJD continue to occur in France and in the UK, with the most recent death occurring in 2019 and 2020 respectively, 35 years since hGH therapy ceased in these countries. A precise calculation of incubation periods in human pituitary hormone recipients is difficult, since the patients are often treated over a period of years; the time period from the mid-point of pituitary hormone treatment to the onset of clinical symptoms of iCJD is therefore used as an estimate for the incubation period.

A major factor influencing incubation periods in hGH-iCJD is the PRNP codon 129 polymorphism of the recipient. It has long been recognized that homozygosity at this locus may predispose to both iCJD and sporadic CJD (sCJD) [20]. In the healthy UK and French populations, the distribution of the individual genotypes at codon 129 of the PRNP gene is similar at around 40% MM, 10% VV and 50% MV [16, 21].

Variations in the frequency of the three PRNP codon 129 polymorphisms (MM, MV and VV) and estimated incubation periods associated with each of these three genotypes have been reported in hGH-iCJD cohorts in different countries [16].

In France, the mean incubation period for hGH-iCJD has been estimated at 14.2 years. However, incubation periods differed according to the patient’s age at start of treatment, with the shortest incubation periods observed in the group of patients aged between 10 and 13.7 years when treatment started. Incubation periods were also influenced by the patient’s PRNP codon 129 genotype, with mean values of 12.6 years in MM and VV homozygotes and 17.6 years in MV heterozygotes [18].

The risk of developing iCJD in the UK hGH recipients was greatest in those patients who started treatment at ages 8–10 years [17]. Estimated incubation periods in the UK hGH-iCJD patients range from 7 to 40 years; these prolonged incubation periods are reminiscent of those occurring in kuru, where incubation periods of over 40 years have been reported [22]. The incubation periods in the UK hGH-iCJD patients are also influenced by the patient’s PRNP codon 129 genotype, but in contrast to the French patients, UK VV homozygous patients had a mean incubation period of 14.3 years, while in MV heterozygous patients the mean incubation period was 23.4 years. The longest incubation periods in UK patients occurred in codon 129 MM homozygotes (mean value 30.8 years) [22].

These observations raised the hypothesis that different prion strains (most likely originating from undetected cases of sCJD in the donor population) contaminated the hGH preparations administered to recipients in the UK and in France, resulting in different incubation periods for each of the PRNP codon 129 subgroups between these countries [16, 23]. This study aims to test this hypothesis by performing experimental transmissions of 22 hGH-iCJD brain homogenates from patients with all three codon 129 genotypes from France (11 cases) and the UK (11 cases) into a panel of well characterized human-PrP-expressing transgenic mice (tgHu), following an established methodology that has been used extensively to identify sCJD prion strains in a range of tissue samples from France, the UK and Spain [11, 14]. Sporadic CJD cases originating from France and the UK were also used as controls in this study. This is the first study, to our knowledge, where the strain characteristics of prions in hGH-iCJD cases have been defined and compared to sCJD prion strains.

In clear contradiction to the initial hypothesis, the prion strains that were identified in the UK and the French hGH-iCJD cases were not radically different. In the vast majority of the cases originating from both countries, the V2CJD strain or a mixture of M1CJD + V2CJD strains were identified by the strain typing in tgHu. These data strongly support the contention that differences observed in the epidemiological profiles between hGH-iCJD cases in the UK and France cannot be attributed solely to the transmission of different prion strains.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

All animal experiments were performed in compliance with institutional and French national guidelines in accordance with the European Union Directives 86/609/EEC and 2010/63/EU. Experiments were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the author’s institutions: INRA Toulouse/ENVT (Permit Number: 01734.01).

Concerning the human CJD samples, in all cases informed consent for research was obtained and the material used had appropriate ethical approval for use in this project.

France: human brain samples were obtained from the Brain Bank of CHU of Toulouse, Cardiobiotec (Centre de Resources Biologiques des Hospices Civils de Lyon) and former French national reference laboratory (CEA, Fontenay aux roses) under approval number AC62009-973/20-01-2010. Samples were pseudo-anonymized before dispatch.

UK: Human brain samples were obtained from the National CJD Research and Surveillance Unit Brain and Tissue Bank in Edinburgh, UK, which is part of the MRC Edinburgh Brain Bank. For the purposes of this study, samples were pseudo-anonymized using a Brain Bank reference number. All UK cases had informed consent for research and their supply and use in this study was covered by Ethics Approval (LREC 2000/4/157: National Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease tissue bank: acquisition and use of autopsy material for research on human transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, Professor James Ironside, amended date: 9th October 2007).

hGH-iCJD cases

22 cases of hGH-iCJD, each of which had frozen tissue (200 to 500 mg) available (cerebral cortex or cerebellar cortex), were included in this study. The patients originated from France and the UK. A diagnosis of iatrogenic CJD was made in each case according to established international criteria (ECDC 2021: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/infectious-diseases-public-health/variant-creutzfeldt-jakob-disease/eu-case-definition). The UK cases are part of a larger series of UK hGH-iCJD cases that has been extensively characterised in terms of neuropathological features, PrPres profiles and prion protein amplification properties [24]. None of the patients had a familial history of prion disease and, in each case, the entire PRNP coding sequence was analysed [25, 26]. For each patient the age at death and the estimated incubation period (based on individual hGH treatment histories) are indicated (Table 1).

