Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Ecological Contexts and Alcohol Drinking Dynamics: An Application of the Survey Data-Driven Agent-Based Model for University Students

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Aims and scope

Abstract

College-aged students are one of the most vulnerable populations to high-risk alcohol drinking behaviors that could cause them consequences such as injury or sexual assault. An important factor that may influence college students’ decision on alcohol drinking behavior is socializing in certain contexts across the university environment. In the present study, we aim to identify and better understand the ecological conditions driving the dynamics of distribution of alcohol use among college-aged students. To this end, a pilot survey study is conducted to evaluate students’ movement patterns in different contexts across the Arizona State University (ASU) campus, and the results are used to develop an agent-based simulation model designed for examining the role of environmental factors on development and maintenance of alcohol drinking behavior by a representative sample of ASU students. The proposed model, which resembles an approximate reaction–diffusion model, accounts for movement of agents (i.e., diffusion) in various contexts and alcohol drinking influences within those contexts (i.e., reaction) via a Susceptible-Infected-Recovered type individual-based model. Of the four most visited contexts at ASU Tempe campus—Library, Memorial Union, Fitness Center, and Dorm—the context with the highest visiting probability, Memorial Union, is the most influential and most sensitive context (around sixteen times higher an impact of alcohol-related influences than the other contexts) in terms of spreading alcohol drinking behavior. Our findings highlight the crucial role of socialization in local environments on the dynamics of students’ alcohol use as well as on the long-term prediction of the college drinking prevalence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The model ran for at least \(4\times (1000+2)=4008\) times to generate sufficient output to calculate variances for four parameters of transmission probabilities and 1000 samples for each of them59.

References

  1. Roisin M O’connor, Craig R Colder (2005) Predicting alcohol patterns in first-year college students through motivational systems and reasons for drinking. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19(1):10

  2. Kypri Kypros, Langley John, Stephenson Shaun (2005) Episode-centred analysis of drinking to intoxication in university students. Alcohol and Alcoholism 40(5):447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. John W Fishburne, Janice M Brown (2006) How do college students estimate their drinking? comparing consumption patterns among quantity-frequency, graduated frequency, and timeline follow-back methods. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 50(1):15

  4. Jennifer L Burden, Stephen A Maisto (2000) Expectancies, evaluations and attitudes: prediction of college student drinking behavior. Journal of studies on alcohol, 61(2):323–331

  5. Kenzie A Cameron, Shelly Campo (2006) Stepping back from social norms campaigns: Comparing normative influences to other predictors of health behaviors. Health Communication, 20(3):277–288

  6. Cecile Dantzer, Jane Wardle, Ray Fuller, Sacha Z Pampalone, Andrew Steptoe (2006) International study of heavy drinking: Attitudes and sociodemographic factors in university students. Journal of American College Health, 55(2):83–90

  7. Edward A Malloy (1994) Rethinking rites of passage: Substance abuse on America’s campuses. Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University

  8. David J Nutt, Leslie A King, Lawrence D Phillips, et al. (2010) Drug harms in the uk: a multicriteria decision analysis. The Lancet, 376(9752):1558–1565

  9. Aertgeerts Bert, Buntinx Frank (2002) The relation between alcohol abuse or dependence and academic performance in first-year college students. Journal of adolescent health 31(3):223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singleton Royce A, Wolfson Amy R (2009) Alcohol consumption, sleep, and academic performance among college students. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs 70(3):355–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lynne Cooper M (1994) Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological assessment 6(2):117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Norberg Melissa M, Norton Alice R, Olivier Jake, Zvolensky Michael J (2010) Social anxiety, reasons for drinking, and college students. Behavior therapy 41(4):555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuntsche Emmanuel, Knibbe Ronald, Gmel Gerhard, Engels Rutger (2005) Why do young people drink? a review of drinking motives. Clinical psychology review 25(7):841–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park Crystal L (2004) Positive and negative consequences of alcohol consumption in college students. Addictive behaviors 29(2):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buckner Julia D, Meade Eggleston A, Schmidt Norman B (2006) Social anxiety and problematic alcohol consumption: The mediating role of drinking motives and situations. Behavior therapy 37(4):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stewart Sherry H, Morris Eric, Mellings Tanna, Komar Jennifer (2006) Relations of social anxiety variables to drinking motives, drinking quantity and frequency, and alcohol-related problems in undergraduates. Journal of mental health 15(6):671–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Norberg Melissa M, Norton Alice R, Olivier Jake (2009) Refining measurement in the study of social anxiety and student drinking: Who you are and why you drink determines your outcomes. Psychology of addictive behaviors 23(4):586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holmes J, Purshouse RC, Brennan A, Meier PS, (2018) Commentary on apostolopoulos, et al (2018) Systems and complex systems approaches for public health planning-back to the future? Addiction 113(2):372–373

