Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nuclear Non-Proliferation Security on Exportation of Fast Reactors with a Closed Fuel Cycle

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

The exportation of fast reactors with a closed nuclear fuel cycle to countries that do not have nuclear weapons could commence within the next few decades, which will require strengthening the non-proliferation regime and improving the effectiveness of IAEA safeguards. Both requirements can be achieved by improving the system of accounting and management of nuclear materials and the reliability of their physical protection. It is well known that the current errors of the accounting and control system do not guarantee the implementation of the non-proliferation regime. The achievable errors and the required time and labor will have to be determined so that the accounting and control system would allow a conclusion about unauthorized interference in the fuel reprocessing process and, consequently, compliance/violation of the nonproliferation regime. The system of physical protection of nuclear material is better prepared for monitoring the non-proliferation regime, but additional studies of its stability on the territory of the importing state are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. N. Avrorin and Yu. I. Churikov, “Non-proliferation regime and exportation control,” At. Energ., 124, No. 1, 42–46 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. N. Avrorin and A. N. Chebeskov, “Fast reactors and the problem of nuclear non-proliferation,” Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. Yad. Energet., No. 1, 64–76 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Gulevich, V. M. Dekusar, A. N. Chebeskov, et al., “Possibility of exporting fast reactors in the context of the international nuclear nonproliferation regime,” At. Energ., 127, No. 3, 171–175 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. IAEA Bulletin, 57–2 (2016).

  5. Nuclear Security Recommendations on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Facilities (INFCIRC/225/Revision 5), IAEA, Vienna (2010).

  6. V. V. Khromov, V. I. Savander, V. B. Glebov, et al., “Processing of the results of non-destructive testing of irradiated fuel by solving extreme problems,” At. Energ., 73, No. 6, 459–462 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. V. V. Khromov, V. I. Savander, V. B. Glebov, et al., “Monitoring of the content of fi ssile elements in the spent fuel from research reactors,” At. Energ., 69, No. 6, 400–402 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Preventive and Protective Measures Against Insider Threats, IAEA Nuclear Security Ser. No. 8-G (Rev. 1) (2020).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. V. Gorin.

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 130, No. 4, pp. 48–51, April, 2021.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorin, N.V., Voloshin, N.P., Churikov, Y.I. et al. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Security on Exportation of Fast Reactors with a Closed Fuel Cycle. At Energy 130, 53–56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-021-00773-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-021-00773-0

Navigation