Table 1 Transmission of tissue isolates (10% cerebral/cerebellar cortex homogenates from hGH-iCJD cases) into mice expressing the human PrP (methionine, valine, at codon 129)
Full size table

Tissue homogenate preparation

For each hGH-iCJD case, 175 ± 20 mg of frozen brain tissue was homogenized in 5% glucose in distilled water in grinding tubes (Bio-Rad) adjusted to 10% (w/v) using a TeSeE™ Process 48™ homogenizer (Bio-Rad).

Transgenic mouse lines

Tg340 and tg361 mouse lines that express human PrP methionine at codon 129 or valine at codon 129, respectively, in a prion protein gene knockout (PrPKo) background, were generated as previously described [9, 27]. Both tg340 (tgMet) and tg361 (tgVal) are homozygous for human PRNP gene.

Mouse bioassays

Six- to ten-week-old female mice were anesthetized and inoculated with 2 mg of brain equivalent (20 µL of a 10% cerebral or cerebellar cortex homogenate) in the right parietal lobe using a 25-gauge disposable hypodermic needle.

Mice were observed daily and their neurological status was assessed weekly by qualified veterinarians. Three signs of neurological dysfunction (tremor, ataxia, difficulty righting from supine position, rigidity of tail, kyphosis, paralysis of the lower limbs or bradykinesia,) were necessary to score a mouse positive for prion disease [28].

When clinically progressive TSE disease was evident, the animals were euthanized and their brains harvested. Half of the brain from those animals that had displayed TSE clinical signs was fixed by immersion in 10% formol saline and the other half was frozen at − 20 °C. Tissues from animals found dead were frozen (no formalin fixation). Incubation period was expressed as the mean of the survival (time to death) days post inoculation (dpi) of all the symptomatic mice scored positive for PrPres, with its corresponding standard deviation.

Abnormal PrP western blot (WB) detection

PK resistant abnormal PrP extraction (PrPres) and Western blot were performed as previously described [29]. Immunodetection was performed using monoclonal PrP-specific antibodie Sha31 (1 µg/ml), which recognize the amino acid sequence YEDRYYRE (145–152) [30].

Vacuolar lesion profiles

Hematoxylin–Eosin-stained paraffin-embedded brain tissue sections were used to establish standardized vacuolar lesion profiles in mice as previously described [3, 31]. Each lesion profile was based on data obtained from 4 to 6 animals.

Reference M1 and V2 CJD strains

Successive 1/10 dilutions of 10% brain homogenate (frontal cortex) from a sCJD MM1 and a sCJD VV2) case were inoculated intra-cerebrally to tgMet (n = 6) and tgVal (n = 6). These data were already presented in a previous study [32] as cases 1 and 6, respectively. The brain of the last PrPSc positive MM1 in tgMet and VV2 in tgVal mice (in highest dilution groups) were used to re-inoculate groups of tgMet (n = 12) and tgVal (n = 12). The brain of these tgMet and TgVal animals were pooled to constitute two stocks of reference material (named M1CJD and V2CJD). The V2CJD stock homogenate was end point titrated by bioassay in tgVal (inoculation of successive 1/10 dilutions of 10% homogenates—Additional file 1: Table S1).

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary material.

Results

22 hGH-iCJD cases were selected, which originated either from France (n = 11) or the UK (n = 11) and included all three possible PRNP genotypes at codon 129 (Homozygous Met129 or Val129, Heterozygous Met129/Val129) (Table 1). In both the UK and France, the availability of hGH-iCJD cases from certain PRNP genotypes (such as MM in the UK or VV in France) with suitable biological (frozen) material was limited. Information on the selected 22 cases, including the estimated incubation period of the disease is included in Table 1.

From the frozen material available, tissue homogenates (10% weight volume) corresponding to either cerebral (frontal, parietal or temporal) cortex or cerebellar cortex from each hGH-iCJD case were transmitted (two iterative passages) to mice homozygous for either methionine (tgMet) or valine (tgVal) at codon 129 of human PrP (Table 1). These two tgHu PrP mouse lines have been shown to express approximately fourfold more PrPC in their brain than human brain tissue [9].

In parallel, French (n = 7) and UK (n = 4) cases of sCJD, classified as MM1, MV1, MV2 and VV2, were transmitted to tgMet and TgVal. (Table 2). Data from these sCJD transmissions have been previously reported in a recent study that aimed to type the prion strains in the brain of MM/MV1 and VV/MV2 sCJD affected patients [11]. Based on the transmission properties of incubation period, lesion profile and biological cloning of prion component present in different brain isolates, this study allowed the identification of two sCJD strains, named as M1CJD and V2CJD, that could be present as either pure components or as a mixture in the sCJD isolates (Table 2).

