Review of the influence of copper and chromium substitution on crystal structure, magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect of GdFe2−x(Cu, Cr)x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) intermetallic compounds

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2021.110343Get rights and content

Highlights

  • GdFe2-x (Cu, Cr)x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) samples prepared by arc melting subsequent annealing.

  • The Rietveld analysis of XRD patterns proves that compounds crystallize in the cubic laves phase.

  • Magnetocaloric effect at low field of GdFe2-x(Cu, Cr)x was studied for the first time.

  • ΔSM, RCP and TEC are calculated.

Abstract

The iron-based compounds GdFe2−x(Cu,Cr)x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) were synthesized successfully by means of arc-melting and annealing at 800 °C for one week. The structural, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of these intermetallic compounds were investigated systematically in detail using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis, Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and magnetic measurements. The Rietveld analysis of X-ray diffraction patterns proves that GdFe2−x(Cu,Cr)x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) compounds crystallize in the cubic laves phase MgCu2-type structure with the Fd3̄m space group. Gadolinium and iron atoms statistically occupy the 8a and 16d sites respectively. Moreover, copper and chromium atoms substitute the iron atoms at site 8a in the MgCu2-type structure. The temperature dependence of magnetization studied in a broad temperature range reveals that all compounds exhibit a ferromagnetic-paramagnetic transition at Curie temperature (TC). We find that the substitution of iron by copper and chromium leads to a decrease in the magnetic ordering transition temperature. The Arrott plots of all our samples show the occurrence of a second-order phase transition. Besides, the performance of magnetocaloric effect (MCE) for GdFe2−x(Cu,Cr)x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) compounds was evaluated by the magnetic entropy change (ΔSM) and the related Relative Cooling Power (RCP). In the vicinity of TC, the ΔSM reached a maximum value of 0.79 J/kg.K, 1.2 J/kg.K, 1.4 J/kg.K and 2.5 J/kg.K, while the RCP was found to be 13.2 J/kg, 21.6 J/kg, 31.7 J/kg and 44.3 J/kg, respectively for GdFe2−xCux (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) compounds. Furthermore, the GdFe2−xCrx (x = 0.1, 0.15 and 2) compounds show ΔSM values of about 0.9 J/kg.K, 1.3 J/kg.K and 1.8 J/kg.K, and RCP values of 14.8 J/kg, 25.4 J/kg and 36.8 J/kg respectively, under a field change of 1.56 T. Through these results, the GdFe2−x(Cu,Cr)x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) compounds can be an attractive materials for use in magnetic refrigeration and heat pumping technology above room temperature.

Introduction

Over recent years, human consciousness about energy and environment has been highly emphasized. The toxic gases associated with global-warming, greenhouse effects and ozone-depleting gases, such as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), hydrofluoric carbons (HFCs) and ammonia (NH3) [1,2] have posed a threat to human life, which limits the conventional gas-compression (CGC) refrigerators. Thus, from an environmental conservation perspective, research on future refrigeration technologies is increasingly oriented toward other techniques, such as magnetic refrigeration (MR), based on the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) [3,4]. The principle of this effect is based on the reversible heating and cooling of a magnetic material after the application of a magnetic field variation [5,6]. In addition, magnetic refrigeration is becoming a promising technology to replace the conventional cooling technique, because it is much more compactly built due to the fact of taking solid substances as working materials. The key advantage of magnetic refrigeration is that it has ecological, economic and environmental benefits [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. What is more, this technology doesn't cause atmospheric pollution or noise and it offers significantly more reliability and energy-efficient than the conventional refrigeration [11].

In this context, the intermetallic materials combining rare-earth elements and transition metals with large magnetocaloric properties have attracted a considered attention owing to its potential application in the magnetic refrigeration (MR) technology [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]].

Most of rare-earth transition-metals intermetallic compounds exhibit a second order magnetic transition (SOMT) [11,14,16,19,20]. Intermetallics that possess a SOMT generally exhibit negligible loss by thermal and magnetic hysteresis, consequently they could be a potential candidate for magnetic refrigeration.

In addition, many promising materials such as Gd5Si2Ge2 [25,26] Mn5Ge3−xSix [27], and MnNiGa [28], have been broadly studied for their high magnetocaloric effect and their application as magnetic refrigerants.

Among numerous rare earth - transition metals-based intermetallic compounds, Laves-phases RM2 (R stands for rare earth elements, and M stands for transition metals) compounds have been massively studied [29,30]. These phases crystallize in three structure types: MgCu2 (C15) type structure, MgZn2 (C14) type structure, and MgNi2 type structure (C36) [31]. The RV2 (R = Ti, Nb, Hf, and Ta) compounds present high melting point, good oxidation resistance, and high strength at elevated temperatures which make them available for high-temperature structural applications [[32], [33], [34]] and hydrogen-storage [35]. In addition, the rare earth Laves phases RCo2 (R = Dy, Ho, Er) [[36], [37], [38], [39]], TbCo2 [40], GdCo2 [41], and SmNi2 [42] with cubic MgCu2-type structure (C15) exhibit attractive and useful properties such as significant anisotropic magnetostriction, large magnetovolume effect, and large magnetocaloric effect around the Curie temperature.

