Skip to main content
Log in

Responsible innovation in organisations – unpacking the effects of leader trustworthiness and organizational culture on employee creativity

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ongoing changes in competitiveness and advancements in technology are challenging the ability of manufacturing firms to bring about responsible innovation in emerging economies. A crucial response to this situation involves supporting employee creativity as a strategy suited to foster responsible innovation. Prior research has established a positive correlation between employee creativity and responsible innovation. However, when attempting to promote employee creativity, firms are often faced with challenges to their organizational culture (OC), especially in the presence of limited employee trust in their leaders. Although, extant research has suggested a positive correlation between leader trustworthiness and employee creativity, little is known of the stability of such relationship under diverse OCs. Also, previous research on the correlation between OC and employee creativity has yielded conflicting findings, thus failing to contribute to the knowledge of how organisations may further engage in responsible innovation. Consequently, we investigated the influence of diverse OCs on employee creativity, and how leader trustworthiness affects the relationship between them. To do so, we undertook a quantitative analysis of a coded cross-sectional survey involving 222 participants from 54 manufacturing organizations in Malaysia. The survey data were evaluated through partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). An importance-performance map analysis shows that clan OC has the strongest positive correlation with employee creativity and exerts the highest level of importance to it. Surprisingly, leader trustworthiness was found to decrease employee creativity and to strengthen the positive relationships of market and hierarchical OC with employee creativity. Our study offers novel insights into how diverse OCs and leader trustworthiness impact employee creativity in an emerging economy context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah, N., Jamaludin, K., & Talib, H. 2015. Operational complexity impact on performance of electrical and electronics industry in Malaysia ARPN. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10: 6593–6601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Daibat, B. 2017. Impact of leadership styles in organizational commitment. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 5: 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T., & Pillemer, J. 2012. Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5): 1154–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T.M. 1997. “Motivating creativity in organisations: on doing what you love and loving what you do”. California Management Review, 40(1): 39–58.

  • Amiri, S., Qayoumi, A., & Soltani, M. 2014. Study the relationship between organization culture and employee’s creativity in cultural organizations (a case study). Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 3(10 (a)): 332–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ann, C., & Carr, N. 2010. Critical reflections on the good, the bad and the ugly of organisation leadership: The case of Wal-Mart. Culture and Organization, 16(2): 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis, J. 2017 On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implication. The Leadership Quarterly 4 February 28: 5–21.

  • Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Landlive, R. 2010. On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6): 1086–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artino, A., La Rochelle, J., Dezee, K., & Gehlbach, H. 2014. Developing questionnaires for educational research, AMEE guide, no. 87. Medical Teacher, 36(6): 463–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf, G., Kadir, S., Pihie, Z., & Rashid, A. 2013. Relationship between organizational culture and organizational innovativeness in private universities in Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22: 882–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, L., Yu, J., Tawse, A., Fields, L. H., McFarren, J. A., & Nae, E. Y. 2021. Relevance of culture in studies of leadership: Ignored or dismissed? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2): 687–708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09678-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auernhammer, J. & Hall, H. 2014. Organizational culture in knowledge creation, creativity and innovation: Towards the Freiraum model. Journal of Information Science, 40(2): 154–166.

  • Azizollah, A., Abolghasem, F., & Amin, D. 2016. The relationship between organizational culture and organizational commitment in Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. Global Journal of Health Science, 8: 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y., Li, P. P., & Xi, Y. 2012. The distinctive effects of dual-level leadership behaviors on employees’ trust in leadership: An empirical study from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2): 213–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9280-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamgbade, J. A., Kamaruddeen, A. M., & Nawi, M. N. 2017. Malaysian construction firms’ social sustainability via organizational innovativeness and government support: The mediating role of market culture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154: 114–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. 2016. The relationship of individual capabilities and environmental support with different facets of designers’ innovative behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1): 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. C., O’Kane, P., Mazumdar, B., & McCracken, M. 2018. Performance management: A scoping review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Human Resource Development Review, 1–36

  • Bursa Malaysia, 2018. List of companies. [online] available at: http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/list-of-companies/main-market. [Accessed on 02/09/2018].

  • Burr, R., & Cordery, J. L. (2001). Self-management efficacy as a mediator of the relation between job design and employee motivation. Human Performance, 14(1), 27–44.

  • Cameron, K. 2008. A process for changing organizational culture. In: Handbook of organizational development, 429–445. Sage Publishing.