Table 2 Transmission of sporadic CJD isolates (10% brain homogenates) into mice expressing the human PrP (methionine, valine, at codon 129)
Full size table

In the French and UK hGH-iCJD isolates, three distinct transmission patterns were observed in mice inoculated with the panel of tissue homogenates.

The first and most frequent transmission pattern (n = 13 cases), was observed in French MM (n = 3, cases 1–3), MV (n = 2, cases 10,11) and VV (n = 2, cases 18,19); and UK MV (n = 2, cases 8,9), VV (n = 4, cases 14–17) hGH-iCJD patients. It was characterized by a short incubation period in tgVal (~ 160 to 180 dpi) and a long incubation period in tgMet (~ 400 to 700 dpi) (Table 1, Fig. 1). All tgMet mice accumulated a type 1 PrPres in their brain, while type 2 PrPres was observed in the brain collected from tgVal mice (Table 1, Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Survival times of human PrP-expressing mice (tgHu) inoculated with growth hormone CJD cases originating from France and UK. Transgenic mice that express the Met129 (tgMet), Val129 (tgVal) human PrP were inoculated intra-cerebrally (6 mice, 20µL per mouse) with a 10% brain homogenate from hGH-iCJD cases of French and UK origin. Two iterative passages were performed in each mouse line (Table 1). For each passage, results are presented according to the country of origin (Fr and UK) and the PRNP codon 129 genotype of patients (homozygous Met129: MM—heterozygous Met129/Val129: MV—homozygous Val129: VV). Survival time (mean ± SD in days post inoculation) in tg Met (○) and tg Val (∆). White/black symbols correspond to a type 1/type 2 PrPres (as assessed by Western blot) in the brain of the mice respectively. Survival times in tgMet and TgVal associated with M1CJD and V2CJD cloned strains as well as an artificial mixture of V2CJD + M1CJD (10–4 diluted) are included as reference (see Table 2)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

PrPres western blot profiles in the brains of human PrP-expressing mice (TgHu) inoculated with human growth hormone iatrogenic CJD (hGH-iCJD) cases. Transgenic mice that express the Met129 (tgMet) or Val129 (tgVal) human PrP were inoculated intra-cerebrally (6 mice, 20µL per mouse) with a 10% brain homogenate from hGH- iCJD cases of French and UK origin. Two iterative passages were performed in each line (Table 1). After each passage and in each mouse line the isoform (type 1/type 2) of the PrPres was determined in mice brain by SDS-PAGE and WB with the anti-PrP monoclonal antibody Sha31 (epitope YEDRYYRE). A PrPres type 1 isoform (MM1 sCJD isolate) and type 2 isoform (VV2 sCJD isolate) were included as controls on each gel. The WB results obtain in each line are reported in Table 1

Full size image

This pattern was very similar to that observed in tgMet and tgVal inoculated with the V2CJD strain (Table 3, Fig. 1) which was observed in the brain of some French and UK MV2 and VV2 sCJD-affected patients (cases 30–32) (Table 2). The vacuolar lesion profile in the brain of the mice (after second passage) confirmed the propagation of the V2CJD prion strain in both the tgMet and tgVal that had been inoculated with these 13 hGH-iCJD cases (Fig. 3).

Table 3 Bioassay transmission in tg Hu mice of artificial V2CJD/M1CJD strains mixture
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Vacuolar lesion profiles in the brain of human PrP-expressing mice (tgHu) inoculated with human growth hormone iatrogenic CJD cases originating from France and UK. French (Fr) and UK hGH- iCJD isolates were inoculated in transgenic mice that express Met129 (tgMet) or Val129 (tgVal) human PrP (intra-cerebral route, 6 mice, 20µL per mouse). After two iterative passages standardized vacuolar lesion profiles were established in the brains of the mice. Lesion profiles corresponding to M1CJD (○) and V2CJD (●) strains are presented for comparison. Results are presented according to the origin (Fr and UK) and the genotype of patients (homozygous Met129: MM—heterozygous Met129/Val129: MV—homozygous Val129: VV°). Fr MM cases: case 1 (∇), case 2 (∆), case 5 (○). UK MM: case 6 (○), case 7 (∇). Fr MV: case 10 (○), case 12 (∆). UK MV: case 11: case 9 (∇), cases 9 (○), case 13(∆). Fr VV cases: case 18 (∆), case 19 (∇), case 22 (○). UK VV cases: case 14 (○), case 15 (∆), case 22 (∇). For the Fr VV cases 18 and 19, second passage in tgMet were not available at the moment of writing (see Table1)

Full size image

The second transmission pattern observed was observed in one MM UK hGH-iCJD case (case 7). It was characterized by a short incubation period in tgMet (~ 200 dpi), and a longer one in tgVal (~ 300 dpi) (Table 1, Fig. 1). Irrespective of the inoculated mouse line, a type 1 PrPres was observed in the brain of the inoculated animals (Table 1, Fig. 1). These features were similar to those associated with the transmission of the M1CJD strain (Table 3) which could be observed in French and UK MM1 and in a part of the MV1 sCJD affected patients (cases 23–26) (Table 2). The vacuolar lesion profile in the brain of the inoculated mice (after second passage) confirmed the propagation of M1CJD prion strain in tgMet and tgVal inoculated with hGH-iCJD case 7.

