Skip to main content
Log in

Techno-economic characteristics of wastewater treatment plants retrofitted from the conventional activated sludge process to the membrane bioreactor process

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While a growing number of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are being retrofitted from the conventional activated sludge (CAS) process to the membrane bioreactor (MBR) process, the debate on the techno-economy of MBR vs. CAS has continued and calls for a thorough assessment based on techno-economic valuation. In this study, we analyzed the operating data of 20 large-scale WWTPs (capacity ⩾ 10000 m3/d) and compared their techno-economy before and after the retrofitting from CAS to MBR. Through cost-benefit analysis, we evaluated the net profit by subtracting the operating cost from the environmental benefit (estimated by the shadow price of pollutant removal and water reclamation). After the retrofitting, the removal rate of pollutants increased (e.g., from 89.0% to 93.3% on average for NH3-N), the average energy consumption increased from 0.40 to 0.57 kWh/m3, but the operating cost did not increase significantly. The average marginal environmental benefit increased remarkably (from 0.47 to 0.66 CNY/g for NH3-N removal), leading to an increase in the average net profit from 19.4 to 24.4 CNY/m3. We further scored the technical efficiencies via data envelopment analysis based on non-radial directional distance functions. After the retrofitting, the relative cost efficiency increased from 0.70 to 0.73 (the theoretical maximum is 1), while the relative energy efficiency did not change significantly. The techno-economy is closely related to the effluent standard adopted, particularly when truncating the extra benefit of pollutant removal beyond the standard in economic modeling. The modeling results suggested that MBR is more profitable than CAS given stricter effluent standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brepols C, Schäfer H, Engelhardt N (2010). Considerations on the design and financial feasibility of full-scale membrane bioreactors for municipal applications. Water Science & Technology, 61(10): 2461–2468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang Y T, Zhang N, Danao D, Zhang N (2013). Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach. Energy Policy, 58: 277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCarolis J, Adham S, Pearce W R, Hirani Z, Lacy S, Stephenson R (2007). Cost trends of MBR systems for municipal wastewater treatment. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2007(15): 3407–3418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djukic M, Jovanoski I, Ivanovic O M, Lazic M, Bodroza D (2016). Cost-benefit analysis of an infrastructure project and a cost-reflective tariff: A case study for investment in wastewater treatment plant in Serbia. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 59: 1419–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell C A K, Pasurka C (1989). Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1): 90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Weber W L (2006). Shadow prices and pollution costs in U.S. agriculture. Ecological Economics, 56(1): 89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenu A, Roels J, Wambecq T, De Gussem K, Thoeye C, De Gueldre G, Van De Steene B (2010). Energy audit of a full scale MBR system. Desalination, 262(1–3): 121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gabarrón S, Ferrero G, Dalmau M, Comas J, Rodriguez-Roda I (2014). Assessment of energy-saving strategies and operational costs in full-scale membrane bioreactors. Journal of Environmental Management, 134: 8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao T, Xiao K, Zhang J, Zhang X, Wang X, Liang S, Sun J, Meng F, Huang X (2021). Cost-benefit analysis and technical efficiency evaluation of full-scale membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment using economic approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 301: 126984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao X D, Li J, van Loosdrecht M C M, Li T Y (2018). A sustainability-based evaluation of membrane bioreactors over conventional activated sludge processes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(2): 2597–2605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2010). Economic valuation of environmental benefits from wastewater treatment processes: An empirical approach for Spain. Science of the Total Environment, 408(4): 953–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Sancho F, Molinos-Senante M, Sala-Garrido R (2011). Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: A non-radial DEA approach. Science of the Total Environment, 409(14): 2693–2699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2009). Technical efficiency and cost analysis in wastewater treatment processes: A DEA approach. Desalination, 249(1): 230–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Xiao K, Shen Y (2010). Recent advances in membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment in China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 4(3): 245–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iglesias R, Simón P, Moragas L, Arce A, Rodriguez-Roda I (2017). Cost comparison of full-scale water reclamation technologies with an emphasis on membrane bioreactors. Water Science & Technology, 75(11): 2562–2570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judd S J (2016). The status of industrial and municipal effluent treatment with membrane bioreactor technology. Chemical Engineering Journal, 305: 37–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krzeminski P, Leverette L, Malamis S, Katsou E (2017). Membrane bioreactors: A review on recent developments in energy reduction, fouling control, novel configurations, LCA and market prospects. Journal of Membrane Science, 527: 207–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Du K (2015). Energy and CO2 emissions performance in China’s regional economies: do market-oriented reforms matter? Energy Policy, 78: 3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin H, Chen J, Wang F, Ding L, Hong H (2011). Feasibility evaluation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal secondary wastewater treatment. Desalination, 280(1–3): 120–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Longo S, Hospido A, Lema J M, Mauricio-Iglesias M (2018). A systematic methodology for the robust quantification of energy efficiency at wastewater treatment plants featuring Data Envelopment Analysis. Water Research, 141: 317–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohsin M, Hanif I, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Abbas Q, Iqbal W (2021). Nexus between energy efficiency and electricity reforms: A DEA-Based way forward for clean power development. Energy Policy, 149: 112052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2010). Economic feasibility study for wastewater treatment: A cost-benefit analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 408(20): 4396–4402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2011). Cost-benefit analysis of water-reuse projects for environmental purposes: A case study for Spanish wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(12): 3091–3097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pretel R, Shoener B D, Ferrer J, Guest J S (2015). Navigating environmental, economic, and technological trade-offs in the design and operation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs). Water Research, 87: 531–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-Garrido R, Molinos-Senante M, Hernández-Sancho F (2011). Comparing the efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies through a DEA metafrontier model. Chemical Engineering Journal, 173(3): 766–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verrecht B, Maere T, Nopens I, Brepols C, Judd S (2010). The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR. Water Research, 44(18): 5274–5283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao K, Liang S, Wang X, Chen C, Huang X (2019). Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: A critical review. Bioresource Technology, 271: 473–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao K, Xu Y, Liang S, Lei T, Sun J, Wen X, Zhang H, Chen C, Huang X (2014). Engineering application of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment in China: Current state and future prospect. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 8(6): 805–819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young T, Muftugil M, Smoot S, Peeters J (2012). MBR vs. CAS: Capital and operating cost evaluation. Water Practice and Technology, 7(4): 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu D, Wang J, Zheng L, Sui Q, Zhong H, Cheng M, Wei Y (2020). Effects of hydraulic retention time on net present value and performance in a membrane bioreactor treating antibiotic production wastewater. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 14(6): 101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou P, Ang B W, Wang H (2012). Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 221(3): 625–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. L182044) and Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (No. 2019172).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kang Xiao.

Additional information

High Lights

• Retrofitting from CAS to MBR increased effluent quality and environmental benefits.

• Retrofitting from CAS to MBR increased energy consumption but not operating cost.

• Retrofitting from CAS to MBR increased the net profit and cost efficiency.

• The advantage of MBR is related to the adopted effluent standard.

• The techno-economy of MBR improves with stricter effluent standards.

Supplementary materials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, T., Xiao, K., Zhang, J. et al. Techno-economic characteristics of wastewater treatment plants retrofitted from the conventional activated sludge process to the membrane bioreactor process. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 16, 49 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1483-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1483-6

Keywords

Navigation