  • Cameron, K. and Quinn, R. 2011. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework, 3rd ed. Wiley.

  • Caniels, M., & Rietzschel, E. 2015. Organizing creativity: Creativity and innovation under constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2): 184–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. Y.-C., Lin, C. Y.-Y., Lin, H.-E., & McDonough, E. 2012. Does transformational leadership facilitate technological innovation? The moderating roles of innovative culture and incentive compensation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2): 239–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9285-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, M. F. Y., & Zhang, I. D. 2020. The triggering effect of office design on employee creative performance: An exploratory investigation based on Duffy’s conceptualization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09717-x.

  • Chien, T., & Ann, H. 2015. The influence of communication, empowerment and trust on organizational ethical climates. International Journal of Economics and Management, 9: 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, L.-F., Wang, A.-C., Wang, T.-Y., Huang, M.-P., & Cheng, B.-S. 2008. Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Human Relations, 6: 1713–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chughtai, A. 2014. Can ethical leaders enhance their followers’ creativity? Leadership, 1–20.

  • Cillo, V., Petruzzelli, A., Ardito, L., & Del Giudice, M. 2019. Understanding sustainable innovation: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(5): 1012–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadgar, H., Barahouei, F., & Mohammadi, M. 2013. The relationship between organizational culture, job satisfaction, organizational commitment and intention to stay of health Personnel’s of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21: 1220–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sivatte, I., Gordon, J. R., Rojo, P., & Olmos, R. 2015. The impact of work-life culture on organizational productivity. Personnel Review, 44(6): 883–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano, G., Scrima, F., & Parry, E. 2017. The effect of organizational culture on deviant behaviors in the workplace. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1326393

  • Dimnwobi, S., Ekesiobi, C., & Mgbemena, E. 2016. Creativity, innovation and competitiveness in Nigeria: An economic exploration. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 5: 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donati, S., Zappalá, S., & González-Romá, V. 2016. The influence of friendship and communication network density on individual innovative behaviours: A multilevel study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(4): 583–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einsteine, P. & Hwang, K. 2007. An appraisal for determinants of organizational creativity and impacts on innovative behavior. 1041–1055. Melbourne, Australia.

  • Elisondo, R., & Donolo, D. 2016. Creativity, involvement, and leisure time: The more, the better. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 2(1): 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, M., & Nico, M. 2002. An organisational culture model to promote creativity and innovation. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28: 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst and Young, 2013. [Online]Available at: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/2013_Asia-Pacific_Fraud_Survey/$FILE/EY-Asia-Pacific-Fraud-Survey.pdf. [Accessed 13 February 2017].

  • Erturk, A., & Albayrak, T. 2019. Empowerment and organizational identification: The mediating role of leader–member exchange and the moderating role of leader trustworthiness. Personnel Review, 49(2): 571–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J. E., & O’Keefe, R. D. 1982. Innovative attitudes, values, and intentions in organizations [1]. Journal of Management studies, 19(2): 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’keefe, R. D. 1984. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6): 682–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, C. & Polzer, J. 2015. Diversity in groups. Harvard Business Review, 1–13.

  • Florida, R., Mellander, C. & King, K. 2015. “The global creativity index 2015”, s.l. Martin Prosperity Institute.

  • Fryxell, G. E., Dooley, R. S., & Li, W.-S. 2004. The role of trustworthiness in maintaining employee commitment during restructuring in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 515–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/b:apjm.0000048716.43075.58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, K. 2015. Developing organizational creativity and innovation. Management Research Review, 38(11): 1126–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. L., & Litchfield, R. C. 2017. Idea collections: A link between creativity and innovation. Innovation, 19(1): 80–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1270765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C., Rasli, A. & Khan, S. 2014. CEO duality, board independence, corporate governance and firm performance in family firms: Evidence from the manufacturing industry in Malaysia. Asian Business and Management, 1–25.

  • Gupta, B. 2011. Organizational culture and creative behaviour: Moderating role of creative style preference. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 10(4): 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2): 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C. and Sarstedt, M. 2013. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.