In another case (case 22, French origin, VV genotype), available transmission results and lesion profiles in tgMet and tgVal, were also compatible with the presence of M1CJD strain. However, incomplete second passage of this isolate in tgVal at the time of writing precluded drawing a definitive conclusion on the nature of the prion strain.

A third transmission profile was identified in French MM (n = 2, cases 4, 5) and MV (n = 1, case 12) cases as well as in UK MM (n = 1, case 6), MV (n = 1, case 13) and VV (n = 2, cases 20, 21) patients.

This transmission pattern was characterized on second passage by a short incubation period in tgMet (~ 200–300 dpi), and a short incubation period in tgVal (about 160–200 dpi) (Table 1, Fig. 1). A type 1 PrPres accumulated in the brain of tgMet while type 2 PrPres was observed in tgVal mice (Fig. 2). In these isolates, the vacuolar lesion profiles in the TgMet matched with the profiles observed in mice inoculated with M1CJD strain while in the tgVal mice it corresponded to the V2CJD strain (Fig. 3). Strikingly, the transmission of artificial mixtures containing V2CJD cloned strain and a low dilution (10–3 to 10–4) of the M1CJD cloned strain in tgMet and TgVal mice resulted in similar transmission patterns (Table 3, Fig. 3).

Discussion

Representativeness of the panel of hGH-iCJD cases

hGH-iCJD cases are considered to be the consequence of childhood treatment with human growth hormone, prepared using pituitary glands collected from donors that were either affected with or at a late stage of incubation of sCJD. France (n = 122) and the UK (n = 81) account for the largest numbers of hGH-iCJD patients identified worldwide. The epidemiological profile of the hGH-iCJD cases in these countries differs in the distribution of PRNP genotypes at codon 129 and in the mean incubation period in each genotype group. These differences between the UK and France have been proposed to have resulted from contamination with different prion strains [16, 23, 24].

Bioassays in reporter animal models, followed by the phenotyping of the propagated prions (vacuolar lesion profile in the brain and incubation period) remains the gold standard approach for the characterization of prion strains. Over the last decade, transgenic mice that express different human PrP variants at codon 129 (tgHu) have been shown to be valuable models in which to discriminate between different human prion agents and have provided valuable insights in the diversity of the prion strains responsible for sCJD [8,9,10,11,12,13]. These mouse models have allowed the identification of five different prion strains associated with sCJD among which two, named M1CJD and V2CJD, are thought responsible for the most frequent clinico-pathological forms of sCJD (observed in MM/MV1 and VV/MV2 patients, respectively) [8,9,10,11]. These same animal models also demonstrated that in around 30% of the MV1, MV2 and VV2 sCJD patients both M1CJD and V2CJD prions were present as a mixture [11].

Transmission of the 11 French and 11 UK hGH-iCJD cases in mice expressing valine 129 (tgVal) and methionine 129 (tgMet) human PrP variants in this study, represents an unprecedented effort to document the nature of the prion strains responsible for this iatrogenic form of the disease. Our study was primarily designed to test the hypothesis that different prion agents were responsible for the hGH-iCJD outbreaks in France and in the UK. While the design of the experiments was fit for this purpose, the materials (cost and duration of bioassay, availability of material from patients) and ethical considerations limited the number of hGH-iCJD cases that could undergo strain typing by bioassay.

Prion strains in the UK and French hGH-iCJD cases

The prion strains that were identified in brain isolates prepared from French and UK hGH-iCJD cases following bioassay in tgHu mice models correspond to prion strains that were previously identified in sCJD patients in France and in the UK using the same mouse models [11].

In contradiction to the initial hypothesis, the prion strains that were identified in the UK and the French GH-cases were not radically different.

In the vast majority of the UK (10 out 11) and French (10 out 11) cases, the V2CJD strain or a mixture of M1CJD + V2CJD strains were identified by the strain typing bioassays.

A pure V2CJD strain was observed in all three PRNP genotypes in French hGH-iCJD patients and in two PRNP genotypes (MV and VV) in the UK patients. In both countries, M1CJD + V2CJD strain mixtures were identified in the three different PRNP genotypes. A pure M1CJD strain was identified in a single UK patient (case 7, MM genotype) and suspected in a French patient (case 22, VV genotype -definitive transmission results not yet available).

These data strongly support the contention that the difference of epidemiological profile observed between the UK and the French hGH-iCJD outbreaks cannot be attributed to the transmission of different prion strains.

V2 dominant presence is concordant with previous investigations in the UK

In the UK, several studies have addressed the question surrounding the prion strains responsible for hGH-iCJD, by the characterisation of the neuropathology features and/or the PrPres biochemical properties in the brain of hGH-iCJD affected individuals, including those cases investigated by bioassay in this study [22, 24, 33]. So far, no comprehensive description of the neuropathological and biochemical PrPres properties in the French hGH-iCJD cohort is available in the literature.