In the literature, GdFe2 compound, which crystallizes in the cubic Laves-phase with MgCu2 type structure, has been the subject of many investigations in the past few years [[43], [44], [45]]. These compounds are of considerable scientific and technological interests because of their excellent magnetic, electronic, elastic and thermal properties, due to the coexistence of complementary features of itinerant (3d) and localized (4f) electrons in these compounds.

In our previous papers [46,47], we have prepared a series of Gd-Fe-Cu and Gd-Fe-Cr alloys to determine the solid state phase equilibria in both ternary Gd-Fe-Cu and Gd-Fe-Cr systems at 800 °C, through the use of SEM-EDS and XRD techniques. The solid solutions GdFe2−xCux and GdFe2−xCrx were identified to exist in these isothermal sections, respectively, which extended from about x = 0 to x = 0.2. This outcome opens the way in this experimental work, for investigating the effect of copper and chromium substitution for iron on the structural, magnetic, and magnetocaloric properties of the GdFe2−x(Cu,Cr)x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 compounds.

Section snippets

Synthesis

Samples with the total mass of 0.5 g were prepared from gadolinium (99.99 wt%), iron (99.99 wt%), copper (99.99 wt%) and chromium (99.99 wt%) metals. Prior to the melting process, calculated amounts of the elements were precisely weighed on a microbalance. Then, alloys were produced by melting the constituents in stoichiometric quantities in an electric arc furnace, in water-cooled copper mold with the use of a non-consumable tungsten electrode under protective argon gas. A piece of zirconium

Structure analysis

The Laves-phases represent the largest group of intermetallic compounds. More than 1400 binary and ternary Laves-phases were introduced in Pearsons Handbook of Crystallographic Data for Intermetallic Phases [57]. Laves-phases show a lot of interesting and useful properties such as excellent magnetic and magnetocaloric effects, corrosion and creep resistance properties. As a result, this class of intermetallics is strongly suggested for use as magneto-optical materials, hydrogen storage

Conclusion

The present paper explores the series of compounds GdFe2−x(Cu, Cr)x (x = 0, 0.1, 0.15 and 0.2) with the aim of investigating their structural, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties. Room temperature X-ray powder diffraction analysis demonstrates that the crystal structure of all the synthesized compounds belongs to the cubic Laves-phase with MgCu2-type structure (Fd3̄m space group). Indeed, the crystal structure of the parent compound GdFe2 was found to stay conserved for all the melting

Credit author statement

M. Saidi: Conceptualization, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Validation.

L. Bessais: Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision, Project administration.

M. Jemmali: Investigation, Data Curation, Supervision, Resources.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was mainly supported by the CNRS, ICMPE, France, and the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research and Technology, LSME, University of Sfax, Tunisia.

References (81)

  • X. Chen et al.

    J. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.

    (2013)
  • E. Brück et al.

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (2007)
  • Q.H. Shi et al.

    Polyhedron

    (2021)
  • L. Li et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2020)
  • V. Franco et al.

    J. Prog. Mater. Sci.

    (2018)
  • A. Bartok et al.

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (2016)
  • R. Guetari et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2013)
  • R. Guetari et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2014)
  • K. Nouri et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2016)
  • W. Bouzidi et al.

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (2017)
  • N. Bouchaala et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2018)
  • J.H. Belo et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2012)
  • H.R. Khan et al.

    Physica C

    (1988)
  • C.D. Rabadia et al.

    Mater. Des.

    (2019)
  • S.S. Mishra et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2020)
  • C. Jiang

    Acta Mater.

    (2007)
  • D. Fruchart et al.

    J. Less Common. Met.

    (1980)
  • C.W. Zhang

    Physica B

    (2008)
  • J. Radakovic et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2013)
  • C.L. Wang et al.

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (2016)
  • Y. Zhuang et al.

    Rare Met.

    (2007)
  • K.W. Zhou et al.

    Solid State Commun.

    (2006)
  • I.A. Al-Omari et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2001)
  • I.A. Al-Omari et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2004)
  • M. Saidi et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2019)
  • M. Saidi et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2019)
  • S. Khazzan et al.

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (2010)
  • K. Zehani et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2014)
  • N. Hosni et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2017)
  • M. Phejar et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2016)
  • D.J. Thoma et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. A

    (1997)
  • J. Cwik et al.

    Acta Mater.

    (2017)
  • Z. Li et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2016)
  • W. Steiner

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (1979)
  • N.H. Duc et al.

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (1998)
  • Maksim Anikin et al.

    Phys. Procedia

    (2015)
  • Maksim Anikin et al.

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (2016)
  • A. Sakka et al.

    J. Magn. Magn Mater.

    (2020)
  • L. Su et al.

    Ceram. Int.

    (2021)
  • J.R. Gómez et al.

    Int. J. Refrigeration.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (6)

    View full text