  • Hanifah, H., Abdul-Halim, H., Ahmad, N., & Vafaei-Zadeh, A. 2019. Emanating the key factors of innovation performance: Leveraging on the innovation culture among SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(4): 559–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardcopf, R., Liu, G., & Shah, R. 2021. Lean production and operational performance: The influence of organizational culture. International Journal of Production Economics, In press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108060

  • Hemmatinezhad, M., Shafiee, S., Sharari, M., & Hemmatinezhad, M. 2012. The relation between organizational culture and creativity: A case study on physical education experts in education administrations. International Journal of Sport Studies, 2(1): 69–78.

  • Hennessey, B., & Amabile, T. 2010. Creativity. The Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1): 569–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henseler, J. 2017. Partial least squares path modeling. In: Advanced methods for modeling markets, international series in quantitative marketing. s.l. 361–381. Springer International Publishing AG.

  • Heritage, B., Pollock, C., & Roberts, L. 2014. Validation of the organizational culture assessment instrument. PLoS ONE, 9: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyns, M., & Rothmann, S. 2015. Dimensionality of trust: An analysis of the relations between propensity, trustworthiness and trust. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 41: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C. H., & Sacramento, C. A. 2011. How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation-creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3): 624–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. 2004. Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1): 52–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. C. 2014. Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8): 1609–1621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1): 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hult, G. T., Hair, J. F., Proksch, D., Sarstedt, M., Pinkwart, A., & Ringle, C. M. 2018. Addressing endogeneity in international marketing applications of partial least squares structural equation modeling. Journal of International Marketing, 26(3): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.17.0151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim, H. I., Aerni I., & Shahbudin, A. S. Md. 2016. Organizational support and creativity: The role of developmental experiences as a moderator. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35: 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00063-0

  • Isa, A. 2014. Talent management practices and employee engagement: A study in Malaysian GLCs. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 4: 64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, M., & Karim, A. 2011. Manufacturing practices and performance: Comparison among small-medium and large industries. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management., 28(1): 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., Wang, S., & Zhao, S. 2012. Does HRM facilitate employee creativity and organizational innovation? A study of Chinese firms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(19): 4025–4047. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.690567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., Bao, Y., Xie, Y., & Gao, S. 2016. Partner trustworthiness, knowledge flow in strategic alliances, and firm competitiveness: A contingency perspective. Journal of Business Research, 69(2): 804–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamipour, M., Mehraban, M., & Jahani, S. 2015. The effect of organizational culture on the employee’s creativity, SAUSSUREA multidisciplinary. International Peer Reviewed Journal, l3: 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J., & Baer, J. 2004. Sure, I’m creative – but not in math! Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22: 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J., & Beghetto, R. 2009. Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. J., & Mir, A. A. 2019. Ambidextrous culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovations: The role of organizational slack and environmental factors. Business Strategy & the Environment, 28(4): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimchak, M., Carsten, M., Morrell, D., & MacKenzie, W. I. 2016. Employee entitlement and proactive work behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(4): 387–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. 2015. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejcie, R. & Morgan, D. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1–4.

  • Kristel, W., & Jeroen, M. 2014. Surveying organizational culture to explore grid-group cultural theory. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 22: 224–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kujala, J., Lehtimaki, H., & Pucetaite, R. 2015. Trust and distrust constructing unity and fragmentation of organisational culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 139: 701–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulichyova, A., Moffett, S., & Mcknight, J. 2019. The role of HRM as an enabler of creativity: Initial research findings. Conference proceedings 18th European conference on research methodology for business and management studies held at Wits business school Johannesburg, South Africa.

  • Lee, J., Cho, J., Baek, Y., et al. 2019. Does ethical leadership predict follower outcomes above and beyond the full-range leadership model and authentic leadership?: An organizational commitment perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36(3): 821–847. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9596-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, E. Y., & Hui, C. 2019. A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management., 38(1): 317–370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9594-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, W., Ma, J., Zhang, Q., Li, J., & Jiang, F. 2016. How is benevolent leadership linked to employee creativity? The mediating role of leader–member exchange and the moderating role of power distance orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 152: 1099–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Lin, B., & Shu, W. 2017. Employee quality, monitoring environment and internal control. China Journal of Accounting Research, 10(1): 51–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X. Y., Kwan, H. K., & Zhang, X. 2020. Introverts maintain creativity: A resource depletion model of negative workplace gossip. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1): 325–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-018-9595-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P., & Gaskin, J. 2014. Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57(2): 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Z., Long, L., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., & Lam, C. K. 2017. Why do high-performance human resource practices matter for team creativity? The mediating role of collective efficacy and knowledge sharing. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3): 565–586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9508-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, A., & Malhotra, A. 2020. Practice 3: Amplify creative associations of knowledge fragments. In: Unleashing the crowd. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. 2003. Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1): 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. 1997. The stress factor: Another item for the change management agenda? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 10(4): 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrotsy, P. 2013. A note on big-C creativity and little-c creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4): 474–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobarakeh, S. 2011. The relation between the organizational culture and creativity of managers and experts of Khuzestan physical education organization. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15: 3648–3650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghimi, S., & Subramaniam, I. 2013. Employees’ creative behavior: The role of organizational climate in Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Business and Management, 8: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, M., Omar, S., & Wei, L. 2015. Trustworthiness in buyer-supplier relation on supply chain collaboration among SMEs. Langkawi, Kedah, 476–480.