In a large number of VV and MV UK hGH-iCJD patients, neuropathological features that are considered characteristic of VV2 sCJD cases (including plaque-like deposits) were identified. Along with the biochemical profile of the UK VV and MV hGH-iCJD cases, this leads to the proposal that pituitary glands collected from VV2 sCJD case(s) might have played a preponderant role in the UK hGH-iCJD outbreak [22, 24].

The results of this study supports this hypothesis, with the unambiguous identification of the V2CJD strain that was obtained by bioassay of brain homogenate from 6 out of the 9 VV and MV UK hGH-iCJD cases.

Similarly, the identification of MM1-like sCJD neuropathological, biochemical and protein misfolding cyclical amplification (PMCA) features reported in case hGH-iCJD 21 in the earlier study by Ritchie et al. concurs with the pure M1CJD strain phenotype we observed in tgHu mice inoculated with cerebral cortex homogenate from the same patient (case 7 in this study). The other UK PRNP codon 129 MM hGH-iCJD case reported by Ritchie et al. (case hGH-iCJD 20) had atypical neuropathological and biochemical features along with PMCA features that suggested the influence of a V2 strain. This case was also included in the present study as case 6, which had transmission characteristics different from case 7, suggesting a mixed M1CJD/V2 CJD strain effect. The transmission findings in cases 6 and 7 therefore provide a direct in vivo correlation that confirms the in vitro findings of Ritchie et al. [24].

Coexistence of several strains in French and UK hGH-iCJD cohorts

The identification of mixed M1CJD and V2CJD strains in both the UK and the French hGH-iCJD cases raises the question of the origin of this strain diversity.

The pooling of pituitary glands during hGH production from several individuals affected with different strains of sCJD may be one explanation for this phenomenon. However, since the co-existence of M1CJD and V2CJD strains have been reported in up to 35% of sCJD cases, the use of pituitary gland from a single donor may also explain the presence of the two strains [7, 11, 34].

In France, 12 batches of extracted hGH, all produced between January 1982 and December 1985, were identified as the potential source of infection. According to available data, a batch was in average produced from 1000 to 1500 pituitary glands, meaning that tissue from up to 18 000 individuals may have contributed to the at-risk batches [18].

In the UK it is estimated that around 200,000 pituitary glands were used to produce the hGH extracts that were used to treat patients that later developed hGH-iCJD [17].

The sCJD prevalence in industrialized countries is estimated to be approximatively 1.5 cases per million people and per year [35]. In people aged over 50, sCJD frequency significantly increases to reach 5.5 to 7.5 case per million people per year in individuals aged between 65 and 79 [36, 37]. However, in France and in the UK (each with a similar population size), between 600,000 and 700,000 deaths are recorded each year, with 80–130 sCJD cases diagnosed annually. Based on these figures, the possibility exists that more than one infectious pituitary gland could have entered in the production of the at-risk hGH batches in both France and the UK.

Epidemiological profiles in both countries

Assuming that the same prion strains are responsible for the UK and French hGH-iCJD cases, the question remains of how the epidemiological differences occurring between the two hGH-iCJD case cohorts may be explained.

The frequency of Met/Met129, Met/Val129 and Val/Val129 individuals in the general population and in their distribution in sCJD cases are similar in France and in the UK [16]. The hGH therapeutic scheme in both countries, including the route of administration (in general intramuscular) and the average age of administration were also similar, making these parameters unlikely explanations for the observed epidemiological differences [17,18,19, 23].

In experimental TSE models, longer and more widespread incubation periods are classically observed when animals are exposed to decreasing doses of infectivity [38]. The average incubation duration for hGH-iCJD patients from each PRNP codon 129 genotype were significantly longer in the UK patients (VV: 14.3 years–MV: 23.4 years–MM: 30.8 years) when compared with French patients (VV: 9 years–MV: 17.6 years–MM: 12 years) [16, 22]. These elements support the hypothesis that French hGH-iCJD affected patients could have been exposed to higher infectious doses than the UK patients.

Although the relevance of findings in experimental TSE models to the physiopathology of CJD in humans is uncertain, they could provide some valuable insights on the relative abilities of sCJD strains to propagate in hosts expressing different human PrP variants.

The end point titrations of V2CJD and M1CJD in tgMet and tgVal indicated that the M1CJD strain displays a 1000-fold lower capacity to propagate in Val129 than in Met129 PrP-expressing host (Additional file 1: Table S1). Conversely, one infectious dose (ID50) of V2CJD strain (as measured by the intracerebral route in tgVal) transmits with shorter incubation period in tgVal than 107.2 ID50 M1CJD strain (as measured by the intracerebral route in tgMet) [11, 32].