  19. Apostolopoulos Yorghos, Lemke Michael K, Barry Adam E, Lich Kristen Hassmiller (2018) Moving alcohol prevention research forward-part i: Introducing a complex systems paradigm. Addiction 113(2):353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Apostolopoulos Yorghos, Lemke Michael K, Barry Adam E, Lich Kristen Hassmiller (2018) Moving alcohol prevention research forward-part ii: new directions grounded in community-based system dynamics modeling. Addiction 113(2):363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Benedict Brandy (2007) Modeling alcoholism as a contagious disease: how infected drinking buddies spread problem drinking. SIAM news 40(3):11–13

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manthey JL, Aidoo AY, Ward KY (2008) Campus drinking: an epidemiological model. Journal of Biological Dynamics 2(3):346–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Huo Hai-Feng, Song Na-Na (2012) Global stability for a binge drinking model with two stages. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2012

  24. Mubayi Anuj, Greenwood Priscilla, Wang Xiaohong, Castillo-Chávez Carlos, Gorman Dennis M, Gruenewald Paul, Saltz Robert F (2011) Types of drinkers and drinking settings: an application of a mathematical model. Addiction 106(4):749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mubayi Anuj, Greenwood Priscilla E, Castillo-Chavez Carlos, Gruenewald Paul J, Gorman Dennis M (2010) The impact of relative residence times on the distribution of heavy drinkers in highly distinct environments. Socio-Economic planning sciences 44(1):45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiang Hong, Song Na-Na, Huo Hai-Feng (2016) Modelling effects of public health educational campaigns on drinking dynamics. Journal of biological dynamics 10(1):164–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Scribner Richard, Ackleh Azmy S, Fitzpatrick Ben G, Jacquez Geoffrey, Thibodeaux Jeremy J, Rommel Robert, Simonsen Neal (2009) A systems approach to college drinking: Development of a deterministic model for testing alcohol control policies. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs 70(5):805–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Joshua M Epstein, Robert Axtell (1996) Growing artificial societies: social science from the bottom up. Brookings Institution Press

  29. Garrison Laura A, Babcock David S (2009) Alcohol consumption among college students: An agent-based computational simulation. Complexity 14(6):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Windrum Paul, Fagiolo Giorgio, Moneta Alessio (2007) Empirical validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10(2):8

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gorman Dennis M, Mezic Jadranka, Mezic Igor, Gruenewald Paul J (2006) Agent-based modeling of drinking behavior: a preliminary model and potential applications to theory and practice. American journal of public health 96(11):2055–2060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Edward H Ip, Mark Wolfson, Douglas Easterling, Erin Sutfin, Kimberly Wagoner, Jill Blocker, Kathleen Egan, Hazhir Rahmandad, Shyh-Huei Chen (2012) Agent-based modeling of college drinking behavior and mapping of system dynamics of alcohol reduction using both environmental and individual-based intervention strategies. In Web) Proceedings of the System Dynamic Conference

  33. Ben G Fitzpatrick, Jason Martinez, Elizabeth Polidan, Ekaterini Angelis (2016) On the effectiveness of social norms intervention in college drinking: The roles of identity verification and peer influence. Alcoholism: clinical and experimental research, 40(1):141–151

  34. Braun Richard J, Wilson Robert A, Pelesko John A, Robert Buchanan J, Gleeson James P (2006) Applications of small-world network theory in alcohol epidemiology. Journal of studies on alcohol 67(4):591–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Miles Cox W, Klinger Eric (1988) A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of abnormal psychology 97(2):168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jennifer P Read, Jennifer E Merrill, and Katrina Bytschkow (2010) Before the party starts: Risk factors and reasons for “pregaming” in college students. Journal of American College Health, 58(5):461–472

  37. Schulenberg John E, Maggs Jennifer L (2002) A developmental perspective on alcohol use and heavy drinking during adolescence and the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Supplement 14:54–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Caldeira Kimberly M, O’Grady Kevin E, Garnier-Dykstra Laura M, Vincent Kathryn B, Pickworth Wallace B, Arria Amelia M (2012) Cigarette smoking among college students: longitudinal trajectories and health outcomes. Nicotine & Tobacco Research 14(7):777–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Witkiewitz Katie, Alan Marlatt G (2007) Modeling the complexity of post-treatment drinking: It’s a rocky road to relapse. Clinical Psychology Review 27(6):724–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. MS Windows NT asu - one university in many places. https://web.archive.org/web/20080607150438/http://campus.asu.edu/. Accessed: 2012-03-18