  • Mostafa, M. 2005. Factors affecting organisational creativity and innovativeness in Egyptian business organisations: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Management Development, 24: 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muisyo, P. K., & Qin, S. 2021. Enhancing the FIRM’S green performance through green HRM: The moderating role of green innovation culture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289: 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo-Valencia, Sanz-Valle, R., & Jimenez-Jimenez, D. 2010. Organizational culture as determinant of product innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4): 466–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo-Valencia, J., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. 2016. Studying the links between organizational culture, innovation, and performance in Spanish companies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología., 48(1): 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasurdin, A., Ling, T., & Hou, K. 2014. The influence of organizational creative climate on product innovation: A study of Malaysian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Economics and Management, 8: 40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor, H., Shirley, T., Adi, M., & Kamaruddin, N. 2013. Knowledge and skills necessary for product innovation in SMEs manufacturing industry in Malaysia. Entrepreneurship vision 2020: Innovation, development sustainability, and economic growth, 515–526.

  • Ogbeibu, S., Senadjki, A., & Tan, L. 2017. The diffusion of creative ideas: A dark side perspective of trustworthiness perception. Perak, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTAR): 70–88.

  • Ogbeibu, S., Senadjki, A., & Gaskin, J. 2018a. The moderating effect of benevolence on the impact of organisational culture on employee creativity. Journal of Business Research, 90: 334–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbeibu, S., Senadjki, A., & Tan, L. 2018b. The dark side of trustworthiness perception and its effect on the diffusion of creative ideas within organisations. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy, 4: 40–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbeibu, S., Emelifeonwu, J., Senadjki, A., Gaskin, J., & Kaivo-oja, J. 2020a. Technological turbulence and greening of team creativity, product innovation, and human resource management: Implications for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244(118703): 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogbeibu, S., Senadjki, A, Emelifeonwu, J., & Paramjeet, V. 2020b. Inspiring creativity in diverse organizational cultures: An expatriates integrity dilemma, FIIB Business Review. SAGE

  • Ogbeibu, S., Senadjki, A., Emelifeonwu, J., Gaskin, J., & Pereira, V. 2021. Augmenting environmental sustainability through the exchange of green creative ideas – evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26: 275–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman, A. K. 2011. Emotional intelligence and employees’ innovator role: The moderating effect of service types. Asian Social Science, 7(10): 151–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owoyemi, O., & Ekwoaba, J. 2014. Organisational culture: A tool for management to control, motivate and enhance Employees’ performance. American Journal of Business and Management, 3: 168–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parke, M. R., & Seo, M. G. 2017. The role of affect climate in organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 42(2): 334–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, H. & Wei, F. 2016. Trickle-down effects of perceived leader integrity on employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics. 30 May.

  • Pirola-Merlo, A., Härtel, C., Mann, L., & Hirst, G. 2002. How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5): 561–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, M., MacKenzie, B., & Podsakoff, N. 2012. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1): 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raduan, C., Naresh, K., Haslinda, A., & Goh, Y. 2008. Organizational culture as a root of performance improvement: Research and recommendations. Contemporary Management Research, 4: 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, R. K. 2011. Knowledge management and organizational culture: A theoretical integrative framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(5): 779–801. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111174320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranucci, R., & Souder, D. 2015. Facilitating tacit knowledge transfer: Routine compatibility, trustworthiness, and integration in M & As. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2): 257–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, I. 2019. Competing values in Asian business: Evidence from India and Dubai. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(1): 97–107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-09-2017-0164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., & Straub, D. W. (2012). Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in “MIS Quarterly”. MIS quarterly, iii-xiv.

  • Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. 2018. Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–27.

  • Rukh, H., & Qadeer, F. 2018. Diagnosing culture of public organization utilizing competing values framework: A mixed methods approach. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 12(1): 398–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1): 68–78.

  • Salin, A. S., Kamaluddin, N., & Manan, S. K. 2011. Unstoppable fraud, scandals and manipulation–an urgent call for an Islamic-based code of ethics. International Conference on Sociality and Economics Development (pp. 474–478). IACSIT Press.

  • Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. 2016. Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies. Journal of Business Research, 69(10): 3998–4010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, T., & López-Fresno, P. 2014. Trust in Leadership for sustaining innovations: How leaders enact on showing trustworthiness. Nang Yan Business Journal, 1(1): 129–136.

  • Schilke, O., & Cook, K. S. 2015. Sources of alliance partner trustworthiness: Integrating calculative and relational perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2): 276–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, C., & Park, J. 2019. Classifying social enterprises with organizational culture, network and socioeconomic performance: Latent profile analysis approach. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(17): 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5010017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K., Chen, J., Del Giudice, M., & El-Kassar, A. N. 2019. Environmental ethics, environmental performance, and competitive advantage: Role of environmental training. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146: 203–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Tarba, S. Y., & De Bernardi, P. 2019a. Top management team shared leadership, market-oriented culture, innovation capability, and firm performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–11.

  • Singh, S. K., Gupta, S., Busso, D., & Kamboj, S. 2019b. Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research.

  • Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. 2020. Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150: 119762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9): 1568–1580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajudin, M. M., Musa, O., & Musa, N. C. 2012. Effects of organizational culture, market orientation, and innovativeness toward new product performance amongst Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Innovation and Business Strategy, 1: 24–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipton, E., Hallberg, K., Hedges, L. V., & Chan, W. 2017. Implications of small samples for generalization: Adjustments and rules of thumb. Evaluation Review, 41(5): 472–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X16655665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, Q. H. 2020. The organisational culture of Vietnamese and Chinese corporations: Do age and gender make a difference? Public Organization Review, 20(3): 549–562. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-019-00458-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. J., Egri, C. P., Ralston, D. A., Naoumova, I., Furrer, O., Li, Y., Darder, F. L., & de la Garza Carranza, M. T. 2021. A multi-country, multi-sector replication challenge to the validity of the cultural tightness-looseness measure. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2): 735–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-019-09682-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, V., & Huettel, S. 2012. Strategic control in decision making under uncertainty. European Journal of Neuroscience, 35(7): 1075–1082. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08009.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D., & Crossan, M. 2005. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16(3): 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan Fairuz, W. C., Selvadurai, S., & Er, A. C. 2013. History of industrial development strategies in Penang since independence: A study of the SMEs. Asian Social Science, 9(6): 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Wang, D., & Liu, Z. 2021. Feedback-seeking from team members increases employee creativity: The roles of thriving at work and mindfulness. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09768-8.

  • Wenxing, L., Zhang, P., Jianqiao, L., Hao, P., & Jianghua, M. 2016. Abusive supervision and employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification. Management Decision, 54: 130–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasinghe, V., & Widyaratne, R. 2012. Effects of interpersonal trust, team leader support, rewards, and knowledge sharing mechanisms on knowledge sharing in project teams. VINE, 42(2): 214–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., & Du, J. 2014. The impact of trust and local learning on the innovative performance of MNE subsidiaries in China. Asia Pacific Journal Management, 31: 973–996. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-014-9390-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakersalehi, M., Maroofiyan, M., & Asmawi, A. B. 2011. Organizational culture and its impact on creativity in Malaysian SMEs. 3rd international conference on advanced management science. 19, 206–211. IACSIT Press.

  • Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Zhang, M., et al. 2021. Antecedents and outcomes of authentic leadership across culture: A meta-analytic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09762-0.

Download references

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay Pereira.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 A summary of the measurement model’s validity, descriptive statistics and the reliability
Table 2 The Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) test

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogbeibu, S., Pereira, V., Burgess, J. et al. Responsible innovation in organisations – unpacking the effects of leader trustworthiness and organizational culture on employee creativity. Asia Pac J Manag (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09784-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09784-8

Keywords

Navigation