When tgHu mice are co-infected with M1CJD and V2 CJD prions, the nature of the strain(s) that propagate in the brain of the recipients depends on the PRNP genotype at codon 129 and to the specific amount of M1CJD and V2CJD infectivity in the inoculum, resulting in the presence of either M1CJD + V2CJD strain mixture or of a pure M1CJD or V2CJD strain in the infected host brain (Table 3) [11]. Based on these elements, a scenario where M1CJD and V2CJD would display different abilities to propagate in an individual according to his genotype at codon 129 and the infectious titre of each strain seems plausible. At low infectious doses, as seems possible in the UK hGH situation, the V2CJD strain would dominate, mostly in VV individuals.

The isolation of a sub-dominant M1CJD strain in homozygous (cases 4 and 5) and heterozygous (case 12) Met129 patients indicates that French hGH-iCJD patients were exposed to this prion strain. The transmission of the M1CJD and V2CJD strain in tgMet mice support the view that the M1CJD strain, even if present at very low level in the extractive hGH, should propagate as the dominant strain in the homozygous Met129 patients. The identification of the V2CJD strain as dominant prion strain in the brain of the homozygous Met129 French hGH-iCJD patients is therefore surprising.

These observations could be explained by the effects of a peripheral (non-CNS) route of transmission that would differentially impact on the relative efficiency of M1CJD and V2CJD transmission by the intramuscular route of exposure in hGH recipients, resulting in a slow or inefficient transmission of the M1CJD strain.

In a given host, the inoculation by a peripheral route of two prion strains can result in radically different transmission profile, depending on their capacity to replicate early in the lymphoid tissues before neuroinvasion. The inoculation of the HY prion strain in hamsters by the intracerebral, the intraperitoneal or the oral route resulted in all three instances in a highly efficient transmission (100% attack rate) of the disease. The inoculation of the DY prion strain in hamsters by the intra cerebral route also resulted in a prion disease. In sharp contrast, the inoculation of a high infectious dose of DY prions in hamsters by the intraperitoneal or the oral route failed to transmit the disease [39, 40]. HY but not DY are able to replicate at detectable levels in the lymphoid tissue. Interestingly, V2CJD strains appeared to replicate at higher levels than M1CJD strain in the lymphoid tissue of tgMet mice [10].

Further investigations will be necessary to confirm the influence of the intramuscular route of infection in modulating M1CJD and V2CJD strain transmission efficiencies. Beyond this, the characterization of the PrPres and measurement of the infectivity levels in the pituitary glands of sCJD patients and the impact of hGH extraction processes on M1CJD and V2CJD strains from the pituitary glands (removal of infectivity) would be very helpful for appreciating the potential exposure conditions to prions in hGH-treated patients. Ultimately, the direct characterisation of prion infectivity levels and strains in the French and UK hGH-batches that appear to have resulted in the transmission of hGH-iCJD would be very informative.

Although numerous elements are still lacking to fully understand the difference existing between the French and UK hGH-iCJD case cohorts, the results that we report in this study indicate that the nature of the prion strains involved are not fundamental to the observed differences in epidemiological profiles.

Finally, the number of hGH-iCJD cases that we investigated (n = 22) should be considered as relatively limited when compared to the total number of hGH-iCJD cases identified in France (n = 122) or the UK (n = 81). Therefore, we cannot be certain that the panel of hGH-iCJD cases that we investigated necessarily provides a full picture of the prion strain diversity in the French and the UK hGH-iCJD cohorts.

Abbreviations

hGH:

Human pituitary-derived growth hormone

hDM:

Human dura mater

iCJD:

Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease

M129 :

Methionine at codon 129 of PRNP

tgHu:

Human-PrP-expressing transgenic mice

tgMet or tg 340:

Homozygous human-PrP-expressing transgenic mice (Methionine 129 variant)

tgVal of tg361:

Homozygous human-PrP-expressing transgenic mice (Valine 129 variant)

sCJD:

Sporadic form of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease

V129 :

Valine at codon 129 of PRNP

vCJD:

Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease

References

  1. McKinley MP, Bolton DC, Prusiner SB (1983) A protease-resistant protein is a structural component of the scrapie prion. Cell 35(1):57–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prusiner SB (1998) Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(23):13363–13383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraser H, Dickinson AG (1973) Scrapie in mice. Agent-strain differences in the distribution and intensity of grey matter vacuolation. J Comp Pathol 83(1):29–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zerr I, Parchi P (2018) Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Handb Clin Neurol 153:155–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63945-5.00009-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parchi P, Castellani R, Capellari S et al (1996) Molecular basis of phenotypic variability in sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Ann Neurol 39(6):767–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Puoti G, Giaccone G, Rossi G, Canciani B, Bugiani O, Tagliavini F (1999) Sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: co-occurrence of different types of PrP(Sc) in the same brain. Neurology 53(9):2173–2176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uro-Coste E, Cassard H, Simon S et al (2008) Beyond PrP9res) type 1/type 2 dichotomy in Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. PLoS Pathog 4(3):e1000029. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bishop MT, Will RG, Manson JC (2010) Defining sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease strains and their transmission properties. Research support, non-U.S. Gov’t. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(26):12005–12010. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004688107