  41. Association American College Health et al (2019) American college health association-national college health assessment: Arizona state university spring 2015. American College Health Association, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  42. Anuj Mubayi (2008) The role of environmental context in the dynamics and control of alcohol use. Arizona State University

  43. Yong Kamuela E, Mubayi Anuj, Kribs Christopher M (2015) Agent-based mathematical modeling as a tool for estimating trypanosoma cruzi vector-host contact rates. Acta tropica 151:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Grimm Volker, Berger Uta, Bastiansen Finn, Eliassen Sigrunn, Ginot Vincent, Giske Jarl, Goss-Custard John, Grand Tamara, Heinz Simone K, Huse Geir et al (2006) A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecological modelling 198(1–2):115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. McCallum Hamish, Barlow Nigel, Hone Jim (2001) How should pathogen transmission be modelled? Trends in ecology & evolution 16(6):295–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Dawson Deborah A (2003) Methodological issues in measuring alcohol use. Alcohol Research and Health 27(1):18–29

    Google Scholar 

  47. Sobell Linda C, Ellingstad Timothy P, Sobell Mark B (2000) Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: Methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions. Addiction 95(5):749–764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Dawson Deborah A, Grant Bridget F, Stinson Frederick S, Chou Patricia S, Huang Boji, June Ruan W (2005) Recovery from dsm-iv alcohol dependence: United states, 2001–2002. Addiction 100(3):281–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Daniel McFadden (1989) A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 995–1026

  50. Hussong Andrea M (2003) Social influences in motivated drinking among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 17(2):142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Constance M Martin, Mary A Hoffman (1993) Alcohol expectancies, living environment, peer influence, and gender: A model of college-student drinking. Journal of College Student Development

  52. Borsari Brian, Carey Kate B (2001) Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of substance abuse 13(4):391–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ten Broeke Guus, Van Voorn George, Ligtenberg Arend (2016) Which sensitivity analysis method should i use for my agent-based model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 19(1)

  54. Salecker Jan, Sciaini Marco, Meyer Katrin M, Wiegand Kerstin (2019) The nlrx r package: A next-generation framework for reproducible netlogo model analyses. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10(11):1854–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Marino Simeone, Hogue Ian B, Ray Christian J, Kirschner Denise E (2008) A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. Journal of theoretical biology 254(1):178–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Iman Ronald L, Conover William J (1979) The use of the rank transform in regression. Technometrics 21(4):499–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sally M Blower, Hadi Dowlatabadi (1994) Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of complex models of disease transmission: an hiv model, as an example. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, pages 229–243

  58. Ronald L Iman, Michael J Shortencarier, Jay D Johnson (1985) Fortran 77 program and user’s guide for the calculation of partial correlation and standardized regression coefficients. Technical report, Sandia National Labs., Albuquerque, NM (USA)

  59. Saltelli Andrea, Ratto Marco, Andres Terry, Campolongo Francesca, Cariboni Jessica, Gatelli Debora, Saisana Michaela, Tarantola Stefano (2008) Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bonabeau Eric (2002) Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 99(suppl 3):7280–7287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge students Mugdha Thakur, Meghan Werbick, Amber Andrande, Sparshee Naik, Annabel Judd, Tyler Ray and Rachel Nicely for helping with collecting of the data and review of the basic version of the model as well as Calvin Pritchard, Gil Speyer, Rebecca Belshe, Jason Yalim, and William Dizon for providing guidance with high performance computing and data storage. The authors also thank Jan Salecker (the author and maintainer of nlrx package) for his useful help and suggestions on using nlrx package.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anuj Mubayi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5: A summary of the results of CART analysis for various target variables.
Table 6: Random variables used in ABM algorithm and their corresponding distributions.
Table 7: The set of all parameters and attributes defined in our ABM.
Table 8: Table of notation for a conventional model in algorithm 1.
figure d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azizi, A., Mubayi, A. & Mubayi, A. Social Ecological Contexts and Alcohol Drinking Dynamics: An Application of the Survey Data-Driven Agent-Based Model for University Students. J Indian Inst Sci 101, 381–401 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-021-00252-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-021-00252-2

Keywords

Navigation