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassard H, Torres JM, Lacroux C et al (2014) Evidence for zoonotic potential of ovine scrapie prions. Nat Commun 5:5821. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaumain E, Quadrio I, Herzog L et al (2016) Absence of evidence for a causal link between bovine spongiform encephalopathy strain variant L-BSE and known forms of sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in human PrP transgenic mice. J Virol 90(23):10867–10874. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01383-16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cassard H, Huor A, Espinosa JC et al (2020) Prions from sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease patients propagate as strain mixtures. MBio. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00393-20

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chapuis J, Moudjou M, Reine F et al (2016) Emergence of two prion subtypes in ovine PrP transgenic mice infected with human MM2-cortical Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease prions. Acta Neuropathol Commun 4:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0284-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kobayashi A, Sakuma N, Matsuura Y, Mohri S, Aguzzi A, Kitamoto T (2010) Experimental verification of a traceback phenomenon in prion infection. J Virol 84(7):3230–3238. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02387-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Douet JY, Huor A, Cassard H et al (2021) Wide distribution of prion infectivity in the peripheral tissues of vCJD and sCJD patients. Acta Neuropathol 141(3):383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-021-02270-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Duffy P, Wolf J, Collins G, DeVoe AG, Streeten B, Cowen D (1974) Letter: possible person-to-person transmission of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. N Engl J Med 290(12):692–693

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown P, Brandel JP, Sato T et al (2012) Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, final assessment. Emerg Infect Dis 18(6):901–907. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1806.120116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Swerdlow AJ, Higgins CD, Adlard P, Jones ME, Preece MA (2003) Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in United Kingdom patients treated with human pituitary growth hormone. Neurology 61(6):783–791. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000084000.27403.15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Peckeu L, Brandel JP, Welaratne A, Amar E, Costagliola D, Haik S (2020) Factors influencing the incubation of an infectious form of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Clin Infect Dis 70(7):1487–1490. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peckeu L, Brandel JP, Welaratne A, Costagliola D, Haik S (2018) Susceptibility to Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease after human growth hormone treatment in France. Neurology 91(8):e724–e731. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Palmer MS, Dryden AJ, Hughes JT, Collinge J (1991) Homozygous prion protein genotype predisposes to sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Nature 352(6333):340–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown P, Brandel JP, Preece M, Sato T (2006) Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: the waning of an era. Neurology 67(3):389–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rudge P, Jaunmuktane Z, Adlard P et al (2015) Iatrogenic CJD due to pituitary-derived growth hormone with genetically determined incubation times of up to 40 years. Brain 138(Pt 11):3386–3399. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awv235

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Brandel JP, Preece M, Brown P et al (2003) Distribution of codon 129 genotype in human growth hormone-treated CJD patients in France and the UK. Lancet 362(9378):128–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13867-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ritchie DL, Barria MA, Peden AH et al (2017) UK Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease: investigating human prion transmission across genotypic barriers using human tissue-based and molecular approaches. Acta Neuropathol 133(4):579–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1638-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moreno CR, Moazami-Goudarzi K, Laurent P et al (2007) Which PrP haplotypes in a French sheep population are the most susceptible to atypical scrapie? Arch Virol 152(6):1229–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Andreoletti O, Levavasseur E, Uro-Coste E et al (2002) Astrocytes accumulate 4-hydroxynonenal adducts in murine scrapie and human Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Neurobiol Dis 11(3):386–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Padilla D, Beringue V, Espinosa JC et al (2011) Sheep and goat BSE propagate more efficiently than cattle BSE in human PrP transgenic mice. PLoS Pathog 7(3):e1001319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Outram GW (1976) The pathogenesis of scrapie in mice. Front Biol 44:325–357

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lacroux C, Comoy E, Moudjou M et al (2014) Preclinical detection of variant CJD and BSE prions in blood. PLoS Pathog 10(6):e1004202. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1004202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Feraudet C, Morel N, Simon S et al (2005) Screening of 145 anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies for their capacity to inhibit PrPSc replication in infected cells. J Biol Chem 280(12):11247–11258. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M407006200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fraser H, Dickinson AG (1968) The sequential development of the brain lesion of scrapie in three strains of mice. J Comp Pathol 78(3):301–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Huor A, Douet JY, Lacroux C et al (2017) Infectivity in bone marrow from sporadic CJD patients. J Pathol 243(3):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jansen C, Parchi P, Capellari S et al (2012) Human prion diseases in the Netherlands (1998–2009): clinical, genetic and molecular aspects. PLoS ONE 7(4):e36333. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036333

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Polymenidou M, Stoeck K, Glatzel M, Vey M, Bellon A, Aguzzi A (2005) Coexistence of multiple PrPSc types in individuals with Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Lancet Neurol 4(12):805–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ladogana A, Puopolo M, Croes EA et al (2005) Mortality from Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease and related disorders in Europe, Australia, and Canada. Neurology 64(9):1586–1591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nishimura Y, Harada K, Koyama T, Hagiya H, Otsuka F (2020) A nationwide trend analysis in the incidence and mortality of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in Japan between 2005 and 2014. Sci Rep 10(1):15509. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72519-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun Y, Liu CC, Fan LY et al (2020) Incidence of and mortality due to human prion diseases in Taiwan: a prospective 20-year Nationwide Surveillance Study from 1998 to 2017. Clin Epidemiol 12:1073–1081. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S274093

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Arnold ME, Hawkins SA, Green R, Dexter I, Wells GA (2009) Pathogenesis of experimental bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE): estimation of tissue infectivity according to incubation period. Vet Res 40(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bartz JC, Dejoia C, Tucker T, Kincaid AE, Bessen RA (2005) Extraneural prion neuroinvasion without lymphoreticular system infection. Comparative study research support, N.I.H., extramural research support, U.S. Gov’t, non-P.H.S. research support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S. J Virol 79(18):11858–11863. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.18.11858-11863.2005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Bessen RA, Martinka S, Kelly J, Gonzalez D (2009) Role of the lymphoreticular system in prion neuroinvasion from the oral and nasal mucosa. J Virol 83(13):6435–6445. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00018-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Peter Adlard for access to data on the use of hGH in the UK and for helpful discussion, and to Jan Mackenzie for data from the NCJDRSU clinical database. The invaluable work of Dr Mark Head and Helen Yull in the Protein Biochemistry Laboratory and Suzanne Lowrie and Margaret LeGrice in the Neuropathology Laboratory in the NCJDRSU is gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

This work was funded by European Regional Development Fund POCTEFA TRANSPRION (EFA282/13) and REDPRION (EFA148/16), by the UK Food Standards Agency Exploring permeability of the species (M03043 and FS231051), by the European Union through FP7 222887 “Priority”, the Alliance Biosecure Foundation (FABS201403) and the French research agency through ANR-15-CE18-0028’unmasking blood prions. The National CJD Research & Surveillance Unit is funded by the United Kingdom’s Department of Health Policy Research Program and the Government of Scotland. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Health or the Government of Scotland. The Edinburgh Brain Bank is supported by the Medical Research Council.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jean-Yves Douet and Alvina Huor have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UMR INRAE ENVT 1225, Interactions Hôtes-Agents Pathogènes, École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 23 Chemin des Capelles, 31076, Toulouse, France

    Jean-Yves Douet, Alvina Huor, Hervé Cassard, Séverine Lugan, Naïma Aron, Chloé Mesic, Didier Vilette, Tomás Barrio & Olivier Andréoletti

  2. BIORAN Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR 5292 – INSERM U1028, Université de Lyon – Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France

    Nathalie Streichenberger & Armand Perret-Liaudet

  3. Neurochemistry Laboratory, Biochemistry Department, Centre de Pathologie et Neuropathologie Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France

    Nathalie Streichenberger & Armand Perret-Liaudet

  4. Laboratoire Universitaire d’Anatomie Pathologique, INSERM U 1214 TONIC, CHU Purpan, C.H.U. Rangueil - 1 Avenue Jean Poulhès, 50032 - 31059, Toulouse Cedex9, TSA, France

    Marie-Bernadette Delisle & Patrice Péran

  5. CEA, Service d’Etude des Prions et des Infections Atypiques, Université Paris-Saclay, 18 Route du Panorama, 92265, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France

    Jean-Philippe Deslys & Emmanuel Comoy

  6. INRAE, AgroParistech, GABI, Université Paris-Saclay, Jouy-en-Josas, France

    Jean-Luc Vilotte & Katayoun Goudarzi

  7. INRAE, UVSQ, VIM, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350, Jouy-en-Josas, France

    Vincent Béringue

  8. National Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Research and Surveillance Unit, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK

    Marcelo A. Barria, Diane L. Ritchie & James W. Ironside

Authors
  1. Jean-Yves Douet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alvina Huor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hervé Cassard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Séverine Lugan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Naïma Aron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chloé Mesic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Didier Vilette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tomás Barrio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Nathalie Streichenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Armand Perret-Liaudet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Marie-Bernadette Delisle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Patrice Péran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jean-Philippe Deslys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Emmanuel Comoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jean-Luc Vilotte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Katayoun Goudarzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Vincent Béringue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Marcelo A. Barria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Diane L. Ritchie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. James W. Ironside
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Olivier Andréoletti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JYD, AH, HC, SL, NA, CM, TB, EC, JLV, KG, VB, JI and OA conducted the experiments. NS, APL, MBD, EC, JI and OA provided biological materials for the study. JYD, AH, HC, CM, DV, TB, EC, JI and OA. analysed the data. JYD, AH, HC, CM, DV, APL, PP, JPD, EC, MB, DR, JI and OA wrote and revised the manuscript. EC, VB, JI and OA obtained the funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Andréoletti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. End point titration of sporadic CJD MM1 and VV2 isolates in transgenic mice expressing the human PrP.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Douet, JY., Huor, A., Cassard, H. et al. Prion strains associated with iatrogenic CJD in French and UK human growth hormone recipients. acta neuropathol commun 9, 145 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-021-01247-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-021-01247-x

Keywords

Acta Neuropathologica Communications

ISSN: 2051-5960

Contact us